Now
Fair
67°
High
85°
Low
54°

Wind turbines are the new symbol of Rock Port

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, May 16, 2008 - 12:45:34 am CDT

ROCK PORT, Mo. —  Clarence Schaffner knows wind power.

His father, Louis, crisscrossed Iowa and Missouri in the early 1940s, installing one of the earliest versions of a wind turbine. They called them windchargers.

Used mostly by farmers, the small devices generated six volts and cost about $50. Schaffner said they powered everything from the farmhouse to the chicken coop.

Story Photo
Just east of Rock Port, the Cow Branch Wind Energy Center, another Wind Capital Group project, provides electricity for other utilities. (Robert Becker)
Loess Hills Wind Farm

What? A four-turbine wind project that made Rock Port, Mo., the first U.S. city to get all of its electricity from wind power.

Where? The wind farm is in the Loess Hills along the Missouri River.

Who? Developed by Wind Capital Group, based in St. Louis, and financed by John Deere Credit Co., Des Moines, Iowa.

How much power is generated? Each of the 1.65-megawatt wind turbines produces enough electricity for about 700 homes. Rock Port's population is about 1,400. Excess power is sold by an electric cooperative.

Cost? $10 million. The price tag for a nearby 24-turbine project called the Cow Branch Wind Energy Center was $80 million.

What's next? Wind Capital Group has held talks with Nebraska Public Power District about building wind farms in Nebraska.




View Larger Map

Times have changed, and so have wind turbines.

As Schaffner talked about the pioneer days of wind energy, four 250-foot-tall white towers — each with three 90-foot-long, knife-like blades — churned on green hills a few miles behind him.

The million-dollar-plus turbines are the new symbol of Rock Port — the first U.S. city to get 100 percent of its electricity from wind power.

Most people know Rock Port as a place to buy fireworks.

“I think it’s great,” said Schaffner, standing on the front porch of the old Opp Hotel, now the home of the Star Hill Prairie Art Institute. “It’s a good source of power.”

Other residents voiced the same sentiment. Said Bud Harger, who helps out at the local hardware store: “Anything that has to do with renewable energy has to be good, regardless of whether or not it’s economically feasible.”

It costs almost twice as much to generate electricity from wind than from coal, the source of half of the electricity generated in the U.S.

But wind energy groups and developers say the cost is gradually dropping as more large-scale wind farms are built. A recent U.S. Department of Energy report said wind energy could account for 20 percent of the nation’s energy supply by 2030.

 All-wind energy communities like Rock Port could become more common across the Great Plains, where the wind blows fiercely at times. In Rock Port, the wind speed averages about 18 mph at the top of the Loess Hills, gently rolling hills and bluffs that rise 200 feet above the flat plains along the Missouri River.

Dependable wind was one reason why Tom Carnahan, president of the St. Louis-based Wind Capital Group, developed the four-turbine Rock Port project, officially known as the Loess Hills Wind Farm, and the Cow Branch Wind Energy Center, a 24-turbine project just east of Rock Port.

The Cow Branch turbines have 140-foot-long blades.

Each wind farm is a separate project, but combined they generate about 55 megawatts, enough to power more than 30,000 homes.

Carnahan, who was in Rock Port this week to film a segment on the wind turbines with ABC News, said the Loess Hills turbines produce enough electricity to meet the needs of the town’s 1,400 people and a second town the same size. What the town doesn’t use is bought by Missouri Joint Municipal Utilities, which sells it on the wholesale market.

The town of Rock Port does not own the four wind turbines. The $10 million project was built and paid for by Wind Capital Group and the John Deere Credit Co., based in Des Moines, Iowa.

“It didn’t cost the city a dime,” Carnahan said.

Despite its wind resources and proximity to transmission lines, the Rock Port project never would have happened without the enthusiastic support of the town’s residents, Carnahan said.

“You have to have strong community support,” he said. “It’s the difference between a project working and not working.”

Jim Hughes, the town’s utilities superintendent, said the arrangement has worked well. When there’s no wind and the turbine blades are still, the town gets its electricity from the same cooperative that buys its excess power when the turbines are really turning.

The turbines have allowed the town, which owns and operates its electricity utility, to semi-retire its six diesel generators. Now the generators, which burn high-priced fuel, are used only sporadically during periods of peak demand.

Hughes and City Administrator Maureen Moore said electric rates have gone up (some residents say by as much as 20 percent), but not because of the wind turbine project.

Moore said the rate increase took effect about six months before the project went online in April. Both officials said they hope the turbine project will help stabilize electric rates.

Both the Loess Hills and Cow Branch wind farms are within 50 miles of the Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge and two key waterfowl migration routes, the Central and Mississippi flyways.

