Now
Fair
48°
High
40°
Low
22°

Mayor eyes little-noticed $10 million pot of city funds

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Sunday, Jun 15, 2008 - 12:47:42 am CDT

It’s not exactly a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow, but Lincoln Mayor Chris Beutler is considering dipping into a little-noticed $10 million pot of money that has been growing quietly over the years, but rarely used.

The money is normally used to pave streets and alleys or build water and sewer lines at the request of property owners who want to create a special assessment district. Such districts were popular in the 1980s and 1990s in Lincoln, but are created much less frequently now.

Beutler does not want to use the money to bridge the remaining $1.5 million gap in the municipal budget — a shortfall that started out at $6 million before budget cuts.

Story Photo
Chris Beutler

It wouldn’t be prudent, he says, to use a one-time bounty to pay for ongoing city expenses.

Instead, he wants to transfer most of the money in the Special Assessment Revolving Fund into a new sort of economic development kitty.

His so-called Fast Forward Fund could be tapped to take advantage of economic opportunities.

After being elected, Beutler was surprised to learn no such fund exists. He had to scramble to cobble together money when the city was asked to kick in $1 million after John Breslow offered $7 million to build a new ice skating complex near the Haymarket.

Beutler said he would use the fund to help with the coming Special Olympics, for example, or to attract tourism.

The idea of tapping the $10 million fund came up while dissecting the budget. City Attorney John Hendry concluded earlier this month the fund could be used for other purposes, with the City Council’s consent. Hendry said the city’s home rule charter allows surplus funds to be transferred elsewhere if all obligations are met.

And because there are no current bonded debt obligations against the fund, he said most of the funds could be used elsewhere.

City Budget Officer Steve Hubka said it’s likely about $8 million could be used.

Beutler pitched the Fast Forward Fund to the Lincoln Chamber of Commerce board of directors Thursday morning, hours before he held a press conference to announce plans to eliminate 45 city jobs, slash StarTran bus funding by more than half a million dollars and reduce new city employees’ retirement benefits.

There are bound to be plenty of other ideas about how to spend $8 million, if the City Council agrees to spend it at all. However, Beutler says it would be a mistake to use the money to shore up the budget.

“That’s entirely the wrong way to go,” he said. “It’s the wrong way to go because it would be doing exactly what’s gotten us into this budget problem in the past.”

He said he doesn’t intend to use any such one-time funding sources to balance the budget. He will release his budget to the public next month.

The special assessments fund dates to at least the 1960s, Hubka said. The city has issued special assessment bonds to build up the fund, which is tapped when property owners want to pave a gravel street or alley, for example. If there’s enough support for the project among abutting property owners, a special assessment district can be created. Money from the special assessment fund is used to pay for the work, and benefiting property owners repay the fund, plus interest.

Normally, such districts are created to bring infrastructure to new subdivisions, but they can be used in older neighborhoods, too.

More than half of the abutting property owners must agree to pay for improvements, and then the City Council must sign off on creating the district. That can be an uphill battle, former Lincoln Public Works Director Karl Fredrickson said.

The special assessment districts have been used less often after the city was burned by a project in the 1980s, Hubka said.

The $10 million left in the fund is almost all interest income, Hubka said. Since 1974, the fund has earned nearly $24 million in interest income.

If Beutler’s proposal goes through, that doesn’t mean special assessment districts could no longer be created. The remaining $2 million could be used to fund them, and the city continues to collect payments for past projects.

Last year, the city collected $1.26 million in special assessments, but that figure has been steadily declining since it peaked at $3.7 million in 1986.

The city could always issue special assessment bonds if the fund needs replenishing, as it has done nine times since the 1970s, Hubka said.

City Councilman Jon Camp was surprised to hear about the $10 million fund, but was initially supportive of the idea to use the money for economic development.

“It caught me by surprise,” he said. “I had no idea the money was there.”

Fredrickson said using the money for other purposes would be a policy shift for Lincoln.

