Now
Fair
71°
High
79°
Low
58°

Other states give bears 2nd chances, but officials say Neb.'s case different

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY CARA PESEK / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 06:44:54 pm CDT

A day after state officials shot a young bear in northwest Nebraska, a Game and Parks official said killing an animal is never the first choice in dealing with a potentially dangerous animal.

But Jeff Hoffman believed it was the right thing to do in the case of the bear that wandered  through Harrison on Monday.

Twice in the span of just a few hours, the bear was spotted in town and on a nearby ranch, Hoffman said.

Story Photo
Lori Windsor of Harrison took this photo of a black bear after it was confined in a barn near Harrison. (Courtesy Lori Windsor)

That’s unusual, he said. Large predatory animals like bears and mountain lions tend to stay away from places where people are.

And once bears lose their fear of humans, he said, they’re more likely to be dangerous.  

“That was a great concern,” he said.

The Game and Parks Commission doesn’t have a protocol in place for dealing with bears that wander too close to civilization, because bear sightings in Nebraska are so rare, Hoffman said. The last bear was killed in Nebraska in 1907.

Instead, officers applied the protocol designed to deal with mountain lions.

But after Monday, he said, Game and Parks officials began talking about the possibility of coming up with a plan specific to bears.

In Colorado, which has a relatively large bear population, the Colorado Division of Wildlife has a two-strike policy, said spokeswoman Jennifer Churchill.

The first time a bear behaves aggressively or ventures too close to where humans live, it’s trapped, ear-tagged and relocated, Churchill said.

If the bear behaves aggressively or ventures into town again, the bear may be killed.

“It does depend,” Churchill said.  “It’s really up to the official’s discretion.”

Last year, a late freeze killed many of the plants and berries that make up much of a bear’s spring diet, she said. That drove hungry bears into towns and cities.

Division of Wildlife officials killed 63 bears in 2007, which, she said, is higher than average.

Churchill said she couldn’t speculate on whether the bear killed in Nebraska might have been ear-tagged and released instead — the states are just too different.

“You don’t have the kind of bear situations that we have here,” she said.

In Wyoming, bears are also often given several chances, said Game and Fish Department game warden Jon Stephens.

Like in Colorado, bears that venture into campgrounds or communities are often trapped, tagged and relocated first.

But Stephens said for a bear to appear in a community and on a ranch in a matter of hours was troubling.

“Once a bear has been habituated to people, it becomes that much bolder, that much braver,” Stephens said.

And that’s when the bear becomes a safety issue, he said.

It’s more difficult to relocate bears in Nebraska than in Colorado or Wyoming because Nebraska lacks large tracts of public land far from people and livestock, Hoffman said. And states don’t generally relocate wild animals in neighboring states.

Moving the bear likely would have meant letting it loose on someone else’s property, he said. 

Had the Harrison bear been spotted walking through a field instead of through a town, state officials would have let the bear be, and hoped it eventually wandered out of the state, Hoffman said.

But the 2-year-old black bear that visited Harrison didn’t seem to be merely passing through, which is why officials made the decision to kill the animal, a decision both difficult and unpopular.

“We don’t want to kill these animals,” Hoffman said. “That’s the last thing we want to do.”

Reach Cara Pesek at 473-7361 or cpesek@Journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Wiccanwriter wrote on May 14, 2008 7:52 pm:
" What a joke!!!! Let's kill a bear because it wandered into town in search of food. Hello, that is what tranquilizer darts are for. I'm sure you could have managed to tranq it and take it back into the mountains or up into the hills away from the human population. Sounds like someone got a little trigger happy. "

wow. kill a bear for our safety wrote on May 14, 2008 8:14 pm:
" nahh. i'd tranqulize it, then relocate it! all you had to do was go get some food! it would of came to you, and then you coulda shot it, and put it in a animal rescue truck or something! "

great wrote on May 14, 2008 8:32 pm:
" more armchair quarterbacking from people who have very little knowledge of the situation. "

Mac wrote on May 14, 2008 9:08 pm:
" I'm with WICCANWRITER. I you can hit a bear with a bullet, you can hit it with a tranquilizer. I'm not buying Game and Parks explanation. And then they're talking about stuffing it like some trophy for their game room? "Hey, we're incredibly sorry we had to shoot the poor thing, but, you know what? It'd look mighty good over the mantel!" I guarantee you, people living in states that know how to deal with large predators are shaking their heads at Nebraska's lame excuse for a solution. "

JJ wrote on May 14, 2008 9:14 pm:
" This is horrible, Nebraska Game & Parks is a joke! "

Jes wrote on May 14, 2008 9:14 pm:
" I wish there would have been another way to deal with the situation...I think it's sad they chose to kill the bear! "

yogi wrote on May 14, 2008 9:19 pm:
" tranq it relocate it, if it comes back again for food shoot it...humans are the main reason bears are shot. thinking that feeding a bear is cute is a sure way to get that bear killed. "

Where exactly wrote on May 14, 2008 9:27 pm:
" Where EXACTLY would you like G&P to have relocated it to? Mahoney State Park? Read the article, Nebraska lacks large tracts of public land like CO and WY and those other states certainly wouldn't be pleased with us dumping it on them. If they released it on private property and it killed livestock, guess who would be paying for it: us, the taxpayers!

Also, does our G&P have tranquilizers for large animals like that readilly available? I doubt it. How about equipment to transfer it safely? I doubt it. How about the training to do it safely for the animal and the staff? I doubt it. Yes, it is a shame for wildlife to have to die, but it happens.

If we're all going to feel sorry for the bear, let's show some compassion for all the deer needlessly slaughtered on highways across the state. Let's apply the same standard and stop driving because we could kill one. Puh-leaze.

Way to go G&P. Now, do some research and talk with our neighbors in CO and WY on ways to handle it better in the future, since I bet this problem will come up again as the front range of the rockies continues to grow with humans. "

To Wiccanwriter wrote on May 14, 2008 9:29 pm:
" Uh, the mountains? Been to western Nebraska lately? Nice try. Most of the land in the panhandle is private, and what little public land there is close to towns (Wildcat Hills, SB National Monument, Chadron/Ft. Rob. state parks), not good places to release it. "

Former Sioux County Resident wrote on May 14, 2008 9:51 pm:
"
Who has an animal control pickup in Harrison
I doubt there even is a tranquilizer gun in Sioux County.
The Village of Harrison is the only community in Nebraska's 2nd largest county by area.
This animal was accident to happen.
He found a needle in a haystack in Harrison and had been tranquilized chances are that if relocated by end of summer probably would have met the same fate.
Had this bear been a mile east he would have been in a burned out tract from a wild fire. It was obvious he was humanized and not afraid of humans. If he had not found food in Sowbelly what could have been his next action.
People wake up realize the area where the bear was at was not Eastern Nebraska. I would bet that there are no homes between Harrison and the Grote Ranch where he was shot. Yet he found the only town in the county of over 2000 sq miles and then found a ranch within hours.





"

CareBears wrote on May 14, 2008 9:59 pm:
" Relocating would have been a much more aproppriate choice. It's not as if it wasn't an option. NE Game and Parks has the ability. I think the decision they made was done in haste and with ignorance. Besides, who was here first- us or the bears? "

its a bear wrote on May 14, 2008 10:28 pm:
" there are lots of bears in the world. it's not like someone shot a person. "

MarkyMark wrote on May 14, 2008 10:31 pm:
" Because your something different in Nebraska, Look out! I hope Jesus Christ himself isn't caught walking down a road, here in Nebraska. "

J wrote on May 14, 2008 10:58 pm:
" Where did the bear come from? I didnt know there were bears in Nebraska, at least it was caught, like when people see mountain lions and game and parks says their are no mountain lions in nebraska (and kansas game and parks says that too even though they been seen in northen kansas too...)
"

