Now
Partly Cloudy
80.0°
High
82°
Low
62°

JFK speechwriter likes Hagel for VP

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Jun 19, 2008 - 05:24:18 pm CDT

Ted Sorensen said Thursday he continues to believe Sen. Chuck Hagel would be a good choice for Sen. Barack Obama’s running mate.

“It would make sense for a national unity ticket,” Sorensen said during a breakfast interview over raisin bran and fruit.

If the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee selected Nebraska’s Republican senator, Sorensen said, Obama could reach across the party divide as he seeks to unify the country.

Story Photo
Ted Sorensen

Related Link(s):

And in choosing Hagel, Obama would buttress the Democratic ticket with a vice presidential nominee who brings strong foreign policy credentials, Sorensen said.

“I often have mentioned the name of Hagel (as being) consistent with the approach of reaching across race, region, religion and party,” said the former Lincolnite who served as President Kennedy’s chief adviser and speechwriter.

In any event, Sorensen said, a presidential nominee shouldn’t make the decision about a running mate “until the last possible moment” when the best assessment can be made about strengths, weaknesses and political gaps.

Sorensen brought up Hagel’s name on his own during the hour-long conversation at the Chase Suites Hotel in Lincoln.

Later, he addressed a fund-raising luncheon in Omaha for Democratic Senate nominee Scott Kleeb.

Sorensen, who lives in New York City, is in Nebraska for three days of events. He signed several hundred copies of his new autobiography, “Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History,” at Lee Booksellers in Lincoln Wednesday night.

During the interview, Sorensen said he believes Obama will be elected president this November and then enter a year of great opportunity that he should approach with some caution.

“I think he may bring in a Congress supportive of the president’s programs in ways that no Congress has been for a long time,” Sorensen said.

“The first year is the honeymoon year (filled) with public support.”

In this case, it also would mark a change of administration “so welcomed by the leaders of the world,” Sorensen said.

“But I believe the amber light should blink during those first 100 days. That’s where President Kennedy stumbled at the Bay of Pigs.”

After winning the White House, a new president and his team “think they can walk on water,” Sorensen said. “They think they have the magic touch.

“I advise caution, prudence, proceeding with care during the first 100 days.”

Impressed with Obama from the first time he met him in 2006, Sorensen supported the Illinois senator during his long battle with Sen. Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination.

Obama studied “a balance sheet” Sorensen had prepared to help him decide whether to enter the presidential race, then phoned him to talk about it.

During the campaign, Sorensen introduced Obama or spoke on his behalf in a number of states, including New Hampshire, South Carolina, New York, Missouri and Iowa.

“I’m not in the inner circle,” Sorensen said.  

“And contrary to some reports, I’m not writing speeches for him.”

However, Adam Frankel, the young assistant who helped Sorensen research and complete his autobiography, now is writing speeches for Obama.

“He knows my approach, my style,” Sorensen said, “so if there’s a whiff of Sorensen or Kennedy in Obama’s speeches that would be the explanation.”

“Hope and history have merged twice in my lifetime,” Sorensen said, recalling the words of Irish poet Seamus Heaney.

Heaney had suggested that would be a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence, Sorensen said.  

But Obama makes it twice, Sorensen said.

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Gutsy Move wrote on June 19, 2008 2:57 pm:
" If that were to happen. Obama can't lose his base support in the Democratic Party on the national level. Having Hagel as his VP choice would certainly ruin that because Hagel, as much as he is against the war, still votes very conservative and would go against Obama's progressive theme. It would make more sense if Obama would choose a Democratic version of Hagel like Webb of Virginia if Obama wants to have the national security credentials on the ticket. "

Jeff wrote on June 19, 2008 3:09 pm:
" Boy - that would be exciting. I think it would be a great ticket - and Hagel could bring some balence to the table, so they stay moderate. "

Yes wrote on June 19, 2008 3:13 pm:
" I now plan to vote for McCain as he seems to be the better of a very poor choice. With a legimate candidate choice on the ticket I would vote for the Obama/Hagel ticket. "

