Now
Fair
71.0°
High
87°
Low
64°

Deena Winter: Council dumps extra night meetings

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Wednesday, Nov 26, 2008 - 12:16:56 am CST

The Lincoln City Council has decided to scrap the extra night meetings it has been holding this year.

Council meetings are at 1:30 p.m. Monday, except the last Monday of the  month, when they begin at 5:30 p.m.

Councilman Jonathan Cook has advocated more night meetings, to accommodate citizens with day jobs. He convinced the council to add five additional night meetings to its schedule this year.

But Cook was gone last Monday during an informal meeting when the council was crafting its 2009 meeting schedule. Councilman Ken Svoboda said he didn’t think the night meetings were attracting more people.

Councilwoman Robin Eschliman said fewer people spoke during the “open microphone” sessions (on the second and last Monday of each month) in 2008 than in 2007, which she took as evidence that night meetings weren’t bringing in more people. (Although only four of the extra night meetings were “open mike” meetings.) 

Eschliman said staffers who work the meetings prefer day meetings — although as a business owner, she prefers night meetings so she can do her job on Mondays.

Cook was disappointed to hear the council dispensed with the extra night meetings, which he said also accommodate working people who wanted to serve on the council.

Roundabout safety: On Nov. 17, the council delayed action for two weeks on an agreement with the state to engineer and build a roundabout at the intersection of North 14th Street and Cornhusker Highway to improve safety.

The state considers it a highly dangerous area, but council members had their doubts about the ability of a roundabout to shuttle heavy traffic to Husker games.

Building Commission ‘out of control’?

During the recent debate over the purchase of $400,000 worth of furniture for a new city-county building west of the County-City Building, the woman questioning the purchase, Nancy Kraft, said she thought the Public Building Commission was “out of control” and lacked oversight.

Out of control? That might be a bit strong. But the commission could use more oversight from both the press and public.

It can be a challenge to keep up with the commission, which is important because it buys, manages and maintains buildings for the city and county.

Until recent months, the Journal Star had to repeatedly request that the commission send its meeting agendas to the newsroom. Finally, it complied.

 The meetings (aside from budget meetings) are not televised on the government access TV channel, Channel 5 — unlike more prominent local government meetings.

I was unable to find any reference to the Building Commission on the city-county Web site, which normally offers a wealth of information about everything and anything.

I also couldn’t find the agenda online, unlike most other local government meetings.

More transparency could help decrease such suspicion that the commission is “out of control.”

Eyes on speeders?: The Police Department is interested in using video to catch speeders and red light violators on camera.

Lincoln has some video cameras installed on traffic signals now, but they’re used to control traffic, mayoral aide Denise Pearce said.

Treacherous tracks: Jennifer Paine, who lives in central Lincoln and works downtown, is among many bicyclists who have had a bumpy ride on the way downtown on Eighth Street.

Both she and her roommate have crashed while traversing old railroad tracks embedded into Eighth Street, just south of the new Harris Overpass. Paine ended up with two black eyes; her roommate sliced her knee open, requiring 13 stitches.

She said she knows about 20 other people who have also crashed there, and if the city doesn’t fix the street, she’s considering a petition to force action.

“If the city doesn’t fill them … I’m gonna go down there with a bag of cement,” she said. “I’ve tried calling the city, and they’re just giving me the run-around.”

The treacherous tracks came up during a recent debate over a nearby redevelopment project — apparently if there’s enough tax increment financing generated by the redevelopment, some of the money could be used to remove the tracks.

Another committee!: The mayor has appointed nine people to a private-sector committee to create a sort of one-stop development shop he calls a Development Services Center.

Mayor Chris Beutler has been pushing for this new one-stop shop to consolidate the process for reviews, permitting and inspection of development projects. The advisory committee will identify issues and problems and advise the city on how to meet the needs of the development industry.

“I envision a day when homebuilders plan a single afternoon to deal with the city instead of days or weeks,” Beutler said. “I envision a day when going to city hall to get permits is synonymous with progress and good feelings, rather than delay and dread. Together, I know we can get there.”

His nine appointees are Bob Caldwell, president of Hampton Enterprises; Kevin Clark of Sinclair Hille; Tim Gergen of Olsson Associates; Randy Harre of Schwisow Construction; Fred Hoppe of Hoppe Homes; Dave Johnson of Studio 951; Steve Peregrine of the Nebraska Investment Finance Authority; Darrick Rademacher of Civil Design Group, and John Rallis of Rallis Construction.

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
bit strong wrote on November 26, 2008 6:40 am:
" Anytime a government spends money without bidding is out of control. Means someone is not watching the ship. This particular commission should be investigated. No public notice, no web site, no agenda, what's going on here? What are they hiding sweatheart deals or the good o'l boys handouts. This commission was formed to pass taxes and spend it evidently without oversite. I do not think it's a bit strong "

Dean wrote on November 26, 2008 6:43 am:
" This committee looks like the wolfes watching the hen house. "

Building Commission wrote on November 26, 2008 6:53 am:
" What do the suditors say about them? Is there oversite? Maybe foley needs to be called in and see what is happening there. Who is getting the business? If the Building commission is a City and County agency then why didn't the County Attorney investigate the allegations instead of paying a outside attorney> So they wasted more money! Sounds like they knew who to call to get the right answer. "

Building Bob wrote on November 26, 2008 8:00 am:
" The City Attorney is the legal counsel for the Building Commission. But yes, ths article is right on track. The commission does things they want to without much oversight. The commission is made up of city counsel members, county board members and a member at large. But try to find out much information about them - you won't! They hold meetings without proper notification. "

Mrs. Johnson wrote on November 26, 2008 9:43 am:
" I think I could find a better name for the mayor's one stop development shop! Talk about the fox guarding the hen house. You have to laugh when you read this stuff. It's not wonder the tax payer takes it in the backside all the time! "

oh Look wrote on November 26, 2008 3:51 pm:
" One stop shop for a City that is going no where. Just look at who's on the committee; everyone who has something to gain or has an ax to grind with the City. Good o'l boys at work here. It's also funny that the Mayor now forms this committee after he has the staff working on this for the last year or so. Oh, I get it they will rubber stamp what he has already done. Called buy in! "

Publicus wrote on November 26, 2008 4:58 pm:
" Perhaps one of the reasons fewer people appeared to speak before the City Council this year is the series of moves the council has implemented over the past few years EXACTLY to discourage public participation. I don't remember all of the moves, but the first change was that citizens could only appear a certain number of times a month/year. Then it was they couldn't speak about issues scheduled for future meetings. The problem with that was that not every subject moved into the pending/futures list was ever scheduled for an actual hearing. There's a lot more to this story than we read here today. "

beerorkid wrote on November 26, 2008 8:18 pm:
" I have seen two people wreck on those tracks in the past. I cross them at quite and angle, have had them mess with my tires, but luckily not wrecked on them, yet. Petitions have been filled at local bike shops, but nothing ever gets done. Thanks Jennifer for bringing this up. "

no roundabout wrote on November 27, 2008 12:08 pm:
" Can you imagine the traffic nightmare a roundabout would cause anywhere on Cornhusker Highway? "