Now
Fair
67°
High
85°
Low
54°

The good, bad and contradictory of our Founding Fathers

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MICAH MERTES / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Jul 03, 2008 - 12:36:37 am CDT

They were great men.

They were grand men.

They wore powdered wigs.

Story Photo
(Illustration by Micah Mertes / Lincoln Journal Star)
Sources for this feature

"Don't Know Much About History" by Kenneth C. Davis

"1776" by David McCullough

"Revolutionary Characters" by Gordon S. Wood

"Bolt Of Fate: Benjamin Franklin and his Electric Kite Hoax" by Tommy Tucker

Fact or legend?

Did Thomas Jefferson have an affair with Sally Hemings?

Depends on whom you ask.

Some consider the claim that Jefferson had an affair with his mistress/slave to be fact; others believe it was just mudslinging Federalist gossip that came out of the 1804 presidential election.

Sally Hemings was the half-sister of Jefferson's wife, Martha. The story is that Jefferson began his relationship with Hemings five years after Martha's death, while Jefferson and Hemings were in Paris.

In 1998, DNA tests of Jefferson and Hemings descendants showed that Hemings' children were fathered by someone in the Jefferson line. However, many scholars have decried these results as inconclusive and unreliable.

Did George Washington chop down the cherry tree?

No, probably not.

The story was told in "Life of George Washington" by Parson Weems, the first biography of Washington. The tale - that little Georgie cut down a cherry tree with his hatchet but DIDN'T lie about doing it when confronted by his father - was one of the many fabrications of the book (and one of the many yarns that helped build Washington's legend).

Did Ben Franklin discover electricity during his supposed thunderstorm kite experiment?

Some historians say the kite experiment did, in fact, happen. But others believe the tale was a hoax propagated by Franklin himself. In his book "Bolt Of Fate: Benjamin Franklin and his Electric Kite Hoax," historian Tommy Tucker portrays Franklin as a publicity hound who bent and broke the truth whenever it suited him. According to Tucker, Franklin's fibbing extended to dubious claims of scientific accomplishment.

- Micah Mertes

They are the reason you get to sprawl out on the blanket-covered grass Friday night and watch the fireworks pop.

But the Founding Fathers were also subject to the flaws and frailties we all are.

As is often the case with historical characters, it’s easy to consider our country’s Founders as almost mythic figures. But in reality, they were just a few men, smarter and better than most, in the right place at the right time. And their ordinary nature makes their incredible accomplishment all the more inspiring.

In case American History 101 is a distant memory, here’s a brief look at our Founders. Consider it food for thought as you’re celebrating tomorrow.

Thomas Jefferson

Born in Albemarle County, Va. (1743-1826)

The Good: Farmer, scholar, lawyer, writer of the Declaration of Independence and the third president of the United States. He had endless faith in the Republic and the American people.

The Bad: Many historians say Jefferson was self-possessed in public but resentful and extremely sensitive in private. And sweet golden Monticello! — did that man hate being edited.

He had grown so attached to his draft of the Declaration that when Congress snipped about a quarter of the document, Jefferson harbored bile for his editors long after the document’s signing.

The Contradictory: Here’s the big question, of course: How could the man who believed “all men are created equal” be a slave owner?

Well, Jefferson did hate slavery and wished for its abolishment. He even wrote about its evils in the Declaration, but that part got cut. Jefferson’s contradiction, however, was also America’s contradiction.

As Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Gordon S. Wood wrote, “Jefferson’s words and ideas transcended his time, but he himself did not.”

John Adams

Born in Braintree, Mass.  (1735-1826)

The Good: He was the second president of the United States, one of the drafters of the Declaration and, of course, the subject of a recent critically acclaimed HBO miniseries (a modern measure of greatness). Ben Franklin described Adams as a man “who means well for his country, is always an honest man, often a wise one, but sometimes and in some things absolutely out of his senses.”

The Bad: Adams was an immeasurably vital figure of the time, but he was also vain and spiteful and often drew long sighs of exasperation from his colleagues. Think of him as the George Costanza of the First Continental Congress. He felt little appreciation for his role in the American Revolution, once lamenting that the event would be remembered as the time “Dr. Franklin’s electrical rod smote the earth and out sprung George Washington.”

The Contradictory: He was one of the most adamant supporters of independence from England and had much hope for the new Republic. But he also held a misanthropic view of people in general, believing they succumbed to personal needs over those of greater society. He was pessimistic about what American society would become: a rat race to money, power and distinction. He eventually supported a more centralized form of government to curb society’s bad habits.   

George Washington

Born in Virginia (1732-99)

The Good: How did this homegrown, relatively uneducated Virginian become the guy on the $1 bill? Well, for starters, he just looked like a leader. He stood about 6-foot-3, with broad shoulders and a rugged athleticism. And he looked great on a horse.

Superficial stuff aside, Washington was polite and virtuous and kept getting appointed to positions he held no desire for. He was both a reluctant commander in chief of the Continental army and a reluctant president of the new government. As Historian Garry Willis observed, Washington “gained power from his readiness to give it up.”

The Bad: Perhaps our monumental hero was a little too reluctant at times. While holding his two most important positions, Washington worried about his Mount Vernon home, detailing to servants various minutiae in how to keep his estate and plantation up and running. His attention to Mount Vernon sometimes surpassed his attention to the new government.

