JFK speechwriter likes Hagel for VP
BY DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star
Ted Sorensen said Thursday he continues to believe Sen. Chuck Hagel would be a good choice for Sen. Barack Obama’s running mate.
“It would make sense for a national unity ticket,” Sorensen said during a breakfast interview over raisin bran and fruit.
If the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee selected Nebraska’s Republican senator, Sorensen said, Obama could reach across the party divide as he seeks to unify the country.
Related Link(s):
And in choosing Hagel, Obama would buttress the Democratic ticket with a vice presidential nominee who brings strong foreign policy credentials, Sorensen said.
“I often have mentioned the name of Hagel (as being) consistent with the approach of reaching across race, region, religion and party,” said the former Lincolnite who served as President Kennedy’s chief adviser and speechwriter.
In any event, Sorensen said, a presidential nominee shouldn’t make the decision about a running mate “until the last possible moment” when the best assessment can be made about strengths, weaknesses and political gaps.
Sorensen brought up Hagel’s name on his own during the hour-long conversation at the Chase Suites Hotel in Lincoln.
Later, he addressed a fund-raising luncheon in Omaha for Democratic Senate nominee Scott Kleeb.
Sorensen, who lives in New York City, is in Nebraska for three days of events. He signed several hundred copies of his new autobiography, “Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History,” at Lee Booksellers in Lincoln Wednesday night.
During the interview, Sorensen said he believes Obama will be elected president this November and then enter a year of great opportunity that he should approach with some caution.
“I think he may bring in a Congress supportive of the president’s programs in ways that no Congress has been for a long time,” Sorensen said.
“The first year is the honeymoon year (filled) with public support.”
In this case, it also would mark a change of administration “so welcomed by the leaders of the world,” Sorensen said.
“But I believe the amber light should blink during those first 100 days. That’s where President Kennedy stumbled at the Bay of Pigs.”
After winning the White House, a new president and his team “think they can walk on water,” Sorensen said. “They think they have the magic touch.
“I advise caution, prudence, proceeding with care during the first 100 days.”
Impressed with Obama from the first time he met him in 2006, Sorensen supported the Illinois senator during his long battle with Sen. Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination.
Obama studied “a balance sheet” Sorensen had prepared to help him decide whether to enter the presidential race, then phoned him to talk about it.
During the campaign, Sorensen introduced Obama or spoke on his behalf in a number of states, including New Hampshire, South Carolina, New York, Missouri and Iowa.
“I’m not in the inner circle,” Sorensen said.
“And contrary to some reports, I’m not writing speeches for him.”
However, Adam Frankel, the young assistant who helped Sorensen research and complete his autobiography, now is writing speeches for Obama.
“He knows my approach, my style,” Sorensen said, “so if there’s a whiff of Sorensen or Kennedy in Obama’s speeches that would be the explanation.”
“Hope and history have merged twice in my lifetime,” Sorensen said, recalling the words of Irish poet Seamus Heaney.
Heaney had suggested that would be a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence, Sorensen said.
But Obama makes it twice, Sorensen said.
Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit





Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Jeff wrote on June 19, 2008 3:09 pm:
Yes wrote on June 19, 2008 3:13 pm:
Nina wrote on June 19, 2008 3:26 pm:
Just what this country needs wrote on June 19, 2008 3:26 pm:
Ted Soreson..... wrote on June 19, 2008 3:41 pm:
yes... wrote on June 19, 2008 3:44 pm:
If Memory Serves . . . wrote on June 19, 2008 3:48 pm:
Outside the Box wrote on June 19, 2008 4:02 pm:
What conclusions can we draw? Maybe the Dems are interested in finding middle ground and consensus which will actually lead to results, while the GOP is concerned with pleasing the hard-core (and vocal) right wing.
And while all this is a fun parlor game, the odds of the Dems going outside their party are slim and none. "
intrigued wrote on June 19, 2008 4:18 pm:
Really wrote on June 19, 2008 4:24 pm:
JB wrote on June 19, 2008 4:24 pm:
Carol wrote on June 19, 2008 4:29 pm:
2) I think a LOT of Republicans would cross over and vote for Obama if his progressive ideas were coupled with proven experience. That is exactly the point. I think Obama would get a lot of middle-of-the-road Republicans.
3) He supported the war years ago, but he hasn't for some time, has actual reasons for changing his opinion, and is vocal and advocative about his opinions and the reason for his changed view. This is much more persuasive than someone screaming about ending the war just because it is the party line. "
Late ODay wrote on June 19, 2008 4:30 pm:
Meh wrote on June 19, 2008 4:52 pm:
Galen wrote on June 19, 2008 5:06 pm:
JR wrote on June 19, 2008 5:07 pm:
Bob wrote on June 19, 2008 5:15 pm:
Do your homework wrote on June 19, 2008 5:34 pm:
Gary in Florida wrote on June 19, 2008 7:23 pm:
JT wrote on June 19, 2008 8:23 pm:
Keith wrote on June 19, 2008 9:15 pm:
Nick Canuso wrote on June 19, 2008 9:24 pm:
I think it's time McCain picks a true conservative to run for VP.
Sen. Ben Nelson! If that happened I may actually cross the isle an vote Republican, or is it democrat, let's see, I'm a Conservative so.. who do I vote for again? "
THE ONLY REASON wrote on June 20, 2008 12:46 am:
dave wrote on June 20, 2008 8:29 am:
What JT wrote on June 20, 2008 9:06 am:
In the article wrote on June 20, 2008 6:06 pm: