Woman sues HHS for suspending Medicaid
By CLARENCE MABIN / Lincoln Journal Star
A Lincoln woman whose Medicaid assistance was suspended by Nebraska Health and Human Services for failing to meet a welfare-to-work agreement is suing the agency over the sanction.
Jennifer Davio, a mother of two young children, said in a lawsuit Tuesday the Legislature authorized sanctions on cash assistance — but not on Medicaid — for parents who fail to meet their obligations under the state Employment First program.
In August, the department temporarily suspended Davio’s cash assistance under the Aid to Dependent Children program and her Medicaid coverage after it determined she failed to participate in Employment First, said her attorney, Erin Ching of the Nebraska Appleseed Center for Law in the Public Interest.
Employment First was designed to move families from public assistance to economic self-sufficiency. Nebraska requires adults who are on ADC and able to work to participate in the program.
Under it, families meet with caseworkers and develop self-sufficiency contracts. Adults can choose from a variety of activities to meet the contract obligations, including education, job skills training, job searching or employment.
Ching said Tuesday the Legislature authorized suspension of ADC cash payments for adults who failed to meet the contract terms. But, she said, lawmakers never approved Medicaid sanctions, and HHS overstepped its authority in doing so.
“She’s no longer challenging the ADC (cash payment) sanction,” Ching said. “The main thrust in her case is that this (Medicaid sanction) won’t happen again.”
An HHS spokeswoman declined comment Tuesday, saying the department had not been served with papers in the case.
Ching said transportation and child-care needs interfered with Davio’s efforts to meet the terms of of her Employment First contract last year. Davio was supposed to attend job search classes for about 20 hours a week, Ching said.
The department imposed sanctions on her beginning Aug. 1.
Ching said Davio, whose children are about 5 and 6, was without Medicaid coverage for about seven months. The benefits were restored after she became pregnant, Ching said.
The lawsuit seeks a judge’s declaration that the Medicaid sanction regulation violates the separation of powers clause of the Nebraska constitution.
Davio, who, according to the lawsuit, has a serious heart condition, is also seeking reimbursement for medical expenses she incurred during the sanction.
In a separate filing Tuesday, Ching asked the court to give the lawsuit class-action status. Such a class would include all ADC parents in Nebraska whose Medicaid was sanctioned for failure to participate in the Employment First program.
Ching said 465 Nebraska families were sanctioned in the first three months of 2008.
Reach Clarence Mabin at 473-7234 or cmabin@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
york county resident wrote on May 21, 2008 3:03 am:
the answer to her problem wrote on May 21, 2008 6:17 am:
"
Sarah wrote on May 21, 2008 6:37 am:
no no no wrote on May 21, 2008 6:56 am:
How does another baby help her? Bad choice for someone with a heart condition and not fulfilling other obligations. (throws hands up in the air) "
kan wrote on May 21, 2008 7:01 am:
"
No wrote on May 21, 2008 7:31 am:
concerned wrote on May 21, 2008 8:02 am:
468 NAC 2-020.09B1
6. If the parent(s) fails to participate in Employment First, the result is the loss of ADC cash assistance for the entire family as well as medical assistance for the adult(s). In a two-parent family, failure to participate by one parent will result in the loss of ADC cash assistance for the entire family and medical assistance for both adults (see 468 NAC 2-020.09B2f).
If I'm reading this right it says DHHS is in the right. "
Heather wrote on May 21, 2008 8:19 am:
Lincoln mom wrote on May 21, 2008 8:36 am:
bio wrote on May 21, 2008 8:40 am:
bigger picture wrote on May 21, 2008 8:41 am:
mmhmm wrote on May 21, 2008 8:51 am:
silence dogood wrote on May 21, 2008 8:57 am:
Mary wrote on May 21, 2008 9:00 am:
unbelievable wrote on May 21, 2008 9:04 am:
toomanybennies wrote on May 21, 2008 9:11 am:
Sounds wrote on May 21, 2008 9:20 am:
Kristin wrote on May 21, 2008 9:25 am:
been there wrote on May 21, 2008 9:49 am:
Full time work with children can happen wrote on May 21, 2008 9:49 am:
I agree with York County - utilize birth control & get a job.
