WASHINGTON — There's one way to force President Joe Biden and Congress to solve the looming crisis over the debt limit: a financial market crash.
That's a view held by several economists and a former White House official, mindful that Congress rarely acts unless an emergency forces lawmakers to.

People walk past the New York Stock Exchange on June 29 in New York.
"For that drama not ending in tragedy, key actors have to play their roles," said Daleep Singh, who was Biden's national security adviser for international economics and deputy director of the National Economic Council. "Market participants have a lead role of playing the victim. They have to produce pain. They have to produce a sea of red on their Bloomberg screens because politicians need to look at those screens."
Republicans and Democrats have been dancing around each other about the need to raise the government's legal borrowing authority. Biden tried to edge closer on Thursday by releasing his budget plan that cuts deficits by $2.9 trillion over 10 years, an offer that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif, quickly dismissed as woefully insufficient. Republicans in the House Freedom Caucus on Friday proposed their own demands, which the White House quickly rejected.
People are also reading…
This fandango could persist for several more months until the last possible moment, when the federal government would hit a currently unknown "X-date" — possibly as early as June — and be unable to pay its bills, possibly setting off a default that would suddenly wash away millions of jobs.
It is a familiar ritual. But every other time before, Congress has found agreement on the debt limit. The question now, in a period of ever-increasing political polarization, is whether today is different.
"Every single major economic institution, conservative, liberal, says that will cause a massive recession, a massive recession, and put us in the hole for a long, long time," Biden said of the possible default as he rolled out his budget in Philadelphia.
McCarthy has promised to put together his own budget plan, but he has little urgency for striking any kind of deal so long as the stock market stays relatively calm. He has said he wants an agreement to put the government on a path toward a balanced budget. But he has also ruled out tax increases or cuts to Social Security and Medicare, which would force deep and controversial reductions in federal spending that could divide House Republicans.
Biden, who would reduce deficits largely through higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations, has said he is ready to go through budget agreements "line by line" once McCarthy has his numbers.

Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., holds a ceremony to nullify the D.C. crime bill Friday at the Capitol in Washington.
But McCarthy's leverage is greatest as the "X-date" approaches at some point this summer and markets are biding their time. So far this year, the S&P 500 stock index has been positive. It has largely swung based on moves by the Federal Reserve to lower inflation or with the collapse Friday of the Silicon Valley Bank, events that are separate from the debt ceiling.
There is a widening recognition that a massive sell-off tied to debt limit tensions would provide instant clarity and snap everyone out of their ideological stagnancy. No one is rooting for the markets to sink, but as Republican lawmakers weigh the possibility of prioritizing repayments to debt holders — a risky short-term fix — there is a sense that markets need to jolt Congress into action.
"Unfortunately, it will likely take a significant financial market event for Biden and the GOP to arrive at a compromise on the debt ceiling," said Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at the consultancy RSM US who said the standoff is already increasing the cost of borrowing for small and medium-sized companies.

President Joe Biden speaks about the February jobs report Friday from the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington.
Analysts at Morgan Stanley a few weeks ago concluded that the most likely "catalyst" to an agreement would be the markets expressing their "fear" of the political and economic "repercussions of default."
When lawmakers realize they can step in with a deal and play the hero to salvage everyone's retirement savings, they will have an incentive to come together, said Singh, who spoke at a New York City conference two weeks ago.
"They have to be able to say, 'Look, I am reluctantly agreeing to pay for spending we've already authorized because I'm saving the 401(k)'s of hardworking families all across the country,'" Singh said. "I think that complacency is itself a big problem."
There is precedent for market crashes forcing Congress' hand.
During the 2008 financial crisis, the House rejected a $700 billion bailout package on Sept. 29, leading the Dow Jones industrial average to plunge almost 7% in a single day. That dramatic selloff ultimately laid out the stakes for Congress, and the rescue package passed the House within days and became law.
And there are those who think that Congress might not take the path that would trigger a market revolt.
Rohit Kumar, a former aide to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said a market drop would "move the needle" on a debt limit deal, but it's not a "prerequisite" for getting an agreement.
"The vast majority of lawmakers understand this has to be done," said Kumar, now an executive at the tax consultancy PwC. "Defaulting on our debt is an entirely different animal, a bell that cannot be unrung. And I think most members appreciate that."
The Senate Budget Committee chairman, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., has said Republicans will only seek a deal when their richest donors "start to sense the reverberations of a potential default and start making phone calls, saying, 'OK, you guys, enough of this clowning around.'"
Given that forecasts already exist about millions of jobs potentially lost, Whitehouse acknowledged that he didn't know why the phone calls from Republican donors are not already starting.
"Maybe they're not feeling the tremors yet," he said.
With all eyes on the Big Dance, Wall Street trades slow during March Madness
With all eyes on the Big Dance, Wall Street trades slow during March Madness

