Fair Vote Nebraska: 'Issue isn't dead'
By MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star
A petition drive aimed at keeping the Nebraska State Fair in Lincoln has failed, but leaders of the effort say the fight isn’t over.
“The issue isn’t dead as far as we’re concerned,” said Mike Donlan of FairVoteNebraska.com. “We’re not giving this thing up yet.”
The group needed to collect 60,000 petition signatures by Wednesday to put before Nebraska voters a repeal of the law that moves the fair to Grand Island.
Related Media
The story so far: Nebraska State Fair
Get background and the latest developments on moving the Nebraska State Fair from State Fair Park in Lincoln. (Laura Meerkatz / JournalStar.com)...
Group leaders said Wednesday they just missed the mark. They plan to unveil their next move soon, although they declined to give details.
Said Donlan: “We’re looking at some legal options.”
The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, city of Grand Island and State Fair Board, meanwhile, are acting aggressively to carry out a new state law that sends the fair west by 2010 and clears the way for UNL to convert State Fair Park into a high-profile research and development campus.
That makes for a long to-do list for each group.
Grand Island
City and fair leaders are crafting architectural plans to ensure Fonner Park is ready to host the 2010 fair.
The city also is working to raise its $8.5 million share of the $42 million it will cost to move the fair. Cindy Johnson, president of the Grand Island Chamber of Commerce, wouldn’t disclose how much has been raised but said the public can expect an update by the end of August.
At least $1.5 million to $2 million in private funds will be raised, Johnson said.
“‘Failure’ is not a word we’re familiar with,” she said.
Grand Island has not allowed itself to be sidetracked by FairVoteNebraska.com, Johnson said.
“But it still was a cloud. It still caused uncertainty. Now that particular hurdle has been handled, and we will continue along the path that we are on, and we will wait until the next hurdle.”
State Fair Board
Just more than five weeks from hosting the 139th Nebraska State Fair, board members are focused on putting on “the very best fair that Nebraskans have ever had,” said Barney Cosner, the fair’s executive director.
That will include family-friendly events and a concert lineup headlined by country star Miranda Lambert.
Cosner hopes this year’s fair, which starts Aug. 22, will be a welcome option for families looking to stay closer to home because of high gas prices.
“I’ll tell you, those that don’t stay close to home are going to be missing out,” he said.
Fair leaders also are brainstorming ideas for the 2009 State Fair, likely the end of the event’s run in Lincoln after more than a century.
“It’s coming fast and furious,” Cosner said.
He expressed appreciation for the support his organization has received in recent weeks, but said FairVoteNebraska.com’s efforts haven’t stalled their work.
“We’ve got so much to do in a short time, we didn’t get a chance to be distracted by other things.”
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
UNL on Friday issued a “request for information” to solicit ideas from developers on how to move forward with its proposed Innovation Campus.
If FairVoteNebraska.com’s petition drive had succeeded, UNL would have had to wait until after the Nov. 4 election to formally contract with any developer.
Now UNL expects to follow its hoped-for timeline, said Bill Nunez, director of institutional research and planning: Receive developers’ submissions by Aug. 15; invite standout developers to campus; then issue a formal request for proposals that will produce a developer for Innovation Campus.
“We believe it’s the best thing not only for Lincoln but for the state of Nebraska,” Nunez said of a research campus. “That’s been our purpose from the beginning — to create something for the state of Nebraska.”
The university must contribute $21.5 million toward moving the fair. Chancellor Harvey Perlman said last week he wouldn’t discuss financial details but said he believes NU will have no difficulty reaching that figure.
FairVoteNebraska.com
The dozen volunteers helping the group had just six weeks to gather the required signatures.
That process went well in Lancaster, Douglas, Hall and other counties but faltered in others, group spokesman Roger Yant said. To make the November ballot, the group needed valid signatures from 5 percent of registered voters in 38 counties.
In Lancaster County, volunteers collected more than the 9,700 signatures required by law. Yant didn’t have a total signature count.
“We did darn good,” he said. “We came close but we didn’t quite make the grade.”
He vowed Nebraskans will know FairVoteNebraska.com’s next move within a day or so.
Whatever action the group takes, allies are unlikely to get the issue on the ballot: Any group seeking to repeal legislation via referendum must follow the petition drive process, according to the Secretary of State’s office.
Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit





Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Erik wrote on July 16, 2008 9:37 am:
Paul wrote on July 16, 2008 9:40 am:
Dano wrote on July 16, 2008 9:42 am:
rh wrote on July 16, 2008 9:46 am:
Jason wrote on July 16, 2008 9:54 am:
CONGRATULATIONS wrote on July 16, 2008 9:54 am:
Sounds about right wrote on July 16, 2008 9:57 am:
John wrote on July 16, 2008 9:58 am:
Vern wrote on July 16, 2008 10:01 am:
Galen wrote on July 16, 2008 10:04 am:
Tyler wrote on July 16, 2008 10:05 am:
J wrote on July 16, 2008 10:09 am:
Sue wrote on July 16, 2008 10:12 am:
READ people wrote on July 16, 2008 10:21 am:
TSG wrote on July 16, 2008 10:23 am:
I signed the petition because I think it brings good revenue to the state. I would really like it to join the Lancaster County Eventer Center. I think that would be a great location for it, and the cheapest for all, and I want UNL to get their research park because I am only 20 years old and I know there aren't very many "good" jobs in Lincoln. So bring in the park and hopefully there will be some. "
i signed because i believe wrote on July 16, 2008 10:30 am:
tax payer wrote on July 16, 2008 10:33 am:
Grundle wrote on July 16, 2008 10:34 am:
Chad wrote on July 16, 2008 10:34 am:
SW wrote on July 16, 2008 10:37 am:
Thank God wrote on July 16, 2008 10:37 am:
Soylent Green wrote on July 16, 2008 10:38 am:
To Erik wrote on July 16, 2008 10:42 am:
Rod wrote on July 16, 2008 10:51 am:
Outside the Box wrote on July 16, 2008 10:52 am:
Time to move on. "
Get the Facts Straight wrote on July 16, 2008 10:56 am:
Sherri wrote on July 16, 2008 10:56 am:
mitchy_v wrote on July 16, 2008 11:12 am:
Ohhh well no worries wrote on July 16, 2008 11:19 am:
as wrote on July 16, 2008 11:29 am:
Barry Walker wrote on July 16, 2008 11:30 am:
I signed the Petition wrote on July 16, 2008 11:43 am:
Having said that, I firmly believe that the Fair should move. The people whining about this move need to get over it. CLEARLY the Fair lacks support here in Lincoln. It is an Agricultural Festival in an urban setting. Why is it so hard to understand why that would fail? The Fair is a dinosaur, it has attractions that do NOT attract urban "customers," and it's absolutely no wonder it failed here. Had the people running the Fair realized that the bulk of their target audience, Lincoln and Omaha residents, have zero interest in cows, pigs, sheep and horses, they'd have adapted the Fair and put in attractions that would interest us. They didn't and the Fair failed. This is simple economics, people, not rocket science.
I wish the Fair well in Grand Island. I think it has a good chance to thrive there, I really do. I hope those who still love the Fair truly enjoy the move, and I hope that this is the best thing for everyone. "
Kent Houseman wrote on July 16, 2008 11:50 am:
JB wrote on July 16, 2008 11:55 am:
Let it go wrote on July 16, 2008 12:13 pm:
Roger not Yant wrote on July 16, 2008 12:28 pm:
asdfg wrote on July 16, 2008 12:39 pm:
Oh the HUMANITY wrote on July 16, 2008 12:39 pm:
The Unicameral settled this for us a long time ago. If you are so unhappy about it, vote out your state senator who went along this diabolical scheme you all cry foul on. If not, I hope you enjoy eating your crow. "
MattS wrote on July 16, 2008 12:49 pm:
Chris wrote on July 16, 2008 12:54 pm:
The state fair board sealed their fate when they decided not to negotiate with Lincoln and UNL and decided to take their ball and go to GI. The fair will wither away even more in GI b/c there isn't a population base to support it. In the mean time Horse racing will move to the Lancaster Event center with an exciting new track/simulcast and will continue their run of success. The Lancaster County fair will improve their offering to compensate for the lack of the State Fair in Lincoln. The Lancaster Co. fair has the possibility to turn into an Eastern Nebraska/Urban fair that will have more people through the gates than the State fair in GI. That could've have been the State Fair's fate, but as Harvey pointed out, the State Fair board is completely irrational, unwilling to change their offerings to appeal to the more urban population that Nebraska has become. Then, in case there was any question if the were irrational, they moved away from their population base. Bye Bye State Fair, you need Lincoln (or at least eastern NE), Lincoln doesn't need you. Good Riddance. "
mitchy_v wrote on July 16, 2008 12:59 pm:
To SW wrote on July 16, 2008 1:03 pm:
I hope you are young wrote on July 16, 2008 1:42 pm:
rh wrote on July 16, 2008 1:48 pm:
And it is LINCOLN people who have to watch a few UNL control the land usage in and around Lincoln. Do we really need to be controlled by them?
They do not play well - they only think of their select few. Look at Whittier School, look at Cushman and look at all the RIF's that have taken place the last few years. Is this really going to bring lots of money to Lincoln? "
Red wrote on July 16, 2008 2:23 pm:
This issue, agree or disagree, still needs to be voted on by the people. The way this all played out seems very shady - "
rondofox wrote on July 16, 2008 2:26 pm:
Chris wrote on July 16, 2008 2:27 pm:
its about time wrote on July 16, 2008 2:46 pm:
Alan wrote on July 16, 2008 2:48 pm:
Alan wrote on July 16, 2008 3:38 pm:
Me wrote on July 16, 2008 3:50 pm:
Bill wrote on July 16, 2008 3:53 pm:
2. Had the Fair not been moved, it would have died a slow and painful death. It did not survive on the Lottery money and the matching funds from the city of Lincoln. There is NOT one building on the Fairgrounds that would pass a current day inspection. Have any of you driven through the park lately. The consultants estimated close to $200 to fix the current location. There is a drain on the taxes we pay.
3. The buildings on the Fairground were insured for $171 Million. That does not mean that is what they are worth. I can insure my house for $10 Million. It does not change the fact that is is worth closer to $120,000.
4. The University only has to pay $21 Million when the property is worth so much more. Okay, charge the University 10 times that amount and who pays for it. The taxpayers. The property is owned by the State of Nebraska. Both the Fairgrounds and the University are State entities. It is called a trasfer.
5. The Fairground were not used. You can say that you have 1001 days of events per year, but you can only have so many flea markets and garage sales. How many of the buildings are used for the races? The Grand Stand and a couple of barns. What are all the other buildings being used for at the same time? Nothing.
6. The two main historical buildings are in worse shape and get less use than Whittier Junior High [a building that keeps getting brought up]. Window are broken, doors are plywood, the electrical could not pass inspection.
7. Had the Fair Board had anyone with Marketing experience, the place might have made a goal of it. They didn't and the State Fair should have been allowed to die in peace. Instead, people point their fingers to the Great and Powerful Perlman who decided he wanted the Fairgrounds and the Legislature gave it to him out of fear......Grow up. He and his staff came up with a plan that would better utilize the property and would be better for the State in the long run.
8. As part of the agreement when the Devaney Center was built on the Fairgrounds back in the early '70, the Fair Board gets the use of the building during the State Fair. During the 70's-90's there were some decent shows in the Arena. For the last ten years, the 15000 seat arena has sat empty during the fair. What kind of managment is that? "
Development wrote on July 16, 2008 4:07 pm:
If you people who are crying about the State Fair want to be taken seriously, start talking sense. "
For Years wrote on July 16, 2008 6:46 pm:
tried wrote on July 16, 2008 7:15 pm:
Hey Mr. Devlopment wrote on July 16, 2008 8:21 pm:
Weasel wrote on July 16, 2008 11:01 pm:
We paid for professionals to say that the fair needs to be in a population base of 300,000. This is why I am upset, we spent all this money to better the fair and now we are putting a massive business venture in the middle of nowhere. "
dennis wrote on July 17, 2008 3:54 am:
GI Guy wrote on July 17, 2008 7:12 am:
the solution wrote on July 17, 2008 7:29 am:
John wrote on July 17, 2008 8:53 am:
Barbara Clegg wrote on July 17, 2008 9:27 am:
Thank Goodness it Failed wrote on July 17, 2008 10:08 am:
Grundle wrote on July 17, 2008 1:42 pm:
Yarrow wrote on July 17, 2008 3:11 pm:
Gonzilla wrote on July 17, 2008 3:13 pm:
Limey Bitters wrote on July 17, 2008 3:25 pm:
mark wrote on July 17, 2008 4:30 pm:
dogma wrote on July 17, 2008 4:55 pm:
I'm tired of people thinking we have to vote on everything. If you didn't want your elected official to vote to move the fair then why didn't you call/email/write your elected official and let them know? The unicameral is there to represent us, if they aren't doing the job then get off your high horse and vote for someone different. For far too long we've allowed one or two disatisfied people (most often from another state) to dictate what we should or should not vote on. "