Ruben Navarrette Jr.: Why we have an immigration debate

2013-05-19T23:50:00Z 2015-01-28T16:46:52Z Ruben Navarrette Jr.: Why we have an immigration debateBy RUBEN NAVARRETTE JR. / Washington Post JournalStar.com

SAN DIEGO -- Journalist-turned-activist Jose Antonio Vargas recently said, "Racism and xenophobia have no place in the debate on immigration reform, period."

No place? Racism and xenophobia have a permanent place in the immigration debate. 

As I learned from nearly 25 years of writing about the subject at ground zero -- in such cities as Phoenix, Dallas and San Diego -- without racism and xenophobia, there would be no debate.

Here's how I divide the pie chart. Of all the anxiety and animosity experienced by Americans about  immigration, 10 percent is about concerns over border security, 10 percent about fear of immigrants committing crimes, 10 percent about anger that they use public benefits, 10 percent about the worry that they won't assimilate and 10 percent about changing demographics. The other 50 percent is about racism and xenophobia. 

Why mince words? Americans almost always look down on immigrants as inferior to those already here. 

That's how it was when Benjamin Franklin, an Englishman, shook his fist at the German immigrants of the mid-18th century, declaring they "will never adopt our language or customs, any more than they can acquire our complexion." And when it was said on the West Coast in the mid-19th century that Chinese immigrants were not "assimilable." And when Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts warned, in 1905, that immigrants (read: the Irish) were "diminishing the quality of our citizenship." And when Italian immigrants in the early 1900s were criticized for allegedly being uneducated and dirty and -- no kidding -- smelling of garlic. And when, in a 1938 public opinion survey, approximately 60 percent of respondents said they held a low opinion of Jewish immigrants, labeling them "greedy," "dishonest" and "pushy." And it goes on, and on.  

Today, the target is often Latino immigrants who -- according to white supremacist websites masquerading as intellectual watering holes -- diabolically pull off the magic trick of taking jobs from Americans while also staying home and collecting welfare. They want to become U.S. citizens and have a voice in the political system, and that's a problem for the supremacists. But they also want nothing to do with citizenship, and that's a problem, too.

Latino immigrants can do just about anything -- from raising our kids to washing windows on skyscrapers -- but as far as many Americans are concerned, they can't do anything right.

We're a nation of immigrants that has never liked immigrants. Our national motto isn't really "E pluribus unum." It's more like "There goes the neighborhood."

Still, you would think a researcher holding a doctorate from Harvard would be smart enough to camouflage his racism and xenophobia.

This was not the case with Jason Richwine, who until recently was a senior policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. With the intent of torpedoing a bipartisan Senate immigration reform bill that would confer legal status onto millions of illegal immigrants, Richwine co-authored a roundly debunked study that said the legislation would cost U.S. taxpayers roughly $6.3 trillion over the next 50 years. 

There was no mention of what surely would be the offsetting of trillions of dollars generated, over the same time period, in new taxes from both immigrants and the businesses that employ them -- as well as the expansion, increased productivity and additional hires of those businesses because of the availability of immigrant labor.

What got Richwine in hot water was the revelation that, in his 2009 Harvard dissertation, he argued  Hispanics were less intelligent than whites -- across the board and in perpetuity.

Richwine didn't just claim Hispanic immigrants were intellectually inferior to white Americans, which would have been bad enough. He went after their descendants. He wrote: "Immigrants living in the U.S. today do not have the same level of cognitive ability as natives. No one knows whether Hispanics will ever reach IQ parity with whites, but the prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-IQ children and grandchildren is difficult to argue against."

Ugh. At least Benjamin Franklin did it with more pizazz. 

Shortly after Richwine's thesis came to light, he resigned his position. Nevertheless, after the initial news reports, the Heritage Foundation handled the episode badly.

And what about that dissertation? In recognition of its brilliance, my alma mater -- the John F. Kennedy School of Government -- awarded Richwine a Ph.D. But don't worry. According to a statement from Kennedy School Dean David Ellwood, these racist rants were reviewed by a "committee of scholars."   

Cambridge, we have a problem. America, you too.

Copyright 2015 JournalStar.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

TODAY'S LETTERS

Letter, 5/28: Nebraska must honor Native Americans

On May 14 and 15, the Center for Great Plains Studies hosted their 41st Symposium in collaboration with the Nebraska Commission on Indian Affairs. For the first time, the Symposium focused exclusively on Native Americans and brought together an incredible array of national Native talent. New…

Letter, 5/28: Pork bill kills independent farms

The Nebraska Legislature will soon consider LB 176, which will allow pork packers and processors to own hogs and contract with someone to grow them ("Opponents say pig packer bill a win for corporate ag," May 26). If this bill passes, it will be the end of the independent hog farmer in our state.

Letter, 5/28: Time for change in LFR

Mayor Beutler will once again appoint a department head ("Huff to retire as fire chief," May 19). We don't need another clone to blindly follow. Lincoln Fire and Rescue has major problems and needs strong leadership. The 10-headed monster needs to have a complete audit with a tax budgeted ag…

Letter, 5/28: On Osteen and choices

Joel Osteen is coming to Lincoln ("Joel Osteen brings 'Night of Hope' to Pinnacle Bank Arena," May 15). He is successful. People like him. He preaches how to relate to each other. His Houston church is one of the largest in America. He fills the pews and coffers every Sunday.