There is never an incentive to do better. The more baby daddies, the more benefits. "
You wrote on May 21, 2008 9:50 am:
okayyyy wrote on May 21, 2008 11:52 am:
No sympathy wrote on May 21, 2008 12:04 pm:
No wrote on May 21, 2008 12:32 pm:
Smith wrote on May 21, 2008 12:50 pm:
Having children is a resposiblity not a right. If you don't live up to that resposiblity maybe you shouldn't have those children. There are lots of people looking for children to adopt. People who do know the difference. "
Idiots wrote on May 21, 2008 12:59 pm:
Why don't you all walk a mile in a homeless person's shoes and see how you like it? That means no car, no stereo, not knowing when you are going to eat next, no stable roof over your head.. Try living in poverty and trying to better yourself, but circumstances holding you back. "
HHS-Heinamen wrote on May 21, 2008 1:40 pm:
1.Banishment of acknowledgement of homosexuals (as they say "Because we don't have to by federal law")
2.Even more mental care facility declination
3.A strong religeous tone in HHS
4.A rather strong opinionated influence in medicare and medicaid coverage
5.They lost 80% of their board since Heinamen, only to replace them with this strong religeous idealism type of boardmembers
I think Heinamen should write a letter to the city of Omaha (particularly mayor Fahey) for making the statement "I plan on making Omaha a safe haven for homosexuals" "
donthavetobethere wrote on May 21, 2008 2:05 pm:
SJL wrote on May 21, 2008 2:21 pm:
be greatful wrote on May 21, 2008 2:31 pm:
To York wrote on May 21, 2008 2:33 pm:
"
FYI wrote on May 21, 2008 3:32 pm:
HHS is right wrote on May 21, 2008 4:01 pm:
ABF wrote on May 21, 2008 4:38 pm:
Birth control does fail...I know. I became pregnant at 19, during my sophomore year of college. So I could've had an abortion or I could go on public assistance until I finished school and got on my feet. I chose the latter. So yes, some of you did pay for me and my daughter. Mothers on welfare do work hard for their children. The "lazy, sit on their behind" myth of women with children who are on welfare is just that. Again, I know...my thesis (which I'm currently working on) explores some of the issues surrounding women with children on welfare. Try doing some actual, academic research before you comment on how lazy we are. I was taking a final on my due date and I was back in summer classes 4 days after my daughter was born. Now I'm off welfare and working on my Master's degree. I am insulted by most of your comments...you should be ashamed. "
To concerned wrote on May 21, 2008 5:15 pm:
Sarah wrote on May 21, 2008 5:56 pm:
Asisstance needed but abuse happens wrote on May 21, 2008 8:31 pm:
There are definately situations where responsible people need assistance...then there is a growing number of those manipulating the system (because that's all they know) to survive in the life style they've become used to...
ABF --Regarding birth control that failed and you got pregnant at 19 --guess what abstenance works everytime!!!! "
AWP wrote on May 21, 2008 9:39 pm:
abuse never stops wrote on May 22, 2008 8:19 am:
Thank God I have been able to provide for my child without help from the State or Federal government but it's good to know it's available for honest people who need the help. "
Hmmmm wrote on May 22, 2008 12:10 pm:
interesting.... wrote on May 22, 2008 12:14 pm:
As for the mothers that wrote about having a child, being on medicaid and then working through it and standing on their own 2 feet, I applaud you! That is exactly how welfare should be used! When times are tough you are able to have that assistance to stand on your on again...not to live life without any responsibilities or efforts towards a better life, bc you can, thanks to us and state dollars "
Whatever wrote on May 22, 2008 4:15 pm:
concerned wrote on May 22, 2008 4:25 pm:
Birth Control Fails wrote on May 22, 2008 6:54 pm:
Amanda wrote on May 28, 2008 1:42 pm:
My Medicaid coverage was also sanctioned because of Employment First. I chose to go back to school but was notified that I was being sanctioned for failure to comply since my projected graduation date was two months beyond their allowed time frame. My family, that is my husband, his two sons, myself and our daughter, had to make due on my husband's job as a garbage man and my financial aid consisting mostly of student loans. Not having health insurance proved to be costly to us and I hope that she wins her case so that this doesn't happen to anyone else again. "
Mary wrote on May 29, 2008 1:53 pm: