Now
Fair
43°
High
51°
Low
29°

Lawyer: DNA tests cast doubt on convictions in '85 murder

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY JOE DUGGAN AND CARA PESEK / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Aug 01, 2008 - 07:18:28 pm CDT

DNA tests released Friday have proven that two men in prison for a 1985 Beatrice murder did not rape the 68-year-old victim, their attorneys said.

And if the court rules in the men’s favor, they could be the first inmates exonerated under the Nebraska DNA Testing Act of 2000.

Joseph White, 45, and Thomas Winslow, 42, are serving prison sentences in connection with the murder of Helen Wilson.

Story Photo
Winslow, White

Related Media

Mother: DNA results reveal injustice

Mary Winslow, mother of Thomas Winslow, talks about the DNA test results that attorneys say prove her son and Joseph White did not rape Beatrice woman...

Feb. 6, 1985 - Helen Wilson, 68, is found dead in her downtown Beatrice apartment. Wilson’s hands were bound, and she had been raped. She died of suffocation.

March 15, 1989 - Joseph Edgar White and Ada Joann Taylor are arrested on suspicion of first-degree murder. The two were arrested after Thomas Winslow of Wymore, who was being held in Lincoln on assault charges, also made statements implicating the two.

March 17, 1989 - Winslow is arrested and charged in conjunction with Wilson’s death.

April and May 1989 - Debra Shelden and James Dean are arrested and charged with aiding and abetting first-degree murder. Both eventually plead guilty to aiding and abetting a second-degree murder, and agree to cooperate with prosecutors in other cases. Kathy Gonzalez is arrested and charged with aiding and abetting first-degree murder, based on statements from Dean and Shelden. Gonzalez eventually pleads guilty to a lesser charge.

Nov. 1989 - White is found guilty of first-degree murder by a 12-member jury.

Late 1989 - Winslow pleads no contest to aiding and abetting first-degree murder.

Early 1990 - White is sentenced to life in prison for Wilson’s death. Winslow receives a 50-year sentence, Gonzalez receives a 40-year sentence and Taylor, Dean and Shelden receive 10 years each.

1994 - Taylor, Dean and Shelden are released from prison.

2000 - The DNA Testing Act is passed by the Legislature.

2006 - Winslow and White file motions for DNA testing, which are denied in district court.

Nov. 2, 2007 - The Nebraska Supreme Court upholds requests made by White and Winslow for DNA testing.

Dec. 13, 2007 - Samples of semen and DNA found at the crime scene and preserved in the Beatrice Police Department evidence room are sent to the UNMC Human DNA Identification Laboratory in Omaha.

Wednesday - DNA results show forensic evidence found at the crime scene came from one unidentified male individual who is neither White nor Winslow.

Friday - Motions will be filed in Gage County and Jefferson County to vacate the convictions of both White and Winslow. A status hearing is set for Aug. 25.

But tests of bodily fluids preserved from the 23-year-old case have cleared the two, their attorneys said.

The DNA samples came from a single, unidentified male that did not match White or Winslow, said Jerry Soucie, an attorney with the Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy who is representing Winslow.

“I feel there was a great injustice done,” said Mary Winslow, the mother of Thomas Winslow. “I feel not only done to my son … but there was also a great injustice done to the Wilson family because these two men did not rape and kill Mrs. Wilson.”

Soucie and Doug Stratton, a Norfolk attorney who represents White, will file district court motions to vacate convictions in Gage and Jefferson counties.

If a judge grants the motions, White and Winslow could be exonerated. If a judge chooses not to erase the convictions, the motions also ask the courts to consider ordering a new sentence or trial for each man.

Whether the men are quickly released depends, in part, on the response from the prosecution.

Gage County Attorney Randy Ritnour said Friday that just because the DNA evidence cleared the men of rape didn’t mean they should also be cleared of other charges.

But he also said his office would cooperate with defense attorneys.

“We seek justice here, not a win at any costs,” he said. “So if … it turns out the evidence should show that these people are not guilty of this crime, then certainly these people shouldn’t be in jail.”

Ritnour, elected Gage County attorney in 2006, said he spoke to former Gage County Attorney Richard Smith about the case Friday morning. He also planned to meet with investigators from the Gage County Sheriff’s Office and Beatrice Police Department who had worked on the case.

The age of the case will make it more difficult for his office to come up to speed on the specifics of what happened, he said.

But his lack of familiarity with the case isn’t all bad, he said.

“We don’t have a dog in this hunt,” he said. “We want justice done, and we’re not afraid to look at it in an objective manner.”

Omaha Sen. Ernie Chambers, who introduced the act, said Friday he was pleased the law has finally done what it was intended to do. DNA testing proves the legal system makes serious mistakes that cost people years of freedom, he said.

“It shows the system is dysfunctional,” Chambers said. “It is not one on which people can rely on justice being done.”

For nearly two decades, those associated with the case believed they had put away Wilson’s killers.

The 68-year-old Beatrice widow was found Feb. 6, 1985, in her apartment, her hands bound, her body severely beaten. An autopsy determined she had suffocated.

The murder happened less than two years after a series of three attacks on elderly women in Beatrice. The women described their attacker as a young adult man with a tall, slim build.

The cases put Beatrice on edge, prompting people to buy door locks and fear a killer in their midst.

Four years after Wilson’s murder, officers began making arrests, eventually charging six people in connection with the crime. Three of them testified that, as a group, they had broken into Wilson’s apartment. They also said White and Winslow took turns raping Wilson while Ada Joann Taylor suffocated her with a pillow.

Taylor, who pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting second-degree murder, remains in custody at Community Corrections in Omaha. Her projected date of release is Aug. 9, 2009.

James Dean, Kathy Gonzalez and Debra Shelden were all released from prison in 1994.

The DNA tests, conducted on semen recovered from the crime scene, undermines their testimony, Soucie said. The DNA has not been compared with Dean, but it has been turned over to authorities who can see if it matches any samples in a national criminal DNA database.

“The bottom line is as we sit here today, the individual who sexually assaulted Mrs. Wilson is not in prison,” Soucie said.

Stratton said investigators working on the case found several fingerprints in Wilson’s apartment that matched none of the suspects.

“For all practical purposes, there is no physical evidence” against White and Winslow, Stratton said.

Nonetheless, a Jefferson County District Court jury convicted White of first-degree felony murder in late 1989 and he was sentenced to life in prison. He always maintained he was not present during the break-in and did not rape Wilson, his attorney said Friday.

Winslow pleaded no contest to aiding and abetting second-degree murder in Gage County District Court and was sentenced to 10 to 50 years in prison. Winslow has consistently maintained he had no memory of being in Wilson’s apartment.

The effort to obtain the DNA tests started in May 2005 when White contacted Stratton, who decided to take the case. In the course of his work, Stratton interviewed Winslow and then referred Winslow’s case to Soucie.

Their first attempt to get the tests was rebuked. In 2006, District Judge Vicky Johnson of Wilber ruled that because White was convicted of a murder that occurred during the commission of another felony, such as robbery or burglary, whether he actually raped Wilson wouldn’t change the outcome of the case.

As for Winslow, the judge said he couldn’t ask for DNA testing because he entered a plea to avoid a possible death sentence.

In November 2007, the Nebraska Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s ruling and ordered the DNA tests. The high court ruled the purpose of the DNA Testing Act was to consider evidence “which is favorable to the person in custody and material to the issue of the guilt of the person in custody.”

White, 45, of Cullman, Ala., is at the Nebraska State Penitentiary in Lincoln where he has spent 18 years in prison.

Winslow, 42, is serving his sentence at the Omaha Correctional Center. He’s served 19 years and his projected release date is April 27, 2020.

His mother said Friday she never believed her son was capable of such a brutal crime. Even though he has served nearly two decades in prison for it, she detected no anger when she talked to him about the DNA test results.

“Overwhelmed was the word he used,” she said. “I guess his words were ‘I want to be able to clear my heart of any feelings of madness or hate toward anybody.’”

Reach Joe Duggan at 473-7239 or jduggan@journalstar.com. Reach Cara Pesek at 473-7361 or cpesek@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
I wrote on August 1, 2008 11:30 am:
" Gotta say it..Thank God for DNA. "

Makes you ponder wrote on August 1, 2008 1:54 pm:
" Who many men/women are in for life or been executed because of the lack of DNA testing?? How do they regain their quality of life, the things they missed?? This is basically a response to the DNA testing as a whole, not meant for the gentlemen above. "

Matt wrote on August 1, 2008 10:08 pm:
" As the prosecution stated, simply because there wss no DNA match does NOT mean they should necessarily be exonerated of all crimes. It really depends on the weight of the remaining evidence. It would be a mistake to presume that simply because that sample doesn't match these two men that they are innocent. They may be, but one needs to first look at the remaining evidence before making any conclusion. Furthermore, the other DNA sample may not have been from the "rapist" but it could have been from a boyfriend or some other consensual partner. The lack of their DNA in the available evidence does NOT mean they didn't rape her or murder her. It merely means she had sex with someone else, either forced or consensual, at some time near the incident.

The men were convicted on evidence not relating to DNA so it would be safe to assume that that non-DNA evidence was at least somewhat convincing. I would expect a new trial, so a jury can weigh that original evidence along with the new DNA evidence "

Cory wrote on August 1, 2008 10:09 pm:
" It seems as though alot of people pleaded guilty to this in one way or another. How could so many be swayed if there is not some degree of truth to the claims they made. "

Well Cory wrote on August 1, 2008 11:58 pm:
" I imagine that some people could be swayed by the certainty of a lesser sentence versus the uncertainty of a jury verdict on a greater charge.

Say you are charged with a crime carrying a potential sentence of 50 years to life. You know that you were home in bed at the time of the crime, but you have no one else to verify that. Let's say that the victim happens to be someone that you despise and that your detestation of the victim is well known in the community. Then you hear that the prosecution has an eyewitness who places you near the scene of the crime. Things aren't sounding good for you. Next thing you know, the prosecutor offers you a deal: plead guilty to a lesser crime which, let's say, carries a sentence of 10 to 25 years. You know you were in bed asleep, but your attorney suggests that the evidence is against you and that by accepting the plea agreement, you'll likely be out in 5 or 6 years.

What you're left with is a very difficult choice: stand your ground and potentially face life in prison (the parole board isn't going to like it when you deny responsibility for the crime) or cop a plea and perhaps be "jammed" out of prison in 5 years. "