Now
Fair and Breezy
37°
High
31°
Low
18°

County hoping to partner with city to finance new jail

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By JEAN ORTIZ / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 06:26:17 pm CDT

Lancaster County leaders may be looking to their city counterparts for help financing a new jail, but that won’t mean the city will put more money toward the complex than it has been.

County commissioners — who saw voters reject their top financing plan last week — have yet to lock in a decision, but leaned strongly toward the recommendation of financial advisers Thursday.

The plan has the city and county entering into a long-term lease with the Public Building Commission, which would issue the bonds for the $65 million, 664-bed jail project.

It would mean redirecting the amount the city now pays to use the jail toward construction costs. Based on an average over the past five years, that would be about $1.45 million annually, said Scott Keene, vice president of Ameritas Investment Corp. But commissioners acknowledged that could change depending on the city’s use of the jail in the future.

“They should be indifferent to it as to the tax impact of this because they’re paying one way or the other,” he said.

The county would then need to devise a plan to make up that lost revenue for operations.

The plan would not jeopardize the city’s bond rating, nor its plans to finance a new arena, Keene said.

The two groups discussed the plan last year before the County Board decided to try to win voter approval.

If financed over 25 years, it would mean a property tax levy of 2.35 cents per $100 of valuation. That translates to about $35.25 annually for the owner of a $150,000 home to cover construction costs.

County budget projections also anticipate increased operations costs for the new jail, which could about double that.

Commissioner Larry Hudkins, who said previously he wanted to move quickly while interest rates are advantageous, said he’d like to see the levy in place by September.

Keene cautioned that could leave the county scrambling if the jail costs more than proposed because a firm project cost won’t be available until late in the year.

But waiting also brings risk, because the county wouldn’t have the money in hand by the time construction got under way early next year.

Hudkins said he doesn’t see the price tag changing.

“I look at it this way: We told (the architects) we’re going to spend $65 million for this jail so you build us what you can for that and you come in at that,” he said.

County leaders had wanted to use voter-approved bonds to be repaid over 26 years, saying that plan kept property tax increases manageable, protected the county’s bond rating and didn’t threaten funding for subdivisions like rural fire departments.

But 54 percent of voters rejected the plan, with some saying they preferred a shorter-term repayment and less money paid in interest over time.

Lancaster County Election Commissioner David Shively said Thursday he couldn’t yet estimate how much it cost the county to put the issue on the ballot, but should know in coming weeks.

The preferred plan now has the lowest interest rate — about 4.48 percent — among all remaining options. It’s so good, Keene said  the voter-approved bonds only carried a very minimal advantage.

County and city officials are due to meet June 3 for a monthly discussion of common issues. The County Board voted unanimously to send letters to City Council members to request everyone’s attendance. County officials also plan to brief Mayor Chris Beutler.

Keene, meanwhile, will return to the board next week with more detailed analysis of the plan, including what repayment scenarios over 15 and 20 years look like.

Architects began designing the jail in February and will have plans later this year. Construction at Southwest 40th and West O is expected to begin early next year.

County leaders say the new jail is needed to replace the one at 10th and J streets and a minimum-security complex in Air Park — both of which are overcrowded.

Reach Jean Ortiz at 473-7107 or jortiz@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Mom of wrote on May 22, 2008 8:04 am:
" I think it is sad that THE PEOPLE have said that they do not want to pay for a new jail, and yet, the commissioners have basically decided that they will make us pay for it one way or another. "

KK wrote on May 22, 2008 8:38 am:
" There was a 26% voter turnout. Half of those people voted no to the proposal, which wasn't for the jail, it was for the FUNDING. Whether or not it's WANTED is not an issue. Geez Louise. "

to mom wrote on May 22, 2008 8:44 am:
" yeah, there are alot of non-violent offenders in jail, because they don't pay their fines or show up for court so where would you like to put them?
its a necessary evil. get over it!! "

Say What wrote on May 22, 2008 8:46 am:
" The voters (54%) say NO and our elected officials are going forward with discussions anyway? Why do these words come to mind; so what, who cares, we know better, etc.
It's like the Florida 2000 vote, remember, let 'em vote, it ain't going to count anyway.
How in the world do you stop this madness? "

