Neb. Republicans back ban on affirmative action
By ANNA JO BRATTON / The Associated Press
LA VISTA — Nebraska Republicans have voted to adopt a resolution to support a ban on race-based affirmative action in the state.
The Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative says it turned in more than 167,000 petition signatures to get the issue on the November ballot. The signatures are currently being counted.
Opponents of the ban say it will keep universities from recruiting minority students, among other problems.
Related Link(s):
The resolution, approved Saturday at the state Republican Party’s convention, says Nebraska Republicans believe in Ronald Reagan’s idea of a colorblind society. It urges Nebraskans to vote in favor of the resolution.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Why do people wrote on July 12, 2008 8:13 pm:
LDE wrote on July 12, 2008 9:00 pm:
biancalana wrote on July 12, 2008 10:10 pm:
all, that's money spent for gender specific purposes),
is it any wonder barely more than 20% of people in a recent
poll identified themselves as Republicans.... "
JB wrote on July 12, 2008 11:57 pm:
Jeff wrote on July 13, 2008 12:15 am:
Locke wrote on July 13, 2008 6:05 am:
Petitioner wrote on July 13, 2008 6:44 am:
(1) Men also get breast cancer.
(2) The initiative says you can't give preferences; it doesn't bar money spent for 'gender specific purposes'.
(3) No state that has adopted the initiative has in any way restricted breast cancer research or screening as a result. "
Hector wrote on July 13, 2008 7:21 am:
concerned wrote on July 13, 2008 9:22 am:
Joseph P. Sokolovsky wrote on July 13, 2008 9:34 am:
Why should minorities be given a advantage in jobs, education and life in general? If people can't "cut it" or make it on their own merits....then
they should try harder or step aside and let those that played by the
rules do it or have it!!
I am a first born American....and my dad often told me he received NO
special treatment or advantage when he mirgrated (legally) to the USA.
Personally, I think Nebraskans are going to be quite surprised at the
HUGE number of fellow Nebraskans that vote NO on affirmative action
in November.....and it will also surprise many people when Democrats
also vote "no" to affirmative action!!! "
MarkyMark wrote on July 13, 2008 10:36 am:
Typical Republican wrote on July 13, 2008 10:52 am:
ddb wrote on July 13, 2008 11:08 am:
Democrat wrote on July 13, 2008 11:53 am:
Doug wrote on July 13, 2008 12:17 pm:
This does not give license to discriminate. It prevents discrimination. Reverse discrimination is still discrimination after all. Bottom line, who is best suited for the job, most qualified etc. "
I wrote on July 13, 2008 1:04 pm:
I am an educated black female. I've been actively seeking a job in my career field for over 4 years in this state. Yes, 4 years!! If AA edicts were followed I would be working now. Obviously affirmative action is not adhered to in this state as it is so why bother to support the initiative.
In Nebraska it's who you know, not what you know. "
sw wrote on July 13, 2008 1:14 pm:
for minorities. wrote on July 13, 2008 1:49 pm:
I hope there will be a state in this country they can find that will help them survive in a society that is anger based.. "
How telling wrote on July 13, 2008 3:04 pm:
Unfortunately, we have laws in this country that prohibit hiring "I" because she is a Black female. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits hiring decisions based on race and gender, among other things. What "I" is advocating is turning back the clock 40 years so we can ignore that law. That's pretty sad.
It's a tough employment world out there, "I." My wife has been looking for a job for the past two years with no luck. It's not just the color of your skin - it's the fact that the job market stinks right now. Also, if you think you're not being hired because you're Black and/or female, there are Federal, State and local (in Lincoln, anyway) agencies that investigate discrimination. You should use the law in your favor and file charges against companies that won't hire you because of the color of your skin or your gender. "
goob wrote on July 13, 2008 3:27 pm:
Yea sure racism is republican only? Are you people serious? Get a grip and stop pandering to the party line....racists and bigots come in ALL forms and party line is NO factor. Oh, tell me about Robert "KKK" Byrd...the grand poo bah oh and democrat leader.
WAKE UP folks. "
goob wrote on July 13, 2008 3:36 pm:
First time to be proud to be American? Yea thats a great change.
Quotas are dangerous and that is exactly why our country is in the shambles it is. "
Once Again wrote on July 13, 2008 5:10 pm:
The are laws that prohibit discrimination...discrimination still exists...go figure.
"Colorblind society?" Not likely in the USA "
Petitioner wrote on July 13, 2008 5:19 pm:
(1) The NSF says you have to have AA, not preferences. NSF gives far more money to California, Michigan and Washington, where preferences are illegal, than it does to Nebraska.
(2) The NCRI also states that if funding of a state program by a federal agency is put in jeopardy by NCRI, then NCRI does not apply to that program. "
Goober Revised wrote on July 13, 2008 5:54 pm:
Ej wrote on July 13, 2008 6:50 pm:
JR wrote on July 13, 2008 8:00 pm:
Get Real wrote on July 13, 2008 9:35 pm:
More to the point, less than 5% of Nebraska's population is black (the group many believe benefits most from aff. action?).
This whole discussion and initiative is a farce. "
Hey JR wrote on July 13, 2008 10:07 pm:
All FOR IT wrote on July 14, 2008 1:30 am:
Shelly wrote on July 14, 2008 9:12 am:
explain this wrote on July 14, 2008 9:18 am:
Outside the Box wrote on July 14, 2008 9:38 am:
JR wrote on July 14, 2008 11:06 am:
I wrote on July 14, 2008 11:49 am:
Again, AA was designed to "equal the playing field" but in a sea capped with white it's hard to think the field is equal if you are of color in Nebraska. Most likely, if you are of color, you're drowning.
Tell your wife "Telling", "Good luck" and when she lands that job to look around and see if she sees equality on that field. Bet not. "
JL wrote on July 14, 2008 12:35 pm:
"I am a first born American....and my dad often told me he received NO
special treatment or advantage when he mirgrated (legally) to the USA."
Sorry, Joseph, your father was from a country whose citizens are permited by the USA to immigrate to our shores. That's not true of every country, no how matter how desperate or deserving the population. So your father did receive preferential treatment. He just doesn't want to admit it. "
De Jure and De Facto wrote on July 14, 2008 1:22 pm:
Courtesy of MomsRising.org: "Women today make up 56% of college graduates and nearly half of the labor force in this country. Yet women make only 73 cents to a man's dollar, and mothers only make 60 cents, for the exact same job."
Go ahead white men...file your lawsuits! "
JB wrote on July 14, 2008 2:41 pm:
Flip it over wrote on July 14, 2008 3:23 pm:
are far less likely to discriminate than Republicans. Every time we vote in a Democratic president I tend to make significant economic and career gains only to quickly
lose them when the party of affirmative action for the rich, white and
males retakes Pennsylvania Avenue. "
Ray wrote on July 14, 2008 4:09 pm:
Democrat wrote on July 14, 2008 6:43 pm:
http://nadc.nol.org/ccdb/search.cgi?page=formb1f&IDNO=08BQC00186&OFFREC=06/30/2008 "