Still could have been prevented wrote on May 14, 2008 11:19 pm:
" I think if a farmer managed to lock a bear in his barn on his own with out the help of "professionals" I think the State could have figured something out besides killing it. Vets travel to your farm with a truck and a horse trailer. All they need in that one package. No vets around with tranqs for horses or what? I would certainly think horses recieve better care than a bear ever would so again, I am sure something could have been done. This is not the movies, the term "professional" and "trained" does mean jack and you all know it. Just admit it, the NGPC made a mistake. It's not that hard, it happens, but stop making excuses. "

Jeorge wrote on May 14, 2008 11:29 pm:
" Jeff is so wrong. The bear deserved to live. "

Get real wrote on May 14, 2008 11:50 pm:
" Assuming that they even had access to a tranquilizer gun out there (which I highly doubt), the G&P officials would have had to have had the proper dose and formula for a bear of that size. Too weak a dose would be dangerous, and too strong a dose would have killed it anyway. Why on earth would any of you think that we have bear-trapping-and-moving equipment in Nebraska?!? I know, we could borrow it from a neighboring state and let the bear tear up the farmer's barn that it was trapped in while we wait. Its not like government agencies take very long to respond to those kind of requests....

Look, maybe shooting it wasn't the ideal situation, but like the article said, now we can plan for if and when the next bear wanders into the state. "

To Former Sioux County Resident wrote on May 14, 2008 11:57 pm:
" I grew up in Cheyenne County in the Panhandle, which is not the end of the Earth, as you portray it. There are cell phones, cable television and the Internet there. Do you SERIOUSLY believe they didn't have the means to deal with this bear other than shooting it? Give me a break. "

bobo wrote on May 15, 2008 12:16 am:
" Could have had him sent to CO, WY or SD as all are close by. No need to kill the animal. "

Right on Where Exactly wrote on May 15, 2008 12:32 am:
" Where exactly, very nicely put. You seem to understsnd how this goes. If a bear or other animal becomes a danger for humans, it has to be taken care of. Most of the panhandle is either private or close to towns, so there is no transporting the animal. It happens. Not trying to sound heartless or anything, but it was the right thing to do. Great job pointing out the obvious Where Exactly. "

Suggestion wrote on May 15, 2008 1:30 am:
" Bear City USA...Rapid City S.D. 146 miles away! Did anyone inquire with them? "

clint wrote on May 15, 2008 7:01 am:
" Yes it's sad someother way could have have happenend to save the bear you people were not there so you have no idea what game and parks was dealing with. It's over, done, get over it. If happens again maybe it could have someone child in its mouth, think about that for and try and put yourself in the shoes of the people that are there doing these jobs before you start passing judgment on them. If if you think you can do better I'm sure they are looking for help. "

Hjalmer wrote on May 15, 2008 7:11 am:
" We don't like things to change here in Nebraska and this bear should have known that! It came here anyway! If we allow this bear to have a second chance--why, why, we might have to start accepting change. The bear probably intended to burn a flag or maybe it intended to look for a job in a packing house. It was all by itself. Maybe the bear was gay! Anyway, it deserved to shot. "

Tired of Whining wrote on May 15, 2008 7:29 am:
" How is Nebraska's case different? A bear is a bear and a town full of scared people is still a town. The only difference from Nebraska's case to CO's, SD's, WY, MN, etc is experience. Does no one remember the part of the article where the bear was seen "hiding under a trampoline"? Why would a brave bear hide. They aren't exactly the type of animal to hunker down in cover and pounce on their prey, now are they? As to where to take this animal... there's even a Bear Sanctuary what.. 10 hours from here? It sounds to me like they just don't want to admit that they didn't know what to do... like with the cougars that have "alleged sighting" in the southeast corner of the state (taken from their own website). Face it, NG&P is inept as an institution. I was camping once and one of our "neighbors" was using treated 2 x 4's as firewood and easily had 12 ft. flames... right next to their camper and propane tanks. You want to know what they guy said that we called from NG&P? He would try to find someone and see if they could come down in a while and that we interrupted his dinner. Then he reminded us that it was a holiday after all and he didn't know if there was anyone available... how about one of the three officials that kept driving through the park to collect fees? What about him? Please, NG&P is a joke in this state, don't fool yourselves. You probably would have had better knowlege on how to handle it if you had called your local Boy Scout troop. "

mitchy_v wrote on May 15, 2008 7:43 am:
" Read the article people. All of it. Most of you are only reading the parts you want to believe. You are saying they should have tranquilized it and "sent to CO, WY or SD as all are close by. No need to kill the animal." Here are a few facts from the articles.
1. Once a bear has been habituated to people, it becomes that much bolder, that much braver
2. Also, zoos are not taking bears and Nebraska does not have enough public land large enough for a bear, Nordeen said.
3. And states don’t generally relocate wild animals in neighboring states.
Game and Parks did the right thing. They are not proud of having to killing. They are considering mounting it for educational purposes. Maybe you should focus all of your "don't kill it, relocated it" towards the humaine society where the kill healthy cats and dogs every day.
"

Tired of hearing Whining wrote on May 15, 2008 7:57 am:
" How about some solutions instead of whining that the Game and Park did the wrong thing? Who would take it? Not who do you think would take it, who would take it. Do you know who to call? Go ahead and call CO, SD, WY, MN, etc. Call the zoos. Call the "Bear Sanctuary". If the bear was captured, would they have room. You make the calls. If any of them say yes, then you can criticize the Game and Parks. "

I live wrote on May 15, 2008 8:03 am:
" where there are lots of black bears. If one is found to be humanized they put it to sleep and take it into the hills a long way from humans and release it. Not sure how many strikes but they should have given it the second. I agree with some that the state says it would be nice to have it stuffed. It appears the state game and parks know how to sell tickets to enter the run down parks but don't know how to do the job they are paid to do. Maybe get some real park rangers (federal)into the state to hold classes for the game and parks commission. "

one strike and your out wrote on May 15, 2008 8:38 am:
" Now if we could only apply this to gun crimes. "

bob wrote on May 15, 2008 8:51 am:
" I think that this was handled very poorly. They could have found another way other than killing this Bear. I think it comes down to dollars and lazyness. Poor effort all around. "

who cares wrote on May 15, 2008 8:58 am:
" ITS A BEAR PEOPLE! What would all of you done in that situation? There is a bear roaming dangerously close to civilization. You have no "tranquilizer darts," all you have is a gun. You cannot let this bear into a town with people. What do you do?? I personally would shoot it in its tracks. But all of you sensitive animal lovers out there go ahead and try and be nice to the BEAR while it rips your face off and kills YOU! And another thing! Who's gonna pay for those federal park rangers to come in an "train" our parks department? YOU..."I live"?? Cause i sure as hell am not gonna pay for it and i dont think the state will either! "

not right wrote on May 15, 2008 8:58 am:
" Killing this bear should have been a last resort. The excuse that they couldn't tranqulize it because they had no where to take it is a a very poor excuse. Hello...anyone heard of the wonderful Omaha henry doorly zoo?? Or the fact that this happened right on the border of SD,WY,CO makes this even more sad. Ne game and parks could have contacted one of these other states to come take the bear and relocate it. The alternatives are endless.....it's not like the bear was in downtown lincoln tearing up O street. "

OmahaAnnie wrote on May 15, 2008 9:01 am:
" The State of Nebraska will kill a young bear that showed that he liked a small town yet give killer human beings a second chance since the Nebraska courts ruled that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. The bear went out to eat; the human's went out to kill. What is wrong with this picture? "

More Than Glad wrote on May 15, 2008 9:20 am:
" Bears are a wild animal that can kill. They are not cute and fuzzy creatures that city people see at the zoo and on tv, ie. Gentle Ben or Smokey the Bear. Once they get used to people then it becomes very dangerous for children even to venture outside. To relocate a wild animal to another state requires federal ok and government red tape, meanwhile the bear would be locked up getting what? Used to humans feeding and caring for it, then after its release it would head back to the nearest human. Not finding enough to eat it will get aggressive and attack.

