Now
Fair
50°
High
40°
Low
22°

The gas-price solution no one wants: driving 55

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By PAUL WENSKE/McClatchy Newspapers

Friday, Jun 27, 2008 - 03:04:53 pm CDT

Jon Zehnder, 54, knows he’s a curiosity because, as his bumper sticker says, “I drive 55.”

“I like to drive fast, but I’m old enough to remember the energy crisis in the 1970s,” said Zehnder, a social worker who lives in Lindsborg, Kan. “And,” he added with a laugh, “I’m saving a butt load on gas.”

But even in a time of $4-a-gallon gas, the slow lane is lonely these days.

Story Photo
(Jupiterimages)

For all the griping about spiking gas prices, there’s no clamor for the return of the little-lamented 55 mph speed limit of the ’70s and ’80s — though most agree it reduces consumption and saves money.

“It’s not that people haven’t thought of it — just no one is even close to discussing implementing it,” said Therese Langer, speaking for the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. “It’s not high on anyone’s list.”

The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that the cost of driving rises faster above 60 mph — adding nearly 20 cents per gallon for each additional 5 mph. The Alliance to Save Energy in Washington estimates that restricting speeds to 55 mph could reduce the use of oil imported from the Persian Gulf by up to 20 percent a day.

Even so, “there doesn’t appear to be any eagerness on Capitol Hill to revisit the issue,” said Ronnie Kweller of the alliance.

No, indeed. Paul Hesse, a spokesman for the U.S. Energy Information Administration, said his agency willingly would analyze the value of a 55 mph speed limit if asked by a member of Congress.

No one has asked.

In truth, the situation today is different, said Mike Right, spokesman for AAA. In the 1970s the crisis turned on shortages caused by the oil embargo and turbulence in Iran. Today, there are no shortages. Instead, Asian demand is causing prices to skyrocket.

“Back in the ’70s people were fearful they would get to a strange area, there wouldn’t be any gas, and they’d be stranded,” Right said. In contrast, today, higher prices seem more an irritant to commuters with busy lifestyles who want to arrive at work or play as fast as their wheels can take them.

“I don’t think the public is ready for those kinds of regulations imposed on their daily lives today,” Right said.

In the 1970s, life was slower. There were fewer interstates. In metro areas, people lived closer in, and most didn’t care if their cars got only 14 miles to the gallon. After all, gas cost less than 40 cents a gallon.

But then the Arab-Israeli conflict triggered the Arab oil embargo. World crude prices quadrupled (to $12 a barrel). Gas at the pump shot up to 55 cents per gallon.

When the shortages occurred, the government contributed to the long lines at the pump by reallocating supplies.

“That created a lot of problems,” said American Petroleum Institute economist Ron Planting. “It’s very hard for someone in Washington to figure out how much fuel every station in the country needs.”

Many Americans recall rationing based on whether a license plate ended in an odd or an even number.

But the most unpopular measure: Congress and President Richard Nixon imposed the 55 mph speed limit and made its adoption in every state a condition for highway funding.

In 1987 and 1988, Congress allowed states to raise speed limits to 65 mph on certain highways. And in 1995 the law was repealed. How much was saved has long been a matter of debate. But the episode raised awareness, at least temporarily.

Congress pressed automakers to increase fuel efficiency, and the average mileage nearly doubled, to 27.5 miles a gallon by 1987. Automakers also began to experiment with hybrids.

Even so, Americans fell in love with sport utility vehicles and big trucks — and fuel efficiency took a back seat again.

Earlier this month trucking giant Schneider National Inc. capped its drivers at 60 mph to save an estimated 3.8 million gallons of diesel fuel a year.

The American Trucking Association has called on other members to do the same.  

Recently a broad mix of business and consumer groups launched the Drive Smarter Challenge campaign, urging Americans to adopt more efficient driving habits.

Their Web site, www.drivesmarterchallenge.org, helps estimate the annual savings of using fuel-efficient practices.

“I’m not sure whether most people make the connection between how fast they drive and how much fuel they use,” said Deron Lovaas, the group’s vehicle director.

One person making that connection is Tim Castleman of Sacramento, Calif., who in 2002 started www.drive55.org, a Web site devoted specifically to the merits of slowing down. At first the site got only a trickle of curious visitors. Since the surge in gas prices, page hits have soared to more than 1,000 a day. Castleman said some visitors send him hateful e-mail. But others post favorable responses or buy a pro-55 bumper sticker.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Business > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
VilleVallo wrote on June 27, 2008 4:24 pm:
" My life partner and I have been obsessing over our MPGs for the past few month. The research we've conducted on our very fuel efficient foreign cars interestingly enough shows that we don't notice much efficiency gained driving 60 mph vs. 55 mph. We both commute (highway miles) to work, and keep it on the slow side. But 60 mph works for us. I laugh every time someone passes me going close to 70 mph in their gas guzzlers, though. "

No problem wrote on June 27, 2008 7:25 pm:
" The younger generations that don't know anything but 70 and 75 mph would
have a problem. If you grew up when you only drove 50 mph you don't think
much of it. I generally go U.S 6 to Omaha and that way I only go 60 mph.
Would be nice for these younger generations to learn to live more frugley
and maybe they would learn some respect. Naaaa, that'd never happen!! "

whatever wrote on June 27, 2008 7:25 pm:
" Let's stop beating around the bush and mandate the 55 mph speed limit. "

Lets dont do this again wrote on June 27, 2008 8:28 pm:
" I really disliked it years ago and I hope it doesn't happen again. If someone wants to save a buck...fine, let them drive 55. If someone wants to go fast...let them. Personally, I'd like to be somewhere in between, so let ME choose. "

where wrote on June 27, 2008 8:55 pm:
" was this picture taken? I've never seen a road like it in nebraska. I'll bet its the new interstate between lincoln and omaha. 55 does save gas but sometimes it will cost an extra night on the road unless you want to put in 12 hours a day. I plan on driving 60 though instead of 70 "

Bob wrote on June 27, 2008 10:26 pm:
" I think the younger generations are going to have a LOT more to get used to other than just driving slower. In about 20 years, driving 55 mph will be the least of their worries - just eating will be pretty important by then.
Go ahead, laugh away, young'uns....history just keeps repeating, again and again. In this case, we let the younger generations re-live the dirty 30's. "

Sammy wrote on June 29, 2008 4:38 pm:
" Driving slower, driving smarter, driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, not driving at all... these are the ways we have to ease our pain at the pump. Anyone who doesn't do all three has no basis to complain. Gas prices are only going up, neighbors, and since we can't redesign our cities (d'oh!) that means that you and me are going to be left to fend for ourselves and eat those gas prices for dinner instead of steak. Hummer drivers, it's either the car or the steak. Take your pick! "

Gross wrote on July 16, 2008 9:50 am:
" I believe the correct term is "boat load". Mr Zehnder's alternative term might provide some middle schoolers with a lighter some fun, but it won't power a car 5 feet. "