Gwynne Dyer: How bad could global warming get?

2012-07-02T23:50:00Z 2015-02-03T09:56:29Z Gwynne Dyer: How bad could global warming get?BY GWYNNE DYER
July 02, 2012 11:50 pm  • 

The usual warnings of environmental doom are greeted with the usual indifference: after all, there are 7 billion of us now, and we’re all still eating. What could possibly go wrong?

The UN Environment Program published its five-yearly Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-5) saying that significant progress has been made on only four of 90 environmental goals that were adopted at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. “If current patterns of production and consumption of natural resources prevail,” warned UNEP head Achim Steiner, “then governments will preside over unprecedented levels of damage and degradation.” Yawn.

Meanwhile, a team of respected scientists warn that life on Earth may be on the way to an irreversible “tipping point”. Sure. Heard that one before, too.

One of the world’s two leading scientific journals, “Nature,” recently published a paper, “Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere,” pointing out that more than 40 percent of the Earth's land already is used for human needs. With the human population set to grow by a further 2 billion by 2050, that figure could soon exceed 50 percent.

“It really will be a new world, biologically, at that point,” said the paper’s lead author, Prof. Anthony Barnofsky of the University of California, Berkeley. But Barnofsky doesn’t go into the details of what kind of new world it might be. Scientists hardly ever do in public, for fear of being seen as panic-mongers. Besides, it’s a relatively new hypothesis, but it’s a pretty convincing one, and it should be more widely understood. Here’s how bad it could get.

The scientific consensus is that we are still on track for 3 degrees Celsius of warming (5 degrees Fahrenheit) by 2100, but that’s just warming caused by human greenhouse-gas emissions. The problem is that 3 degrees is well past the point where the major feedbacks kick in: natural phenomena triggered by our warming, like melting permafrost and the loss of Arctic sea-ice cover, that will add to the heating and that we cannot turn off.

The trigger actually is about 2 degrees C (3.5 degrees F) higher average global temperature. After that, we lose control of the process: ending our own carbon-dioxide emissions no longer would be enough to stop the warming. We may end up trapped on an escalator heading up to plus-6 degrees C (plus-10.5 degrees F), with no way of getting off. And plus-6 degrees C gives you the mass extinction.

There have been five mass extinctions in the past 500 million years, when 50 percent or more of the species then existing on the Earth vanished, but until recently, the only people taking any interest in this were paleontologists, not climate scientists. They did wonder what had caused the extinctions, but the best answer they could come up was “climate change.” It wasn’t a very good answer.

Why would a warmer or colder planet kill off all those species? The warming was caused by massive volcanic eruptions dumping huge quantities of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for tens of thousands of years. But it was very gradual and the animals and plants had plenty of time to migrate to climatic zones that still suited them. (That’s exactly what happened more recently in the Ice Age, as the glaciers repeatedly covered whole continents, then retreated again.)

There had to be a more convincing kill mechanism than that, and the paleontologists found one when they discovered that a giant asteroid struck the planet 65 million years ago, just at the time when the dinosaurs died out in the most recent of the great extinctions. So they went looking for evidence of huge asteroid strikes at the time of the other extinction events. They found none.

What they discovered was that there was indeed major warming at the time of all the other extinctions — and that the warming had radically changed the oceans. The currents that carry oxygen-rich cold water down to the depths shifted so that they were bringing down oxygen-poor warm water instead, and gradually the depths of the oceans became anoxic: the deep waters no longer had any oxygen.

When that happens, the sulfur bacteria that normally live in the silt (because oxygen is poison to them) come out of hiding and begin to multiply. Eventually, they rise all the way to the surface over the whole ocean, killing all the oxygen-breathing life. The ocean also starts emitting enormous amounts of lethal hydrogen sulfide gas that destroy the ozone layer and directly poison land-dwelling species. This has happened many times in the Earth’s history.

Don’t let it worry you. We’ll all be safely dead long before it could happen again: the earliest possible date for a mass extinction, assuming that the theory is right and that we continue down our present track with emissions, would be well into the next century.

The only problem is that things like this tend to become inevitable long before they actually happen. Tick, tock.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Letter, 4/18: Voter turnout shameful

How sad, and I say, "shame, shame" on the citizens of Lincoln. When I voted this afternoon, I was number 98 out of 1,500 possible voters at my precinct ("24 percent turnout," April 7). In other countries there are threats that put the voters in severe danger, yet, for the right to vote, thos…

Letter, 4/18: Let business decide

The news from Indiana over the law recently signed by Gov. Pence has lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered people everywhere in a snit ("Indiana lawmakers reject extending civil rights protections," April 14). What is missing is that the LGBT community lacks perspective. After all, the…

Letter, 4/18: Don't misquote Jesus

In regard to what Jesus does or does not say about being gay ("On choice and sexuality," April 7), it is helpful to refer to Matthew 19:4-6. Jesus' teaching is based on God's created order, the creation of male and female. In this way, Jesus affirms the divinely established order for marriag…

Letter, 4/18: Now is time for gas tax

There’s no better time to increase our gas tax ("Ricketts makes it clear: Expect veto on gas tax hike," April 13). Gas prices are down and deferred maintenance and replacement of roads and bridges is growing fast. We sympathize with our senators and the governor not wanting to raise taxes, b…