And John Adams — the guy who originally nominated him as leader of the Continental army, mind you — certainly had his doubts. On one occasion, Adams said of Washington, “That he was too illiterate, unlearned, unread for his station and reputation is equally past dispute.”

The Contradictory: Like Jefferson, Washington prospered from the labor of his slaves, despite the fact that he spoke out against slavery.

Benjamin Franklin

Born in Boston, Mass. (1706-90)

The Good: Franklin was a big, witty, multi-talented dynamo. In addition to helping draft the Declaration and negotiating an American alliance with France, Franklin was a printer, writer, scientist and philosopher. He invented bifocals and the lightning rod and wrote a vast collection of witticisms in his “Poor Richard’s Almanack.”

At the time of the Revolution, he was one of the most famous men in the world.

The Bad: Though Franklin was known for his advocacy of an ethical society, having even come up with 13 personal virtues he tried to adhere to daily, the guy was no saint, especially when it came to chastity. His son was reportedly born out of wedlock — no small taboo at the time. And according to many accounts, Franklin carried on some of his less pure inclinations through much of his life.

The Contradictory: The man was a walking contradiction. He embodied the self-made rustic individualism of America, but also hung out in the aristocratic circles of England and France.

He was at once a patriot and a sophisticate. 

Other players

John Hancock

(1736-93)

The Good: First president of Congress; great penmanship.

The Bad: He earned much of his wealth by smuggling.

The Contradictory: Though he had no military experience whatsoever, he wished to be commander of the Continental army and was peeved when Washington took the position.

Benjamin Church

(1734-78)

The Good: He was the first doctor available to treat the wounded of the Boston Massacre.

The Bad: He was a traitor. Church was the first guy caught spying for the British.

Contradictory: Before being caught as a spy, Church was widely known as a passionate patriot.

Samuel Adams

(1722-1803)

The Good: John Adams’ cousin was stellar at peeving the British and making a scene. He was one of the key players behind the Boston Tea Party.

The Bad: He was often reckless and indulgent. He even squandered his inheritance.

The Contradictory: Though his name is now associated with good beer, Adams was actually an inept beer-maker, ruining his father’s brewery after taking it over.


Reach Micah Mertes at 473-7395 or mmertes@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
402 > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
snotmare wrote on July 3, 2008 7:55 am:
" This is a good article, a good bit of history! The only bad thing about it is that it leaves out other important parts of their history, namely their religious values and how that played a dominant role in our nation's founding. "

Nina wrote on July 3, 2008 8:29 am:
" Wonderful reading! Also Jefferson was an inventor of the highest degree, making innovations to his home that no other had. But then as now, as I commented on another posting, we've not had a perfect president, and never will. We just hope to choose the one who has the most wisdom, knowledge, leadership qualities, and whose heart is in the right place - caring for America's people, and our relationships with other countries of the world. "

religious values wrote on July 3, 2008 8:54 am:
" Well, Thomas Jefferson has said, "Christianity is the most vile and corrupt system that has ever shone upon man," and also, "The Bible is a pile of dung." He edited most of the original Bible out and wrote his own to take out the contradictions and errors. You can even buy it in the bookstore today. Most of the founding fathers were deists, meaning they believed "something" created the universe, but that it didn't care about us and most likely forgot we were ever here. It's all common knowledge, but we don't like to admit these things. Even though we should. "

MarkyMark to snotmare wrote on July 3, 2008 9:25 am:
" The religious values may have played a role in their character, but as far as making it's way into legislation of the founding of America, religion was missing as it should have been. These people were starting a country and the Bronze-Age mythology of religion shouldn't and didn't play a part. Remember how religious "Christians" earlier that century were actually burning innocent people to death, that had been accused of being "witches". These are exactly the reasons religion must be kept away from American government....just take a look at the Middle East........ "

Ok wrote on July 3, 2008 11:17 am:
" Jefferson also attended church in the House of Representatives when he was President, how's that for separation of church and state. "

To religious values wrote on July 3, 2008 11:33 am:
" Actually, you are completely incorrect in your assumptions about their theological understanding. Most of these men were well versed in the political philosophy of John Locke, who said that we were created by God and were given freedom by God. If you don't believe me, just compare the Declaration of Independence to Locke's Second Treatise on Government. Enough of your revisionist history already. "

Chris wrote on July 3, 2008 12:07 pm:
" The truth regarding the founding fathers and religion is that they very much believed in distinct separation of Church and State, unlike many evangelical activists in today's political landscape. The founding fathers belief in this is rooted in the writings of John Locke and others who wrote during the aftermath of the English Civil War, in which many were killed due to religious differences and religions pervasiveness in the state. This article is all and all a good piece in terms of raising awareness, but falls flat in not enstilling the reader with a sense of the sacrifices these good men made so we all of the rights we have today. Also with respect to the slavery issue, I think you would be hard pressed to find any land owner in Virginia during Jefferson's time, who did not own slaves. Slavery was an economic reality then, just as the warped views of race as a concept and economic redistribution are cultural and political realities we live with today. "

Ryan wrote on July 3, 2008 12:10 pm:
" 'Well-versed' and 'believing in' are two different things. I've read Locke and understand how it shaped the nation. Locke's ideas of God were still mostly deist, and it's not revisionist in any way to claim that Jefferson and Washington were deists. They were admittedly so. "

Dave wrote on July 3, 2008 12:40 pm:
" HA ha ha... leave it to somebody to make this article an argument for sullying government with religion-- Just move to the Middle East and you can have all the mixing of government and religion you want. "