Editorial, 7/14: Floods show importance of city’s future water source

Editorial, 7/14: Floods show importance of city’s future water source

Lincoln Water System wellfield, 3.18

A view of the Lincoln Water System south wellfield near Ashland on March 18. For a time last week, city officials mandated water restrictions because of problems caused by the Platte River flooding.

First, the good news: The cost of major repairs to Lincoln’s wells along the Platte River is anticipated to be lower than initially forecast.

But every silver lining has a cloud, and this one is no different. Owing to its growth, Lincoln will need a second water source in the coming years – and repeated floods bringing historic levels of water to Nebraska add importance to the city’s pursuit of a second water source.

Yes, the need is several years down the road. An endeavor of this nature, though, requires significant investments of time and resources to do properly before demand outstrips supply. In a city that’s gained nearly 100,000 residents in the last three decades and shows no signs of slowing down, playing ahead remains imperative.

And, much to its credit, Lincoln is doing just that. Mayor Leirion Gaylor Baird championed the topic on when she served on the City Council prior to her election this spring and mentioned re-examining the timeline for this second water source Thursday when unveiling a climate resiliency plan.

For decades, officials purchased land along the Platte River to ensure a reliable water supply. Last year, that paid off, as the city added a new well along the Platte near Ashland. Recent increases to water and wastewater usage fees are designed to pay for the next project, whether it’s purchasing excess water from Omaha’s Metropolitan Utilities District or drawing additional water from the Missouri River.

Because Lincoln isn’t near a local source of freshwater, this process is more costly. That distance, however, has insulated the city from the damages seen elsewhere in the state. Incredibly, Nebraska has experienced two 500-year floods in the past eight years.

The city dodged bullets with both.

The first, along the Missouri River in 2011, devastated parts of southeast Nebraska but was some 50 miles away from the capital city. The second, this spring’s record flooding on several rivers, affected the city’s wellfields and forced three days of mandatory water restrictions upon Lincolnites without doing any physical damage in town.

Scenes of devastation this week from central Nebraska – as parts of communities including Kearney, Gibbon and Wood River were inundated and evacuated following epic rains – only underscore the urgency of this pursuit.

Extreme fluctuations in precipitation – including droughts, such as the one in 2012 that led Lincoln’s previous round of water restrictions before this year – have been on the rise in recent years.

Lincolnites see the weather that contributes to floods and droughts. They experience the impact of water restrictions that closed car washes, reduced toilet flushes and led restaurants to use disposable plates and silverware.

However, the work required to secure a second water source occurs mostly outside their vision. Though largely unseen, this process is of the utmost importance to Lincoln’s future.


Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News

Husker News