There's a reason it's called March Madness.
Much like the Olympics or World Cup, the NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament is a major sporting event that draws significant viewership, even for games played during normal working hours. That makes it difficult for even the most dedicated employees to keep their focus on work.
Last year, college basketball's Big Dance averaged 10.7 million total television viewers for its live game telecasts, with the Kansas Jayhawks' 72-69 championship game victory over the North Carolina Tar Heels pulling an average of over 18 million viewers on TBS, TNT, and truTV. Even nonsports fans get in on the action with office brackets, which arguably take little to no skill to fill out, let alone win, but allow people to have some skin in the game.
"It's hard to find somebody who doesn't know a friend who's filling out a bracket," Rodney Paul, a sports analytics professor at Syracuse University, told Stacker. "It's pretty easy to be able to get involved, especially with something that there's no stakes or low stakes."
To quantify March Madness' effect on productivity, Stacker looked to the stock market, collecting trading volume data from the Chicago Board Options Exchange between 2009 and 2022. We found more often than not, trade volume dipped at the start of the tournament. Trade volume was measured as the sum of shares exchanged during trading hours on all U.S. equities exchanges and trade-reporting facilities during trading hours. Our full findings lay ahead.
You may also like: History of the NFL from the year you were born
Traders take pause

In 11 of the last 13 years the NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament took place, the number of shares traded during the tournament's first day decreased compared to the day before. This goes against the typical trading pattern.
Usually, the number of shares traded daily steadily rises throughout the week before slouching on Fridays. From Wednesday to Thursday (the typical tournament start day), the number of shares traded increases by 0.8% on average, according to trading data going back to October 2007. During March Madness, however, the trend flips: The number of shares traded on the tournament's first day is an average of 10% lower than the day prior—a nearly 11 percentage-point swing.
Looking at data from the first day of the tournament is especially crucial. Both the opening and second days are March Madness' busiest—there are 32 games played between the first two days, with the earliest tipoffs happening around noon ET. Because so many games take place during work hours, the start of the tournament is when productivity could take the biggest hit.
Explaining the outliers

On the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in Manhattan, it's not uncommon to see traders have at least one of their many screens tuned into the games. Though most traders are used to being in a high-pressure, reactive environment.
Many games are scheduled on or around the Federal Reserve's March meeting, which also happens in mid-March. But usually, their decisions are baked into the market, says Jonathan Corpina, a senior managing partner at Meridian Equity Partners with nearly 25 years of Wall Street experience.
"When you look at the economic calendar, we know there are things coming out. Everyone knows the Fed is going to make an announcement. You probably have your position or bet on what the market is going to do," Corpina said.
That bears out in the data. The two times the number of shares traded bucked the trend during March Madness and increased were after major and unexpected economic events: the 2013 banking crisis in Cyprus, and a surprise decision from the Fed to cut its rate hike outlook in 2016 due to economic headwinds.
Despite dipping data, March Madness brings positives

However, the data doesn't tell the full story. Rodney Paul warns that a drop in trading volume doesn't necessarily equal a loss in productivity across the whole workforce.
"People will project that to a loss of productivity," he said. "We live in a society where you can really shift your time in different ways, so maybe people start earlier, maybe people don't take the coffee break that they would otherwise."
Beyond that, March Madness is an event that can improve workplace dynamics—even if people skip work to tune into games. A 2011 study found that while productivity decreases in the workplace during the games, it's also a way to bring an office together.
"It's just something that gets people talking," Paul said. "It can lead to other things. Because as you're going throughout the day, you start talking about the game, but it might lead to talking about yourself, your family, etcetera, and other things that build up a deeper relationship."