Nina wrote on June 19, 2008 3:26 pm:
" I would go for that. Not only would Hagel be knowledgeable, but he has fine character, and a moderate-to-conservative stance on many issues, which would balance the ticket for those reluctant to vote for Obama because he is a moderate-to-liberal (my classification - I know some just call him liberal, but I've known some REAL liberals, and he's not nearly extreme enough to fit that moniker. We would be in sane, safe hands with the duo of Obama-Hagel, even though they will have a horrific task at pulling us out of the quagmire of debt, poor reputation, etc., Bush has given us. It's been amazing and beyond sad how far we've spiraled down during his tenure. "

Just what this country needs wrote on June 19, 2008 3:26 pm:
" This is exactly what this country needs after an outstanding year in the primaries. Our political arena needs to become more cohesive and central, and this will bind the two parties, as Chuck Hagel has been recognized as one of the most well-liked people in Washington. His ability to see the big picture, and approach things with a constructive agenda, rather than a political one, is why he would have made the best choice for President. If either candidate were smart, Hagel would be the best VP. He has shown that although he votes conservative, liberal views never fall on deaf ears to him. He is open-minded and will provide results, critcisms, and plans. He is one of the reasons I still claim being a Nebraskan, while working in the Nation's Capitol (that and football). "

Ted Soreson..... wrote on June 19, 2008 3:41 pm:
" is a brilliant person and an excellent speech writer but wouldn't this just allow Democrats to always lose the argument against Republicans when it comes to who has a better foreign policy? Why should Democrats cede that argument? It doesn't make any sense? Would Republicans somehow cross over at unprecedented numbers to vote for a Democrat because he has a Republican on VP who supposedly offers foreign policy experience? Lets not forget Chuck Hagel voted to support this war. "

yes... wrote on June 19, 2008 3:44 pm:
" because moderate ideas are awesome. "

If Memory Serves . . . wrote on June 19, 2008 3:48 pm:
" Didn't Hagel promise that he wouldn't be a candidate for any office in 2008? "

Outside the Box wrote on June 19, 2008 4:02 pm:
" I find it interesting that the Democrats are getting press for considering a potental GOP VP (even if many R's consider Hagel a "traitor" for speaking his mind). Yet, I have not seen one word about the Republicans considering a D for their VP slot.

What conclusions can we draw? Maybe the Dems are interested in finding middle ground and consensus which will actually lead to results, while the GOP is concerned with pleasing the hard-core (and vocal) right wing.

And while all this is a fun parlor game, the odds of the Dems going outside their party are slim and none. "

intrigued wrote on June 19, 2008 4:18 pm:
" Never happen, but I would seriously consider voiting for this ticket. "

Really wrote on June 19, 2008 4:24 pm:
" Right now I support Obama but if Hagel becomes part of the ticket, I'll vote for Mr. Ed the Talking Horse first. After the past year and a half he has lost all credibility. "

JB wrote on June 19, 2008 4:24 pm:
" Hagel is great on world issues, but takes the "Bush" line on domestic ones. Atleast he uses he own mind and votes as he feels. There are to many Republicans that do as scriped for them. "

Carol wrote on June 19, 2008 4:29 pm:
" 1) it would be ridiculous for the Democratic party to field a traditional democratic candidate simply to be stubborn about the party of the person deciding foreign policy. I think it would be a stronger move to admit that included in their progressive policies is the ability to recognize their weaknesses and do whatever it takes to act in the best interest of the country.
2) I think a LOT of Republicans would cross over and vote for Obama if his progressive ideas were coupled with proven experience. That is exactly the point. I think Obama would get a lot of middle-of-the-road Republicans.
3) He supported the war years ago, but he hasn't for some time, has actual reasons for changing his opinion, and is vocal and advocative about his opinions and the reason for his changed view. This is much more persuasive than someone screaming about ending the war just because it is the party line. "