For all you people wanting to relocate the bear, please post your email, address, or phone number so I can add you to the list for the next possible bear sighting and relocation area. Before you start crying foul just remember that the bears were in Eastern Nebraska (also) first.

Wasn't it long ago that a mountain lion in Eastern Nebraska was threatening people and they wanted it taken care of. Fortunately an Omaha commuter ran it over and saved it the tragedy of being shot. In the end the animal died. What is good for the Eastern state is good for the Western state. (remember the wild animals were here first).

"

think before shooting wrote on May 15, 2008 9:24 am:
" Did anyone consider checking with the state of South Dakota, because I bet thats where it came from. Would their game and park commission take the bear and relocate it in their state ? Black bears are found in the black hills! Please find a solution to keep bears alive if spotted, because more than likley it will happen again. "

huh wrote on May 15, 2008 9:29 am:
" "They could have found another way" What? Nobody they contacted wanted it. Will you take it? "

Nina wrote on May 15, 2008 9:46 am:
" Set your priorities, I believe. A dead bear is better than a mauled, or killed, child, and you animal lovers know deep in your hearts you would think so, too, if it were your child who was in danger. "

Wildlife didnt get the memo wrote on May 15, 2008 10:15 am:
" Well from all the posts that I have read it disturbs me that people think this is their land and god forbid an animal whether it be a bear, deer, badger, etc come just wondering into "our civlitation". Obviously this bear missed the recent "wildlife meeting" where they discussed about not wandering to close to "the people" Listen up wild animals do not know "our boundries", they do not know that if they take one step too close that it will end their lives, they do not know what "our comfort level" is. They are innocent and no different than a child w/ the lack of knowledge and their extreme curiosity in that they should be handled as such. We have to remember that we share this land w/ wildlife. Bordering states deal w/ this all the time and live among wildlife alot more than we do. The don't freak out and just shoot every animal that comes a little to close. I guess in Ne if its not a deer or a rabbit....Holy Cow shoot it. "

Guppy wrote on May 15, 2008 10:27 am:
" Clearly here in Nebraska bears are not something that we see roaming the wide open prairie. We do not have sufficient space for bears obviously, but that doesn't mean there aren't plenty of other places that do. Relocating the bear would have been much more humane and realistic. Thinking that the bear who was wandering around would have caused terror and wrecked the lives of your loved ones is simply ignorance. If the G&P people would have acted right away, I'm sure the bear would still be alive today. The whole thing saddens and disgusts me. I hope that the next time something like a bear wanders into unfamiliar territory, people think twice. "

Not rocket science wrote on May 15, 2008 10:37 am:
" Obviously the bear wandered in from a neighboring state, so why couldn't it be relocated to a neighboring state? How would this have been such a problem. Hey Nina. When's the last time someone in Nebraska got mauled by a bear? Black bears aren't known to attack humans anyway. "

No one from wrote on May 15, 2008 11:10 am:
" Harrison has yet to say, "boy I wish that bear was still around!"

Easy for outsiders to say when their livelihood is not affected.

Harrision, NE is not bear country. There are plenty of places in this country for bears. "

Not rocket science wrote on May 15, 2008 11:11 am:
" Don't you think they tried to relocate it? What were they suppost to do, drive to Wyoming and just drop it off without the wyoming game and parks knowing? "

not right wrote on May 15, 2008 11:17 am:
" The zoo's didn't want it. The neighboring states didn't want it. Nebraska didn't want it. Do you want it. Next time the G&P and drop it off at your house then. "

Big Bear wrote on May 15, 2008 11:58 am:
" I suppose some opinions would change if a bear was near your children. "

