Other states give bears 2nd chances, but officials say Neb.'s case different
BY CARA PESEK / Lincoln Journal Star
A day after state officials shot a young bear in northwest Nebraska, a Game and Parks official said killing an animal is never the first choice in dealing with a potentially dangerous animal.
But Jeff Hoffman believed it was the right thing to do in the case of the bear that wandered through Harrison on Monday.
Twice in the span of just a few hours, the bear was spotted in town and on a nearby ranch, Hoffman said.
Related Link(s):
That’s unusual, he said. Large predatory animals like bears and mountain lions tend to stay away from places where people are.
And once bears lose their fear of humans, he said, they’re more likely to be dangerous.
“That was a great concern,” he said.
The Game and Parks Commission doesn’t have a protocol in place for dealing with bears that wander too close to civilization, because bear sightings in Nebraska are so rare, Hoffman said. The last bear was killed in Nebraska in 1907.
Instead, officers applied the protocol designed to deal with mountain lions.
But after Monday, he said, Game and Parks officials began talking about the possibility of coming up with a plan specific to bears.
In Colorado, which has a relatively large bear population, the Colorado Division of Wildlife has a two-strike policy, said spokeswoman Jennifer Churchill.
The first time a bear behaves aggressively or ventures too close to where humans live, it’s trapped, ear-tagged and relocated, Churchill said.
If the bear behaves aggressively or ventures into town again, the bear may be killed.
“It does depend,” Churchill said. “It’s really up to the official’s discretion.”
Last year, a late freeze killed many of the plants and berries that make up much of a bear’s spring diet, she said. That drove hungry bears into towns and cities.
Division of Wildlife officials killed 63 bears in 2007, which, she said, is higher than average.
Churchill said she couldn’t speculate on whether the bear killed in Nebraska might have been ear-tagged and released instead — the states are just too different.
“You don’t have the kind of bear situations that we have here,” she said.
In Wyoming, bears are also often given several chances, said Game and Fish Department game warden Jon Stephens.
Like in Colorado, bears that venture into campgrounds or communities are often trapped, tagged and relocated first.
But Stephens said for a bear to appear in a community and on a ranch in a matter of hours was troubling.
“Once a bear has been habituated to people, it becomes that much bolder, that much braver,” Stephens said.
And that’s when the bear becomes a safety issue, he said.
It’s more difficult to relocate bears in Nebraska than in Colorado or Wyoming because Nebraska lacks large tracts of public land far from people and livestock, Hoffman said. And states don’t generally relocate wild animals in neighboring states.
Moving the bear likely would have meant letting it loose on someone else’s property, he said.
Had the Harrison bear been spotted walking through a field instead of through a town, state officials would have let the bear be, and hoped it eventually wandered out of the state, Hoffman said.
But the 2-year-old black bear that visited Harrison didn’t seem to be merely passing through, which is why officials made the decision to kill the animal, a decision both difficult and unpopular.
“We don’t want to kill these animals,” Hoffman said. “That’s the last thing we want to do.”
Reach Cara Pesek at 473-7361 or cpesek@Journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
wow. kill a bear for our safety wrote on May 14, 2008 8:14 pm:
great wrote on May 14, 2008 8:32 pm:
Mac wrote on May 14, 2008 9:08 pm:
JJ wrote on May 14, 2008 9:14 pm:
Jes wrote on May 14, 2008 9:14 pm:
yogi wrote on May 14, 2008 9:19 pm:
Where exactly wrote on May 14, 2008 9:27 pm:
Also, does our G&P have tranquilizers for large animals like that readilly available? I doubt it. How about equipment to transfer it safely? I doubt it. How about the training to do it safely for the animal and the staff? I doubt it. Yes, it is a shame for wildlife to have to die, but it happens.
If we're all going to feel sorry for the bear, let's show some compassion for all the deer needlessly slaughtered on highways across the state. Let's apply the same standard and stop driving because we could kill one. Puh-leaze.
Way to go G&P. Now, do some research and talk with our neighbors in CO and WY on ways to handle it better in the future, since I bet this problem will come up again as the front range of the rockies continues to grow with humans. "
To Wiccanwriter wrote on May 14, 2008 9:29 pm:
Former Sioux County Resident wrote on May 14, 2008 9:51 pm:
Who has an animal control pickup in Harrison
I doubt there even is a tranquilizer gun in Sioux County.
The Village of Harrison is the only community in Nebraska's 2nd largest county by area.
This animal was accident to happen.
He found a needle in a haystack in Harrison and had been tranquilized chances are that if relocated by end of summer probably would have met the same fate.
Had this bear been a mile east he would have been in a burned out tract from a wild fire. It was obvious he was humanized and not afraid of humans. If he had not found food in Sowbelly what could have been his next action.
People wake up realize the area where the bear was at was not Eastern Nebraska. I would bet that there are no homes between Harrison and the Grote Ranch where he was shot. Yet he found the only town in the county of over 2000 sq miles and then found a ranch within hours.
"
CareBears wrote on May 14, 2008 9:59 pm:
its a bear wrote on May 14, 2008 10:28 pm:
MarkyMark wrote on May 14, 2008 10:31 pm:
J wrote on May 14, 2008 10:58 pm:
"
Still could have been prevented wrote on May 14, 2008 11:19 pm:
Jeorge wrote on May 14, 2008 11:29 pm:
Get real wrote on May 14, 2008 11:50 pm:
Look, maybe shooting it wasn't the ideal situation, but like the article said, now we can plan for if and when the next bear wanders into the state. "
To Former Sioux County Resident wrote on May 14, 2008 11:57 pm:
bobo wrote on May 15, 2008 12:16 am:
Right on Where Exactly wrote on May 15, 2008 12:32 am:
Suggestion wrote on May 15, 2008 1:30 am:
clint wrote on May 15, 2008 7:01 am:
Hjalmer wrote on May 15, 2008 7:11 am:
Tired of Whining wrote on May 15, 2008 7:29 am:
mitchy_v wrote on May 15, 2008 7:43 am:
1. Once a bear has been habituated to people, it becomes that much bolder, that much braver
2. Also, zoos are not taking bears and Nebraska does not have enough public land large enough for a bear, Nordeen said.
3. And states don’t generally relocate wild animals in neighboring states.
Game and Parks did the right thing. They are not proud of having to killing. They are considering mounting it for educational purposes. Maybe you should focus all of your "don't kill it, relocated it" towards the humaine society where the kill healthy cats and dogs every day.
"
Tired of hearing Whining wrote on May 15, 2008 7:57 am:
I live wrote on May 15, 2008 8:03 am:
one strike and your out wrote on May 15, 2008 8:38 am:
bob wrote on May 15, 2008 8:51 am:
who cares wrote on May 15, 2008 8:58 am:
not right wrote on May 15, 2008 8:58 am:
OmahaAnnie wrote on May 15, 2008 9:01 am:
More Than Glad wrote on May 15, 2008 9:20 am:
For all you people wanting to relocate the bear, please post your email, address, or phone number so I can add you to the list for the next possible bear sighting and relocation area. Before you start crying foul just remember that the bears were in Eastern Nebraska (also) first.
Wasn't it long ago that a mountain lion in Eastern Nebraska was threatening people and they wanted it taken care of. Fortunately an Omaha commuter ran it over and saved it the tragedy of being shot. In the end the animal died. What is good for the Eastern state is good for the Western state. (remember the wild animals were here first).
"
think before shooting wrote on May 15, 2008 9:24 am:
huh wrote on May 15, 2008 9:29 am:
Nina wrote on May 15, 2008 9:46 am:
Wildlife didnt get the memo wrote on May 15, 2008 10:15 am:
Guppy wrote on May 15, 2008 10:27 am:
Not rocket science wrote on May 15, 2008 10:37 am:
No one from wrote on May 15, 2008 11:10 am:
Easy for outsiders to say when their livelihood is not affected.
Harrision, NE is not bear country. There are plenty of places in this country for bears. "
Not rocket science wrote on May 15, 2008 11:11 am:
not right wrote on May 15, 2008 11:17 am:
Big Bear wrote on May 15, 2008 11:58 am:
Several points to think about wrote on May 15, 2008 12:12 pm:
Second--Bear Country USA is an open air animal park. Having a bear who is not afraid of humans is just what they need--yea right! Having been through that park I am glad that this bear was not taken there because he could have been a danger to the park visitors and if that would have happened he would have had to have been put down anyway.
Third--the author of the original story that appeared in yesterday's LJS is a close relative of mine--she checks her facts carfully before writing anything. Her story said that none of the zoos would accept the bear and that takes the Henry Doorly off the list of options.
Fourth--I've actually been to Harrison and Sioux County as well as most of that part of the state. How a bear found that tiny little town in the middle of all that open country is amazing. If he was able to find a town in search of food once he would be able to do it again and would become a problem. Sure, it would have been great if there was another option but think about it--the last time a bear was shot in Nebraska was 1907. Bears have not been common in Nebraska since the early 1900's. Their have only been two other bear sightings reported in Nebraska since the last bear was shot here. Any procedures Game & Parks may have had on their books to deal with bears would be completely outdated. Should they update them? Absolutely.
At the rate that people are encroaching on tradtional wildlife territory in the Black Hills and Rookie Mountains I'm certain we are going to continue to see increases in cases like this and we should have a better plan for dealing with it than just killing these animals but states are going to have to work together. That doesn't always happen so well (anyone remember issues surrounding water rights?). So until someone decides to use a little vision in planning human sprawl and in interstate planning for dealing with wildlife/human contact there is potential danger to both humans and animals. "
who read this bears mind wrote on May 15, 2008 1:13 pm:
mitchy_v wrote on May 15, 2008 1:46 pm:
Grundle wrote on May 15, 2008 1:49 pm:
Actually Grundle wrote on May 15, 2008 2:41 pm:
More than once chance wrote on May 15, 2008 2:45 pm:
1) Bear seen repeatedly in Harrison= not shot by local law enforcement.
2) Bear seen by rancher entering barn= not shot by rancher.
3) Game and parks called in and did the appropriate thing.
Seriously people, get over it. "
mitchy_v wrote on May 15, 2008 3:49 pm:
asking for trouble wrote on May 15, 2008 3:51 pm:
To more than one chance... wrote on May 15, 2008 4:03 pm:
Um wrote on May 15, 2008 4:03 pm:
Yes...I saw a bear more than one time as well. No one shot it. Most were educated on how to handle wildlife encounters since the park has wildlife. The U.S. needs to fence in all parks then so animals can't wonder off cause if you see one roaming the area and it poses a threat..aw forget it..you guys need some help from someone better than me. "
Wow wrote on May 15, 2008 4:08 pm:
Vets wrote on May 15, 2008 4:42 pm:
Grundle wrote on May 16, 2008 9:11 am:
Lindsay wrote on May 16, 2008 10:53 am:
John Holmes wrote on May 16, 2008 12:49 pm:
Ryan wrote on May 16, 2008 3:53 pm:
Aaron wrote on May 16, 2008 11:39 pm:
I hike, backpack, and camp in the rockies all the time. Black bears live in the rockies where I hike. In no way am I scared of being around them. Black bears are big cowards. Someone mentioned reading something about this bear hiding under a trampoline....makes sense since they're big cowards. Let's not let hysteria either way cloud what should be a needed discussion on a policy that needs to be determined to handle black bears in the future.
In my opinion our state should look closely at how Colorado and Wyoming handle things like this. I don't have all the answers for the particulars. From what I've read no one else does either. Just a lot of hysteria here. I think the bear should have had a second chance somehow, but it's hard to second guess people who follow orders and policies and there is no policy for them to specifically deal with this. How about we all take all the energy we're putting into these posts and follow through with letting NGPC hear what our opinions are. "