Now
Fair
71.0°
High
87°
Low
64°

Future of high-rise project uncertain

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Nov 26, 2008 - 12:16:56 am CST

Former Mayor Coleen Seng’s attempt to get a new high-rise built downtown — for which the city bought and razed about half of a city block — appears to have hit a snag.

One key part of the project —an 18-story retirement home for the University of Nebraska-Lincoln alumni — is no longer in the works.

The city has been negotiating with a developer for 19 months, but business and city officials are saying privately the deal appears to be foundering.

Story Photo
A conceptual rendering of the Catalyst Building from the east. This is not the final design of the buildings. ( 2015 Vision 14th and Q Streets )

Related Media

Downtown high-rise timeline

Since the mayor announced the project in February 2006, Catalyst One has demolished buildings and drawn up some pretty ambitious plans for downtown Li...

Redevelopment proposal

Lincoln Synergy Group proposed a 22-story building with a hotel, apartments, offices and retail space above a city parking garage on the block bounded by P, Q, 13th and 14th streets. The city bought, demolished and paved over two restaurants and two theaters on the downtown block in 2007.

The developers also proposed an 18-story building that would house a retirement community linked to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln on the block directly north, bounded by Q, R, 13th and 14th.

In April 2007, after looking over proposals from three developers, city officials chose a $180 million blueprint pitched by Lincoln Synergy Group, a partnership between Lincoln developer Monte Froehlich and several out-of-town investors.

At the time, officials estimated it would take six to 18 months to work out a redevelopment agreement with the developer.

Now, 19 months into negotiations, Urban Development Director Dave Landis would not comment on the status of the project, saying any announcements are “not mine to make, create, announce.”

“Any decision-making would be above my pay grade,” he said last week.

The office above his pay grade — the mayor’s — also declined to comment.

But Froehlich said Monday the two sides were still working and would have an announcement soon. He said, as far as he knows, the project isn’t dead.

“I don’t know if the status has been determined,” he said. “We’re still working on it.”

Asked whether they’re working on an alternative plan, he said “not necessarily.”

“I’m really not at liberty to go into the details,” he said.

He said the economic turmoil is “certainly a component.”

“If you just look around the nation, there are not huge projects coming out of the ground or being announced,” he said.

Froehlich’s group proposed a 22-story building with a hotel, apartments, offices and retail space above a city parking garage on the block bounded by P, Q, 13th and 14th streets.

The developers also proposed an 18-story building that would house a retirement community linked to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln on the block directly north, bounded by Q, R, 13th and 14th streets.

That portion of the project appears to be dead. The new director of the University of Nebraska Alumni Association, Diane Mendenhall, said, “At this point, we’re not involved in that or planning to move forward.”

Former Alumni Association director Ed Paquette had worked for several years — and looked at several sites — to create a unique home for alumni retirees. He abruptly left the association in September 2007.

Mendenhall said the decision to pull out of the project was made prior to her arrival this September, when the association reorganized and redirected its mission and determined the high-rise was “something that doesn’t fall within our umbrella of our intent to connect alumni back to the university.”

Lincoln Synergy’s proposal was four times more expensive than the other bid whose details were disclosed. Dial Realty Corp. of Omaha proposed a $45 million project that would include a 112-room Residence Inn by Marriott, 13 stories, 14 condos, a sports bar and entertainment complex. A smaller building would have had shops on the first floor and offices on the second and third floors occupied by Sinclair Hille architects.

A third bid came from developer John Q. Hammons — a Missouri hotelier who built the Embassy Suites downtown — but he didn’t submit a formal proposal.

The city has spent a considerable amount of money making way for the high-rise.

The city bought, demolished and paved over two restaurants and two theaters on the downtown block in 2007.

The former Douglas 3 theater at 13th and P streets was already vacant and the Star Ship 9 discount theater between 13th and 14th streets on Q Street was operating, although Douglas was already planning to close it. The city bought the two theaters for $3.2 million.

While Douglas was a willing seller, the owners of the Taste of China and Wasabi Japanese restaurants on the northeast corner of 14th and Q were reluctant.

The Taste of China owner didn’t want to move, the city couldn’t pay as much as the owner wanted and the City Council refused to authorize the use of eminent domain. The city finally took a roundabout approach to getting that property.

Froehlich bought the Taste of China for about $730,000 and the city paid him $430,000 (the maximum they could have paid the restaurant outright) for the right to demolish the restaurant. The plan was for Froehlich to sell the property to the high-rise developer for $300,000 — which, as it turned out, was himself.

So it’s unclear whether the city could be on the hook for that $300,000, too.

And that’s not counting demolition, paving and other associated costs.

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Justin wrote on November 26, 2008 2:31 am:
" I'm getting really tired of seeing that parking lot. Honestly, the pacing of development in Lincoln is practically glacial. I hope to see that high-rise in the next...oh..let's make it 6 years. "

One more thing wrote on November 26, 2008 5:53 am:
" Another mess Seng left for Mayor Beutler to try to clean up . Do what you
need to do Mayor to fix this one. We'll support it. "

Brian wrote on November 26, 2008 6:09 am:
" This is Seng's legacy. I say we name the parking lots after her. "

Way to go City.... wrote on November 26, 2008 6:28 am:
" Get rid of taxpaying businesses, give money to Douglas Theatres for a business they were closing anyway and replace them with parking lots. More to come like this in the Haymarket. Watch your wallet, Lincoln taxpayer. Maybe these developers (and the City) need some of those bailout funds from the US Government. Where is MY bailout??????? "

CapeGirardeauHusker wrote on November 26, 2008 6:32 am:
" I can remember going to movies at the Starship Nine and then being crushed to learn that it was being torn down. And Taste of China was a favorite too. Both of these options were cheap, convenient and great entertainment options for a grad student at UNL. "

Citizen wrote on November 26, 2008 7:09 am:
" Another fine piece of work we can attribute to Mayor Seng. Such a shame she is not still in office. I can't think of a better cause for the city to waste its money on. It is not like there are sidewalk repairs that need to be done or streets to be maintained. Great Job Former Mayor Seng. "

Galen wrote on November 26, 2008 7:14 am:
" More waste of tax dollars. "

Glad to Hear It wrote on November 26, 2008 7:36 am:
" I'm glad to hear this project is on hold (at best). There are many things that can be built in these areas that would be beneficial to Lincoln - a high rise isn't one of them. This is a chance for the City, under much improved management, to improve how this area could be redeveloped. "

Outside the Box wrote on November 26, 2008 8:10 am:
" I still haven't found good Chinese food in this city since Taste of China was torn down.

Please come back!!! "

Hope It Works Out wrote on November 26, 2008 8:11 am:
" It is unfortunate if this project doesn't go through. Getting this property on the tax rolls is important. Private enterprise that produces jobs, retail space and tax revenue for the city is important to our success. Anyone that says "glad to hear it" like the previous comment certainly doesn't understand the importance of private enterprise and growth that that make a city like Lincoln successful. "

bob wrote on November 26, 2008 8:25 am:
" It's too bad they couldn't affix the word "arena" to the end of this project because I'm sure it would have moved along much quicker. I second the call for naming the parking lots after Seng. "

Jason wrote on November 26, 2008 8:41 am:
" So far, I've liked what Beutler has done. Cut your losses and let this die. The parking lot would be a fitting tribute to a mayor that left this city flat. We have real needs and real concerns such as infrastructure which need more money than a monument to a mayor and her antiquated communal ideals. I have news for you mayor, a dead, opportunity-less economy kills urban sprawl too. "

So wrote on November 26, 2008 8:54 am:
" what else is new? This kind of junk is what costs the taxpayers so much. And the city wants a new arena? Yea right! Spend money on the streets that are falling apart and quit trying to be another kansas city. Lincoln is not and never will be a large progressive city as much as the developers, mayor, and most of the citizens want. "

Wake up Lincoln wrote on November 26, 2008 8:58 am:
" Wake up Lincoln! I was so happy to hear of the high rise plans and now we hear it may not be built. What a shame. Lincoln needs to get a clue! Look 50 miles up I-80 to a city that knows what it's doing to improve its image across the country and they're reaping the benefits. That's the Big 0. Omaha! I guess we need to call Lincoln "The Little L". C'mon Lincoln, get it in gear and improve the look of downtown. Sooner. Not later. "

Harry the Antenna Guy wrote on November 26, 2008 9:09 am:
" Lincoln doesn't need more development downtown. It is fine. It was a scam that we got stuck with the cost of removing our only budget theater and other viable businesses. A big thanks for more wasted and inefficient spending goes out to the former mayor. Lesson learned - don't start spending money and ripping down buildings until you have a project lined up. Pie-in-the-sky ideas often fall through and what does Lincoln have to show for it? More surface parking, which I think they should accommodate by tearing down every other block downtown. Maybe we should name the parking lot in honor of the former mayor. "

Paul wrote on November 26, 2008 9:10 am:
" This city is going to be paying the price for Sengs horrific development decisions for decades. "

Go to Sleep Lincoln wrote on November 26, 2008 9:15 am:
" Lincoln has no use for fantasy high rises. We have precious resources that do not need to be squandered putting up high density building. Downtown has enough density that it cannot fill. Why on earth would we want to build more so that it can go empty? As far as trying to be like other cities - why? How about we try something different and be our own city? How about we learn to like the community as it is and try not to grow into more crime and poverty? "

J wrote on November 26, 2008 9:19 am:
" The article mentions that there are not huge products coming out of the ground or being announced. I disagree. If you just drive down Dodge street in Omaha or anywhere in midtown Omaha, you can see many huge multimillion dollar projects being started. This town just can't do anything right and investors do not want to come in and spend their money, except for the Scott brothers who get trounced on repeatedly by the city council (which is horrible). No wonder Lincoln is suffering so bad while Omaha is still thriving in one of the worst economic times since the early 1900's. "

Daydreamers wrote on November 26, 2008 9:24 am:
" The city and developer were both unrealistic when it came to this project. Where did they think they were going to find tenants to fill another high rise downtown? I work downtown. Every day I walk past retail and office spaces which have sat empty for years. Maybe the city should reconsider the need for this project and come-up with a better use for the space. I would love to see a grocery store at this location. With all the students on UNL campus, I'm sure it would be a big success. I just wish more thought would have been given to the need for this project before they tore down the businesses. "

So many wasted opportunities wrote on November 26, 2008 9:29 am:
" OK, Seng was a bad mayor. She became mayor after making bad decisions on the city council. She was elected to the city council because a lot of citizens helped her make a bad decision on the Northeast Radial. With all that said, bad decisions regarding development in Lincoln go back much further than her administration. It is always hard to know where the blame should start. For as long as I can remember, the good old boys and their good old boy attorneys are the only ones who can get anywhere in this town. The taxpayers suffer because the administration (whoever they may be) support limited private uses of land, but go to extraordinary expense to support UNL's wish lists.What great opportunities exist in Lincoln if it weren't for the inbreeding depression that's been going on for years. "

JB wrote on November 26, 2008 9:32 am:
" Downtown: the land of parking lots. Another Block 35? What is this block's number? This is the time money should be spend on big projects. Puts lot of money through the city's economy. "

John wrote on November 26, 2008 9:36 am:
" Lincoln please be a "do it" city. Omaha is a "do it" city. Lincoln is a "we'll think about it" and "do a study" city! "

Mr. Snrub wrote on November 26, 2008 9:39 am:
" I can't believe they tore down those theaters and restaurants for a high rise retirement home! How safe can a high rise retirement building be? I stayed in a hotel once that had 15 floors, and it said on a sign by the elevator that if there was a fire you were supposed to use the stairs. I don't think it would be safe for all of those retired people to be running down 18 flights of stairs at their age during a fire! They could break their hips or not get out in time! I guess they could install escalators instead of stairs, but come on city of Lincoln, haven't you invested enough in this high rise death trap? "

Bob wrote on November 26, 2008 9:40 am:
" Yep. Pretty tough to get a an arena/Haymarket overhaul vote to pass when you have other projects like this going on simultaneously. Not to be pessimistic but the less 'projects' just getting started the better in terms of trying to get Lincoln to vote YES on the arena (especially in downtown). Like the article states, the sad part is that we've already spend 400K+ of city $$$$ this now dead ended project. How pathetic is that? "

figures wrote on November 26, 2008 9:42 am:
" just what we need there , an ugly parking lot! sure is nice to know that the leaders of the city know what there doing. all i see happening, is things going out. there pushing the money out of lincoln. WAY TO GO!! "

Well wrote on November 26, 2008 9:45 am:
" I blame George W. Bush. "

Jess wrote on November 26, 2008 9:53 am:
" I was never a fan of this idea. I liked the Starship Theatre and the Taste of China restaurant. I'm glad no more of my tax dollars will be wasted on this thing. Could we please spend the money repairing some streets and sidewalks and maintaining our parks. We shouldn't build any more big projects until we can sustain what we already invested in. "

to outside the box wrote on November 26, 2008 10:00 am:
" I thought Taste of China had great food too. But now if I want good Chinese food I go to Zhang's. It is in with the little shops that are located with Russ Market at Coddington and West A. Their food is at least as good as Taste of China. If you haven't been out there yet - try it! "

seriously wrote on November 26, 2008 10:41 am:
" I'm all for building Lincoln up, but wouldn't it make more sense to have the project planned BEFORE the demo takes place and Lincoln loses businesses? This is a huge mess now and a complete waste of time and money if it is going to just stay a parking lot. "

Alan wrote on November 26, 2008 10:56 am:
" No surprise this is falling on its face. Remember how the public came to the aid of Taste of China to prevent the city from taking his property by eminent domain? Of course they just did it anyway.

When will the city stop pandering to the 800 lb Gorilla that is UNL? Did anyone even determine there was a demand for a downtown retirement home for UNL grads? "

Ned wrote on November 26, 2008 11:11 am:
" Oh come on! Its not Sengs fault its the economy (which IS George Ws fault) and if the building had been up and collecting taxes she would be an unsung hero. "

Gary wrote on November 26, 2008 11:40 am:
" Oh Great!!! They take away our Starship theater and now this. Seems like Lincoln's got too big of ideas and in the process their taking away everything that matters to the people. First the Starship and now the State Fair. Unless you like arts or music in this town there's nothing to do. I think the Douglas theater should have build us another dicount theater to replace the one we had. I wonder now that they've changed hands that monopoly is broke, I doubt it though. Sad very sad. "

Red wrote on November 26, 2008 11:47 am:
" They paved paradise and put up a parking lot! "

Chillax wrote on November 26, 2008 12:10 pm:
" Calm down. It's fine. Even if this deal doesn't go through, it will be much easy to find a redeveloper (local or otherwise) if the land is already cleared. "

To Ned wrote on November 26, 2008 12:24 pm:
" Look to Congress on who to put the blame on the economy. It is pretty clear in the Constitution. Look up section 8 - Powers of Congress. As for this "project," it is sad that we have to deal with Seng's legacy. Too bad the Starship is not around anymore - great place to see a second run movie. "

Doug wrote on November 26, 2008 12:54 pm:
" My wife and I regularly attended movies at the Star Ship 9. The last couple of years it was open it was obvious to me that Douglas Theatre Company was considering closing it because it needed maintenance and improvements the theatre was not getting. With that said I think the city should have had their ducks in a row before they purchased the property. Possibly the Star Ship would still be operating while the city figured things out. "

Becky wrote on November 26, 2008 3:10 pm:
" city planning. thats all i can say. we need it. what we have isn't cutting it. shouldn't the city wait to buy property until there is an actual plan? the businesses that closed for this project were well liked in the area. why take them away prematurely, when there doesn't appear to be a decent plan on the horizon? seems like a huge waste of our money. I'd like to see something productive done- but more representative of what the people of Lincoln would want. I want a cheap theater and more restaurant options. Actually, I don't even care if its a cheap theater, just competition for Marcus theaters. "

get real wrote on November 26, 2008 3:45 pm:
" Douglas sold it cause the tiff money came due and they would have to start paying taxes on it. "

Trying to remember... wrote on November 26, 2008 3:45 pm:
" It seems to me that there were several proposals on this project, and at least one indicated they were able to proceed but the city chose the expanded version with two towers instead of the single building that was originally planned. Proves once again that a bird in hand is worth two in the bush. "

Nice 5 mil lot wrote on November 26, 2008 4:05 pm:
" Sure is a sweet 5 million dollar parking lot... I think it has about 125 stalls in it. at 5 dollars a day (max fee). that is if it generates that. We are looking at only about 22 years of that parking lot to get our tax dollars back... Not Bad Ehh... "

Chris wrote on November 26, 2008 4:26 pm:
" to get real: Your comment proves that you have no idea what TIF is, it would probably be best if you didn't try to comment on it.

LJS comment lesson time: TIF is used to improve infrastructure in conjunction with a new project. Lincoln's policy is to only use TIF money in the public domain, i.e. sidewalks/streets, moving/replacing sewer/electric infrastructure, and street beautification. No money can go directly into the private side of a project. Further, TIF money is a diversion of the property tax. Here is how it works. The baseline taxable value does not change. That is, the entities that are currently receiving a revenue stream from a property will continue to receive that same amount. The amount at which the new development is appraised, over and above the baseline value, has the property taxes diverted to pay off a bond that was used for the TIF improvements. Any private developer who's project uses TIF must immediately pay full property taxes on the higher appraised value. The baseline value property taxes go to the entities that received those funds before, the increased value property taxes go to pay off the improvements.

