UNL cancels William Ayers speech
BY MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star
Following widespread public furor over its invitation to ’60s and ’70s radical William Ayers to speak at a conference next month, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln late Friday canceled the speech for security reasons.
“The university’s threat assessment group monitored e-mails and other information UNL received regarding Ayers’ scheduled Nov. 15 visit, and identified safety concerns which resulted in the university canceling the event,” read a four-paragraph statement issued by UNL.
UNL refused to provide specifics on the threats, but Board of Regents Chairman Chuck Hassebrook of Lyons said law enforcement officers had expressed concerns about the potential for violence during Ayers’ speech.
Related Link(s):
With those concerns in mind, Hassebrook said, “I think it’s the best outcome.”
UNL’s invitation to Ayers — a founder of Weather Underground, the group that claimed responsibility for the bombings of public buildings in protest of the Vietnam War — represented poor judgment from the start, Hassebrook said.
“My concern has been not with what he was going to say about education. It was that he’s an unrepentant terrorist,” he said. “(UNL) did the right thing.”
In a statement, NU President J.B. Milliken said: "I understand why many Nebraskans were upset by the proposed Ayers lecture. But notwithstanding many calls for the Board of Regents or the president to cancel it, I believe strongly that such an action would have been inappropriate.
"While the immediate controversy over Ayers' scheduled appearance may be over, the importance of recognizing that a university is a place for the open exchange of ideas, free of outside political or popular pressure, remains."
Ayers, a distinguished education professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, had been scheduled to deliver the keynote address at the College of Education and Human Sciences student research conference.
The conference is part of a two-day celebration honoring the college’s 100th anniversary. Ayers’ address was to have been called “We Are Each Other’s Keepers: Research to Change the World.”
A faculty committee selected Ayers last spring, believing he could share valuable insight on topics like social justice and urban educational reform, Marjorie Kostelnik, the education college’s dean, has said.
But since then, Ayers’ connections to Sen. Barack Obama — the two served on a Chicago board together years ago — have emerged as a focus in the presidential race, making his name much more widely known.
So when news of Ayers’ planned appearance at UNL broke Thursday, the public reaction was swifter — and angrier — than UNL originally anticipated.
Phone calls and e-mails flooded the offices of NU President J.B. Milliken, UNL Chancellor Harvey Perlman, Kostelnik and the NU Foundation.
Some donors threatened to withhold financial support to the university unless Ayers was disinvited. One such donor: the Gilbert M. and Martha H. Hitchcock Foundation in Omaha, which has provided millions to NU in the past 40 years.
And statements from political leaders urging UNL to rethink its decision poured in.
“This is an embarrassment to the University of Nebraska and the State of Nebraska,” Gov. Dave Heineman said. “Bill Ayers is a well-known radical who should never have been invited to the University of Nebraska.”
Rep. Lee Terry, a Republican, and Sen. Ben Nelson, a Democrat, also issued statements condemning Ayers’ selection.
State Auditor Mike Foley also expressed concern, saying early Friday he’d sent Kostelnik a records request seeking details on the funding of the student research conference. Kostelnik had said Ayers’ appearance was to be privately funded.
Regents and Milliken had agreed the selection was bad judgment.
But regents also said it would have been inappropriate for them to act as censors.
The decision on whether to host Ayers, they said, was rightly left to UNL.
“You don’t want decisions about who can speak made by a group of elected officials,” Hassebrook said.
Even so, the swift decision to cancel Ayers may hurt UNL’s reputation within the scholarly community, one faculty member said.
“It’s a major infringement on academic freedom, unless it turns out that the university had clear evidence of threats to life,” said David Moshman, an educational psychology professor and expert on issues of academic freedom.
“If it’s not as serious as that, I think they used that as an excuse to make a political judgment.”
Moshman said UNL allowed what he termed a “heckler’s veto” — sending a message that those angry about a controversial speaker need only call in threats of violence to get the speaker canceled.
“That’s a dangerous precedent,” he said.
UNL faculty and students, particularly the committee that selected Ayers, now lose an opportunity to hear a professor highly regarded in his field, Moshman said.
“But they may also get a major lesson in academic freedom,” he said. “That may be an unexpected benefit.”
Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Bye Bye Ayers "
He can go give another speech to the socialists in Venezuela. "
This was just another example of how liberal the professors at major universities have become, and how the tide needs to turn to save this country of ours, and the children that are sent to these schools. "
What expertise are we talking about?? Did anyone bother to research how much money Ayers and the foundation he was part of poured into the city of Chicago's school system, and in the end admitted that there was no significant improvement? Another fine example of "Liberals Gone Wild".
A fine reason to invite a terrorist to speak, who never repented for the actions that he admitted to, and said that he only wished that he could have done more.
Fire the butts that made the decision to invite him to speak in Nebraska...they are showing their true selves. "
Now maybe UNL will get some good publicity instead of looking like a bunch of idiots. "
Small minded and uninformed people caused us to shun someone who might have had something to offer on education. Yea for the dim and oblivious among us! You have spoken and our weak leaders have listened.
It's good to know that the flagship of Nebraska education and my alma mater is so backwards. Kudos to UNL! "
As as graduate myself, I fully honor and encourage the university format as forum for understanding of many viewpoints, it was clear this was a huge mistake. We don't need this clown using NU as a venue for his continued mockery of American traditions and values, in which, Nebraska stands as one of the few remaining bastions. "
trip to UNL. To not allow Ayers to speak on the UNL campus was "the right" decision. Why? Were it not for some bungling by the FBI back when
Ayers was arrested/charged...the creep would still be in a federal prison.
I suggest respectfully, that some of you do some research on Ayers before claiming freedom of speech and all that stuff. And perhaps all you Obama supporters might give a stronger consideration to the 'real' relationship be Obama and Ayers...and both to ACORN. "
So you need not worry that your tax dollars were being used to bring new ideas or diverse opinions to anyone. Heaven forbid! "
And I have to wonder if we'd have seen the same reaction if a right-wing terrorist like G. Gordon Liddy had been invited to speak? "
You want to hear him speak then band together and pay for him to speak somewhere other than a state university.
It's a shame this person is not in jail but he's not and as an American he has the right to say whatever he likes he just doesn't need to say it at UNL. "
Perhaps as a teacher you should educate yourself. Please! "
I believe the invitation was a deliberately provocative act; surely they could have found another Marxist educator who doesn't advocate bombing as a solution.
I'm a two-time alumna of UN-L (although, not the teachers college) and I found the news of Mr. Ayers' visit disturbing, because I question the motives behind his selection, and because I think he's unrepentent about his violent past.
It's interesting that the threat of loss of funding is probably behind the decision to un-invite Mr. Ayers, but the security cover story is at least somewhat believeable. Regardless of the means, the end reached is the best one. "
Barack Obama was 8 yrs old when the Weathermen were active. He's paid his dues to society, it's over and done. He is now a responsible, contributing citizen, etc etc. Sen. Obama met him while serving on a volunteer Board related to education, funded by the renowned Republicans named Annenburg. Isn't there an Annenburg School of Communications, or some such.
McCain/Palin are demonstrating the worst of America and inciting violence. This may be proof. Apparently making terrorist threats? That's against the law. Big bucks Republicans threatening the budget? When money controls the political life of a country is that Fascism? The low information voter, hysterical imbecils, and rabid believers of Fox pap should not be given this power in an alleged democracy. Talk about shredding the very fabric of ... McCain/Palin look in the mirror. Shame, shame, shame. Rejection based on past deeds. Way to go Christians.
Vote for Obama/Biden. The desperate old dude and arm candy ticket are a a world-wide embarrassment. "
I'm disappointed that the "Breastplate Of Righteousness" worn so proudly by weak minded conservatives has reared its ugly head in Nebraska. It is embarrassing to those of us in the state who are intelligent enough to hear various points of view and come to our own conclusions.
I'm going to go hide my books now. "
Ayers, is nothing but a terrorist....and still is, but now working threw the back door to infect our children with his so called expertise.
Thank you for removing him from coming to UNL. To bad he is not in the slam. p.s. and don't give the line that it happened 30+ years ago, I was there . "
He was indicted on charges of conspiracy to bomb police stations and government buildings. The ‘bungling’ by the FBI to which you refer, which prevented his conviction, was illegal wiretaps, break-ins and mail interception. That sounds like a bit more than bungling, rather willfully breaking the law. A bit disappointing coming from law enforcement officers.
Perhaps you can learn more from the article in our own Lincoln Journal Star.
http://journalstar.com/articles/2008/10/17/news/doc48f934971f7ba459358732.txt "
UNL and Nebraska are so easily pushed around by the big donors...disgusting. Heineman has no business in this discussion, he doesn't work for the University, he simply pushes his way around by threatening to take dollars away, and UNL cows down. "
Glamorizing terrorists in the name of academic freedom is nonsense, and the faculty members who don't understand that ought to find other employment.
Keep up the good work, and you will have our support. "
" If the students want to hear him that bad, go to Chicago and listen to him on his own campus. "
Haven't you noticed? That's exactly what students are doing. They're going elsewhere for a better education. Nebraska can't provide access to diverse thought, so they're finding better jobs by attending more diverse campuses. Check the numbers,...young nebraskans are leaving, and this is one of the primary reasons.
My own two nebraskan daughters have left the state, because they said they're just tired of the bigots. One is in Europe, one in Missouri, and both, by the way, are being educated for less money than it costs to attend UNL. "
Voters in California were duped into registering as Republicans by
Young Political Majors, or YPM,, a group hired by the GOP, who
thought they were signing a petition. Elections officials and lawmakers have launched investigations into the activities of YPM staff in Florida and Massachusetts. In Arizona,the firm was recently a defendant in a civil rights lawsuit.Prosecutors in Los Angeles and Ventura counties are
investigating complaints about the company. "
Since Ayers continues his belief system from his youth, as is evidenced by his lack of remorse over his actions and stated feelings for this country, I cannot fathom what he could possibly have to contribute to a society such as ours....unless it is to get us to the society HE would find more conducive to his beliefs. What better way than the education of our young!
Let him share his "wealth of knowledge" by going to any number of other countries who are already at the place he would like to see us...and preferably to take up residence! "
What a joke. No wonder why we spend so much on education and no students are getting what THEY pay for. I guess money is the only educator people need. Why do we have teachers and professors? Obviously money talks.
Better find a new way to go trick or treating this year kids. You're parents are too frightened to open they're doors to even check the weather. "
Ayers went and did what he did 40yrs ago because of a war that more than half of the American population disagreed with as many politicians shunned the voices of protesters. They did this as their wallets grew lined with green and hundreds of America's own died every day upon every hour in a foreign land. If the politicians did not listen to dieing voices, then perhaps they would listen to the explosive crumblings of political buildings, but a man was wrong and thrown in prison. He did his time and was freed, though he still had contempt for the ones getting away with real murder as their pockets grew. Instead of doing what he did again he decided to let it go, the war was over now and the only thing left for him to do was educate the young.
40yrs later and we're at war again against terrorists. A man wants to teach not about politics or war, but real solid education that can be used down the road. His voice is silenced once again. This is due to politicians bringing up his name to discredit another as they spread fear into the hearts and minds of they're followers. It goes further beyond as those supporters relabel the man as a terrorist and find him guilty all over again. They voice out violence, hate, and intolerance as they chime together not to allow a free man to speak on an issue that has nothing to due with half a century ago. The man gets sent home packing without being able to say one word in defense.
Later down the road another young youth sees the rational of the actions taken by the mob. Then they see the actions of the single person who's voice was erased before it spoke. They see the answers taken so long ago before of the frustrated youth. History sometimes repeats itself. "
It wasn't a Nobel peace prize for goodness sake. If people want to hear what he has to say, buy his books and read them. For goodness sakes, what a bunch of whiney babies! "
Who are the terrorists now? "
People say he didn't kill anyone in his bombings. A young mother and her child left the bathroom in the Capital 20 seconds before the bomb went off. Had the young mother and her child been in the bathroom for another 20 seconds, they would have killed. The only reason Ayers did not kill anyone was pure dumb luck. "
PANSIES "
The mystery to me is how he ever got invited in the first place. Even if one were unfamiliar with the history of the Weather Underground, Ayers has had a Wikipedia page for over three years. He's withdrawn from previous events because of his past, long before he became an issue in the presidential campaign. For heaven's sake, when you think about inviting a keynote speaker, don't you google him? Did Teachers' College really think this would fly under the radar? "
UNL can do what it wants, but allowing angry donors and an angry public to influence their decisions so strongly is unfortunate. I would prefer they kept their students in mind.
And the irony of folks making violent threats against the University to protest the inviting of a "terrorist" would be laughable, if it weren't also frightening, disgusting, and depressing. "
With SOME academics, and boost our reputation with other academics. All academics don't think alike.
And the greatest current danger Professor Ayers presents is his paternalistic, bigoted world view. "
NOW THAT THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY IN NEBRASKA SHOULD WE JUST GO IN ORDER AND ELIMINATE THE SECOND AMENDMENT NEXT? "
Nothing in Nebraska besides NU football and the people want to keep it that way. "
Wouldn't it better serve the interests of those opposed to him speaking to actually LET him speak so you can assess his message? In actuality, this may be more entertaining and lead to more criticism than not letting him speak at all. After all, his research and policy views are really lacking in any merit. It would allow people to attack the message.
Anyway, I just think the hypocrites who are threatening with violence or with removing donations should really step back and realize that this is a university, not a therapist. You want your university to consider your feelings, then get ready for research productivity to tank. You want your university to compete with other universities in the nation? Then educate yourself. Everyone knows Ayers is an idiot; that is WHY he should be allowed to speak. It gives more fodder. At least people can go to church on Sunday knowing that their threats of violence kept the boogie man away. It's what Jesus would have done. Pathetic. "
You know not knowing anything about what is going on in this article nor what the proposed speaker has or allegedly has done what makes me shake my head is the comments of hate and bigotry that actually perhaps border on some kind of potential psychiatric problems that some of the commenters are making. If those opposed to this speaker are taken at face value in print then they are hateful close-minded own believe pushing people that are perfect models for the "conservative party" of today. The conservative party basically means close-minded and free to push their views or lies at anyone with fear. Logic, reality, and truth do not win when you push fear. Luckily those who cave into this fear are the same carbon copies of the hate speakers. You all can get together and pat each other on the backs. No wonder the KKK had a presense here in this state. "
UNL is a cowardly institution and the people of Nebraska are cowards to not allow this man to speak. He just wants to speak, can't you listen first before you judge?
You want to talk about terrorism, how about those neanderthals who go to such lengths to drive away free speech. Who are the real terrorists now? "
I am a grad student in the Teacher's college, and I was looking forward to his talk. I guess academic freedom really doesn't exist at UNL. The individuals who would benefit most from his talk (the education students) would probably argue that he should come and speak... but I guess the students don't really matter at UNL. All we do is pay tuition and keep the door open. Remember, if it weren't for the students, there would be no UNL.
I am disappointed in the Teacher's College for caving, in the chancellor for being more worried about money than academic freedom, and the president for caving to regent pressure. You are all a sad bunch! "
I am a Ph.D. student in the CEHS and assure the public that the CEHS faculty back this worldview in near unanimity.
The "free speech" of which Moshman bloviates ONLY applies to those who hold this uber-liberal point of view. I would be summarily railroaded out of the program were I to challenge his viewpoint at UNL.
Just try getting a Ph.D. advisor in CEHS if you are known to be conservative. "
LOGICAL FALLACY - thanks UNL for promoting intellectual discourse! "
From the start this was a bad idea. The University took no action until all of us started calling and telling them we would withhold our donations unless the invitation to speak was recinded.
I am happy with the decision, however I am not happy that we have Deans at our University that still think that this was a good thing for us. I guess it is PC today to support a terrorist-just look at Obamas advisors and "friends" "
Trying to demonize UNL on the basis of 1st amendment infringement is absurd beyond belief! "
This is guy is an admitted terrorist who killed innocent Americans. He admitted to this - its not up for debate - he, in his own words, said he was "guilty as hell."
This isn't some ultra liberal figure that is coming and being denied access. This is a guy that bombed government buildings and admits to doing so. UNL has a number of very liberal figures come speak at the university on a regular basis. Furthermore, many of the faculty are ultra liberal. This is NOT political. This also has nothing to do with "listening to different view points" or about Nebraskans being "closed minded." NU brings in controversial figures all the time! It has nothing to do with the content of his talk.
This is common decency!!
The guy is a self admitted murderer...why should the University give him a forum?? If you can't understand that then maybe YOU are the one with the "closed mind!" "
This is the reason the USA is looking bad these days. Perhaps this should be the "Thankful States of America"or perhaps the "United States of Thankful" for this so patriotic individual because what he/she wants is a land ful of people who love to push their views. Perhaps he wants those who disagree with him eliminated. Guess what eventually it may be just you and your ideas-would that not be fine. You of course are THE person who knows everything and is Right. Yes I have lived in 7 states and this is a hick close minded state but there is more states out there for YOU.. perhaps you should form the United People The Most Patriotic Ever States of America and make you the leader/dictator forever! "
(Censored) Nebraska (Censored) Hicks are their own worst (Censored), enemy "
Let the donors keep their biased contributions and the university can sink lower in the academic standing of the country and world. "
more". Recently featured on a magazine cover trampling the American flag.
I wonder just what Mr Ayers was planning to speak about? Much research has shown that millions of dollars and years of effort have not been very successful in the Chicago inner city schools and neighborhoods.Drop out rates have risen and the crime rate is out of control, all happening byw under liberal government control. So was he going to mention the failure of socialism in Chicago? check out wikipedia for results of Annenberg Challenge in Chicago. "
The acts of the destruction of property and life is all a matter of ones point of view. There are Vietnamese who to this day would see little difference between what I did in their country and what Mr. Ayers did here. Apparently we are not a very forgiving people.
If we can forgive the country of Vietnam who killed over 58,000 US troops enough to allow them to make cheap stuff for us, and we can't forgive Williams Ayers. What does that make us? "
What a bold and mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. "
Furthermore, the guy has admitted to "murder" and is even cavalier when admitting to it!
This has nothing to do with conservatives quashing liberal content either!! UNL regularly brings in all sorts of very very liberal speakers. This simply has to do with a university NOT wanting to give a murderer - who brags about getting away with it - a public forum!
Would you be as equally outraged if a self admitted KKK member, who had murdered blacks in the south during the civil rights movement, was "uninvited." I think not!
You who are claiming that this is politically motivated are the ones with your head in the sand. Not every single issue is made because of politics...sometimes its just the right move!
I am a democrat and will be voting for Obama, but I fully support UNL's decision to cancel the speech from the murdering coward. This is not about "conservative Nebraska"...this is about rationally based decision making! "
Ayres' gang terrorist thugs threatened, harrassed and killed people.I wonder how he feels being on the potential receiving end of virulent behavior.
And a further irony: In a magazine interview, Ayres mocked this country when he gloated about being "free as a bird" after commiting terrorist acts. Now, he is being protected by that same country. Only in America... "
Good decision that should never have been needed to be reached. "