Hattie wrote on May 22, 2008 9:12 am:
" The tax payers said the did not want this. Get it! "

Get a Clue wrote on May 22, 2008 9:32 am:
" The voters are sending the City, County and State a message - we are spending too much money and some cutbacks are needed. Too bad the voters didn't have the opportunity to vote on moving the fair because of the cost. Now another cost to do another study - WHAT??? "

Again wrote on May 22, 2008 10:12 am:
" ONLY in Lincoln and Nebraska, its "do what we say and vote for it" or
we'll REALLY let ya have it with two barrels!!! Theres NEVER, NO, NONE,
ZIP regard for the citizens. Why is Nebraska the nearly highest taxed state in the U.S. Doesn't take a college degree to figure that out!!! And
alot of people that won't come to NE have figured that out along time
ago. We have a gas problem in this country, so why not build a jail
as far from courts as we can so it costs more for gas to transport the
criminals. We've cleared out the downtown for shopping and dining, we've
gotten rid of the trains, -- yeah lets help this country make the
citizens suffer as much as we can!!!!!!! I rode trains and buses for years
after I got out of high school. But now we're really educated and every-
body must have what they WANT and all they WANT!!! We don't care what it
costs ya!!!! Its keep those lawless criminals safe and happy with the best
of everything!

"

Comm UnSense wrote on May 22, 2008 10:24 am:
" What some of us were hoping for when we voted against the bond issue was a third option of financing - cut back the cost. Sell the land for what you paid for it. (Yeah, right...) Buy cheaper land closer to the court house. Then build a less lavish jail. Are we building a hotel or a jail? Call that steel building company and git 'er done! "

Both Ways wrote on May 22, 2008 11:21 am:
" You people of Lincoln can't have it both ways. You push your senators to impose longer and tougher minimum sentences for crimes yet whine and moan about spending money on a jail. "

What wrote on May 22, 2008 12:11 pm:
" about 30 years bonds with the option to prepay in 15 or 20 years?? "

DR wrote on May 22, 2008 1:14 pm:
" If this Lancaster County board would support new business and not push them away. We would not be having this issue. Lancaster county recieves the lodging tax revenue and keno money. Motorsports is the fasting growing of all motorsports. They had the chance to let a privatly funded investor spend millions and the pushed him away. There went 10-23 million in tax revenue out the window. They wonder why the people do not support there ideas. "

Just wrote on May 22, 2008 2:16 pm:
" run the new jail on a city ballot. NO one wants the thing. NO one wants the thing. No one wants the thing. No one wants the thing. What part of a legal election don't you understand. To hell with lincoln and lancaster co. "

For Real wrote on May 22, 2008 2:58 pm:
" We are already paying for a $10,000,000.00 horse barn at the Lancaster event center the voters had no say on. This board is out of line. "

More for Real wrote on May 22, 2008 5:19 pm:
" Also lost 10 to 23 million according to a UNL study because the county board created zoning to prevent motorsports in Lancaster County that could have added to the sales tax and lodging tax coffers. These taxes will benefit the city and county which of course will bring more dollars to pay for these necessary jails. Let's at least tax some visitors visting our state, not all the poor folk who live here. "

... wrote on May 22, 2008 5:22 pm:
" Sure. Listen to these people. Don't build the jail. They voted against it. Ignore the fact we're not in compliance with federal regulations on jail standards/capacity and that we'll probably start losing federal funding and be facing hefty fines. It's not like those will cost much...probably only a few million to tens of millions. And after those fines are levied and paid that we'll STILL need a new jail to be in compliance.

Do these people commenting here even know what the problem is? "

....... wrote on May 22, 2008 9:17 pm:
" If the Lancaster county board would stop putting up road blocks and chasing developers away that would bring in great jobs. We would not need a jail resort for people. When people cannot find work or loose there job. Jail is sometimes the only alternative. Looks like the county board is going to make it a comfortable choice. Yes there is federal presure on the county to fix the over crowding. They have been out of compliance since 2002. That does not mean it has to be such a nice comfortable place inmates want to return to. Were is the jail taskforce? They sure made a motorsports task force when they wanted to kill the idea of millions coming into our community. "

responsible leaders wrote on May 22, 2008 10:22 pm:
" should expand the jail right where it is. That was the original idea. "