Now
Fair
79.0°
High
84°
Low
66°

UNL cancels William Ayers speech

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Oct 17, 2008 - 10:42:48 pm CDT

Following widespread public furor over its invitation to ’60s and ’70s radical William Ayers to speak at a conference next month, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln late Friday canceled the speech for security reasons.

“The university’s threat assessment group monitored e-mails and other information UNL received regarding Ayers’ scheduled Nov. 15 visit, and identified safety concerns which resulted in the university canceling the event,” read a four-paragraph statement issued by UNL.

UNL refused to provide specifics on the threats, but Board of Regents Chairman Chuck Hassebrook of Lyons said law enforcement officers had expressed concerns about the potential for violence during Ayers’ speech.

Story Photo
William Ayers (AP file)

With those concerns in mind, Hassebrook said, “I think it’s the best outcome.”

UNL’s invitation to Ayers — a founder of Weather Underground, the group that claimed responsibility for the bombings of public buildings in protest of the Vietnam War — represented poor judgment from the start, Hassebrook said.

“My concern has been not with what he was going to say about education. It was that he’s an unrepentant terrorist,” he said. “(UNL) did the right thing.”

In a statement, NU President J.B. Milliken said: "I understand why many Nebraskans were upset by the proposed Ayers lecture. But notwithstanding many calls for the Board of Regents or the president to cancel it, I believe strongly that such an action would have been inappropriate.

"While the immediate controversy over Ayers' scheduled appearance may be over, the importance of recognizing that a university is a place for the open exchange of ideas, free of outside political or popular pressure, remains."

Ayers, a distinguished education professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, had been scheduled to deliver the keynote address at the College of Education and Human Sciences student research conference.

The conference is part of a two-day celebration honoring the college’s 100th anniversary. Ayers’ address was to have been called “We Are Each Other’s Keepers: Research to Change the World.”

A faculty committee selected Ayers last spring, believing he could share valuable insight on topics like social justice and urban educational reform, Marjorie Kostelnik, the education college’s dean, has said.

But since then, Ayers’ connections to Sen. Barack Obama — the two served on a Chicago board together years ago — have emerged as a focus in the presidential race, making his name much more widely known.

So when news of Ayers’ planned appearance at UNL broke Thursday, the public reaction was swifter — and angrier — than UNL originally anticipated.

Phone calls and e-mails flooded the offices of NU President J.B. Milliken, UNL Chancellor Harvey Perlman, Kostelnik and the NU Foundation.

Some donors threatened to withhold financial support to the university unless Ayers was disinvited. One such donor: the Gilbert M. and Martha H. Hitchcock Foundation in Omaha, which has provided millions to NU in the past 40 years.

And statements from political leaders urging UNL to rethink its decision poured in.

“This is an embarrassment to the University of Nebraska and the State of Nebraska,” Gov. Dave Heineman said. “Bill Ayers is a well-known radical who should never have been invited to the University of Nebraska.”

Rep. Lee Terry, a Republican, and Sen. Ben Nelson, a Democrat, also issued statements condemning Ayers’ selection.

State Auditor Mike Foley also expressed concern, saying early Friday he’d sent Kostelnik a records request seeking details on the funding of the student research conference. Kostelnik had said Ayers’ appearance was to be privately funded.

Regents and Milliken had agreed the selection was bad judgment.

But regents also said it would have been inappropriate for them to act as censors.

The decision on whether to host Ayers, they said, was rightly left to UNL.

“You don’t want decisions about who can speak made by a group of elected officials,” Hassebrook said.

Even so, the swift decision to cancel Ayers may hurt UNL’s reputation within the scholarly community, one faculty member said.

“It’s a major infringement on academic freedom, unless it turns out that the university had clear evidence of threats to life,” said David Moshman, an educational psychology professor and expert on issues of academic freedom.

“If it’s not as serious as that, I think they used that as an excuse to make a political judgment.”

Moshman said UNL allowed what he termed a “heckler’s veto” — sending a message that those angry about a controversial speaker need only call in threats of violence to get the speaker canceled.

“That’s a dangerous precedent,” he said.

UNL faculty and students, particularly the committee that selected Ayers, now lose an opportunity to hear a professor highly regarded in his field, Moshman said.

“But they may also get a major lesson in academic freedom,” he said. “That may be an unexpected benefit.”

Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Curt wrote on October 17, 2008 6:35 pm:
" The real threat is donors not giving to the Foundation, they have a bit more common sense than the people running the teachers college. "

UNL Student wrote on October 17, 2008 6:37 pm:
" I am very happy to hear this. We dont need this kind of people around our campus. "

Saline County wrote on October 17, 2008 6:38 pm:
" UNL is a cowardly institution. "

CS wrote on October 17, 2008 6:39 pm:
" Rhiiiiigggghhhhttt...and in the interests of safety they probably won't tell us what these supposed security risks were. Iran's president can come to the US and speak on a college campus and UNL can't handle a guy that is just another professor? Way to go, UNL. Since your security measures are so lacking Ill look forward to many presentations by the local Rotary club instead of world class leaders and international researchers since you can't seem to figure out security for them. No wonder there is a brain drain. You took the easy way out. Welcome to the bush leagues, University of Community College, Nebraska. "

shorty5 wrote on October 17, 2008 6:46 pm:
" Could it be they cancelled Ayers because too many people refused to contribute to UNL if he gave his talk? MONEY TALKS! "

b dog wrote on October 17, 2008 6:49 pm:
" Security???? Please. UNL cancelled because they were going to lose all that money from donors. Money controls everything.
Bye Bye Ayers "

mom wrote on October 17, 2008 6:49 pm:
" Wow - so much for freedom of speech. I guess rich donors have deemed that our kids shouldn't hear about this man's academic research. So when is the UNL book burning scheduled? "

hate terrorists wrote on October 17, 2008 6:53 pm:
" Thank God Nebraska has some common sense. This ( I do not know what to even call him) is not the kind of person The State of Nebraska should associate with, in any way shape or form. Nebraskan's have two brain cells to rub together!!!! Congratulations!!! "

Brain Drain wrote on October 17, 2008 6:55 pm:
" Pathetic. "

Hmmm... wrote on October 17, 2008 6:57 pm:
" The wisest and most prudent decision the University has made in ages! "

gunfighter wrote on October 17, 2008 7:00 pm:
" Smart move UNL.
He can go give another speech to the socialists in Venezuela. "

taxpayer000 wrote on October 17, 2008 7:00 pm:
" Wise decision to disinvite him... "

Wondering wrote on October 17, 2008 7:02 pm:
" Yeah, I'm guessing this is more because of the financial backing UNL will lose. What did they think would happen? I mean, come on people! Obviously the people have spoken. "Callers flooded the offices of university leaders..." "

Jeff wrote on October 17, 2008 7:06 pm:
" Hurray for right wing conservative over-reaction. Nothing better could have come along for conservative politicians to solidify their political base with a little condemnation of a "washed up" terrorist. This is better than condemning illegal immigrants. What's that you say? He was given an award for Citizen of the Year in Chicago in 1997? He's a tenured published professor. A little late for the indignation, don't you think. Political posturing is all that this is, but probably better for everyone to postpone it until after the election, and then life can get back to the typical illegal immigrant bashing. "

Outraged in Omaha wrote on October 17, 2008 7:11 pm:
" This is good news. He should have never been invited in the first place. Now we need to look at all of the guest speakers that UNL has invited to speak in the last year. Then go back to 2007, and 2006, and so on. I'll bet there's a pattern of anti-social behavior at UNL. Academic Freedom? Hogwash. I'll bet they're as corrupt as Bush and his cronies. "

Principle wrote on October 17, 2008 7:11 pm:
" Cancelled for security concerns...not because he is a terrorist. Such principle. "

Disgusting wrote on October 17, 2008 7:13 pm:
" This right-wing reactionary "gotta have a punching bag because Obama is a terrorist" mentality of the people in this state and around the country makes me SICK. You're all being dupped, people, and your Republicans could care less who gets trampled along the way. No wonder Nebraska keeps falling further and further behind the rest of the country. we are the state of kool aid. Ayers made a big mistake 40 years ago, but he never killed anyone and no charges were ever filed. He's been an expert in these education areas since the early 90's. He worked on a committee started by a huge Reagan supporter and associate. Again, this makes me ill that people's ignorance and lack of thinking resulted in this cancellation. "

jmjljjd wrote on October 17, 2008 7:25 pm:
" It should now be determined what person(s) made the decision to invite William Ayers to UNL in the first place. Those person(s), if university or state employees, should be fired for using such a lack of judgment. "

d wrote on October 17, 2008 7:31 pm:
" Thank you the the regents. He can speak at Berkley or Boulder and they can have huge drum circles. As a hard working taxpayer its nice to see that while the Academic circles praise this criminal, that there are RESPONSIBLE people associated with the University who are not afraid to hold this person ACCOUNTABLE for his past actions. The guy bombed NY Police Headquarters! He's a terrorist! He tried to shape gov't policy with violence! LJS - I'd like to know who selected him to speak to these students and hear their explanation. Of course, a decision that stupid likely involves the word 'tenure'... Ah, Academia. "

TG wrote on October 17, 2008 7:32 pm:
" Its too bad that politics trumps academic freedom and dialogue in this firetruck red state. "

cluck cluck wrote on October 17, 2008 7:32 pm:
" wow we should be able to hear from controversial figures even if they don't espouse the same views. I thought that was the purpose of higher learning institutions was to listen to points of view we may not have considered or may learn from. "