 Refuge manager Ron Bell said birds and waterfowl do use the Loess Hills and the Missouri River. He sees the benefits of renewable energy, but also the downside.

“It has a potential for birds hitting the blades, especially on days that are overcast and cloudy,” Bell said.

 No discussions were held with Wind Capital Group or Rock Port officials before the projects were being built, Bell said.

With the turbines on private land, there is little the refuge can do as far as monitoring a bird-kill situation. He’s also concerned more wind farms will crop up on the Loess Hills. Bell said 800 acres of the 7,350-acre refuge are in the bluffs.

The turbines already are attracting people from nearby Interstate 29, said Police Chief Curtis Elam. They want to know where they can get close-up photos, he said. The towers are on private property, but there are good views from U.S. 136.

Nancy Teague, owner of Rock Port Recollections, said the turbines are a progressive move by the community, but she doesn’t think they will bring in a lot of tourism.

“Everyone who comes into the shop off the interstate is amazed at the look of the wind turbines,” Teague said. “It creates interest, but I don’t know if it will bring people.”

Walter Shandy of nearby Phelps City, who was pumping gas at Casey’s General Store, likes seeing the turbines towering over Rock Port.

“I’ve seen it out in California —been out there a few times. It’s kind of strange around here till you get used to it,” Shandy said.

The 79-year-old retired mason said the project brought workers and money to the farming area. But now he wishes someone would invent a renewable source of energy to power cars and trucks.

“I hate paying $4 per gallon,” Shandy said, pointing a finger at the gasoline pump.

Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at 402-473-72243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Scott wrote on May 16, 2008 6:06 am:
" Wind energy is the most unrealiable and ineficient way to produce energy. The cost is almost 5 times more than a coal fired powered plant that will produce energy on demand. You cannot store the energy that is produced from wind. David Sokol likes wind energy because the federal government is subsidizing his billion dollar Mid American Energy. With out the subsidies there is now way we would have wind energ. "

wrote on May 16, 2008 7:46 am:
" The cost may be higher, but how can you argue that it is inefficient? "

Rob wrote on May 16, 2008 8:05 am:
" Its expensive now because its uncommon. At least its a step in the right direction and a offers a bit brighter hope for future energy resources like solar and switch grass. That is if you like progressive thought and process. "

Progress but not the solution wrote on May 16, 2008 8:05 am:
" Wind energy is much like ethanol... it's not the solution to renewable energy, but it's going in the right direction. Just like ethanol, wind energy over time will become much more efficient and cost competitive (or obsolete!). I am more than fine with coal energy since that is a fairly clean source now, but I'm glad others are developing the technology that will be used 100 years from now and over time we will wean ourselves off of non-renewable resources. "

So Scott wrote on May 16, 2008 8:09 am:
" I guess the other utilitys and oil companys don't get subsidys? How much does the government pay towards ethanol? I think wind power would be great in nebraska. The wind blows all the time. When it's not the people complaining should provide enough wind to turn the turbines. "

woosh wrote on May 16, 2008 8:20 am:
" Do you realize how many wind turbines would have to be built to generate any significant amount of power? That's what makes it inefficient.

We have a huge supply of CLEAN coal in this country that can be used for power until the technology is far enough along to start using renewable sources of energy that are cost effective and efficient. Nuclear would be a great place to start. "

Jan wrote on May 16, 2008 8:35 am:
" So what if wind is subsidized? So is the oil industry. "

NS wrote on May 16, 2008 8:47 am:
" This is awesome! It's cool to see something so progressive in such a small town and so close to home. As far as I'm concerned the wind energy trend can't catch on fast enough. It's a great, clean way to produce electricity from something that happens constantly in some areas and will never run out. "

One Eyed Jack wrote on May 16, 2008 8:52 am:
" Time to wake up. How much electricity does the U.S. import from foreign sources. NONE. In fact, Nebraska exports electricity to surrounding states. Wind is the cry of the enviros until it kills birds or obstructs views. Let's focus our energies instead on a substitute for gasoline and diesel. Hint: Corn ethanol ain't the answer! "

Matt wrote on May 16, 2008 8:57 am:
" Why can't you store energy that is produced from wind? Am I missing something here, aren't wind turbines connected to the same grid as coal power plants? What difference does it make where the electricity was produced?
"

Jim wrote on May 16, 2008 9:10 am:
" It is not efficient because it is an unavailable source at times when it is needed most, think about those 100 degree summer days when people fire up their air conditioners...those are not the days that the wind generally blows. That is why it is inefficient..its not there when you really need it. If used at all, it is better only in smaller increments to diversify sources of power, I feel it is a mistake to go 100 percent...this town will see their rates explode. "

natefrog wrote on May 16, 2008 9:27 am:
" Do some research and find out whether coal is truly clean or not. I'll give you a hint; it isn't. I worked in the power industry; coal spews much pollution into the atmosphere, including much more radiation per year than comparable nuclear power plants. "

Unreal wrote on May 16, 2008 9:32 am:
" I am amazed at the reactions of people who pooh-pooh an energy source that will never run out, is clean, doesn't require massive mining efforts, and doesn't leave toxic waste. The only downside is that some people consider the turbines ugly - although I think they're neat looking and much better than a large hole in the ground or a nuclear reactor.

Sure it's more expensive now. Your plasma TV was more expensive a few years ago, but as the technology improves (and people realize the potential) the price steadily decreases.
"

Nina wrote on May 16, 2008 9:57 am:
" And a beautiful sight they are, as you near Rockport. Artistic, inspiring and sleek, I can get hung up in the wonder of such a sight, and for a moment forget their greater purpose of supplying energy for all who live nearby. Somehow they remind me of angels, and it may be that God has indeed sent us such angelic innovations to sustain life. "

gld wrote on May 16, 2008 10:06 am:
" The only true clean, efficient,reliable source of power for electricity that the United States has is Nuclear Power. It could be very cheep if polititions would stay out of it.
Wind is not the answer. It is just a new fad. "

pollution wrote on May 16, 2008 10:20 am:
" Coal is clean power?? How do you figure that??? See the real numbers about just how 'clean' coal power is: http://www.sierraclub.org/cleanair/factsheets/power.asp

Also, how do you get that coal to NE, or MO? Doesn't that involve using MORE energy in transporting it here? And, just how 'clean' is strip mining (the most common way used to get coal from the closest sources)?? Talk about destroying an environment, this has to be pretty much on top of the list for most destructive method of getting a fuel source! "

Roger wrote on May 16, 2008 10:27 am:
" Several points to clarify. First off, you can't store any energy. Once it is produced, it is on the grid. The point the writer was trying to make is that you can't produce a bunch of energy from wind and save it for days when the wind isn't blowing.

The second point is that you always have to have a backup plan for wind energy. It is a simple fact that the wind doesn't always blow. Plus when it does blow, the wind apeed is different, and the amount of generation is tied to the wind speed.

I applaud the attempt to go to alternative energy sources. Keep up the research. It is great to see.

Just out of curiosity, what do people think about nuclear energy? "

Joseph Blow wrote on May 16, 2008 10:28 am:
" I think people are confusing inefficent (spelling) with readily available. Yes, there will be times when the wind isn't blowing, some of that time will be covered via their generators other times they'll buy energy from the co-op. Of course they'll sell surplus energy to the co-op so it may be a wash. Remember if this system can break even that's a huge victory. I've seen a fairly large windfarm up in Iowa. Does anyone know details about that?? The bottom line is we've got to start trying alternative to fosil fuels, period. Atomic power anyone...???? Didn't think so, so a few windmills really aren't that big of an eye sore. "

D wrote on May 16, 2008 10:31 am:
" I agree. I have around 3000 acres just to the east of the wind farm by rockport and driving that windy highway (believe it is hwy 2) and seeing those huge sleek turbines is a sight to see. They fit in so well with the countryside that I took many pictures at dusk with my camera and they look amazing. Truely something for everyone to see. There is no sound, no pollution, no gas being used to create or transport the energy (unlike oil), very quick to construct with prefabrication and much more aesthetically pleasing than a power plant in your backyard. "

Your Answer wrote on May 16, 2008 10:43 am:
" Okay people let me help you out. Yes the wind doesn't blow all the time, but you can get 100% of you power from wind. This is how! The power the city uses is a know factor by averaging the power they have used over a set time. Now you create a set of wind turbines that will generate equal to or more than the amount of power the city will use over the next set time. It true that some days you willn't create as much power than other days, but its averaged out. During the winter when most people don't use as much power the wind turbines create the same amout of power, that power is dumped into the power grid and the meter (at the power company just like at you house) will not how much power is used. In the summer when the town uses more power than is created the meter turns the other way. Its called net metering, which I find interesting that Nebraska is one of the few states that doesn't allow net metering, but thats what the power company is doing. Check out net metering if you need more information. Hope this helps. "

for wind power wrote on May 16, 2008 11:05 am:
" We know the wind does not blow 24/7 365 days. Have some energy uses shut off the grid when this happens. For their trouble, the would get cheaper electric rates. I am for nuclear energy, and also dropping the 42 cent tariff on other countries ethanol to reduce fuel prices. We need a real energy plan. "

two cents wrote on May 16, 2008 11:06 am:
" There is a place for wind energy, but it will be only a small slice of the U.S. future power generation. Like it or not, coal, natural gas, nuclear and other resources will continue to play a major role in generation for decades to come due to the projected growth of this country's energy demand. That is why it's important to ramp up research/development of carbon capture and sequestration technologies (storing CO2 in the ground).