“As long as it’s legal,” he said, “they can do whatever they want.“

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Not a surprize wrote on June 15, 2008 5:15 am:
" When figures get confused, figures don't add up. This article is somewhere in la, la, la land and gives me the impression that someone is doing something that is a little questionable. "

Bubba wrote on June 15, 2008 6:49 am:
" Bet the Mayor can find some project for the Scotts to use this money for, so it doesn't go wasted. Yhey know what's best for Lincoln anyway. "

Mrs. Johnson wrote on June 15, 2008 7:51 am:
" While some of our fine city workers sit and wonder if they'll have jobs and be able to feed their families, they mayor finds a pot of gold for the Chamber and 2015 group to play with. It's sad! "

Just Starting wrote on June 15, 2008 8:26 am:
" I don't think the people of Lincoln realize what is happening with this budget issue. There aren't too many businesses that can exist in today's economic climate without raising prices, yet we are asking the city government to continue doing what they have been doing with fewer people, and in actuality, with fewer dollars. Blaming the previous city administrations is not the way to go either.

We are not giving the employees raises that are in line with what is happening in the outside world either, in fact we are asking them to take less and less. Therefore the experience is going to walk and we are going to be continually starting over. Yes, the cost won't be as high, but neither will the knowledge and ability.

Something has to give. "

dale wrote on June 15, 2008 8:28 am:
" typical, heres some money we didnt know we had, so lets not cut the budget and keep feeding this overgrown sow called the city government. Lets hire even MORE people in order for 3 of them to do the work that 1 person in the private sector would be more than capable of doing. And YES...lets give them the 2 to 1 match on their retirement in order to instill the arrogance so often seen of "government workers" toward the private sector in this city. I'd love to see it all crumble to the ground, I'm sure they have a program in place for just that scenario. "

Jan wrote on June 15, 2008 10:34 am:
" I think using this money for economic development is a good idea. I also think there is a problem with the government being the biggest employer in the state. "

Hjalmer wrote on June 15, 2008 11:21 am:
" Dale, did you read the article? 45 city jobs were eliminated. The City of Lincoln needs to wise up and start investing in it's economy as the Mayor is doing. The current national economy will bring more bad news to Lincoln without action now. With the expectation that all the major airlines will be in bankruptcy by the end of the year because of fuel prices, Lincoln is likely to lose all air service to its airport. Airlines are trying to cut expenses so why stop in both Omaha and Lincoln when they're so close together? That will really hurt the prospect for development in Lincoln. Your city needs to get off it duff and invest in it's own future. Omaha just signed a 25 year contract with the NCAA and is putting serious money into its future. "

Concerned wrote on June 15, 2008 12:37 pm:
" It seems like city services are randomly cut without actually looking at the impact on the public. Someone retires and they simply are not replaced. This impacts some departments far more than others because they have more people leaving. It might be helpful if someone within city government actually spent some time looking at job functions and responsibilities to determine what jobs or parts of jobs need to be continued. I agree with Mrs. Johnson. How will city employees losing their jobs impact the economy? It can't be in a good way. "

J wrote on June 15, 2008 12:50 pm:
" The city needs to be spending right now. It is not attracting any special companies or individuals by making cuts. Why save the money when you are slashing all over the place in a shortfall. I want the city to raise taxes just to keep up, but it has extra money that could be used for this and the mayor will not do it. Some needs to explain why he is doing this. Less jobs and benefits will lead to under qualified people running the city, which we may already have. Quit cutting. I understand if he was cutting extra fat, but he is cutting core needs. Raise taxes and spend this money. "

No respect wrote on June 15, 2008 1:32 pm:
" Isn't it strange how the city can't live with the nearly highest taxes
in the United States, yet tax the low income and retired people trying to
hold on to their homes and lives, as much as those making big salaries
and LPS with a cost of living increase every year while the rest of the
retireds have been on FIXED incomes for years, but the city just keeps
taking and taking and taking from that fixed income and could care less
whether the retireds lose their homes or have to move to a state where
they aren't taxed on their social security and given exemptions. For
those running our lives, to not know about this pot of Gold, shows the
integerity, the sneaky crookedness this city is known for. If the mayor
wants to laugh about it, my respect for him and his cronies has gone
further down the drain!!!! "

shane wrote on June 15, 2008 2:18 pm:
" If you remove the gain in police and firefighter, due to the change in city size, the city has LESS workers than 10 years ago. I would call that pretty good management of personel. There is a freeze on city hiring and at least 30 people taking an early retirment buyout. While the 2 for 1 match might irritate people, it was negotiated fair and square and to get rid of it you will have to negotiate it out. "

