Violent crimes up, but crime rate dropped in Lincoln in '07
BY LORI PILGER / Lincoln Journal Star
Bucking a national trend, violent crime inched up in Lincoln in 2007, according to crime statistics released by the FBI last week.
Lincoln’s police chief says the numbers represent a reasonable snapshot of the city, but they don’t tell the whole story.
While the city did have the greatest number of aggravated assaults (assaults with intent to inflict bodily harm) it’s seen since 1995, Chief Tom Casady said the crime rate fell last year.
It was a mixed bag when it came to crime in Lincoln last year. Here are the numbers, compared with 2006.
Violent crimes: 1,325, up from 1,256
Murders: 6, up from 5
Rapes: 113, up from 100
Robberies: 173, up from 162
Aggravated assaults: 1,033, up from 989
Property crimes: 11,755, down from 12,237
Burglaries: 1,904, down from 1,922
Larcenies: 9,428, down from 9,884
Auto thefts: 423, down from 431
Arsons: 2, down from 4
Source: Preliminary Annual Uniform Crime Report, 2007
First, numbers from the Uniform Crime Report.
Last year in Lincoln, compared with 2006, there were:
69 more violent crimes
44 more aggravated assaults
13 more forcible rapes
11 more robberies.
On the flip side, there were:
482 fewer property crimes
456 fewer larceny/thefts
18 fewer burglaries
Eight fewer motor vehicles stolen
Two fewer arsons.
What does it all mean?
Reports of violent crime were up in Lincoln, despite being down 1.4 percent nationally and 0.4 percent in cities with populations of 100,000 to 249,999.
Yet, the crime rate in Lincoln went down in 2007 — by one-half of one percent.
In part, the rate drop was due to fewer theft reports. In the fall, Lincoln police changed how they respond to drive-offs at fuel stations, which led to fewer reports.
“Really, for 2007 there ought to be an asterisk,” Casady said.
One number did catch his attention, the chief said.
In 2007, 173 robberies were reported. If not for a spike in 2005, which had 225, 2007 would have been the highest year on record for the crimes.
“That’s the one trend of the bunch that has me concerned,” he said.
Casady said the bulk of the increase came in the form of street robberies, not businesses.
Otherwise, he said, not much stands out.
“As I always caution people, it is always best to look at UCR (Uniform Crime Report) crime at a distance, not year to year,” Casady said.
A graph of the city’s crime rate on his computer screen showed it’s been going down, more or less, since 1991.
Violent crime, although it inched up last year, has held pretty steady over the past 16 years.
Lincoln has grown about 15 percent in the past decade, by U.S. Census estimates, Casady said. Yet the number of property crimes and violent crimes reported to Lincoln police and tracked by the FBI has gone down 6.2 percent.
Uniform Crime Report data track murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson.
Casady said the problem with the data is that they don’t look at all crimes. Because there are so many more thefts than rapes and robberies, thefts end up making a disproportionate impact on a city’s crime rate, he said.
“So a tiny change in larceny-thefts drives the entire stat.”
Casady advised against making judgments about how well a community is policed strictly based on the so-called Part I FBI crime data.
“Crime is only a small part of the overall police workload,” he said.
Reach Lori Pilger at 473-7237 or lpilger@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
aj wrote on June 15, 2008 7:04 am:
Come on! If its up, its up! Dont try and downplay it or offer different numbers to make it seem like it is not happening! "
Elaine wrote on June 15, 2008 7:54 am:
We wrote on June 15, 2008 11:01 am:
Nebraska is tame wrote on June 15, 2008 3:54 pm: