Surgeries ahead for toddler attacked by pit bull
By The Associated Press
Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 - 08:39:57 pm CDT
OMAHA — Doctors say a 15-month-old girl attacked Wednesday afternoon by a pit bull in east Omaha faces many surgeries after the dog tore off one-third of her scalp.
The girl, Charlotte Blevins, was in serious condition Thursday. Doctors were able to reattach the scalp to cover about 80 percent of the injury.
Two mothers were pulling two children in a wagon when the dog got free from its collar and attacked.
The toddler’s mother, 29-year-old Wendy Blevins, was bitten when she tried to get between the dog and her child. She, the other mother and a 17-month-old boy were treated for less serious injuries.
The owner was ticketed on suspicion of harboring a dangerous animal. The dog will be euthanized.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit


Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Frank wrote on June 26, 2008 9:59 pm:
I agree.. wrote on June 26, 2008 10:00 pm:
Cole wrote on June 26, 2008 10:10 pm:
Pit Bulls, Rottweilers and Doberman Pinchers have no business being kept as domestic animals. I know what you're saying - "Hey, it's not the dog - it's the owner. Pit Bulls need to be brought up to blah blah blah blah....." Right. How many times have you every seen a headline like, "Child Viscously Attacked and Killed by Collie" ...or labrador ...or Saint Bernard? People who own Pit Bulls should go live on an island somewhere. The rest of us would like to walk down the sidewalk with our toddlers in little red wagons without fear of our scalps being ripped off!! "
Lets be honest wrote on June 26, 2008 10:24 pm:
Pit bulls wouldn't look good with pink bows and lacy sweaters. Pit bulls don't fit in in the Regency neighborhood in Omaha. Pit bulls have a persona and people own them cuz they like the image . . . a nasty, take no crap, aggressive, live by my own rules, mean son of a gun.
Who's more likely to own a pitbull, THE BRADY BUNCH or RAMBO? "
Frank wrote on June 26, 2008 10:26 pm:
Don't think that collies or labradors don't attack people. They most certainly do. There are irresponsible owners of those types of dogs as as well as pitbulls, rottweilers, and dobermans. The main difference is that far fewer owners of those types of dogs are irresponsible. Unfortunately, many people who own pitbulls and other powerful breeds own them for the image alone and are not very responsible with them. Another difference is that collies and labs aren't as powerfull and don't do as much damage when they attack. All of the dogs in your example were not bread to be pets. They were all bread to be working dogs of some sort, and yet people take them all as pets. "
Come on Frank wrote on June 26, 2008 10:43 pm:
Captain Howdy wrote on June 26, 2008 10:52 pm:
to cole wrote on June 26, 2008 11:18 pm:
Too dangerous wrote on June 26, 2008 11:58 pm:
Lets be honest Cole wrote on June 27, 2008 12:02 am:
I'm not Rambo, and I own a pit bull. I do not own a pit bull because I'm a "bad boy". I am very aware that if he decided to fight another dog or a person, he would most definitely win. That is why I always harness him when out walking on the trail and never take him to dog parks where he could meet other dogs.
It is sad that pit bull haters stereotype ALL pit bulls as being vicious and stereotype ALL pit bull owners as thugs. My wife and I take exception to that...because there are a lot of things people do every day that endanger others...talking on the cell phone while driving, smoking, drinking and driving. Where is the outcry against these actions? I wish those people would go live on an island. Until then, come visit us in Walton where there are dobermans, american staffordshires, pit bulls, poodles, labs, mutts, you name it. Perhaps you'll even get to meet one of these wonderful dogs on the MoPac trail and be enlightened about your ignorance...or you could just continue to live in hatred. Truly it is the owner's responsibility to know their own and their dog's limits. Don't hate the breed. "
Mindless Robot wrote on June 27, 2008 1:17 am:
Collies and Labradors aren't built like a Rhino. Have a mouth like an Alligator and have the disposition of a Wolverine.
I've been bitten by a Collie, however it didn't take half of my head off.
They are hardwired to be aggressive. "
Greg B wrote on June 27, 2008 2:53 am:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L9zaa6gD0I "
Teri wrote on June 27, 2008 3:52 am:
Mo. Mom wrote on June 27, 2008 6:14 am:
My opinion wrote on June 27, 2008 6:49 am:
Chomper wrote on June 27, 2008 6:58 am:
According to a 27-year study of dogs in the New York City area made by Dr. Robert Oleson, of the U.S. Public Health Service, these are the 9 dogs most apt to take a nibble out of a human being. They are, in the order of their aggressiveness:
1. German shepherd
2. Chow chow
3. Poodle
4. Italian bulldog
5. Fox terrier
6. Mixed chow chow
7. Airedale
8. Pekingese
9. Mixed German shepherd "
J.D. wrote on June 27, 2008 7:07 am:
Arrgh wrote on June 27, 2008 7:24 am:
Been there wrote on June 27, 2008 7:48 am:
Ghost wrote on June 27, 2008 8:00 am:
Dog owner wrote on June 27, 2008 8:37 am:
C wrote on June 27, 2008 8:47 am:
Plus there is a reason you can buy a BB gun with out a permit but need one for a handgun. Poodles, Labs, Scotties etc.. would be like a BB Gun, they could attack but the damage would tend to be minimal, Rotweilers, dobermans, and pitbulls are more like handguns. Safe if owned by a responsible person but catastrophic if irresponsible. Also, how can someone accuse the media of being biased against a dog bread? ARE YOU SERIOUS?? The reason you read more about pit bull attacks is because they cause more damage than other dogs. "
home boy wrote on June 27, 2008 8:53 am:
you said it Cole wrote on June 27, 2008 8:59 am:
jaded wrote on June 27, 2008 9:01 am:
Get informed wrote on June 27, 2008 9:16 am:
My MIl owns a lab that can do serious damage. He his 85 pounds and has very strong jaws. Do not tell me that he does not attack. He has knocked me down and bitten my hand. I am family not a stranger and this dog knows me. All dogs can be dangerous. The owners should be responsible for the dogs actions. To start banning animals is dangerous. Where will you stop and why do you feel the need to take away the right of responsible people to own dogs because you think it is what should be done. If we made people take responsiblity for their actions, quite a few things would be different in society but we don't do that. "
JG wrote on June 27, 2008 9:18 am:
Open your minds wrote on June 27, 2008 9:25 am:
All dogs if not trained or cared for properly can attack. I have a dog that is a Pitbull mix with a Malamute. She is a sweetheart. But she was trained properly. We introduced her to people and other pets so she wouldn't attack. We are also careful on how we play with her so she doesn't get agressive. This should be the case with all dogs. My mom has a golden retriever. Although he is a very gentle dog, if not properly taken care of he could cause much more damage then my dog could simply because of his huge size.
All dogs are pack dogs and have the instinct in them to act as pack dogs. Do not stereotype pitbulls into being "gang dog" or "bad dogs" All dogs have the ability to be bad dogs.
So before you coninue ranting about pit bulls, do some research. You will see that any dog can be mean. Should we ban all dogs? While we are at it why don't we ban anything that could harm us. I better get rid of my childs bicycle. Wouldn't want him to fall off and get hurt and have the city council ban bicycles in the city. "
Seriously... wrote on June 27, 2008 9:29 am:
kp wrote on June 27, 2008 9:40 am:
NatureVS.Nurture wrote on June 27, 2008 9:40 am:
so sad wrote on June 27, 2008 9:40 am:
i pray for the little girls recovery, this mother and child are scarred for life.... "
Chris wrote on June 27, 2008 9:41 am:
Did you know wrote on June 27, 2008 9:53 am:
I understand the need to do something but lumping dogs of a certain breed together and saying they are all bad and deserve to die is not the answer. Target viscous dogs and their owners in general, not just those of a certain breed. Any dog can attack or bite, the breed just does not matter. "
Did you know wrote on June 27, 2008 9:56 am:
I understand the need to do something but lumping dogs of a certain breed together and saying they are all bad and deserve to die is not the answer. Target viscous dogs and their owners in general, not just those of a certain breed. Any dog can attack or bite, the breed just does not matter.
Also "so sad"- the whole locking jaws thing is a myth- no dogs jaws lock, especially not bully breed. "
Cole wrote on June 27, 2008 9:57 am:
Look - the world is dangerous and we can't live in a bubble. But if we can find a SIMPLE way to lower the risk of kids being viscously attacked and sent to the hospital or morgue, wouldn't we do it? If you and your wife felt the need for canine companionship, it's not like you didn't have choices. "
Lori wrote on June 27, 2008 10:04 am:
LK wrote on June 27, 2008 10:11 am:
Frank wrote on June 27, 2008 10:36 am:
Darth Hello wrote on June 27, 2008 10:41 am:
-C3PO to Chewbacca: "It was a fair move. Screaming about it won't help you."
-Han Solo to R2D2 and C3PO: "It's best to just let him win. You don't want to upset him."
-C3PO to Han Solo: "But noboby worries about upsetting a droid."
-Han Solo: "That's because droids don't pull people's arms out of their sockets when they lose."
-C3PO to R2D2: "I suggest a new strategy R2. Let the Wookie win."
See the point? "
SDM wrote on June 27, 2008 10:44 am:
A different approach wrote on June 27, 2008 10:48 am:
There ARE pit bulls capable of restraint, love, affection, and obedience, just like any other breed.
We need to create a way to award and monitor all breeding of these dogs by professional breeders, including heavy fines for unregulated breeding (not all, but most of which is currently done to foster aggressive behavior and to make a quick buck). Potential owners should be required to accummulate vast amounts of education on everything from history, temperament, obedience training and restraint techniques before being assigned a license that will help enforcement officials to regulate any undesirable traits and issues with their new pet. Vaccination records, home environments and interaction with the public would be monitored and documented frequently and on a regular basis.
These sorts of breeding and regulation programs are available around the world for certain breeds that also have a history or a tendency to be bred for aggression. This is not the only time America has overpopulated the country with dogs from unregulated breeding facilities -- how many breeds are now known for their susceptibility to allergies, disease, deformity and in the worst cases (such as now), distemperament and violence? We need to start making some major changes.