Late ODay wrote on June 19, 2008 4:30 pm:
" Well, let's get real. Being in ANOTHER PARTY kinda puts the kibosch on that. It is an unnecessary risk for Obama, since it would likely make him a target of some unbalanced screwball wingnut who wants to return the GOP to power. More importantly, Hagel already has as a definite place in the upcoming administration: "Secretary of Defense" leaps to mind. Wes Clark will provide those advantages Sorensen awards to Hagel. Clark spanked McCain quite effectively over military matters a week ago on MSNBC's "Morning Joe". I'm sure Obama's people took notice. (My prediction: "Obama/Clark" vs. "McCain/Jindal") "

Meh wrote on June 19, 2008 4:52 pm:
" @Outside the Box ... then you weren't paying attention. There was quite a bit of similar speculation that McCain would extend a VP offer to Hillary Clinton. Sorry to blow the premise of your message. "

Galen wrote on June 19, 2008 5:06 pm:
" Of course it makes sense- Chuckie is more Liberal then conservative! I wouldn't vote Chuckie Hagel DOG CATCHER..... "

JR wrote on June 19, 2008 5:07 pm:
" What about Hagel as Sec of State? Just throwing it out there. I am not advocating or even predicting. Just wanted to know what people would think of that combination. "

Bob wrote on June 19, 2008 5:15 pm:
" JB, you can't be that naive. The Dems have their party talking points distributed every single day by e-mail. They never budge on their issues, and they never will. If thats not a script, then I don't know what you mean. "

Do your homework wrote on June 19, 2008 5:34 pm:
" For the benefit of people who incessantly chirp that Hagel is a "liberal", let me quote LJS's own DON WALTON quoting Robert Novak, writing about Hagel: “His harsh assessment resonates with many Republicans who believe Bush’s war policy has led the party to disaster.” Hagel’s judgments, Novak writes, “come from someone credited with rebuilding Nebraska’s Republican Party and who has earned a lifetime conservative voting rating of 85.2 percent from the American Conservative Union.” "

Gary in Florida wrote on June 19, 2008 7:23 pm:
" Wow! I never thought of that possibility. Do you think Chuck would do it? It would be just like throwing an anvil to a drowning man. Obama and godd old Chuck Hagel. Given a well run campaign they could possibly surpass Goldwater’s electoral haul in 1964 or even McGovern in 1972. These two may even win an actual state in addition to the District of Columbia. Actually I doubt it, but this could be a record breaking duo. Ted Sorensen should be Obama’s campaign manager with sharp ideas like that. Just in case Hagel refused is Thomas Eagleton still alive? "

JT wrote on June 19, 2008 8:23 pm:
" Yes, let's reward Republicans for the great job they've done in the last eight years. Bill Richardson has more experience in foreign policy than does Sen. Hagel, let's go with him instead of a Republican. "

Keith wrote on June 19, 2008 9:15 pm:
" Two votes for Mr. Ed the talking horse! Hagel should go out to pasture and leave America alone. "

Nick Canuso wrote on June 19, 2008 9:24 pm:
" Sure, why not? Heck, maybe Hagel should just try and take over the DNC! I suppose some may be surprised that Hagel isn't mentioned as McCain's VP, but let's face it, it's not that McCain is too conservative, it's that he's too patriotic.
I think it's time McCain picks a true conservative to run for VP.
Sen. Ben Nelson! If that happened I may actually cross the isle an vote Republican, or is it democrat, let's see, I'm a Conservative so.. who do I vote for again? "

THE ONLY REASON wrote on June 20, 2008 12:46 am:
" Hagel would consider running as Obama's VP is because he knows HIS GIG IS UP here as a "Repbuplican" Senator from Nebraska. "

dave wrote on June 20, 2008 8:29 am:
" Barrack Obama - Nobody says nothing better than him. "

What JT wrote on June 20, 2008 9:06 am:
" JT how can Bill Richardson have more foreign policy experience than Senator Hagel. Has he been working on international deals as the Governor of New Mexico? "

In the article wrote on June 20, 2008 6:06 pm:
" Sorenson is referred to as a "former Lincolnite" and that is it. He is one of the only great political stars to come out of this State and he is a "Former Lincolnite." Is this a great news town or what??? "

Legislature Coverage