Shane wrote on October 17, 2008 7:35 pm:
" Glad to see the Republican's have completely killed free speach at UNL. How transparent of Mike Foley to use his authority to "investigate" the student research group at this time. Certainly no attempt to intimidate in that action. I hope that voters remember this affront to First Amendment rights when they vote for the next Governor, Secretary of State and State Audior. After all elected officials are to adminster state law NOT rule base on their beliefs "

Janet wrote on October 17, 2008 7:40 pm:
" It's too bad that one can't speak their mind anymore and that everything has to be about money....I would have enjoyed listening to him speak. If he is a professor at a university in Illinois I don't understand what the threat thing is about? People in Nebraska are so close minded... "

natefrog wrote on October 17, 2008 7:40 pm:
" The drooling masses win again. Congratulations. "

davidb wrote on October 17, 2008 7:52 pm:
" Wow. Tick this on the list of "reasons why I'm glad I moved away". "

Sad wrote on October 17, 2008 8:01 pm:
" Its a sad day when American's silence the voices of people who have differing opinions, especially when those opinions were formed in decades ago and irrelevant to the topic that he was to address. It is very easy to fall into the lynch mob mentality, especially when passions are built up by hate media. Hopefully we wont follow these knee jerk reactionism when it comes to other issues of speech isues "

Sad beyond words wrote on October 17, 2008 8:05 pm:
" It's a sad day in Nebraska when a speech needs to be canceled due to threats. Free speech died today in Nebraska and those who called and threatened Ayers have become terrorists. Ironic,isn't it... "

it figures wrote on October 17, 2008 8:06 pm:
" Ah...they caved in - money talks! "

Im glad this is over. wrote on October 17, 2008 8:10 pm:
" Harvey Perlman appears to be the only department head that feels as though it is ok to invite a terrorist to the UNL Campus. Harvey has definetly made enough poor decisions lately. I think it's time he steps aside as his views are not of the State of Nebraskas best interest. "

whatever wrote on October 17, 2008 8:14 pm:
" If you are concerned about your kids "learning" in an environment such as "this" where radicals from all manner of leftist points of view are lurking around every corner you are too late. Virtually every student educated in the State of Nebraska in the last 40 years from pre school to PHD have been educated in an institution where the evil teachings of the "left" have been absorbed into their spongy brains with no hope of ever an independent thought to be had again. Actually this is encouraging, the radical elements of the far right that have taken over the Republican Party continue to remain clueless of their enemies from around the world. Honestly I would be much more concerned about our governors relationships with the Chinese and the Cubans. That poses a greater threat to the security of this nation than this dude ever will. "

Michael wrote on October 17, 2008 8:18 pm:
" Good!! Now get rid of the individual responsible for even thinking about bringing a terrorist to speak at the University of Nebraska. I would expect something like that at Berkley...but not Nebraska.

This was just another example of how liberal the professors at major universities have become, and how the tide needs to turn to save this country of ours, and the children that are sent to these schools. "

Free Speech University wrote on October 17, 2008 8:20 pm:
" What a shame there isn't free speech at our publicly funded-very embarrassing! "

mark wrote on October 17, 2008 8:20 pm:
" Smart move. Academe is free to host Professor Ayers in their home, at their expense. Freedom of speech doesn't mean I have to pay for your speech. "

Denise Litz wrote on October 17, 2008 8:20 pm:
" As a 1990 graduate of the College of Home Economics,I am deeply disappointed in the judgment of the faculty and staff at the College of Education and Human Sciences. The type of propaganda William Ayers promotes does not, in my opinion, have a place on university campuses. I am thankful enough people protested his appearance which led to a revocation of his speaking invitation. "

Stop the Insanity wrote on October 17, 2008 8:21 pm:
" I see all the politicians involved saw it fit to try and score some political points while stifling debate and the exchange of ideas. Certainly Ayers' politics are/were controversial, but his educational ideas have merit and deserved to be heard at the University. This is a sad day for the College of Education, our state, and for our students. For all of you complainers and conservative talk show sycophants, it's safe to go back to your caves. "

Excellent wrote on October 17, 2008 8:23 pm:
" Glad that smarter heads prevailed. "

Stopped wrote on October 17, 2008 8:24 pm:
" Power to the people "

David wrote on October 17, 2008 8:25 pm:
" The triumph of reason. "

Husker wrote on October 17, 2008 8:27 pm:
" "He had been selected by a faculty committee last spring for his expertise in areas like social justice and urban educational reform, said Marjorie Kostelnik, dean of the college."

What expertise are we talking about?? Did anyone bother to research how much money Ayers and the foundation he was part of poured into the city of Chicago's school system, and in the end admitted that there was no significant improvement? Another fine example of "Liberals Gone Wild".

A fine reason to invite a terrorist to speak, who never repented for the actions that he admitted to, and said that he only wished that he could have done more.

Fire the butts that made the decision to invite him to speak in Nebraska...they are showing their true selves. "

mark wrote on October 17, 2008 8:27 pm:
" And yes, I was concerned about MY safety with this person in town. He had nothing to fear, but pointed dialogue. "

reality wrote on October 17, 2008 8:32 pm:
" This speaker was not canceled due to security factors. This speaker was canceled due to lack of diversity in this state. No wonder the population is so low in a state geographically large. "

LDE wrote on October 17, 2008 8:44 pm:
" What a shame that Nebraska has to bear the image of such a red-neck and reactionary State that a few hecklers will shut down academic freedom by scaring leaders into canceling a speech from someone who has never been convicted of terrorism and if he were a terrorist in the present moment would be carted off to an obscure holding facility near Cuba to be tortured and held without habeus corpus until hell freezes over. What a wonderful comment about the solid Christian Values of redemption and forgiveness held by upstanding and religious people in Nebraska. In this State "faith heightens fear. It sure doesn't have the effect of casting it out." Rather those who are feared get cast out! "

Jeremy wrote on October 17, 2008 8:45 pm:
" Judgement this poor should cost someone their job, no exceptions. If the people making these poor decisions are still employed by the university, I will still not sent a single penny, as well as I will forbid my children to attend such a university. "

tom issaquah wrote on October 17, 2008 8:45 pm:
" Good decision on the part of the University, Save face and don't put the hometown through a media circus. I think some over sight of who is being given the privilege to speak at the University would be in order to avoid this poor decision by the faculty "

Smart move wrote on October 17, 2008 8:47 pm:
" This was the smartest thing UNL has done in a long time! But then, everything at UNL is all about money.

Now maybe UNL will get some good publicity instead of looking like a bunch of idiots. "

Hop wrote on October 17, 2008 8:51 pm:
" Security reasons? I guess that's somewhat plausible, but almost certainly an excuse to bow to the public outcry.

Small minded and uninformed people caused us to shun someone who might have had something to offer on education. Yea for the dim and oblivious among us! You have spoken and our weak leaders have listened.

It's good to know that the flagship of Nebraska education and my alma mater is so backwards. Kudos to UNL! "

Sad wrote on October 17, 2008 8:56 pm:
" So what we are saying is that once again, the almighty dollar wins? Closed minded Nebraska people are not even willing to hear what he has to say and once again UNL bows to the monetary pressures. Way to go UNL! I am so proud of my alma mater. "

Teacher wrote on October 17, 2008 8:58 pm:
" What a sterling opportunity for the vacuous intellectuals of the University to forgo their tenure and resign their posts to support this man who has committed unspeakable acts and feels no remorse for them. These professors and PhD’s who have never met a payroll or taken a real risk in their life can show the world their true, slavish devotion to academic claptrap by walking off campus and quitting. Perhaps they can get back in time to march against Sarah Palin or Sean Hannity when they want to speak. "

-chet wrote on October 17, 2008 9:03 pm:
" Thanks for coming to your senses UNL. Thanks President Milliken and the NU Regents for stepping up.

As as graduate myself, I fully honor and encourage the university format as forum for understanding of many viewpoints, it was clear this was a huge mistake. We don't need this clown using NU as a venue for his continued mockery of American traditions and values, in which, Nebraska stands as one of the few remaining bastions. "

Cowards wrote on October 17, 2008 9:11 pm:
" UNL is run by close-minded cowards. It is a second rate research university with third-rate administrators. As a grad student with an "A" average I speak from experience. If you want a diploma, UNL can handle it. If you want an education, Kansas State might be a better choice. The opportunity for peolpe to hear from this current icon in American politics was a gift. To cancel, was a crime. "

Joseph P. Sokolovsky wrote on October 17, 2008 9:13 pm:
" You know what people....I don't care WHY UNL cancelled the "terrorist's"
trip to UNL. To not allow Ayers to speak on the UNL campus was "the right" decision. Why? Were it not for some bungling by the FBI back when
Ayers was arrested/charged...the creep would still be in a federal prison.
I suggest respectfully, that some of you do some research on Ayers before claiming freedom of speech and all that stuff. And perhaps all you Obama supporters might give a stronger consideration to the 'real' relationship be Obama and Ayers...and both to ACORN. "

Marky Mark wrote on October 17, 2008 9:16 pm:
" Hey Mark - If you would have bothered to read the original article, you would have known that no public funds were being used to bring Ayers to Lincoln. Private monies only.
So you need not worry that your tax dollars were being used to bring new ideas or diverse opinions to anyone. Heaven forbid! "

Dennis P UNL Alum 91 wrote on October 17, 2008 9:16 pm:
" Bill Ayers does have a right to free speech (thanks to a technicality). But so do all the donors, the alumni, and elected officials. Liberals need to learn that freedom of speech doesn't absolve you of being responsible for your speech. Thank you to the administration for righting this wrong! "

Zoomie wrote on October 17, 2008 9:17 pm:
" Seems very ironic...Everyone gets upset at the idea of a speaker who 40 years ago engaged in violence, but they're happy that he isn't coming because someone threatened violence...sort of seems at least some people have become what they claim to dislike.

And I have to wonder if we'd have seen the same reaction if a right-wing terrorist like G. Gordon Liddy had been invited to speak? "

BigC wrote on October 17, 2008 9:21 pm:
" Icon in American politics? Are you kidding me? This "icon" is a socialist fraud who has made no appologies for what he perpetrated in his past and has gone as far as claiming he didn't DO enough...

You want to hear him speak then band together and pay for him to speak somewhere other than a state university.

It's a shame this person is not in jail but he's not and as an American he has the right to say whatever he likes he just doesn't need to say it at UNL. "

julie wrote on October 17, 2008 9:21 pm:
" So, we're condeming Bill Ayres because of his violent past, but applauding the decision to disinvite him because of threats of violence against the university if he does speak? Hypocracy anyone? "

Teacher teacher wrote on October 17, 2008 9:22 pm:
" Do you even know what 'unspeakable acts' Ayers has committed? Other than what your information (I mean entertainment) source Sean Hannity has told you as a means of smearing Obama?
Perhaps as a teacher you should educate yourself. Please! "

CS wrote on October 17, 2008 9:24 pm:
" They can't fire the 'person' responsible, either, since it was a committee that invited him. How many people need to get fired just to justify the collective need to remain ignorant in this state? Perlman? The entire faculty committee? How about expelling some students that supported this speaker as well, just to get the message across? This makes me sick to my stomach. Its almost enough to make me want to remain poor just so as little of my money goes to the U as possible because they have shown what really dictates their policies-money, and political pressure. "

a professor somewhere else wrote on October 17, 2008 9:31 pm:
" http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63

I believe the invitation was a deliberately provocative act; surely they could have found another Marxist educator who doesn't advocate bombing as a solution.

I'm a two-time alumna of UN-L (although, not the teachers college) and I found the news of Mr. Ayers' visit disturbing, because I question the motives behind his selection, and because I think he's unrepentent about his violent past.

It's interesting that the threat of loss of funding is probably behind the decision to un-invite Mr. Ayers, but the security cover story is at least somewhat believeable. Regardless of the means, the end reached is the best one. "

Constitutional voter wrote on October 17, 2008 9:32 pm:
" This is a travesty. I cannot believe that the University & all the right wing base politicians, sympathizers, or fear of defeat in the next election have adopted the McCain nonsense! Free speech, academic freedom? This is nothing but Republican dirty tricks to even bring up his name.

Barack Obama was 8 yrs old when the Weathermen were active. He's paid his dues to society, it's over and done. He is now a responsible, contributing citizen, etc etc. Sen. Obama met him while serving on a volunteer Board related to education, funded by the renowned Republicans named Annenburg. Isn't there an Annenburg School of Communications, or some such.

McCain/Palin are demonstrating the worst of America and inciting violence. This may be proof. Apparently making terrorist threats? That's against the law. Big bucks Republicans threatening the budget? When money controls the political life of a country is that Fascism? The low information voter, hysterical imbecils, and rabid believers of Fox pap should not be given this power in an alleged democracy. Talk about shredding the very fabric of ... McCain/Palin look in the mirror. Shame, shame, shame. Rejection based on past deeds. Way to go Christians.

Vote for Obama/Biden. The desperate old dude and arm candy ticket are a a world-wide embarrassment. "

Embarrased wrote on October 17, 2008 9:33 pm:
" I have no doubt that the donors made this decision. They call the shots in the athletic department, who among us is naive enough to think that a decision by a professor to invite Ayers would be outside of their scope.

I'm disappointed that the "Breastplate Of Righteousness" worn so proudly by weak minded conservatives has reared its ugly head in Nebraska. It is embarrassing to those of us in the state who are intelligent enough to hear various points of view and come to our own conclusions.

I'm going to go hide my books now. "

How Lame wrote on October 17, 2008 9:34 pm:
" Blaming the cancellation on a threat assessment? How lame. The fact is this is so indicative of the arrogance and the out-of-touchness of the entire UNL system, including its administrators and the Board of Regents. The people who invited this would-be murderer need to be fired forthwith. "

Khkhkk wrote on October 17, 2008 9:34 pm:
" For those who are dubious about the security issues: I work in one of the offices that fielded literally hundreds of calls regarding this issue. The threats were real and were very disturbing; profanity-laced shouting and rants that were simply unbelievable. The fact that I live in a state filled with such intolerant and hateful people is sad. I do not condone Ayers' behavior of years past, but the irony of people threatening to destroy UNL, or injure people to "teach the university a lesson" about someone else's past violent actions is pretty amazing. "

clarence wrote on October 17, 2008 9:35 pm:
" If the students want to hear him that bad, go to Chicago and listen to him on his own campus. "

UNL alum wrote on October 17, 2008 9:38 pm:
" The reaction of the university, Governor Dave Heineman, and the rest of Nebraska's political leaders is embarrassing and sad. "

Billy Bob wrote on October 17, 2008 9:43 pm:
" Freedom of speech,. Who's freedom? I think not Bill Ayers.
Ayers, is nothing but a terrorist....and still is, but now working threw the back door to infect our children with his so called expertise.
Thank you for removing him from coming to UNL. To bad he is not in the slam. p.s. and don't give the line that it happened 30+ years ago, I was there . "

Jerry wrote on October 17, 2008 9:44 pm:
" This smacks of censorship. Are we Nebraskans so insecure in our beliefs that we can't allow someone with whom we disagree to speak in a public forum. The comments of Nelson, Terry, Foley and Heineman were predictable. Hassebrook was disappointing. "

me wrote on October 17, 2008 9:48 pm:
" Quote from whatever, "Honestly I would be much more concerned about our governors relationships with the Chinese and the Cubans. That poses a greater threat to the security of this nation than this dude ever will. " I felt it needed to be said again. "

Well Done Donors wrote on October 17, 2008 9:52 pm:
" Safety? Yeah,the safety of their expected fat regular donations that big alumni donors threatened to withhold, and the large will bequests that rich oldsters threatened to rescind. "

Joey wrote on October 17, 2008 9:58 pm:
" Joseph P. Sokolovsky - You know I'm sure the British would have considered the American rebels to be 'terrorists' when they destroyed property by throwing tea into Boston harbor. That is essentially what Mr. Ayers did, destroy property in protest of the Viet Nam war. He killed no one. Some of his fellows died while putting together another bomb, but he was not responsible for that.
He was indicted on charges of conspiracy to bomb police stations and government buildings. The ‘bungling’ by the FBI to which you refer, which prevented his conviction, was illegal wiretaps, break-ins and mail interception. That sounds like a bit more than bungling, rather willfully breaking the law. A bit disappointing coming from law enforcement officers.
Perhaps you can learn more from the article in our own Lincoln Journal Star.
http://journalstar.com/articles/2008/10/17/news/doc48f934971f7ba459358732.txt "

Proud American wrote on October 17, 2008 10:07 pm:
" A very wise decision the University has made in canceling his invititation and speech, I can't believe he's actually a professor, he’s a terrorist and once a nut case always a nut case, If the students want to hear him that bad, go to Chicago and listen to him on his own campus. Ayers was the founder of Weather Underground, the group that claimed responsibility for the bombings of public buildings in protest of the Vietnam War, The guy bombed NY Police Headquarters! He's a terrorist! Ask any Vietman War Veteran what there views are of this man. How soon all you citizens forget. We dont need this kind of people in the USA, Once a traitor, always a traitor! "

brad wrote on October 17, 2008 10:08 pm:
" Inviting Bill Ayers to speak is an indication of very poor judgment. The Dean of the College of Education and Chancellor Perlman's continued employment with the university should be reviewed. As an UNL alum I am very concerned that we have these two individuals in leadership positions at the state's flagship university. Funds will not flow to the university as long as these two remain employed at UNL. "

Eli wrote on October 17, 2008 10:10 pm:
" It seems the person(s) behind the threats have done no less than anyone charged with a bomb threat or other act of terrorism. Now the governor and UNL have an obligation to take action and prosecute those who would cause the roil. "

Me wrote on October 17, 2008 10:11 pm:
" Good call by the university. A terrorist should never be welcome receive this kind of publicity for his actions. "

Shane... wrote on October 17, 2008 10:12 pm:
" this had nothing, I repeat nothing, to do with Republicans vs. Democrats, and you know it. "

Dan wrote on October 17, 2008 10:13 pm:
" Its called academic freedom people, They weren't giving him an award. This is an institution full of educated people, and they can make their own decisions on what to believe in. I don't condone what he did in his past, but he is a world renowned academic. Please people, read books and educate yourselves, your world will make a lot more sense to you. "

kelly wrote on October 17, 2008 10:18 pm:
" So, we have security for others, but not Ayers? How about the high dollar technology said to be in use at UNL? Can a man not stand before a camera to address the audience?