It's very realistic to save this breed of dogs. I, too, have known many lovable and well-trained pit bulls. I've also known horrendous dogs, of many different breeds, some bigger and more capable of damage than others... though in fairness, an unmonitored small child is just as vulnerable to ANY violent dog, regardless of size or breed.
It will take a large-scale desire and effort by our community to find a more positive solution than simply to ignore the problem by banning the breed. "
I wrote on June 27, 2008 10:56 am:
As a side note: some people just moved into my neighborhood who have pit bulls. They put up a fence around their backyard and said, "We have pit bulls. I sure hope they don't get out some time because they don't like other people." Nice. "
natefrog wrote on June 27, 2008 10:58 am:
Linzee wrote on June 27, 2008 11:18 am:
www.bestfriends.org/vickdogs/ "
LISTEN wrote on June 27, 2008 11:20 am:
And to you, "Every dog bites" people. Go to the CDC website and see what types of dogs bite the most and which types of dogs cause the worse injuries and death. You'll discover that 60% of fatal dog bits are caused by pit bulls and rottweilers. THAT is why these dogs should be banned. I would suspect if you looked at the type of explosives that caused the most injuries, you'd probably find fireworks. If you looked at the ones that caused the most severe injuries and death, they probably would be high explosives.
WAKE UP! "
T wrote on June 27, 2008 11:29 am:
It happened to me wrote on June 27, 2008 12:30 pm:
Gregg wrote on June 27, 2008 1:11 pm:
Are you listening to yourselves? By your logic, we should not allow SUV's on the road because they have too much power and mass...they kill pedestrians too easily.
And compact cars like a little Kia Spectra...well they take too much damage in a collision, so they should be banned due to safety as well.
The fact is, the OWNER of the pitbull is the blame. Either he conditioned and trained the dog to be a menace, or perhaps the dog was a 'born menace' and he failed to do anything about it.
I've been around many, many pitbulls. They were all much safer to be around than my two little Welsch Corgis, or my mother in law's cat.
Think logically about wanting things banned. Don't think with your emotions...it usually gets you into a worse predicament. "
Frank wrote on June 27, 2008 1:11 pm:
It happened wrote on June 27, 2008 1:46 pm:
who will pay wrote on June 27, 2008 1:47 pm:
So Frank . . . wrote on June 27, 2008 2:18 pm:
Back atcha It happened wrote on June 27, 2008 2:23 pm:
I said pits were hardwired to react to "suddeness". You can't deny that! It happens with pits, leashed and unleashed, more than in any other breed of dog. AND THEY'RE MISSION IS TO KILL!
If you every walk in shoes like mine, I bet you won't be so anxious to defend the pit nor it's owner. "Oh, that's okay Mr. Pit. Chew me up. I should know it's not your fault 'cos you're just wandering? Where's your daddy by the way!?. Just take my eyeball while we wait for him". "
Footsteps to follow.... wrote on June 27, 2008 2:27 pm:
• Denver: Total ban.
• Aurora: Banned, but dogs registered with the city before Jan. 31, 2006, were grandfathered in. Owners must be at least 21, have their dogs spayed or neutered, have $100,000 in liability insurance and place signs near their front doors to alert visitors they have a pit bull.
• La Junta: Banned, but with provisions similar to Aurora's.
• Commerce City: Limits ownership. "
RoseyGirl wrote on June 27, 2008 5:28 pm:
jack wrote on June 27, 2008 6:04 pm:
To RoseyGirl wrote on June 27, 2008 8:08 pm:
And "nothing to deserve it"???..Aggression is innate to the breed.HARDWIRED! Problem is, you just never know when. So like Barney Fife says "nip it in the bud". "
Bubba wrote on June 28, 2008 6:41 am:
whos rights wrote on June 28, 2008 9:42 am:
Shelly wrote on June 28, 2008 10:15 am:
RoseyGirl wrote on June 28, 2008 3:32 pm:
read wrote on June 28, 2008 5:32 pm:
Another dog attack wrote on June 28, 2008 6:32 pm:
Read the story here...http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,373325,00.html "
RoseyGirl wrote on June 28, 2008 9:42 pm:
http://www.animalfarmfoundation.org/item.php?item=376
http://www.atts.org/stats1.html "
Angie wrote on July 1, 2008 4:46 pm:
Anthony wrote on July 1, 2008 4:53 pm:
Sheilah Blanco wrote on July 3, 2008 2:51 pm:
Little dogs are far more likely to bite period, especially children than big dogs. I had a cocker spaniel once, sweet as she could be could NOT STAND kids. Yet when my grand daughter was staying with me, MY AMSTAFF would die before he'd let anyone even touch her when they were scolding her. Took her for rides let her poke him in the eyes, slept right by her bed at night guarding her. Why the big news about "pit bulls" (they're actually bull terriers you know, a pit bull is one who is trained to fight, and is actually put in a pit......most bull terriers do NOT fit that description one in a hundred will go bad if trained properly) POODLES can be holy terrors, esp the bigger ones...they think they're still bear hunters. What's the matter with you...where's the BIG story.....the one about the baby killed by the family Pekingnese? "