Now
Fair
50°
High
40°
Low
22°

State changing how troubled families are served

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Sunday, Jun 22, 2008 - 12:16:10 am CDT

The state is changing the way services are provided to troubled families by dramatically reducing the number of contracts it has with agencies to provide services and making a few private agencies responsible for keeping families together.

Instead of more than 100 contracts — with many agencies providing  a single service — the state will contract with six, large private agencies.

Beginning July 1, those six agencies will provide all the services required to work to keep children safe and living with their families.

How it works now

The following example, which shows how the state investigates and handles reports involving troubled families, is fictional:

A Health and Human Services case manager investigates a report that young children in a family have been seen outside playing at midnight several times in the last few weeks.

The case manager finds the young, single mother is overwhelmed. Her own mother recently died. Her boyfriend left. She admits she has been drinking too much and has not heard the children leave the house, which is filthy and has little food.

The case manager decides the children are in danger of neglect, but the family might be able to stay together with help: counseling for the mother and a few months of family support, where a worker comes into the home to teach her how to discipline her children, manage her money, and plan and prepare meals.

The case manager decides to put the children into an emergency shelter while things are being sorted out. So the HHS worker starts making arrangements for services, contacting several local agencies.

How it will change

Under the new consolidated system that begins July 1, the HHS case manager will still do the initial investigation. But then the manager will call just one number, and the family will be assigned to an agency that offers, through its network, all the necessary services.

If it is a crisis situation, that private agency must have a worker at the family home within two hours.

If there is no crisis but some serious issues, the agency should contact the family within a day.

If there are no serious safety concerns, the HHS case manager will set up a meeting with the agency worker and the family to discuss services.

The private agency will provide all services, and both HHS and the agency will monitor progress.

Agencies to provide services

These agencies have signed contracts to provide services in a specific region under the new system.

Southeast Service Area: OMNI Behavioral Health, $2,846,347; Cedars Youth Services, $3,580,925; and Visinet Inc., $2,730,983.

Western Service Area: Boys and Girls Home of Nebraska Inc., $5,096,562.

Central Service Area: Visinet, $1,899,229; and Boys and Girls Home of Nebraska, $2,488,125.

Northern Service Area: Boys and Girls Home of Nebraska, $7,674,062.

Eastern Service Area: Boys Town, $1,953,930; OMNI Behavioral Health, $3,931,574; and Child Saving Institute, $957,967.

Each agency’s success rate will be evaluated and the results posted on the Health and Human Services Department Web site.

It is a major reform intended to improve the services and the outcomes, said Todd Landry,  director of the HHS Division of Children and Family Services.

Landry anticipates the new system will improve services to children, as well as oversight of those services, and help the state determine what works best.

Last year, the state worked with more than 8,500 families providing in-home services and safety-related services through 116 contracts, at a cost of about $20 million, Landry said.

The goal of the new system is not to save money but “to change the way we deliver services to get better outcomes,” he said.

The winning bidders had to commit to serving the entire region, not just one county. And the agency had to commit to providing all the services, Landry said.

One result should be that families in western Nebraska have access to all services, something that currently isn’t the case, he said.

The contract agency generally will have subcontracts with other agencies in order to provide the full array of services.

For example, the Lincoln-based Cedars Youth Services has subcontracts with Lutheran Family Services and Epworth Village,  said Katie McLeese Stephenson, Cedars chief operating officer.

HHS case managers will do the initial investigation, then turn over cases to the contracting private agency, which will provide all services.

Under the new system, HHS case workers will not have to make a number of calls trying to arrange for services.

“They will make one phone call, one referral to a provider,” Landry said. “It makes for a much more efficient and timely response.”

The new system also creates a partnership role between case worker and provider, he said.

The private agency will indicate what services the family needs, and, if documented, the case worker will authorize the services.

The private agency and HHS will monitor the progress, Landry said. HHS also will track how successful each network is and post outcomes on its Web site, he said.

The agencies will be rated on  issues such as their timely response to a crisis call and the reduction in substantiated reports of maltreatment for the families they serve.

In regions with several contract agencies, families will be assigned to agencies on a rotating basis. That assures a fair distribution of the work, risk and reward. It also allows the state to better compare results, Landry said.

Carol Stitt, director of the state’s Foster Care Review Board, sees both benefits and potential problems with the new contracts.

Stitt says it’s unclear how the state will maintain oversight of  providers. She also has concerns about the short timeline for agencies setting up new services, a two-week period between contracts being signed and the beginning of the new system.

In addition, her agency and others have questioned the quality of services by some of the agencies with state contracts.

“Why wasn’t past performance considered?” she asked.

But Stitt praised the requirements that many of an agency’s employees have college degrees and the agency provide training.

When the new system begins, some disruptions may occur as some families transfer to new providers, Landry said.

“We believe that is going to be minimal,” he said.   

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Not a surprize wrote on June 22, 2008 6:32 am:
" This does not appear to solve anything. This actually appears to create problems as it appears that this is a bid situation, and my experience with bid situations is that the lowest bid is not always the best and that even with a quality bid there can be problems. Somehow this gives me the impression that oversight is not going to happen and that the winners of the contracts will have so much latitude that the whole meaning of the program will not achieve its goals. "

What wrote on June 22, 2008 2:21 pm:
" What does Stitt mean, at least they are requiring a college education. Many state agencies have thrived on :been there and understand: type of workers and being with the system for over 20 years, I have worked with some of the dumbest people with college degrees whereas some of the greatest problem solvers have been the ones who have learned from experience. "

JoBeth wrote on June 22, 2008 4:00 pm:
" Our State HHS is a disaster. NE needs qualified people (those who care, not just those with an education) who they wil not burn out by giving huge case loads. Hire more people, and quit running the good ones out. "

mc wrote on June 23, 2008 10:54 am:
" I don't know where you all get your information but human services does not pay a good amount of money so many who are working in these areas do CARE. We aren't in for the paycheck. I'd like to see you all work in these agencies, just like most people you want to complain but don't want to do nothing to help. Do any of you donate money or provide foster family assistance to these children in need? This is a new process that will speed assistance up and allow the agencies involved not to shuffle these children around all over the place. Rather things stay the same or change for the better someone will always complain. It's tougher than it looks, there are a lot of rules and regualtions that have to be followed. So keep on complaining. "

Get more info first wrote on June 23, 2008 2:04 pm:
" Before everyone begins saying DHHS is bad and they are just allowing providers all this latitude in providing services, they should really look into what exactly these contracts look like. They are available at the DHHS web site under children and family services. They are the first of many outcome based contracts that hold providers WAY more accountable than any in the past could ever have imagined. The access to these services allow children and families to remain intact when possible to allow the least amount of disruption to children. The providers are being held to federal safety and permanency measures including placement stability. This is a huge change for the way DHHS has done work and with any change, I'm sure there may be stumbling blocks. Let's look on the positive side for once and see that maybe someone is looking out for the best interests of the kids in our state and that someone is trying to achieve the Governor's outcome of having fewer and fewer kids in out of home care. My request is that you get all the information before you just start complaining. "

to not a surprise wrote on June 26, 2008 2:59 pm:
" The bids weren't given for how much an agency would charge, it had to outline what services the agency would provide and how they will create better outcomes. "

the drumbeat continues wrote on June 27, 2008 9:36 am:
" We've been down this road before in other HHS activities (regional service providers.) Supposedly, it was changed a years ago because it wasn't working. HHS clearly lacks leadership in terms of the services they provide and the who they are willing to listen to in the changes they make (certainly not those receiving services. It's all about saving money, not people or families. Family support in this state is shameful!! When we see events like Von Maur, suddenly the cockroaches run for the corners. If the goal was competent oversight, things would look a lot different. We currently do not have this in our state. Retracing old steps in an effort to save money (as the administration has repeated over and over) will end up costing taxpayers more money; in the interim, at-risk families twist in the wind. It starts at the top, and it is unconcionable. Toss these lightweights out. "