Any questions? "

Chris wrote on November 26, 2008 4:31 pm:
" I was exited about this project but also thought it was a bit too grandiose when I first heard it. I still hope redevelopment does happen on that block. A residential building would be very nice, and I think Lincoln could support it. I tried to get an apartment a couple years ago downtown and couldn't find anything. There is going to be a lot more people (empty nesters, singles, no child couples) that will opt for downtown living over the 'burbs. It's a shifting demographic. Plus, the need for increased infrastructure will be lessened when compared to new suburban development, which will save money. I hope this block doesn't sit vacant for a long period of time, like the Embassy block. "

Chris wrote on November 26, 2008 4:42 pm:
" Becky: What makes you think the Planning Department had anything to do with this project? I would personally hate to be a planner in this city because of the high ratio of naysayers and those resistant to change. All everyone in this city seems to want is more endless miles of (incredibly expensive) suburban sprawl development with no unique attributes and completely car-oriented. That doesn't take planning. That just takes money grubbing developers getting their way, with citizens unknowingly left the bill for maintenance. Is it any wonder that our tax burden continues to rise when the majority of development is the absolute most expensive possible form of development. Does anyone realize the enormous amounts of resources it takes to pave a street for just one mile, along with the sewer, water, electricity, sidewalks, parks, fire houses, police stations, schools. The increased amount of upkeep for snow removal, repaving, median/right of way upkeep, park services, busing. Our city has grown spatially much faster than it has in terms of population. Meanwhile there are vacant houses in the city center that already have this all built. Dense urban development adds citizens and property tax/sales tax revenue to the city without increasing the costs to the city for development. Maybe at some point people will come to realize this. I'm a dreamer. "

Norm wrote on November 26, 2008 5:02 pm:
" No more parking lots! Stop tearing down old buildings and leaving parking lots and one-story buildings from the Brutalist school of architecture. When I moved back to Lincoln about a year ago I couldn't believe the number of surface parking lots and one-story buildings in the downtown and surrounding areaa. What a complete waste of space. Build up, not out. This isn't rocket science: 3-4 levels of parking underground; non-chain restaurants, shops, theaters, etc. on the street level; 5-6 stories of condos/apartments with balconies; and a roof top deck. Duplicate this throughout downtown and the surrounding Antelope Valley area. Also get out of the car mindset and invest in a real public transportation system that runs after 6 PM. Lincoln would thrive. There is a large market for folks who want to live in or near downtown instead of wasting natural resources through suburban sprawl. "

Norm is right wrote on November 26, 2008 7:43 pm:
" Norm, I agree with you but Lincoln has refused for years to allow building up instead of out.
Chris, I wouldn't want to be a planner in this town either, but for a different reason. It is the lack of highly qualified and creative thinkers in city government that would drive me nuts. The projects are all so uninspiring.
As for those who think this building would be inhabited and generating tax revenues if it had been built a year or two, think again. It would probably be empty and on the brink of bankruptcy.It would be great if Bush really were responsible for all of our problems. It was his administration that tried to curtail Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and it ws the democrats who squashed the plan to regulate them. Do some research. Watch the tapes of Congressional hearings on the subject. "

Mark wrote on November 26, 2008 8:42 pm:
" Well thank heavens someone with a vision comes to bear. Lets tear down a perfectly good theater that working families could afford so we can have yet another stupid parking lot for the privilaged few. Way to go City of Lincoln. Question is: HOW MUCH is your next little pet project gonna cost? "

JB wrote on November 26, 2008 10:47 pm:
" Lincoln and it's ugly buildings plus it's many parking lots. The City-County, State Office, and Federal Building could be torn down tommorow and no one would care. Still we tear down unique older buildings to add to downtowns many parking lots. "

Pie in the Sky wrote on November 27, 2008 6:47 am:
" Most of this is due to poor city planning. Our planning commission is so far out of touch with reality that all these folks see is pie in the sky. The economy has no effect on their decisions as most of these folks feel they are above the economy and can make decisions about other peoples money better than the people can. The reality of this is that the planning commission needs to be dissolved. These folks meet and talk and play like little gods that everyone is suppose to bow down to. Yet they make decisions that cost most of us too much. We could do better without their input. Just look around Lincoln, you will find area after area after area with space for rent and empty lots were projects got started and then abandoned. It's sad that all of this is happening when our great planning commissions sits back and keeps proposing more and more pie in the sky. Why should the people care most of them will move on before the proverbial fan gets hit. Stop the insanity. PLEASE. "

Chris wrote on November 28, 2008 12:11 am:
" Pie in the Sky: You do realize that the planning commission has no decision-making power and simply reports to the city council, right? "

James wrote on December 2, 2008 1:41 pm:
" Final word...Seng Memorial Parking Lot. Ribbon-cutting ceremony to be attended by homeless and stray animals. "