Group accuses petition workers of fraud
By MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star
The group fighting a proposed ban on affirmative action on Wednesday said it has video, audio and photo evidence showing proponents of the ban are engaging in petition fraud.
Nebraskans United lawyer David Kramer said petition circulators on behalf of the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative have exhibited “fraudulent and illegal activity” as they try to persuade voters to sign the petition, which would put a ban on race- and gender-based affirmative action on the November ballot.
Among Kramer’s accusations:
Related Media
Group accuses petitioners of fraud
David Kramer, campaign director of Nebraskans United, speaks about incidents his group alleges to be fraud on the part of petitioners working for a pr...
* Petitioners have failed to read the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative’s “object statement,” the paragraph explaining that the petition would place on the ballot a constitutional amendment prohibiting racial and gender preferences in hiring and admissions decisions.
Petitioners are required by law to read the full object statement to voters. Instead, some have summarized it, others have cherry-picked certain points and still others have ignored it altogether, Kramer said.
Audio clips produced by Kramer appear to back that up.
* Petitioners have left their petitions unattended, a violation of state law. For example, Kramer distributed a photo of a petitioner at Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo who apparently left his table for extended periods.
* Petitioners have filled in information for signers and gathered signatures under false names.
Such examples, Kramer said, show the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative isn’t being transparent as it asks voters to repeal forms of affirmative action Kramer believes most Nebraskans actually support.
He said his group may challenge the validity of some signatures and that he hopes Attorney General Jon Bruning will investigate.
“We are asking for a very simple thing,” he said. “We would like those who advocate changing the constitution of the state of Nebraska to comply with Nebraska law as they try to do so.”
The Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative needs to collect about 115,000 petition signatures by July 4 to get the issue on the ballot. Initiative leaders have said they’re confident they’ll do so, though they won’t say how many signatures they have so far.
And they blasted Kramer’s criticisms, saying Nebraskans United is making a last-ditch effort to stifle the affirmative-action debate before it’s put to a vote.
“Why today? It’s the fourth quarter,” said Doug Tietz, initiative executive director. “When you’re down, you start tossing Hail Marys and hope something works.”
One day earlier, the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative had unveiled survey results showing 71 percent of likely voters supported ending race and gender preferences.
Nebraskans United is “desperate” to slow the initiative’s momentum, Tietz said.
Tietz questioned whether Kramer’s video and audio clips were authentic and said he knew of no instances where petitioners had acted inappropriately.
All petitioners are thoroughly trained, he said.
“This is something that’s important and we abide by the rules,” he said.
Further, Tietz said the initiative has its own video evidence showing its opponents harassing petitioners and signers.
“I wish I had the video tape ready right now,” he said.
Kramer dismissed that.
Nebraskans United allies are trained not to harass petitioners, he said.
“Are there instances where there might be a problem or two? Sure,” he said. “But is it a problem and practice like it is with (the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative)? No, it is not.”
Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit





Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
cal wrote on June 25, 2008 5:02 pm:
This group that is trying to stop this from being on the ballot know that if given the chance, sensible people will vote to do away with affirmative action. But instead of debating in the world of ideas, they resort to lies. They know they will lose an honest debate. They are even running a radio spot claiming that those that sign the pettition could be victims of identity fraud because some of the pettition gatherers have criminal records.
The group Nebraska United are so off based they have nothing on their side but lies to try and sway people from signing the petitions. "
Petitioner wrote on June 25, 2008 5:50 pm:
We need to use paid petition collectors because the number of signatures has been continually raised by those in our state who hate democracy, to make it nearly impossible to collect enough signatures to make the ballot. "
Wait wrote on June 25, 2008 6:04 pm:
Big Lie wrote on June 25, 2008 6:13 pm:
Late ODay wrote on June 25, 2008 6:39 pm:
Dave wrote on June 25, 2008 6:49 pm:
Tim wrote on June 25, 2008 6:57 pm:
Zoomie wrote on June 25, 2008 7:02 pm:
Joewicket wrote on June 25, 2008 7:55 pm:
Straight Thinker wrote on June 25, 2008 7:57 pm:
JpS wrote on June 25, 2008 8:26 pm:
in his position in the Nebraska Republican Party!! Nebraska does NOT need affirmative action....if people can't get jobs on their qualifications then what do we owe them....a free ride? That is not the Nebraska way of life that I grew up with or believe it. "
Kip wrote on June 25, 2008 8:39 pm:
Jessica Tok wrote on June 25, 2008 8:45 pm:
Harry the antenna guy wrote on June 25, 2008 10:12 pm:
JB wrote on June 25, 2008 10:44 pm:
A wrote on June 26, 2008 12:07 am:
Tom wrote on June 26, 2008 1:47 am:
Terry wrote on June 26, 2008 6:31 am:
out of stats wrote on June 26, 2008 7:25 am:
I hope our president, or our next president, or ---- wait a minute those guys are NEVER FROM NEBRASKA EITHER, why should we allow their names on our ballot? We pay pennies on the dollar for their election campaigns, yet we still vote for them because it IMPACTS OUR LIVES REGARDLESS OF WHERE THE FUNDING COMES FROM.
Get a grip people-- it doesn't matter who starts or funds something, if it impacts your life or the lives of those around you it should be addressed by you, not avoided or shunned because the topic may make you uncomfortable, or you disagree with it. Everyone deserves a right to vote, it's rather unpatriotic to fight against that right. "
hh wrote on June 26, 2008 8:15 am:
Sure Im paranoid but wrote on June 26, 2008 8:26 am:
Is there any effective process in place to make sure that the opposition to this, or any other, initiative aren't using this tactic? "
Dano wrote on June 26, 2008 8:31 am:
Outside the Box wrote on June 26, 2008 8:37 am:
Our highly paid (and lowly trained) petition collectors will stop every man, woman, and semi-legal resident and read our object statement - a cleverly worded bunch of double-talk that sounds too good to be true: Do away with the BCS and determine a true champion each and every year.
Only those who take the time to read the petition (and translate our double-talk) will find our true intent: the Nebraska Cornhuskers will be the National Champions every year, regardless of wins, losses, or Lee Corso.
Who's with me??? "
Lincolnite wrote on June 26, 2008 8:37 am:
Is this the same group wrote on June 26, 2008 8:57 am:
BCDEFG wrote on June 26, 2008 9:16 am:
mitchy_v wrote on June 26, 2008 9:50 am:
JB wrote on June 26, 2008 9:50 am:
John wrote on June 26, 2008 10:00 am:
Me The People wrote on June 26, 2008 10:57 am:
JR wrote on June 26, 2008 12:13 pm:
Alan wrote on June 26, 2008 2:24 pm:
working WOMAN wrote on June 26, 2008 3:02 pm:
I worked as temporary summer help with a company that is 90% male dominated and very physically demanding. I worked with some great guys that treated me as an equal(thankfully). I was trained by them to learn other aspects to the job so that I would have a better chance at bidding for a permanent position.
When the position came open, I bid for it and even had the support of my co-workers telling the hiring people to hire me(because I could work just as hard as they could). And when I did get the job I would have people tell me"you only got hired because of AA"
I have to say..I AM SO SICK OF HEARING THAT! There were other WHITE males that bid for the same position and didn't get the job. I don't know why they didn't get hired(maybe they did a lousy job in the interview), and I really don't care. I worked just as hard as the men did, earned their respect, and even had them telling the boss to get me hired on because I proved myself. I would imagine that Affirmative Action had a LITTLE something to do with my getting hired, but I can tell you right now that you could ask any one of the men I worked with and they will tell you I DESERVED that job on my qualifications.
The reason I am telling you this, is because had this been a job where I didn't get a chance to prove myself first, I garauntee you they wouldn't have hired me because I am a woman. They would have taken one look at me and thought "no way can she physically handle this position". I was one of the lucky ones that got the chance to prove myself first.
How many others out there do you think have been turned down for a position(with the same ability as a man) because she doesn't "look" as strong or able? And yes..maybe her application doesn't have the same qualifications on it as a man but that's because no one would ever hire her in the first place to gain any qualifications! Sometimes(maybe not all the time) I think that Affirmative Action has helped in that area. I don't believe that minorities should get a position because they are minorities, but no one can tell me that there still aren't people out there that will refuse to hire a minority based on skin color or gender even if they have the same qualifications. Minority bigotry is still very alive even in Nebraska. It's sad that a company is forced to hire minorities because of Affirmative Action, but without it we are losing tha chance at hiring some very good people.
I know many people that still use the N word for african amearicans and think everyone except for white men are stupid, and unfortunately some of them are the people that hire.
I'm sick of the "he or she got the job instead of me because they are a minority" excuse. How do you know what their qualifications are? Did you see the application? There are too many jobs out there to say you can't get one. You just might have to take a job that most snobby white men think they are too good for- you know- the ones that the minorities usually take?
Stop blaming Affirmative Action for "reverse discrimination" and realize that it actually was put in use for a good reason. If it wasn't there for some people, they would have never been given the oppurtunity to prove they can do the job.
And for you people that do play the race or gender card when you get fired? Shame on you too! Maybe you just got fired because you didn't do a good job. You are the people that make people believe that AA is discrimination. "
No thanks wrote on June 27, 2008 7:32 am:
We turned and walked away. I couldn't even believe that someone would try to use that as a sales pitch "