UNL and Nebraska are so easily pushed around by the big donors...disgusting. Heineman has no business in this discussion, he doesn't work for the University, he simply pushes his way around by threatening to take dollars away, and UNL cows down. "

AnnG - Alumni wrote on October 17, 2008 10:20 pm:
" Way to go Nebraska! I support this decision to cancel. UNL absolutely does not need to associate with this or any other situation that is suspicious. There is no need to explain the cancellation. Enough said. I am proud to be an Alumni. Thank you! "

Fred - Florida wrote on October 17, 2008 10:21 pm:
" Congratulations to the folks at U Nebraska that were able to diplay the common sense that the people who pay their salaries expect, by dis-inviting William Ayers.

Glamorizing terrorists in the name of academic freedom is nonsense, and the faculty members who don't understand that ought to find other employment.

Keep up the good work, and you will have our support. "

HVJ wrote on October 17, 2008 10:21 pm:
" Sanity prevails! Once in a while we finally get it right. Next summer the offended ones can travel to Illinois-Chicago on their own tab and take a course from, or have a chat with, the Distinguished Prof. Ayers. "

Ted Haubrich wrote on October 17, 2008 10:23 pm:
" Most of us had never heard of Bill Ayers before McCain made sucha hallaballoo about him. Look, you don't invite speakers to talk at a University becasue their views are in line with your own. That wouldn't do anyone any good. You invite people to speak becasue they have something to say, you by no means need to agree with them. Disinviting him was a cowardly thing for UNL to do that speaks volumes on its lack of commitement to free speach and academic rigor.Apparently all it takes is some money and a couple of phone calls to have to University turned into a platform for ones own personal political views. "

jeffrey wrote on October 17, 2008 10:23 pm:
" To clarence who wrote on October 17, 2008 9:35 pm:
" If the students want to hear him that bad, go to Chicago and listen to him on his own campus. "

Haven't you noticed? That's exactly what students are doing. They're going elsewhere for a better education. Nebraska can't provide access to diverse thought, so they're finding better jobs by attending more diverse campuses. Check the numbers,...young nebraskans are leaving, and this is one of the primary reasons.

My own two nebraskan daughters have left the state, because they said they're just tired of the bigots. One is in Europe, one in Missouri, and both, by the way, are being educated for less money than it costs to attend UNL. "

To Joseph P. Sokolovsky from an Independent sick of GOP lies wrote on October 17, 2008 10:28 pm:
" You know what they say about casting stones in glass house?

Voters in California were duped into registering as Republicans by
Young Political Majors, or YPM,, a group hired by the GOP, who
thought they were signing a petition. Elections officials and lawmakers have launched investigations into the activities of YPM staff in Florida and Massachusetts. In Arizona,the firm was recently a defendant in a civil rights lawsuit.Prosecutors in Los Angeles and Ventura counties are
investigating complaints about the company. "

JT wrote on October 17, 2008 10:31 pm:
" Probably a smart move. The situation is too intense right now. Bring him back in a couple years when right wing radio isn't spending all their time on him (because they can't win on the issues) and no on will care. "

Wimpy wimpy wimpy wrote on October 17, 2008 10:34 pm:
" UNL should be ashamed of itself. So much for free speech, free thought and the examination of issues from all perspectives. Four years ago -- another presidential election year -- it canceled a scheduled appearance by filmmaker Michael Moore for really lame reasons. I hope the Foundation really rakes it in from those opposed to Ayers' appearance because I won't be giving any money to my alma mater (BA and MA) until it starts acting more like a university and less like a football team money machine. "

Steven Leavin wrote on October 17, 2008 10:37 pm:
" Those who hold power in this state continue to stifle and drive away their young. In some places a university is a beacon of intellectual courage, exploration and integrity. But they are no place like Nebraska. "

Jobe Castor wrote on October 17, 2008 10:39 pm:
" I am just a common man, I am not a scholar, but it seems to me that if this guy was a common friend to McCain, the democrats would be offended and calling him a terrorist. Anyone that disagrees, please voice it. "

ururpast wrote on October 17, 2008 10:40 pm:
" Thank you for someone exercising some common sense, even though it was most likely determined by the financial threats to Univ. funding, and not the threats to Ayers!

Since Ayers continues his belief system from his youth, as is evidenced by his lack of remorse over his actions and stated feelings for this country, I cannot fathom what he could possibly have to contribute to a society such as ours....unless it is to get us to the society HE would find more conducive to his beliefs. What better way than the education of our young!
Let him share his "wealth of knowledge" by going to any number of other countries who are already at the place he would like to see us...and preferably to take up residence! "

jab wrote on October 17, 2008 10:51 pm:
" Freedom of speech, yes. Freedom of speech from someone who was a part of a group claiming responsibility for bombing public places, putting fellow Americans in harms way, and is seemingly unrepentant....he forfeits his freedoms. "

moneymoneymoneymoney wrote on October 17, 2008 11:08 pm:
" "While the immediate controversy over Ayers' scheduled appearance may be over, the importance of recognizing that a university is a place for the open exchange of ideas, free of outside political or popular pressure, remains.", J.B. Milliken said.

What a joke. No wonder why we spend so much on education and no students are getting what THEY pay for. I guess money is the only educator people need. Why do we have teachers and professors? Obviously money talks.

Better find a new way to go trick or treating this year kids. You're parents are too frightened to open they're doors to even check the weather. "

JB wrote on October 17, 2008 11:09 pm:
" Wimped out. Making a mountain out of mole hill. To many right wingers listening to Rush on the radio. Total censorship. "

Tina Bauermeister wrote on October 17, 2008 11:09 pm:
" Who's the terrorist here? What hypocrits. Too ignorant to even realize that they have threatened violence against someone because he threatened violence. Congratulations Nebraska. You just took one more step backwards. Kudos to the 1st Amendment supporting administrators and government representatives. Sounds like the free thinking institution I'd want my kids to attend. Will your library have any books left in ten years or will they all be burnt? Maybe the University should vet all education material through its donors. I am truly embarrassed for the entire state. "

mark leeper wrote on October 17, 2008 11:16 pm:
" millikan is dead on, universities need people to speak, from all angles, even those who were violently opposed to the illegal and deceptive practices of Nixon. grow up, Nebraska. "

UNL 71 wrote on October 17, 2008 11:17 pm:
" Thank goodness that the image of our fine football team won't be sullied by having Ayers speak at its sponsoring University. And thank goodness that no one will have to cancel their season tickets or rescind their donations to the Touchdown Club now that this terrorist has been sent packing back to the Communist State of Illinois. Luckily I live in a place that is so close-minded that I won't have to be exposed to any alternative points of view other than those espoused by our wonderful Governor and Board of Regents. "

JPD wrote on October 17, 2008 11:35 pm:
" Is he worse now than he was in March? That was over six months ago. Someone doesn't know what is going on if you have to wait until mid-October to all of a sudden discover who he is. Somebody needs to get their heads out of his armpits. Donors won this one. "

common sense wrote on October 18, 2008 12:00 am:
" The correct, commense sense decision was made. This isn't about freedom of expression. Nobody believed this guy was going to come and talk about how to blow up your capitol. Nebraskans weren't trying to quiet some speech named "Bomb-making 101". But, this is for a celebration about education and inspiring our future educators. Common sense says there have to be other choices of role models that are inspiring education heroes and reformers in our country...who have never been on the FBI's most wanted list. "

Shikago wrote on October 18, 2008 12:03 am:
" This man has spoken all of the country for years unhindered and now they have issues with him.....RRRRRrrrright! "

chicken little wrote on October 18, 2008 12:06 am:
" The sky is falling, the sky is falling.....supposedly uttered by chicken little or was it really Hassebrook? "

An Alternative wrote on October 18, 2008 12:11 am:
" If UNL is truly interested in someone who has positively impacted change in education, I would suggest Erin Gruwell, the Freedom Writer Teacher from Long Beach California. She is scheduled to speak in Lincoln on Nvember 13 at Union college. Perhaps that would be a better choice. "

Gidget in Chicago wrote on October 18, 2008 12:16 am:
" The university did the right thing! Some people are saying it's not fair to stop free speech! What about the people that got hurt or terrorized because of Ayers and the underground what about their freedom of speech! Ayers should not be allowed at any university and should not be allowed to teach at the university in Chicago! "

NRK wrote on October 18, 2008 12:17 am:
" All of you people who commented on here and wrote to the regents during the last couple of days about pulling your donations better get your checkbooks ready... "

mTm wrote on October 18, 2008 12:20 am:
" POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!! "

Pathetic wrote on October 18, 2008 12:41 am:
" ....to see so many Nebraskans are ignorant enough to buy into McCain/Palin's negative campaigning tactic's & in turn threaten acts of violence themselves against someone they'd never heard of prior to this campaign. What hypocrites. It's a pathetic way to portray our state: censorship combined with partisan politics & those with all the money calling all the shots. "

Matt wrote on October 18, 2008 12:47 am:
" Cowards... "

Disappointed in UNL wrote on October 18, 2008 1:21 am:
" I'm disappointed UNL. What a cowardly move. "

History wrote on October 18, 2008 4:27 am:
" Why do people wonder how and why people like Ayers do what they do or did?
Ayers went and did what he did 40yrs ago because of a war that more than half of the American population disagreed with as many politicians shunned the voices of protesters. They did this as their wallets grew lined with green and hundreds of America's own died every day upon every hour in a foreign land. If the politicians did not listen to dieing voices, then perhaps they would listen to the explosive crumblings of political buildings, but a man was wrong and thrown in prison. He did his time and was freed, though he still had contempt for the ones getting away with real murder as their pockets grew. Instead of doing what he did again he decided to let it go, the war was over now and the only thing left for him to do was educate the young.