Consider the logic.... wrote on June 15, 2008 3:03 pm:
" involved in NOT using this money for the budget shortfall but instead NEW spending. If this was your household budget, would you use this logic....NO, not if your thinking rationally. When your household budget is short, you cut non-essentials and funnel ALL money (even if it is only temporary funds) to your essentials - this includes taking care of what you already have (like parklands, streets, sidewalks etc) instead of lofty dreamy spending because it is FOUND money. Come on mayor/council, please think with some common sense...no more new spending, tighten the belt and take care of current obligations, save for worse economic conditions and quit the games with City (tax payer) funds!! "

Hey wrote on June 15, 2008 3:09 pm:
" It's christmas at city hall. Bet the streets don't get fixed with this money. I may have read the article wrong but I think it was there for city streets. taxpayers can up the anty and fix the streets and leave this for the new hotel arena. "

A better idea for the million wrote on June 15, 2008 6:10 pm:
" This money should go to one-time spending for capital investment which has been long deferred. Fix up deteriorating buildings and the like. The Parks system and other Departments can make a good list for the Mayor. Preserving what we have will save tax money in the long run.

Economic development? Encouraging tourism? That's not the responsibility of government. Let the Chamber do that. "

dewboy wrote on June 15, 2008 6:57 pm:
" it is beyond me why our esteemed Mayor keeps worrying about the so-called economic development in this city WHICH is supposed to be the job of the chamber of commerce DONE WITH THEIR MONEY. So far it seems to be costing the ACTUAL tax payers more than it is worth. This city is slowly going down the tubes and the only thing this jerk thinks about is economic development while everything else goes to hell. This sounds like a blank check for the 2015 group and its cronies which incidentally includes our esteemed mayor. By the way, our AIRPORT already sucks. "

Mark wrote on June 15, 2008 10:12 pm:
" Just so much more political double-talk, smoke and mirrors. You can bet the rich, powerful, and privileged are laughing all the way to (their) bank! "

WAKE UP PEOPLE wrote on June 16, 2008 6:05 am:
" Economic Development yeah right West Haynarket he means. Why is he giving money to special Olympics it's a one time shot. Why isn't the Chamber, DLA and all the do gooders giving to special olympics why does the city have to continue to support special projects. What is the LONG TERM benefit of the Olympics? "

I love all these wrote on June 16, 2008 11:32 am:
" people who think city workers are underpaid. Did you all know that they get matched 2to 1 401k benefits? That is absolutely insane! As far as I am concerned they have nothing to complain about. "

Ignorance is Bliss wrote on June 16, 2008 12:40 pm:
" It's truely hilarious reading all of these comments from people who have absolutely NO CLUE as to what they are talking about when it comes to a City Budget and economic management. How fast can your knee jerk? Oh, the City should manage it's budget like a household budget, yeah right. Spending money on economic growth is the right way to go.

Tip of the day: "retireds" is not a noun. "Retirees" is. You're welcome. "

Excuse me wrote on June 16, 2008 12:46 pm:
" Ok, I work for the city. The ONLY reason to work for the city is the benefits. It isn't private sector folks. No bonuses, no raises for a job well done, nothing. You hit a pay ceiling and NO MORE do you get except for your piddly 2% cost of living increase at the end of each year. I can't pay my bills with this job alone, and have to work 2 extra jobs just to pay my mortgage and buy groceries for my family...but I can take my kid to the doctor when he broke his arm and I may be able to retire when I am 70, granted I can still afford to survive at the pay I receive and retire from that position. So, it is nice to know readers think I am not worth the retirement dollars I will receive for getting to struggle like hell right now. "

Alan wrote on June 16, 2008 2:17 pm:
" If this money was to be used for paving and other improvements why now fix some streets with it? The last thnig Lincoln needs is a new department or other fund that has to be replenished with tax dollars. "