Now
Fair
21°
High
47°
Low
29°

Russia has gone too far in Georgia

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Tuesday, Sep 02, 2008 - 01:08:30 am CDT

The United States and its western allies have few cards to play in the power struggle with Russia over the future of Georgia.

But it’s becoming increasingly clear that it must play the cards that it has or Russian will become increasingly emboldened and think it can disregard the sovereignty of its neighbors with impunity.

Despite promises that it would withdraw, Russian forces remain near the Georgian port city of Poti.

There’s little doubt that Russia’s actions have alarmed the former Soviet bloc nations that gained independence when the former Soviet Union broke up.

Ukrainian President Victor Yushchenko wrote in a column published in the Washington Post: “The tragic events in Georgia also exposed the lack of preventative mechanisms by the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and other international organizations.”

In Poland, the Russian invasion of Georgia triggered a rapid public embrace of a U.S. plan to install interceptor missiles on Polish soil.

Journalist Kamil Tchorek, who grew up in Poland under Soviet domination in the 1970s and 1980s, wrote in a column in Britain’s Guardian, “Poles are convinced that the time for treading softly around the Russian bear has passed.”

Meanwhile, Russian officials mocked diplomatic efforts to punish Russia. Referring to talk of blocking Russia from joining the World Trade Organization, former President Vladimir Putin said, “We don’t feel or see any advantages from membership, if they exist at all.”

Despite that overt disdain, and despite the European Union’s dependency on Russia for natural gas and oil, the West does have some economic leverage over Russia.

A possible vulnerability is the circle of rich oligarchs around Putin and President Dmitri Medvedev who are active in the global economy, making investments around the world, including the United States. Those assets could be subject to seizure under international law if Russia violates international law in Georgia or elsewhere.

Already the events in Georgia have prompted investors, including some Russians, to pull assets out of Russia. Its currency reserves have plummeted in recent days, the Washington Post reported.

There’s some merit to the observation that Georgia is not blameless in the current dispute, but the disproportionate Russian response was inexcusable.

The long-term Western response to Russia’s aggression in Georgia must be intelligent and deft, but there must be one. Russia’s actions cannot go unchallenged, or the pattern will be repeated.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Sean wrote on September 2, 2008 7:21 am:
" Puhllleaaase! The United States has been exposed as paper tiger and the UN is even worse. The Chinese suppressed Tibet and failed to keep their promises regarding human rights to the IOC. The hunta in Burma locked down their country after a natural disaster and sold relief supplies to their people. The Russians invaded Georgia with impunity. They all knew they could get away with minimal if any consequences at all.
All due to the spineless response of the United States Government and the UN. Get used to it. "

Zoomie wrote on September 2, 2008 7:51 am:
" Sean, what were we supposed to do? I agree there is little we can do, but military confrontation would never have worked! First, we lack the forces to do it (short of a nuclear war) because our forces are tied up in Iraq and Afghanistan (and under McSame will remain so for years to come, Iraqi desire that we leave not withstanding). Indeed, quietly ignored by the press last week was McSame's admission we likely will need to reinstate the draft! Second, the Russians warned us several years ago -- when Bush and the EU recognized Kosovo's seperation from Serbia -- that what was good for the goose was good for the gander, and that they would likely treat Russian populated regions of bordering nations the same way. And they are! They've already recognized the two breakaway provinces from Georgia as independent nations, and are already discussing bring both provinces into Russia proper. And this weekend, the Russian President announced that henceforth Russia views their border regions as their "area of influence," implying they will not hesitate to interfere in any bordering nation if they see it as in their interest (and they point to our policy towards Cuba as an example of what they can and will do).
What the US needs to be cautious about (but sadly McSame wants to set up a direct confrontation, apparently confident Russia will ALWAYS back down, a very, very dangerous assumption) is the wish of several formerly Soviet Block nations who want into NATO ONLY because they want the guarantee that if Russa attacks them, we'll rush in to defend them. Traditional conservatives are absolutely correct that this is NOT in our interest, and we can only lose in such a situation. Unless the nations involved are in some way critical to the US, we should allow Russia its sphere of influence. "

misplaced wrote on September 2, 2008 8:18 am:
" All these words of strong condemnation over Russia's action in Georgia have no potential to alleviate the situation. If, however, our media would take a critical stand against our government attacking a sovereign nation, and occupying it, we could create change. We are a democratic society and as such our voices must be used to prevent abuses by our own government. If we had spoken out against our own government's international acts of aggression we would perhaps have the moral authority to condemn Russia. As it stands their actions mirror ours. Let's turn our cautionary words toward an audience we may be able to influence, resulting in a positive change in the condition of our world. "

THE OTHER JR wrote on September 2, 2008 8:33 am:
" Maybe the current regime should just send the United States military into another backwards, oil-rich country populated by darker-skinned people. Do another little "shock and awe" performance. That would teach those darn Russians a lesson. "

Tzi wrote on September 2, 2008 10:57 am:
" It's too late. Putin is testing the resolve of the West and we failed the test. He's been building up arms, training his troops and making alliances with nations like Iran and Venezuela.

The invasion of Georgia gave Russia a chance to give its troops experience in real combat conditions. It gave them a chance to try out all their new weapons and strategies. It also gave them insight in to what western powers would do if it decided to invade other nations. There is nothing to stop it from going after other lands. Already Russia is threatening Moldavia and the Ukraine.

The similarities between the aggressions now and the aggressions going on in the 1930s should send a cold shiver down the spines of anyone who's studied the history.

England and France let Hitler have Austria in their attempt to maintain the peace.

Make no mistake, if it does get worse Russia will be controlling all the factors. No international agreement (including NATO) is going to stop them. "

Matt Bernhardt wrote on September 2, 2008 12:57 pm:
" Russian aggression? Need we be reminded again who started this war? As far as I remember, it was the Georgians who began the incursion. Of course it was into land they already govorned but they killed Russian peacekeepers. What were the Russians to do? Sit idly by as their countrymen were killed?

No.

They did the only thing they could do, much like the United States has done in this so called "War on Terror", fight back.

Yes they should leave the native lands of Georgia, but as far as I can tell, they have won this war and deserve at least the lands of South Ossetia and Abkhazia which want to leave Georgia anyway.

They have won this war fair and square and if the US gets to put a democracy in Iraq, the Russians can install whatever kind of govornment they want in these two lands. Fair is Fair. Lets just not forget who the aggressor was. "

Matt Bernhardt wrote on September 2, 2008 1:39 pm:
" Oh yeah and in the area of "Disproportionate responses" what about the United States invading a country on the grounds of "Weapons of Mass Destruction" when no said weapons are found? Isn't that a "disproportionate response"?

I am not a US military hater or "hippie" or anything like that, but I do not like it when history is rewritten in American favor or written against past or present enemies of the state (Russia). "

Funny wrote on September 2, 2008 5:18 pm:
" Funny how many of you use the US invasion of Iraq to justify Russa invading Georgia. Rather than saying both were wrong, you go out of your way to criticze the US.

As far as a response, what would anyone have us do? Even if we werent mired in Iraq and Afghanistan , do we risk world war 3 for Georgia? People rightly scream when we lose 4000 troops in Iraq but there will no one left to scream if we all die in a global thermonuclear war. "

JT Hutt wrote on September 2, 2008 5:31 pm:
" Sadly it is the Bush McCain Sabre Rattling that has pushed Russia into action. They talk about missile systems and NATO expansions (read: imperialism) into formerly "Warwaw" areas. How PO'd would Bush McCain be if all the sudden Russia wanted a "missile defense" system in Cuba?
It disgusts me to say this, "Maybe Putin is telling the truth." Bush McCain, tell us again about your moral authority on the world stage. Our credibility is shot. This isn't Change. This is more of the Same. "

whatever wrote on September 2, 2008 5:44 pm:
" The "options" the JS points out really won't work. Russia can simply cut off the oil and gas supplies to Western Europe for a few days and more than make up the money in the profits from the massive price spikes that will hit the market. Not a smart ploy by a Republican led debtor nation that helps facilitate the movement of U.S. jobs overseas. Including knowledge based jobs. So really what the JS is advocating seems to be war against Mother Russia. Let's look at the long list of winners in those conflicts. Umm, OK the Mongols come to mind. Look the great powers of their time couldn't beat Russia Sweden failed after 21 years, France after more or less a decade of fighting. Germany had some success in WW I but that defeat led to their almost total destruction in WW II. "Zoomie" pretty much hits the nail on the head as far as the geo politics goes. Look what we did to the Serbs in Kosovo a traditional and long ally of Russia. We got lucky that time that the Russian government was able to reign in some of the Nationalist Generals and some renegade divisions who were well on their way to defend the Serbs. We won't get lucky again if something flairs up there. Georgia is in Russia's front yard and IT IS their sphere of influence. We haven't the troops, the will nor the resources short of using Nukes to go head to head with Russia. In a purely conventional war we would be soundly defeated. And make no mistake about it if we put missiles in Poland their will be strong pressure put on the Russian government from their own people to go to war and it's much more than a slight possibility. Journal Star this is probably one of the most blatantly irresponsible and naive` editiorials I have ever read but you may very well get your wish for war your are advocating. "

Matt Bernhardt wrote on September 3, 2008 3:03 pm:
" To Funny-
I'm sorry. I didn't mean for it to come across that I was criticizing the US. I am just sick and tired of the people who will blatantly support the US in Iraq yet condemn Russia for their actions. Its the same thing, why is what they are doing so much worse?

In all, I am just fed up with the Republican foreign policy of "The US is the world's policeman" yet I am also equally fed up with Democratic social programs and "we all must be equal" attitudes. Some people work very hard for their wealth and should be entitled to it.

I don't know what I am going to do on election day, probably cry, and drink alot. "