40yrs later and we're at war again against terrorists. A man wants to teach not about politics or war, but real solid education that can be used down the road. His voice is silenced once again. This is due to politicians bringing up his name to discredit another as they spread fear into the hearts and minds of they're followers. It goes further beyond as those supporters relabel the man as a terrorist and find him guilty all over again. They voice out violence, hate, and intolerance as they chime together not to allow a free man to speak on an issue that has nothing to due with half a century ago. The man gets sent home packing without being able to say one word in defense.

Later down the road another young youth sees the rational of the actions taken by the mob. Then they see the actions of the single person who's voice was erased before it spoke. They see the answers taken so long ago before of the frustrated youth. History sometimes repeats itself. "

GBRNU1 wrote on October 18, 2008 5:09 am:
" I'm sure there are a few books those of you who agree with the decision to un-invite Ayers would like to see banned too. Guess you all better go through the stacks at Love library and start making your list. That's probably next on the agenda. "

BH wrote on October 18, 2008 5:27 am:
" And what's really sad is Bill Ayres is a buddy of potentially the next President of the United States. In that case, he will probably be the next head of the US Department of Education. "

Re Jobe Castor wrote on October 18, 2008 5:32 am:
" I don't think there are many local liberal radio talk shows that tell democrats to raise hell and demand to stop a man from free speech, and then they're followers turn it around and make threats instead. That's not protesting, that's terrorism. "

Sultrydayinne wrote on October 18, 2008 5:39 am:
" Let's rename the university to University of Nebraska Foundation since UNL is too cowardly to allow Mr. Ayers speak. By the time he would of given his talk we would of said William Ayers who? Conservatives win again in Nebraska. Put the muffle on what is left of free speech. "

Bob Ryan wrote on October 18, 2008 6:00 am:
" WOW!, so the next time we want to invite someone we need to be certain that person has never said or done anything that carries the least trace of controversy.Let's put our robots in their seats and give them a good dose of generic, vanilla, conservatism. I mistakenly thought that this was exactly the kind of thing that made for a great education. I was wrong/ At least I was wrong in terms of UNL. OOPs gotta run the football game is almost on......Shame on us "

ethylhusker wrote on October 18, 2008 6:00 am:
" Can we now please ban Rush Limbaugh and Clarence Thomas from attending Nebraska football games too? They've done far more to hurt tis country... "

tom issaquah wrote on October 18, 2008 6:10 am:
" I would like to know the age of most of the responders to this article. As one that was around when Bill Ayers and his wife were on the run and bombing I remember the feeling in the country of terror not knowing when this man and his group were going to bomb next. Kind of like the feeling we all had when Charles Starkweather was on his killing spree. I would imagine that most of the posts here that don't put any credence in the past have never been scared to move about the community for fear of running into a person like this. It is important to not forget that this man was clearly a fugitive and when the FBI raided an Weather underground apartment his fingerprints were all over the bomb making ingredients and bomb making brochures etc. We all need to do our due diligence when deciding who to affiliate ourselves with and realize there are consequences when we decide to align ourselves with terrorist and people that want to kill Americans. The decision to cancel this event is a good one that will prevent a lot of problems for the community due to security and just a lot of bad undeserved press for Lincoln. "

MJ wrote on October 18, 2008 6:34 am:
" What are all these people afraid of? This could have been an incredible learning opportunity for the students and citizens of the state. What's next, the Board of Regents going throgh the stacks in the library and removing controversial books? What cowardice and intolerance. "

karwied wrote on October 18, 2008 6:36 am:
" This is so funny! The other day the LJS had around 300 posters crying that they didn't want Bill Ayers anywhere near the UNL campus. Now, look at all the posters who are again crying "foul". You can't have it both ways, people. Bill Ayers was a terrorist, IS a terrorist and will always be a terrorist. He received the person of the year award from CHICAGO!!!
It wasn't a Nobel peace prize for goodness sake. If people want to hear what he has to say, buy his books and read them. For goodness sakes, what a bunch of whiney babies! "

Cole wrote on October 18, 2008 6:57 am:
" Cancelled because of threats...
Who are the terrorists now? "

Bill wrote on October 18, 2008 7:18 am:
" Unbelievable......Heineman consorts with known communist rebel regimes, all in the name of selling Nebraska corn and beans, if Ayers was such a threat I'm sure the FBI could have fabricated some charges to lock him up. The University gave into public pressure, something it should never do. "

tony wrote on October 18, 2008 7:18 am:
" So all you liberals saying free speech is being "killed," what do you think you are attempting to do with your negative response to the postings here and calls made to the UNL offices? Does free speech only ride on a one-way liberal street in your minds? "

Randy wrote on October 18, 2008 7:26 am:
" Freedom of speech means you can say what you want and not be jailed for saying it. It doesn't mean we have to listen to you. Freedom of speech means I also am free to give to who I want to and not give to who I don't want to. People who said they were no longer giving were expressing their freedom of speech, with money. If you feel so strongly that Ayers should have been allowed to speak, then put up YOUR money and have him speak somewhere so you can listen to him.

People say he didn't kill anyone in his bombings. A young mother and her child left the bathroom in the Capital 20 seconds before the bomb went off. Had the young mother and her child been in the bathroom for another 20 seconds, they would have killed. The only reason Ayers did not kill anyone was pure dumb luck. "

critically thinking wrote on October 18, 2008 7:28 am:
" UNL a, supposedly educational entity do not critically think and let fear base their thinking. Be afraid, we no longer live in a democracy. The only country better at propaganda was USSR.

PANSIES "

CarolT wrote on October 18, 2008 7:31 am:
" I am ashamed of the state of Nebraska, that ridiculous governor, and UNL for cancelling a speech ON EDUCATION by a distinguished professor OF EDUCATION. Nebraska is once again the laughing stock of the nation. CAROLT "

Gerard Harbison wrote on October 18, 2008 7:46 am:
" I'm sure of the thousands of people who emailed various administrators to protest this invitation, there were a couple of drooling idiots who stupidly threatened violence. There was a lot of anger out there. I doubt there was a credible threat, one that couldn't have been dealt with comparatively easily. The real reason this was cancelled was of course $$$.

The mystery to me is how he ever got invited in the first place. Even if one were unfamiliar with the history of the Weather Underground, Ayers has had a Wikipedia page for over three years. He's withdrawn from previous events because of his past, long before he became an issue in the presidential campaign. For heaven's sake, when you think about inviting a keynote speaker, don't you google him? Did Teachers' College really think this would fly under the radar? "

hl wrote on October 18, 2008 7:57 am:
" hey jeff, theres no such thing as a "washed up" terrorist. this man is a radical and normal people with normal thinking dont want this person here. period. so to blame right wingers is out of bounds. try blaming it on normal people with comman sense. ayers is a terrorist who should be in prison. and to the brilliant one calling unl "cowardly", maybe you should think what terrorism is. defined as "cowardly acts of aggression to prove a radical point most normal people disagree with". put that in websters. the only cowards in this are ayers himself and anyone who wants to hear this man. "

larry wrote on October 18, 2008 8:02 am:
" This is a no-brainer and Heineman and Perlman deserve praise for not bringing a terrorist on campus. Other qualified experts can give a peaceful and thoughtful address. "

RussianMike wrote on October 18, 2008 8:03 am:
" I seem to recall Lincoln was able to allow - and properly police - a KKK rally a few years back. I'm glad we Nebraskans hand-select which terrorists have the right to free speech and which do not.

UNL can do what it wants, but allowing angry donors and an angry public to influence their decisions so strongly is unfortunate. I would prefer they kept their students in mind.

And the irony of folks making violent threats against the University to protest the inviting of a "terrorist" would be laughable, if it weren't also frightening, disgusting, and depressing. "

mark wrote on October 18, 2008 8:12 am:
" 'the swift decision to cancel Ayers may hurt UNL’s reputation within the scholarly community, one faculty member said.'
With SOME academics, and boost our reputation with other academics. All academics don't think alike.
And the greatest current danger Professor Ayers presents is his paternalistic, bigoted world view. "

UNL Alum wrote on October 18, 2008 8:14 am:
" I WAS LOOKING AT THE UNL POLICE WEB SITE AND I DID NOT SEE ANY REPORTS TAKEN ABOUT THREATENING EMAILS OR PHONE CALLS. UNLPD WOULD BE THE ONE TO INVESTIGATE. INTERESTING.
NOW THAT THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY IN NEBRASKA SHOULD WE JUST GO IN ORDER AND ELIMINATE THE SECOND AMENDMENT NEXT? "

bg wrote on October 18, 2008 8:48 am:
" This deeply embarrassing day for the University of Nebraska. Whether you hate Bill Ayers or support him, the University exists as a forum where a variety of ideas are to be considered. One avoids parochialism and chauvinism by, at the very least, listening to people outside of one's typical environs. The University of Nebraska, my alma mater, has shown itself to be a cowardly, second rate, institution. "

Alix Gibson wrote on October 18, 2008 8:58 am:
" No need for this over-hyped ex-hippie, lucky-he-wasn't-jailed professor to speak at UNL. Though obviously the motives were political and money centered the choice to cancel him was correct. I have not seen anywhere that he rennounced his past actions. I'm sure an equal, if not better speaker can be found. Though McCain politics won locally and rightly kept him away, nationally linking this goof to Obama has not worked. "

In a related story... wrote on October 18, 2008 9:00 am:
" UNL officials are trying to get in touch with Osama bin Laden, a world class leader who's politics are very similar to Mr. Ayers. This guy should be in prison if he hadn't gotten off on a technicality. Terrorism is terrorism, folks. "

Al wrote on October 18, 2008 9:16 am:
" From what I've read on these comments here, I've concluded that UNL is damned if it does and damned if it doesn't. Think about it. "

unl 2005 wrote on October 18, 2008 9:24 am:
" Regardless of his past, if Ayers expertise was in defending the spread offense rather than education he would be welcome at UNL. Sad priorities for the premier educational institution in the state. "

TT wrote on October 18, 2008 9:26 am:
" This goes further than free speech or whether universities are right of left wing. It goes to something called academic freedom. The freedom to study ideas whether they be popular or unpopular. The neo-conservative agenda is about shaping ideas on patriotism, the economy and morality. They have successfully bankrupted the universities so that these institutions have to rely on private funds. These private funds come with strings attached which handcuff the faculty. We are not better off here folks because someday a speaker YOU want will be canceled and his or her ideas will not be shared. Nebraska is not backward, it is just in the hands, politically and financially, of people who do not respect academic rights and freedoms. Now that is un-American! "

Free Speech wrote on October 18, 2008 9:30 am:
" It tickles me I was able to exercise MY right to free speech! I understand the value of inviting in different thoughts and ideas. I'm university educated. But I didn't want the unrepentant radical here. It was unnecessary. Go read something he's written if you're thirsty for his knowledge. I used my free speech rights to say I'd be curtailing my generous donations to the U. were Ayers to speak. Free speech for everyone! And yes, people, money DOES talk. Welcome to the opportunities of America! "

Good Decision wrote on October 18, 2008 9:32 am:
" I was surprised to read that Ayers had been invited to come to UNL in the first place. While he may have moved on, he was never held accountable for his terroristic actions, thus giving society the option to accept or reject him based on his entire past not just his academic achievements. UNL Regents and others in authority have a responcibility to manintain the integrity of the university, and I for one applaud this decision. "

Smart wrote on October 18, 2008 9:48 am:
" It doesn't take a scholar to know this was a smart move on the University of Nebraska's part. It made me question it's (UNL) intelligence to have even considered having this sick individual speak on campus in the first place. Just as it makes me question Obama's association with Ayers. "

Frank wrote on October 18, 2008 10:15 am:
" What a bunch of "rednecks" there are in the UNL system. I will never recommend the institution to a young adult.

Nothing in Nebraska besides NU football and the people want to keep it that way. "

John Connor wrote on October 18, 2008 10:20 am:
" I don't get it. People are threatening this guy (or the university) with violence or other "security" issues because they are angry that this guy was once violent? That doesn't make any sense.

Wouldn't it better serve the interests of those opposed to him speaking to actually LET him speak so you can assess his message? In actuality, this may be more entertaining and lead to more criticism than not letting him speak at all. After all, his research and policy views are really lacking in any merit. It would allow people to attack the message.

Anyway, I just think the hypocrites who are threatening with violence or with removing donations should really step back and realize that this is a university, not a therapist. You want your university to consider your feelings, then get ready for research productivity to tank. You want your university to compete with other universities in the nation? Then educate yourself. Everyone knows Ayers is an idiot; that is WHY he should be allowed to speak. It gives more fodder. At least people can go to church on Sunday knowing that their threats of violence kept the boogie man away. It's what Jesus would have done. Pathetic. "

Proud wrote on October 18, 2008 10:20 am:
" This country was founded by men who over through the government. They did not believe that the current government represented the people "

Sitting uncomfortably wrote on October 18, 2008 10:26 am:
" It's a major embarrassment to the State to see so many people and the university get their panties in a massive collective bunch. If there was doubt that we are a academic Hick State before, we stepped up and proved it solidly. "

Open MindNot Wanted wrote on October 18, 2008 10:46 am:
" This is a scary statement one and all: he’s a terrorist and once a nut case always a nut case, Who is the nut case here. Do you have a degree in some psychiatric field to analyze people. Perhaps you should start with yourself one would think.


You know not knowing anything about what is going on in this article nor what the proposed speaker has or allegedly has done what makes me shake my head is the comments of hate and bigotry that actually perhaps border on some kind of potential psychiatric problems that some of the commenters are making. If those opposed to this speaker are taken at face value in print then they are hateful close-minded own believe pushing people that are perfect models for the "conservative party" of today. The conservative party basically means close-minded and free to push their views or lies at anyone with fear. Logic, reality, and truth do not win when you push fear. Luckily those who cave into this fear are the same carbon copies of the hate speakers. You all can get together and pat each other on the backs. No wonder the KKK had a presense here in this state. "

disgusted wrote on October 18, 2008 11:08 am:
" So much for free speech. Glad we could finally get that Amendment off the table. Oh, and so much for "higher" education-- UNL is showing what it really represents: athletic-supporting donors and redneck mentality. Ayers is probably happy to have to stay at his far more prestigious university than be exposed to what Nebraska tries to pass off as a learning institution. "

thankful wrote on October 18, 2008 11:09 am:
" All of you who are commenting crtically about UNL and the "hick" state of NE, I wonder if you have ever lived or studied anywhere else? Having lived and studied in other states and countries, I chose to come back to NE and UNL. Maybe you should choose to leave! I've been to socialist countries, I've been held at gunpoint by terrorists and I'm thankful the choice made to cancel Ayers speech at this time! "

Moshman is a Joke wrote on October 18, 2008 11:30 am:
" Moshman will cry about this all he wants, Just don't open your mouth and anything he does not agree with in his class. "

Doug Corey wrote on October 18, 2008 11:34 am:
" Once again Nebraskans are showing their ingorance - congratulations! "

j83 wrote on October 18, 2008 12:30 pm:
" This is stupid. Ayers is now a well respected professor who has changed since his radical days. This was the 1960s and 1970s, a completely different time. I;m sure there are a lot of people who did some terrible things back then, be it drugs or racism or whatever.

UNL is a cowardly institution and the people of Nebraska are cowards to not allow this man to speak. He just wants to speak, can't you listen first before you judge?

You want to talk about terrorism, how about those neanderthals who go to such lengths to drive away free speech. Who are the real terrorists now? "

Jon wrote on October 18, 2008 12:38 pm:
" All you people upset about the cancellation and crying 'what about free speech' need to understand one thing. Free speech works both ways!! He has the right to be invited here to speak freely, and those of us who disagree have the right to protest and speak freely about our disapproval of him doing so. That doesn't make us ignorant or stupid, it makes us 'free speakers' just like Mr. Ayers. That is what makes free speech so great. Cry free speech all you want but I look at this situation as one in which free speech worked. Oh yea, and the money talked a little as well ;) "

ht wrote on October 18, 2008 12:43 pm:
" The man is a respected researcher and practitioner in the education field. He wasn't coming to UNL with a political agenda, but rather to speak on education theory (a field he is an expert in). It is too bad that UNL let the conservative right make this decision for them by threatening to withhold money.

I am a grad student in the Teacher's college, and I was looking forward to his talk. I guess academic freedom really doesn't exist at UNL. The individuals who would benefit most from his talk (the education students) would probably argue that he should come and speak... but I guess the students don't really matter at UNL. All we do is pay tuition and keep the door open. Remember, if it weren't for the students, there would be no UNL.

I am disappointed in the Teacher's College for caving, in the chancellor for being more worried about money than academic freedom, and the president for caving to regent pressure. You are all a sad bunch! "

dave wrote on October 18, 2008 12:48 pm:
" This is not a question of free speech anymore than carry a rifle to the top of the tower is the freedom to bear arms. If Mr. Ayers wants to come to UNL and speak in front of the Union, then more power to him. If he wants to hand out flyers in front of the stadium, have at it. If he wants to write an op ed piece for the LJS then go ahead. That is free speech. However UNL inviting him to key note the 100 anniversary is not free speech, that is stupidity. "We are each others keepers: Reasearch to change the world". That is a speech he should give in front of the union on his own free accord, I might even go and listen. "

Chaz wrote on October 18, 2008 1:04 pm:
" Keep in mind that UNL, the College of Education and Human Sciences, Dean Kostelnik and demigod professor David Moshman all think inviting a convicted, unrepentant domestic terrorist to speak--at TAXPAYER EXPENSE--was a great idea. Such is the shroud called "academic freedom".

I am a Ph.D. student in the CEHS and assure the public that the CEHS faculty back this worldview in near unanimity.

The "free speech" of which Moshman bloviates ONLY applies to those who hold this uber-liberal point of view. I would be summarily railroaded out of the program were I to challenge his viewpoint at UNL.

Just try getting a Ph.D. advisor in CEHS if you are known to be conservative. "

bonnie bachman wrote on October 18, 2008 1:06 pm:
" Great move! One less lousy marxist in Lincoln. "

Tom wrote on October 18, 2008 1:06 pm:
" If we cave like this in this country, can we blame moderate people in Arab countries for closeting themselves when the extremists there call for thought different from theirs to be banned? The Terrorists win again as the freedom to exchange ideas, right or wrong, withers. This is a University not some backward parochial school where approved thoughts are allowed, or is it? "

ad hominem wrote on October 18, 2008 1:31 pm:
" "what you are saying is invalid because i don't like you personally."

