House defeats $700B financial markets bailout
By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS / The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation’s financial system, leaving both parties’ lawmakers and the Bush administration scrambling to pick up the pieces. Dismayed investors sent the Dow Jones industrials plunging nearly 800 points, the most ever for a single day.
“We need to put something back together that works,” a grim-faced Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said after he and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke joined in an emergency strategy session at the White House. On Capitol Hill, Democratic leaders said the House would reconvene Thursday, leaving open the possibility that it could salvage a reworked version.
All sides agreed the effort to bolster beleaguered financial markets, potentially the biggest government intervention since the Great Depression, could not be abandoned.
Related Link(s):
U.S. Reps. Jeff Fortenberry, Adrian Smith and Lee Terry all voted against the government’s mortgage-finance bailout, which was defeated Monday by the House of Representatives.
“Undoubtedly, America is facing a serious financial challenge,” said Fortenberry, who represents Lincoln and Nebraska’s 1st Congressional district, in a news release. “This bill is clearly an improvement from the original proposal. However, we are falling into the trap of sequential decision-making. Adopting this construct shuts the door on alternatives that may be less costly, easier to implement - and may provide a way through this crisis. The choice between action and inaction today is a false one.
“Nebraskans and most other Americans have made responsible financial decisions. Now we are forcing them to foot the bill for the financial industrialists of Wall Street who created this problem for Main Street. And perhaps we have not addressed the underlying fundamental problems.
“I could not in good conscience support this legislation.”
- Lincoln Journal Star
But in a remarkable display on Monday, a majority of House members slapped aside the best version their leaders and the administration had been able to come up with, bucking presidential speeches, pleading visits from Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and urgent warnings that the economy could nosedive without the legislation.
In the face of thousands of phone calls and e-mails fiercely opposing the measure, many lawmakers were not willing to take the political risk of voting for it just five weeks before the elections.
The bill went down, 228-205.
The House Web site was overwhelmed as millions of people sought information about the measure through the day.
The legislation the administration promoted would have allowed the government to buy bad mortgages and other sour assets held by troubled banks and other financial institutions. Getting those debts off their books should bolster those companies’ balance sheets, making them more inclined to lend and ease one of the biggest choke points in a national credit crisis. If the plan worked, the thinking went, it would help lift a major weight off the national economy, which is already sputtering.
Hoping to pick up enough GOP votes for the next try, Republicans floated several ideas. One would double the $100,000 ceiling on federal deposit insurance. Another would end rules that require companies to devalue assets on their books to reflect the price they could get in the market.
In the meantime, Paulson said he would work with other regulators “to use all the tools available to protect our financial system and our economy.”
“Our tool kit is substantial but insufficient,” he said, indicating the government intended to continue piecemeal fixes while pressing Congress for broader action.
Stocks started plummeting on Wall Street even before Monday’s vote was over, as traders watched the rescue measure going down on television. Meanwhile, lawmakers were watching them back.
As a digital screen in the House chamber recorded a cascade of “no” votes against the bailout, Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley of New York shouted news of the falling Dow Jones industrials. “Six hundred points!” he yelled, jabbing his thumb downward.
The final stock carnage was 777 points, far surpassing the 684-point drop on the first trading day after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.
In the House, “no” votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle. More than two-thirds of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats opposed the bill. Several Democrats in close election fights waited until the last moment, then went against the bill as it became clear the vast majority of Republicans were opposing it.
Thirteen of the 19 most vulnerable Republicans and Democrats in an Associated Press analysis voted against the bill despite the pleas from President Bush and their party leaders to pass it.
In all, 65 Republicans joined 140 Democrats in voting “yes,” while 133 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted “no.”
The overriding question was what to do next.
“The legislation may have failed; the crisis is still with us,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a news conference after the defeat. “What happened today cannot stand.”
Republican leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said he and other Republicans were pained to vote for such measure, but he agreed that in light of the potential consequences for the economy and all Americans, “I think that we need to renew our efforts to find a solution that Congress can support.”
Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said there was scant time to reopen legislation that was the product of hard-fought bipartisan negotiations.
“What happened today was not a failure of a bill, it was a failure of will,” said Dodd, the Banking Committee chairman. “Our hope is that cooler heads will prevail, people will think about what they did today and recognize that this is not just scare tactics — it’s reality.”
A brutal round of partisan finger-pointing followed the vote.
Republicans blamed Pelosi’s scathing speech near the close of the debate — which assailed Bush’s economic policies and a “right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation” of financial markets — for the defeat. It was not much different from her usual tough words against the president and his party.
“We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House,” Boehner said.
Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the whip, estimated that Pelosi’s speech changed the minds of a dozen Republicans who might otherwise have supported the plan.
That amounted to an appalling accusation by Republicans against Republicans, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee: “Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decide to punish the country.”
More than a repudiation of Democrats, Frank said, Republicans’ refusal to vote for the bailout was a rejection of their own president.
The two men campaigning to replace Bush watched the situation closely — from afar — and demanded action.
In Iowa, Republican John McCain said his rival Barack Obama and congressional Democrats “infused unnecessary partisanship into the process. Now is not the time to fix the blame; it’s time to fix the problem.”
Obama said, “Democrats, Republicans, step up to the plate, get it done.”
Lawmakers were under extraordinary pressure from powerful outside groups, which gave notice they considered the legislation a “key vote” — one they would consider when rating members of Congress.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said opponents of the bailout would pay for their stance.
“Make no mistake: When the aftermath of congressional inaction becomes clear, Americans will not tolerate those who stood by and let the calamity happen,” said R. Bruce Josten, the Chamber’s top lobbyist, in a letter to members.
The conservative Club for Growth made a similar threat to supporters of the bailout.
“We’re all worried about losing our jobs,” Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declared in an impassioned speech in support of the bill before the vote. “Most of us say, ’I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it — not me.“’
“We’re in this moment, and if we fail to do the right thing, Heaven help us,” he said.
If Congress doesn’t come around on a bailout, more pressure would fall on the Federal Reserve.
The Fed, which has been providing billions in short-term loans to squeezed banks to help them overcome credit stresses, could keep expanding those loans to encourage lending. And, it could keep working with other central banks to inject billions into financial markets overseas.
It also has the power to expand emergency lending to other types of companies and even to individuals if they are unable to secure adequate credit.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
SO its helps who wrote on September 29, 2008 11:28 am:
bush llit wrote on September 29, 2008 11:50 am:
Bush Hater wrote on September 29, 2008 12:05 pm:
But wait, this is the republican way. Do not use any intelligence, just scare the people into bad choices. Easy to do when so many people just do not have any intelligence. They just follow along. What scares me is Bush saying we have to do this. That should make you do just the opposite. Was it not Bush after all that said 14 days ago if we did not pass this that the economy would come to a screetching halt by the next Friday? Thanks to everyone who was too stupid to see what putting him into office and keeping the republican led Congress in power for so long would do. "
Alan wrote on September 29, 2008 12:19 pm:
Deb wrote on September 29, 2008 12:32 pm:
CanAnyoneElseSeeThis wrote on September 29, 2008 1:06 pm:
Mrs. Johnson wrote on September 29, 2008 1:09 pm:
Pro Bush war but... wrote on September 29, 2008 1:12 pm:
JB wrote on September 29, 2008 1:16 pm:
Chuck wrote on September 29, 2008 1:24 pm:
ted wrote on September 29, 2008 1:25 pm:
Eric wrote on September 29, 2008 1:26 pm:
Rys wrote on September 29, 2008 1:33 pm:
Roo wrote on September 29, 2008 1:35 pm:
BicycleMike wrote on September 29, 2008 1:38 pm:
Kendra wrote on September 29, 2008 1:38 pm:
O_Really Factor wrote on September 29, 2008 1:39 pm:
as wrote on September 29, 2008 1:43 pm:
Then look for government/taxpayer help.
Step two - quit giving loans to those who can't afford to pay for them. "
JT wrote on September 29, 2008 1:45 pm:
Twhite wrote on September 29, 2008 1:49 pm:
Douglas wrote on September 29, 2008 1:53 pm:
M wrote on September 29, 2008 1:54 pm:
Tzi wrote on September 29, 2008 2:01 pm:
Mark wrote on September 29, 2008 2:01 pm:
BankDitt wrote on September 29, 2008 2:01 pm:
Remember wrote on September 29, 2008 2:09 pm:
BankDitt wrote on September 29, 2008 2:27 pm:
whatever bush wrote on September 29, 2008 2:44 pm:
Yippy Skippy wrote on September 29, 2008 2:46 pm:
whatever wrote on September 29, 2008 2:53 pm:
For those that say that the market should take care of itself, here if the effect of nothing being done to bring this situation under control. If you want a loan for a new business, a new car, a house, so you can plant your crops in the spring....that money may not be there. The affects of this mess will start affecting the average American. Banks are nervous, and the world is nervous. The markets all over the world are plunging as we speak. "
Old Guy wrote on September 29, 2008 2:55 pm:
Get rid of Pelosi now wrote on September 29, 2008 3:00 pm:
Jon wrote on September 29, 2008 3:01 pm:
ILL REMEMBER wrote on September 29, 2008 3:06 pm:
independent wrote on September 29, 2008 3:11 pm:
luckily, all 3 of our reps voted NO. check it out at votesmart.com. "
tom b wrote on September 29, 2008 3:18 pm:
a loan...my bank is midwest bank is smart and i know my limits...
this is more of a east coast west coast problem...you know...
the ones with no common sense... "
BarryO wrote on September 29, 2008 3:25 pm:
James the Liberal wrote on September 29, 2008 3:26 pm:
Norman R. Kelley wrote on September 29, 2008 3:35 pm:
Ed wrote on September 29, 2008 3:56 pm:
JR wrote on September 29, 2008 4:07 pm:
Jay wrote on September 29, 2008 4:08 pm:
you must remember this. . . wrote on September 29, 2008 4:13 pm:
Nina wrote on September 29, 2008 4:13 pm:
Say What wrote on September 29, 2008 4:18 pm:
What they forget is that Bush pushed for the "The American Dream Downpayment Act of 2003" which helped thousands of low to moderate income and minority families with downpayment and closing costs, which represent the greatest barrier to homeownership. With that the rate of minority homeownership has climbed above 50 percent, and more than 2.5 million minority families have become new homeowners.
Now, how can Clinton be blamed for something that Bush wanted and got?
This is why the republicans are going to lose big in November because they refuse to admit they made a mistake. "
Upset wrote on September 29, 2008 4:21 pm:
Further, these guys in office don't have to worry about retirement either, since they don't have to worry about 401(k) contributions or savings plans like us working people.
I'd like to say it's good to have a job now, but I don't know if I will should this keep holding up. I'd like to say it's good to have a house now, but I don't know if I will if this keeps up. I'd like to say it's good to have security knowing my savings and retirement accounts are in banks or credit unions, but I don't know if I can say that now. "
Beamer wrote on September 29, 2008 4:22 pm:
So.. wrote on September 29, 2008 4:43 pm:
whatever wrote on September 29, 2008 4:51 pm:
Yep wrote on September 29, 2008 5:04 pm:
health car, guards and perks for the rest of his life, so why should he
care. Pelosi has been a trouble maker from day one. She needs to be
ousted. So the banks won't have money to lend. Maybe its time for people
to quit spending beyond their earnings!!! "
Deal maker wrote on September 29, 2008 5:20 pm:
mike lacroix wrote on September 29, 2008 5:39 pm:
Ninajean Rohlfs wrote on September 29, 2008 5:40 pm:
Oh really O_Really Factor wrote on September 29, 2008 6:52 pm:
'That amounted to an appalling accusation by Republicans against Republicans, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee: “Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decide to punish the country.”' "
MarkyMark wrote on September 29, 2008 7:45 pm:
More Republican symbolism over substance than ever before. "
Hillary wrote on September 29, 2008 8:04 pm:
In all fairness, Bill Clinton did sign the Republican sponosored bill. It was authored by Phil Grahamm, McCains economic advisor. "
JB wrote on September 29, 2008 8:24 pm:
ted wrote on September 29, 2008 8:46 pm:
Yup wrote on September 29, 2008 10:10 pm:
Jerry Simpson wrote on September 29, 2008 10:22 pm:
It seems that wrote on September 29, 2008 10:36 pm:
William Skripka wrote on September 29, 2008 10:49 pm:
Eric wrote on September 29, 2008 11:39 pm:
grrr wrote on September 30, 2008 1:01 am:
No one wants to bail out these companies, but these companies are the backbone of the U.S. banking structure. Unfortunately, some sort of bail out is absolutely necessary to keep the U.S. economy from catastrophic problems. You need to understand these are not just lemonade stands! "
BH wrote on September 30, 2008 6:04 am:
Whoa ted wrote on September 30, 2008 6:17 am:
This blame game is nuts wrote on September 30, 2008 6:36 am:
Scott wrote on September 30, 2008 7:22 am:
karwied wrote on September 30, 2008 8:10 am:
karwied wrote on September 30, 2008 8:48 am:
JB wrote on September 30, 2008 9:02 am:
Proud American wrote on September 30, 2008 9:11 am:
JOHNGUY wrote on September 30, 2008 9:18 am:
Bill Clinton talked on Letterman a week ago about how this got started. Now I know yall don't respect Bill very much, but he said some interesting things. check out the youtube videos. Chris Rock follows up on the same show and slams Clinton for not mentioning Barack enough. It's pretty funny. "
Alan wrote on September 30, 2008 11:46 am:
Republican wrote on September 30, 2008 11:55 am:
Yup wrote on September 30, 2008 12:00 pm:
to Whoa ted wrote on September 30, 2008 4:14 pm:
why is it wrote on September 30, 2008 4:52 pm:
Also, we have had a democratic controlled congress for years now .... how can all this be George Bushes fault? they have way more control - he may propose budgets, laws, etc. - but they pass them and/or fail to pass them.
Seems there is a lot of "blood" on their hands and all they can do is point fingers .... GO FIGURE "
anon wrote on September 30, 2008 10:24 pm:
Oponents have no more than vague "she's mean to us" statements. What did she say that you have a problem with? "
e wrote on September 30, 2008 10:28 pm: