Column: The United States, future energy superpower

2012-11-20T23:50:00Z 2015-01-28T17:02:05Z Column: The United States, future energy superpowerBY E. THOMAS McCLANAHAN / The Kansas City Star

Four decades ago, the Arab oil embargo consigned Americans to gas lines. Odd-even rationing became routine, and everyone with a passing interest in energy policy heard regular predictions that the planet was nearing “peak oil.”

We’ve been told forever that we’re “running out of resources,” that we’re facing a future of shrinking options, that we’d better change our ways and oh, by the way, our friends in the green movement will tell us exactly how our ways must be changed.

Which is why this month, the greens no doubt reacted in horror at the International Energy Agency’s latest forecast on oil production.

Forget about peak oil. What the future portends is energy abundance. Within eight years, the IEA says, the United States will overtake Saudi Arabia as the planet’s largest oil producer. All those predictions about running out? The ever-gloomy greens ignored the most important resource-production factor of all: human ingenuity.

New drilling techniques involving hydraulic fracking have produced a gusher of oil and natural gas from shale formations in several states including Kansas, but mainly in Texas, North Dakota, Ohio and Pennsylvania. The boom has added tens of thousands of new jobs and more revenue for state, local and federal government.

True, the IEA’s prediction could be too optimistic, just as the environmental-disaster scenarios of the last 40 years have been too pessimistic. And one risk is that the Obama administration will do everything in its power to curb the new drilling techniques, denying much of this new bounty to the nation.

Yet while there’s no way of knowing how long production can increase at the current exponential rate, the new oil and gas already is creating geopolitical waves.

“The big thing is a change in the dynamic,” said economist Chris Kuehl of Kansas City, Kan.-based Armada Corporate Intelligence. “Back in the embargo days, OPEC was responsible for about 70 percent of world oil. I think OPEC is now supplying 35 percent globally. They still have a role to play and the Saudis can always ramp up production. But now it’s harder for them to throw their weight around.”

With the nation’s oil-import bill falling from 60 percent of U.S. energy demand in 2005 to nearly 40 percent, there’s a lot less fear about embargoes or arbitrary price increases imposed by malodorous regimes. “The Irans and Venezuelas,” Kuehl says, “are almost becoming nonentities when it comes to oil.”

For those concerned about climate change, the shale revolution also brought unexpected benefits in the form of lower carbon emissions. Since 2008, the use of coal in U.S. power generation has dropped from 50 percent to about 34 percent, while the share of natural gas, a cleaner-burning fuel, has risen to almost the same level. The nation’s CO emissions have dropped to levels not seen since 1991.

Naturally, some greens see in the shale revolution cause for lamentation. Economist Frank Ackerman, writing at a blog called Triple Crisis, called fracking a “disaster in the making.”

Greens worry about the threat to ground water or the release of methane. While these are real concerns, I’m betting the attendant problems will fall far short of the potential catastrophe some predict. To me, that seems a reasonable bet, given the apocalyptic hogwash environmentalists have put out for the last 40 years.

Let’s recognize that there aren’t any environmentally cost-free ways to produce energy. And while the shale revolution entails risk, the risks must be balanced against its considerable benefits.

If the trend holds, a lot more Americans will have jobs, the nation will become an energy superpower and the Middle East will drop several notches on Washington’s priority list. The IEA energy forecast is excellent news in a period of seemingly endless economic malaise.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Letter, 5/25: Legal battles ahead

So, the stories are already out there ("Ricketts urges constituents to flip senators on death penalty," May 22). With the Legislature now taking away the death sentence, those that are on death row would not be executed. Why? They were sentenced at a time when the death penalty was in play a…

Letter, 5/25: No greater payment

As a former member of the Lincoln Board of Education, I would like to provide one correction to your May 7 editorial ("The voters have spoken"). In that opinion piece, you write that members of the Board of Education "serve long hours for no pay." I beg to differ.

Letter, 5/25: Cold-blooded killer

On the day you celebrate the votes needed to do away with the death penalty ("Death penalty repeal passes Legislature, awaits veto," May 20), I was praying for the family of a slain police office in Omaha ("Slain Omaha officer remembered as new mom who gave back," May 21). She did not have a…

Letter, 5/25: Deserving death

During December 1957 and January 1958, Charles Starkweather, age 19, and Carol Fugate, age 14, went on a murder rampage, killing 10 people in and around Lincoln and one in Wyoming, for a total of 11 people.