LOGICAL FALLACY - thanks UNL for promoting intellectual discourse! "

happygael wrote on October 18, 2008 1:34 pm:
" Cancellation was the only decision Nebraska school officials could have made. I miight also add that I do not believe ay threats were made against his life unless they were made by the left as a cover and to spread some kind of guilt on the peole who opposed the Ayer';as appearance on the campus. You can bet he would be seen around town and been interviewed by the local media to gain more publicity for his peculiar brand of liberalism. "

An Idea of Grand Proportion wrote on October 18, 2008 1:40 pm:
" Instead of complaining about it lets invite him to speak in another venue. surely one of our more liberal thinking institutions of higher learning will invite him, or someone reading these comments has the knowledge of how to collect money to have him travel here. I for one would pony up a few bucks to have the man come and share his experiences. "

Reason wrote on October 18, 2008 2:05 pm:
" The narrow minded, unthinking, mob mentality that has taken hold among conservatives is truly frightening. Fascism here we come. "

UNL Alum wrote on October 18, 2008 2:17 pm:
" I am personally offended that the people of this state would limit the rights of the future leaders that attend UNL. Our children should be given the right of educational freedom and allowed the opportunity to learn and grow. This was an excellent opportunity for the students at UNL to excercise their freedoms and become more well rounded by experiencing something outside of their comfort zones. Cut the apron strings and let the kids learn. I don't want our future leaders being closeminded jerks! "

HF wrote on October 18, 2008 2:28 pm:
" Invitation indicates total lack of commmon sense in the first place "

Kim M wrote on October 18, 2008 2:36 pm:
" This wasn't about Security - This was totally about $$$$$$$$.
From the start this was a bad idea. The University took no action until all of us started calling and telling them we would withhold our donations unless the invitation to speak was recinded.
I am happy with the decision, however I am not happy that we have Deans at our University that still think that this was a good thing for us. I guess it is PC today to support a terrorist-just look at Obamas advisors and "friends" "

Matt P. wrote on October 18, 2008 2:38 pm:
" Ok. First, STOP with the "freedom of speech" rhetoric! UNL stopping this guy from talking absolutely is NOT an issue of freedom of speech. You do NOT have a constitutional right to be invited to a university to deliver a speech. No one is infringing on his rights. The university can choose who it wants to speak and is free to cancel that invitation if it sees fit. My god! Please understand the 1st amendment before you go spouting of this ridiculous rhetoric. Ayers could still come and protest at the university if he wanted. He is simply being denied this specific forum - a keynote address.

Trying to demonize UNL on the basis of 1st amendment infringement is absurd beyond belief! "

jga wrote on October 18, 2008 2:40 pm:
" Whatever happened to 'free speech,' especially in a university setting? Ayers' views on education have nothing to do with 'radicalism' or 'terrorism'! His ideas for education reform are worth a hearing. Everyone knows that education needs reform. Ayers spoke at the University of North Dakota. Is North Dakota more open to ideas than Nebraska? "

Ray Collins wrote on October 18, 2008 2:41 pm:
" I guess this just goes to show you the folks at UNL have no spine. Bill Ayers is a respected professor at the University of Chicago. We are talking 40 years ago. If Ayers was such a problem, then why would folks continue to give to U of C. The last time I checked they had an endowment in excess of $6 billion and University of Nebraska system was at 1.2b. Some of you pinheads will say that U of C is just a big city liberal school. That same pinhead will still be the one who says Obama is a Muslim. Glad I left Nebraska 20 years ago. "

me again wrote on October 18, 2008 2:47 pm:
" Are you people kidding me?? This has absolutely NOTHING to do with free speech. It also has NOTHING to do with "right wing conservatism" stifling academic freedom.

This is guy is an admitted terrorist who killed innocent Americans. He admitted to this - its not up for debate - he, in his own words, said he was "guilty as hell."

This isn't some ultra liberal figure that is coming and being denied access. This is a guy that bombed government buildings and admits to doing so. UNL has a number of very liberal figures come speak at the university on a regular basis. Furthermore, many of the faculty are ultra liberal. This is NOT political. This also has nothing to do with "listening to different view points" or about Nebraskans being "closed minded." NU brings in controversial figures all the time! It has nothing to do with the content of his talk.

This is common decency!!

The guy is a self admitted murderer...why should the University give him a forum?? If you can't understand that then maybe YOU are the one with the "closed mind!" "

alum wrote on October 18, 2008 3:16 pm:
" Wonder just what Mr. Ayers was going to talk about, wikepedia describes the result of years and millions spent on his progect as follows....The results of an August 2003 final technical report of the Chicago Annenberg Research Project by the Consortium on Chicago School Research "suggest that among the schools it supported, the Challenge had little impact on school improvement and student outcomes, with no statistically significant differences between Annenberg and non-Annenberg schools in rates of achievement gain, classroom behavior, student self-efficacy, and social competence." "

doubtful wrote on October 18, 2008 3:28 pm:
" I doubt there were actual physical threats. I would not put it past the university to fabaricate the threats to deflect attention from their stupidity. The only real threats were to the university's bottom line. "

Wallis Harsch wrote on October 18, 2008 3:32 pm:
" Does anyone in Nebraska have a spine? Where are the attorneys, the students, the faculty, the media? This is an enormous embarrassment, and I am no longer proud to say I am from Nebraska. What do they want to do next -- resurrect McCarthy? "

Censored wrote on October 18, 2008 3:35 pm:
" Maybe you should choose to leave....

This is the reason the USA is looking bad these days. Perhaps this should be the "Thankful States of America"or perhaps the "United States of Thankful" for this so patriotic individual because what he/she wants is a land ful of people who love to push their views. Perhaps he wants those who disagree with him eliminated. Guess what eventually it may be just you and your ideas-would that not be fine. You of course are THE person who knows everything and is Right. Yes I have lived in 7 states and this is a hick close minded state but there is more states out there for YOU.. perhaps you should form the United People The Most Patriotic Ever States of America and make you the leader/dictator forever! "

BH wrote on October 18, 2008 3:36 pm:
" I can just imagine the "Squawk" that would be made if Ann Coulter would be invited to speak. Of course, she would NEVER be invited by the faculty. But we could sure see a "flip-flop" in the responses in the LJS. "

boo hoo wrote on October 18, 2008 3:37 pm:
" Stop whining about free speech. If it were Palin or Cheney invited to speak (fat chance) the liberals would burn the campus down. Ayres is still free to speak his mind, but doesn't deserve a huge soapbox paid for with our tax dollars. "

whoa wrote on October 18, 2008 3:38 pm:
" If ninety five percent of the people who responded to this article would do the least bit of research, they would find that Ayers involvement in the Chicago public schools has been a disaster. They are at the bottom of the nation as far as academic success, of which he has been a "leader" in getting them to that point. "

JB wrote on October 18, 2008 3:46 pm:
" Censorship! Who want to see a boring conservative speak? Where are the back bones. To many people listening to right wing reactionary talk radio. "

American wrote on October 18, 2008 4:14 pm:
" Censorship at it's worst! "

Freedom of Speech wrote on October 18, 2008 4:18 pm:
" (Censored) like I said, (Censored), and furthermore (Censored)......


(Censored) Nebraska (Censored) Hicks are their own worst (Censored), enemy "

A. Morissette wrote on October 18, 2008 4:19 pm:
" I was going to point out the irony in threatening a former domestic terrorist with acts of violence, but I see that it's already been done. For their next act, citizens of the Cornhusker State will send their electoral votes to the candidate that wants to get rid of ethanol subsidies. Nebraska: Welcome to cognitive dissonance country! "

JC wrote on October 18, 2008 4:20 pm:
" Since private funds were being used for his appearance, or so they say, let the organizers locate a private venue for his speech. They can then open it to anyone who wants to listen to this individual without directly involving the university. "

Ashamed alum wrote on October 18, 2008 4:20 pm:
" I never thought I'd catch myself saying this, but today I am ASHAMED to be counted among University of Nebraska alumni. Is this the level to which a higher learning institution will stoop? I don't buy this safety concerns BS for one second. The University is just run by a bunch of cowards that are too wussy to go ahead and have Ayers speak when the rednecks of the state are whining about it. Disgusting. "

Open Mind wrote on October 18, 2008 4:21 pm:
" If it weren't 2008, this bunch might be burning "witches" at the stake! "

3-Time Alumni Mom wrote on October 18, 2008 4:29 pm:
" Accolades, accolades, accolades to UNL for their decision to cancel Wm Ayers' speaking engagement. He was the Bin Laden of his time and should not be heralded as a worthy lecturer for our students. By all rights he should be speaking to others but only from his jail cell. Keep up the good work UNL. "

NY for Nebraska wrote on October 18, 2008 4:35 pm:
" I am very curious. Does everyone who made a post here really understand the background and history on Mr. Ayers? Simply put, he was on the FBI's Most Wanted list. This is major stuff. He was set free on a technicality. Please try to understand the issues before babbling about freedom of speech and dogging the University of Nebraska which is a respected University. Go on look up Ayers on Google. Then resbumit your post in support of this decision. Thanks. Go Big Red!!! "

HB wrote on October 18, 2008 4:58 pm:
" Suddenly UNL becomes self righteous and censures free expression. This is the same university who used Tommy Lee to nationally promote the school. A woman abuser, drug addict and proclaimed womanizer. This is why I will not send any of my three children to UNL even if it means I will pay out of state tuition.

Let the donors keep their biased contributions and the university can sink lower in the academic standing of the country and world. "

disappointed wrote on October 18, 2008 5:00 pm:
" it's amazing to me to see how this decision has brought out such angry reactions, by people on both sides of the issue. whether it was the "right" decision or the "wrong" decision, those who look at our state as a bunch of hick farmers without intelligence are going to have their opinions affirmed by the comments here, as well as those who look at our state as being a bunch of conservative, close minded sheep. My opinion is that, if there truly were threats on Mr Ayers, it's better that this didn't happen, both for his safety and for the integrity of our community. That doesn't mean I think it was a bad idea or a good idea for him to come here. It's not political. It's about being a respectful and proud Nebraskan. If he could have come here without having his safety threatened, those who are against it could still speak up, and those who are for it could still speak up. When violence becomes the issue, there's nothing wrong with being prudent. Apparently unlike most of the people who have made these comments, I cannot read minds, so I actually don't know the reasoning behind the cancellation. I will choose to go forward, whether I believe it was right or wrong. I'm so disappointed that this is the way people have chosen to speak their voices. And regardless of your opinion on the politics, if you want to have a say, do it so it makes a difference and VOTE! "

alum wrote on October 18, 2008 5:00 pm:
" NY for NE is correct, seems many of you are not very familiar with Mr. Ayers past or his present activities. Mr Ayers admitted his involvement in terrorist acitvities, escaped conviction and prison sentence because of a technicality. As recently as 9/11 of 2001 Mr Ayers spoke of his "wish that they had done
more". Recently featured on a magazine cover trampling the American flag.
I wonder just what Mr Ayers was planning to speak about? Much research has shown that millions of dollars and years of effort have not been very successful in the Chicago inner city schools and neighborhoods.Drop out rates have risen and the crime rate is out of control, all happening byw under liberal government control. So was he going to mention the failure of socialism in Chicago? check out wikipedia for results of Annenberg Challenge in Chicago. "

CS wrote on October 18, 2008 5:33 pm:
" Lots of people were on the most wanted list in the 60s and 70s. A recent speaker at UNL, Angela Davis, was on the list and there wasn't any hue and cry about that. She also was acquitted on a technicality. Never mind that Ayer's group never killed anyone and sent warnings before their bombings.We wouldn't want facts to get in the way of a good ignorant rant. This was all found on Google, by the way. It just takes more than 10 seconds to sift through the top 20 hits of republican BS to find anything useful and vaguely informative and not biased. "

Dennis wrote on October 18, 2008 5:39 pm:
" Years ago, come to think of it about the same time Mr. Ayers was making some choices, I had sworn to defend and protect the Constitution of this country, and one of the most fundamental freedoms is the freedom of speech. So, my efforts and all those who have served is for not if Mr. Ayers is made to give up his right to speak. You all need to give some serious thought to what has transpired here. Who will be next?

The acts of the destruction of property and life is all a matter of ones point of view. There are Vietnamese who to this day would see little difference between what I did in their country and what Mr. Ayers did here. Apparently we are not a very forgiving people.

If we can forgive the country of Vietnam who killed over 58,000 US troops enough to allow them to make cheap stuff for us, and we can't forgive Williams Ayers. What does that make us? "

Thank you Dennis wrote on October 18, 2008 6:52 pm:
" Thanks to Dennis for risking your life, and for pointing out that many have died so that our country could remain free. My best friend died in Viet Nam. We keep giving away our freedoms, one at a time. I am ashamed of the university, the regents, and the donors. Upfront it should be known that the Freedom of Speech is more important than the speaker. He can't be too dangerous or he wouldn't be on the faculty at the University of Illinois. I would not have chosen him and have doubts that I'd agree with his ideas, but I have no fear of listening to him. It's a dangerous slippery slope. So now we must all fear the donors and the true terrorists (those who would take away our freedom of speech) and consider who it is that students are allowed to hear speak. I, too, believe our universities are obscessed with irrational liberal philosophies, but a TRUE CONSERVATIVE is one who would protect our core Constitutional values. "

Sigh wrote on October 18, 2008 6:59 pm:
" "He was the Bin Laden of his time"

What a bold and mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. "

You are kidding wrote on October 18, 2008 7:44 pm:
" You all need to read the First Amendment! This is NOT a freedom of speech issue. How many of you have had the right serve as a key not speaker?? He was invited to speak...it was NOT his "right" to speak at the event!!

Furthermore, the guy has admitted to "murder" and is even cavalier when admitting to it!

This has nothing to do with conservatives quashing liberal content either!! UNL regularly brings in all sorts of very very liberal speakers. This simply has to do with a university NOT wanting to give a murderer - who brags about getting away with it - a public forum!

Would you be as equally outraged if a self admitted KKK member, who had murdered blacks in the south during the civil rights movement, was "uninvited." I think not!

You who are claiming that this is politically motivated are the ones with your head in the sand. Not every single issue is made because of politics...sometimes its just the right move!

I am a democrat and will be voting for Obama, but I fully support UNL's decision to cancel the speech from the murdering coward. This is not about "conservative Nebraska"...this is about rationally based decision making! "

CS wrote on October 18, 2008 8:10 pm:
" More half and non truths from the conservative hit parade. He can't admit to murders that were never committed, now can he? Those of us that supported his speaking have only laid out facts, and facts that he has said himself that he does not deny, nor feel sorry for. He was a product of the time. Should we force Nelson Mandela to apologize for blowing up radio towers on South Africa? He was a terrorist too, and served 20 years in prison in a ghetto for it, yet is revered now as a human rights activist. Ayer's was doing nothing different than many others were doing at the time, many of whom have reformed as well, many of whom you would never even know about. Ayer's wasn't tried because the government broke the law to obtain evidence, not that that would bother many of you of the '24' watching crowd. You can't be tried twice for the same crime. That is why he is free now. Them's the breaks-and the same system works for all of you as well. Welcome to America. "

Tod wrote on October 18, 2008 9:12 pm:
" I don't know why David Moshman sounds so discouraged. Now he has a chance to invite a child molester, another murderer, or some other citizen he holds in high regard to speak instead. There's a real example of humanity at its finest. There has never been any question of Ayre's guilt, so I truly cannot understand why UNL's academics believe such a person to speak on campus. Maybe Charles Manson is next on the list of invitees? "

roadtripper wrote on October 18, 2008 9:35 pm:
" How ironic.

Ayres' gang terrorist thugs threatened, harrassed and killed people.I wonder how he feels being on the potential receiving end of virulent behavior.

And a further irony: In a magazine interview, Ayres mocked this country when he gloated about being "free as a bird" after commiting terrorist acts. Now, he is being protected by that same country. Only in America... "

Dave wrote on October 19, 2008 12:06 am:
" Moshman's "infringement on academic freedom" comment is so typical of the ivory tower pedant. Moshman goes on to say the decision to cancel Ayer's speech is a "dangerous precedent." Yeah, right! Tell me: does this happen often at UNL? Do we often invite unrepentant terrorists to give speeches here? Lets try to learn from this experience people. That way, a few years from now, when UNL invites bin Laden to speak, we don't have to go through this again. "

UNL Jim wrote on October 19, 2008 3:32 am:
" Academic freedom is not well. The University is caving to the will of conservative wealthy alumni who are threatening to pull funding, and random email threats of violence from mentally unstable people. This is a sad state of affairs for American academia. Add another point on the "Shift to Fascism" scoreboard. "

buddyboy wrote on October 19, 2008 8:28 am:
" Not wanting to spark controversy and avoid media circus by who UNL invites? Tommy Lee and Larry the Cable Guy..now that is first rate academia paid for by us. "

Buddyboy wrote on October 19, 2008 9:34 am:
" Tommy Lee and Larry the Cable or Bill Ayers? Which best represents a world class academia? I guess the only bombs Larry and Tommy laid were bad movies and bad music... "

HPG wrote on October 19, 2008 3:55 pm:
" Even if I was going to donate to Nebraska I wouldn't for the plain and simple fact that they merely entertained the thought of brining Ayers here!
Good decision that should never have been needed to be reached. "

mccrea wrote on October 19, 2008 6:52 pm:
" First of all, if Ayers was not a respected professor regardless of his ignorance in his younger days, he would not have been invited to speak at this college in the beginning. I am sick and tired of hearing the words unrepentant from people. Maybe he has repented to God who is the only person that you can actually repent to. "

CS wrote on October 19, 2008 9:17 pm:
" Angela Davis was in Lincoln in September and was sponsored by a campus organization-all contact regarding the visit went to a UNL email address. She was on the FBI's most wanted list as well and was not a problem, so what troubles me is that UNL donors didn't even know she was here. It wasn't until Ayers was discussed in concert with Obama that suddenly it was an issue-he was invited last spring. That pretty much shows that if it didn't happen on Fox or Rush that it didn't happen at all. "

David2 wrote on October 19, 2008 9:27 pm:
" those of you lamenting the lack of "free speech"...are you suggesting we should bring Iran's "Ineedadinnerjacket" to UNL so he can tell the students what a horrible place the USA is? You can certainly entertain different opinions without bringing in terrorists and known enemies to this country. "

unl student wrote on October 21, 2008 8:03 pm:
" Thank you, Nebraskans--who can still stand up against terrorists! This university has values and patriotism; we don't support people who hate our country! "