Wind energy has many benefits, obviously, but it'll only be a small piece to the puzzle. "

David wrote on May 16, 2008 11:30 am:
" You're absolutely wrong, Scott. If this entire country was nothing but windmills, the areas that are not getting enough wind will be fed by those other areas that "are" getting wind, just like how the electric is interconnected now. Secondly, coal is more financially wasteful than wind because not only does our hard earned money go to other states, but you're forgetting about all of the added costs of medical bills of those affected, which in turn carries over to the costs of insurance, which eventually increases the costs for all of us. Not to mention the costs as a result of the pollution that contributes to the global warming which causes more damages, injuries and death than what we've ever seen in the past. Also, wind energy brings money immediately back to the local economy, which coal does not do. Thirdly, with gas prices continously going up, the price of coal will be even greater and will ultimately be directly more expensive than wind energy as a result of the costs of transporting the coal. Fourthly, Rock Port proves that this is possible and nobody can prove them wrong otherwise. Coal is the absolute worst idea that we could implement, and is shown to be much more costly to the country as a whole. "

REJim wrote on May 16, 2008 12:17 pm:
" Lest someone from nebraska find a way to complain about something done in Missouri. It's their town and they like it. I've seen on tv there is another town closeby that is going straight windfarm. At least the Missouri is progressive and trying things. In nebraska I remember the old saying if it works don't fix it. Another good one was let them try it first and if it makes money or works then maybe we'll try it. When coming into nebraska from missouri I look to the west along the bluffs and see the good life state sign. Wrong. I guess nebraska can sit back and wait until some other place develops a energy bill that works, then in twenty years they may try it. "

Jay wrote on May 16, 2008 12:43 pm:
" Actually, Lincoln does allow net metering. In fact, I believe that Hyde Observatory is doing just that. Visit the LES policy on Net Metering here: http://www.les.com/your_les/adminboard_ms2007/0707.asp. Also, I recommend everyone get a subscription to Home Power Magazine at www.homepower.com to learn a little more information about wind, solar, and other alternatives. "

CSS wrote on May 16, 2008 1:32 pm:
" There is no such thing as clean coal. Burning coal should be illegal. This is great, and I'm happy to see a midwestern town taking the leader here. Forget all the coal apologists, they aren't thinking long term. "

Betty wrote on May 16, 2008 2:16 pm:
" Don't forget, there is a wind farm in Nebraska at Ainsworth. They had 36 turbines the last time I was there. It was amazing to look at and so quiet. "

Bart wrote on May 16, 2008 3:09 pm:
" There are tons of wind turbines near Palm Springs and they are awesome. They work of the constant mountain pass winds. Nebraska is the most windy place I have ever been in where people call a huge blowing wind a breeze. With a grid of these turbines all over the midwest there is little doubt they could serve the whole area, so don't worry about the 100 degree still days, there is wind somewhere. Coal is the worst form of electric energy as it shoots C02 into the atmosphere. Even Mr. George W now acknowledges that being a major problem. I doubt the folks in Lincoln have heard that news yet so it will take a while for them to accept it. "

Wind fan wrote on May 16, 2008 3:56 pm:
" A group in Des Moines has come up with a plan to store wind energy via compressed air. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10695864/ "The plant will use power from its own wind turbines, supplemented by cheaper electricity bought at off-peak times, to force air into rock formations at least 2,000 feet underground."
What I can't tell is if the windmills will generate electricity and compress air, or just compress air which will later be used to create electricity. Regardless, wind energy may be expensive now, but new technologies are being invented from todays trials to where in 10 or 20 years, wind energy will be more efficient and cleaner than fossil fuels.

"

George wrote on May 16, 2008 10:26 pm:
" It is rediculous to say wind power is inefficient. Fossil fuels pollute. We should generate as much as possible from the wind, water, solar and geothermal etc. and use fossil fuels, mainly natural gas, for on demand backup when the wind is insufficient. We can take coal and convert it to hydrogen fuel for a zero pollution solution. If we had any kind of leadership the last 20 years, we could have a "mission to the moon" type of mentality to get this done. The sooner we make an energy economy of our own, the sooner we won't have to spend trillions of dollars killing people to protect our "oil sources". "

makes sense wrote on May 17, 2008 10:49 am:
" to use wind energy. So much sense, in fact, that the traditional industries and those with a fiduciary interest in those industries feel a need to campaign against it. My sense is that their sense is that wind generated electricity is the wave of the future and they sense a need to protect their market, their profits, not the environment or our future well-being. As a community, as a nation we should be all over wind power: Common sense people not nonsense. "