Now
Fair
71°
High
79°
Low
58°

NPPD, private developers team up to add more wind energy

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star

Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 - 12:52:53 am CDT

The Nebraska Public Power District plans to add more than 400 megawatts of wind power — roughly equal to a mid-sized coal-fired plant — to its energy portfolio over the coming decade.

NPPD, the state’s largest electric utility, would not own the turbines but would work with private developers on a number of projects, said Dave Rich, the utility’s renewable energy development manager.

The investment in wind energy  could exceed $1 billion, Rich said, and would take place over the next 12 years. Most construction costs would be covered by the private entities and NPPD would pay for the transmission lines, he said.

Story Photo
NPPD wind farm six and a half miles south of Ainsworth, Neb. (Courtesy photo)

If completed, the projects would give a major boost to wind energy development in Nebraska, which has lagged behind surrounding states. Nebraska ranks sixth in the nation for wind energy potential.

NPPD wants to add the wind turbines as part of a long-term goal to generate 10 percent of its electricity from renewable energy resources, such as wind, solar, biomass and methane.

“Our goal has been 5 percent without a target date. Now it’s 10 percent by 2020,” Rich said. The NPPD board set a specific date earlier this year to show its commitment to renewable energy, he said.

Beth Boesch, spokeswoman for NPPD, said the utility is investing in wind energy resources as a “hedge” against increasing coal and other fuel costs. She said it’s also in anticipation of climate change regulations that may require utilities to increase their use of renewable energy.

A megawatt of wind energy  serves the needs of 225 to 300 homes, according to the American  Wind Energy Association.

NPPD expects to add 430 megawatts of wind energy to meet the board’s 10 percent goal.

“We can meet that with 80 megawatts of wind every other year,” Rich said.

NPPD already operates a 60-megawatt wind farm south of Ainsworth in north-central Nebraska. It also gets hydroelectricity from federal government projects and its own small plants.

The Columbus-based utility is involved in two other wind farm projects near Bloomfield in northeast Nebraska: the $140 million Elkhorn Ridge, scheduled to come on line this fall, and the $69 million Crofton Hills, to be completed next year. Both are Community Based Energy Development or C-BED projects being built by private companies.  NPPD will buy the power under 20-year contracts.

Rich said NPPD is partnering with private companies because, unlike public power utilities, they can receive federal renewable energy tax credits, which pay roughly one-third of the cost.

Under a recently passed state  law, private companies that develop C-BED projects do not have to pay state sales tax on  equipment, such as turbines and substations.

Rich said NPPD is negotiating to sell half its interest in both projects to four electric utilities: Lincoln Electric System, Omaha Public Power District, City of Grand Island, and the Municipal Energy Agency of Nebraska.

LES spokesman Russ Reno said  the city-owned utility is reviewing a power sales agreement to buy 6 megawatts of electricity from the Elkhorn Ridge project and will look at buying some from the Crofton Hills project. 

Reno said LES, which operates two wind turbines north of Interstate 80, finds it advantageous to buy wind power because larger projects keep costs down and Elkhorn Ridge is in a higher wind area of the state. Also, NPPD has a transmission line that  can deliver  the power to LES.

“It’s the lowest cost renewable option that we have at this point,” Reno said.

No regulatory approval will be needed from the Nebraska Power Review Board for the additional NPPD wind energy projects, Rich said. That’s because the wind energy will be added in increments of 80 megawatts or less, he said, and therefore are exempt from the state regulatory process.

Rich declined to say where any future wind turbine projects would be built.

“At this point we can’t share where it is,” he added. “But there are benefits in physical dispersion.”

Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at 402-473-7243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Good Idea wrote on July 22, 2008 7:33 am:
" OK, this is a good idea, but let's get MORE of this stuff going on! Fossil fuels will be the death of us! Wind, solar, geothermal, nuclear - these are all power options we need to be exploring with a vengeance over the next decade, not just experimenting in. "

Outside the Box wrote on July 22, 2008 8:27 am:
" Hooray!! Even though we are "lagging behind" it doesn't mean that we can't catch up in the hurry. As witnessed by the LES rate increases, coal (and the delivery thereof) is not going to get any cheaper or any more plentiful. Wind is always going to be free. The sooner we start to harvest it, the sooner we can see a return on the investment.

The project needs to be kicked into high gear ASAP. "

Vern wrote on July 22, 2008 8:27 am:
" Nebraska needs to have more wind farms. Iowa and Kansas have large ones and benefit from them. The ONLY thing in this state is the wind. We might as well use it. "

Mrs. Johnson wrote on July 22, 2008 8:57 am:
" More...More! "

Chris wrote on July 22, 2008 9:54 am:
" Excellent!

Maybe someday Nebraska will lead in some big solution like this...

Hopefully the next president will make help lead the way into a solar revolution that Nebraska could benefit from as well.

We should also look into algae biofuels instead of the debacle that is corn ethanol... "

Brian in Lincoln wrote on July 22, 2008 10:02 am:
" Great start, but only 10% of the total in the next DECADE? You goal should be a minimum of 50% in the next decade and 75% in the next 20 years. Like others have said, the delivery of coal is going to be the most costly venture you will have. The coal itself is cheap, but the delivery of it will kill the industry. Time for more, more and then MORE !!! "

WD wrote on July 22, 2008 10:35 am:
" Nebraska isn't going to lead in wind power, because they are already behind the ole cows tail. T Boone Pickens has a big project in
Texas and is on Capitol Hill trying to convince the idiots! But true,
wind is all that Nebraska has! But its generally not available for
turbines! "

Sounds great but... wrote on July 22, 2008 10:47 am:
" What about the thousands of birds that will be killed by the blades of these wind turbines? Are we willing to sacrifice them for our energy? "

Outside the Box wrote on July 22, 2008 11:02 am:
" I've heard the naysayers cite bird deaths as an opposition point to wind power, but I've never seen any stats to back it up. I've never read about LES disposing of truckloads of dead birds from their windmills NE of Lincoln.

Even though we use the phrase "bird brain" as an insult, one would think birds have the mental capacity to avoid the large rotating object. If not, then Darwin's theory is proved again. "

nppd dude wrote on July 22, 2008 11:12 am:
" The transmission line approval is the big hurdle, it takes years to get the route approved before any poles go in "

Big Chief wrote on July 22, 2008 3:46 pm:
" Wind power can be used for other uses besides generating electricity for the grid. A wind turbine that generates Direct Current electricity costs a fraction of the system that generates 60 cycles per second Alternating current. True DC current has to be used fairly close to the generating site but it could be used in farm operations and many other things. Using this DC wind power to treat waste water from sewage may be a good source for Hydrogen. The Oxygen from electrolysis can be used in water treatment also. Wind has been used for milling grains and pumping water for centuries. There are all kinds of possibilities. "

Ben wrote on July 22, 2008 10:37 pm:
" Oh, what leaders we are. 10%. Why not 50? We continue to appear like bakward corn hicks. Lovely. This falls below proposed federal guidelines, and those stink. "