Several points to think about wrote on May 15, 2008 12:12 pm:
" First--Had this bear been wandering thorugh Harrison last week at this time the lives of children could have been in danger because it is very likely that school children would have been in the area ("he wandered across the football field"). I'm for one an thankful that my nieces who live on a ranch further north of where this bear was shot were not outside of their school building at the time the bear decided to tour the town and that he didn't make it any further north of town or past any homes where smaller children were playing outside and could have been harmed.
Second--Bear Country USA is an open air animal park. Having a bear who is not afraid of humans is just what they need--yea right! Having been through that park I am glad that this bear was not taken there because he could have been a danger to the park visitors and if that would have happened he would have had to have been put down anyway.
Third--the author of the original story that appeared in yesterday's LJS is a close relative of mine--she checks her facts carfully before writing anything. Her story said that none of the zoos would accept the bear and that takes the Henry Doorly off the list of options.
Fourth--I've actually been to Harrison and Sioux County as well as most of that part of the state. How a bear found that tiny little town in the middle of all that open country is amazing. If he was able to find a town in search of food once he would be able to do it again and would become a problem. Sure, it would have been great if there was another option but think about it--the last time a bear was shot in Nebraska was 1907. Bears have not been common in Nebraska since the early 1900's. Their have only been two other bear sightings reported in Nebraska since the last bear was shot here. Any procedures Game & Parks may have had on their books to deal with bears would be completely outdated. Should they update them? Absolutely.

At the rate that people are encroaching on tradtional wildlife territory in the Black Hills and Rookie Mountains I'm certain we are going to continue to see increases in cases like this and we should have a better plan for dealing with it than just killing these animals but states are going to have to work together. That doesn't always happen so well (anyone remember issues surrounding water rights?). So until someone decides to use a little vision in planning human sprawl and in interstate planning for dealing with wildlife/human contact there is potential danger to both humans and animals. "

who read this bears mind wrote on May 15, 2008 1:13 pm:
" I'm amazed at all the people that knew what this bear was thinking and its plans. In the article it says once a bear loses its fear of humans then it becomes dangerous. Who says this bear had lost it's fear of humans?? It's called CURISOSITY people. Just because a bear wanders close doesn't automatically mean its lost its fear of humans and will be back to ravage the towns people. A bear wandering through is not aggresive behavior, it doesn't mean it will be back again, it doesn't mean its lost its fear of people, and it doesn't mean its all of a sudden used to people. So all of these are assumptions and excuses as with most things in society these days. "

mitchy_v wrote on May 15, 2008 1:46 pm:
" If it was just "curious" it would have bolted out of town. It stuck around, becoming more comfortable in these new surroundings. "

Grundle wrote on May 15, 2008 1:49 pm:
" Let's see...who am I going to trust with the management of wildlife in Nebraska? Armchair quarterbacks whose only experience with 'wildlife' has been in a zoo? Or Game and Parks officials who have college degrees in wildlife management? Hmmm...this is a tough one. I may have to think about this for awhile. Okay, I'm done...I'm gonna go with the people who KNOW what they are talking about, the Game and Parks officials. "

Actually Grundle wrote on May 15, 2008 2:41 pm:
" I was a CO G&P official and the Nebraska G&P not only handled this like amateurs but makes me question if they have ever been trained on such a situation. Im sure there was a vet near by where they could have gotten the appropriate tranquilizers and subdued the animal. G&P officials are required to know what tranquilizers work for what animal and how much for what type of animal. There was many different ways they could have handled this, seems to me they took the easy road. And if they would have done the right thing I will bet my life that bear would never come around again. A traumatizing experience like that scares them for life. "

More than once chance wrote on May 15, 2008 2:45 pm:
" The bear received several chances before the final outcome:
1) Bear seen repeatedly in Harrison= not shot by local law enforcement.
2) Bear seen by rancher entering barn= not shot by rancher.
3) Game and parks called in and did the appropriate thing.

Seriously people, get over it. "

mitchy_v wrote on May 15, 2008 3:49 pm:
" I have spoken with several county Game & Parks officials and they did not take the easy way out. They made several attempts to relocate it. Tranquilizers do no good if you have nowhere to take it. I trust the Game & Parks decision on this one. "

asking for trouble wrote on May 15, 2008 3:51 pm:
" "A traumatizing experience like that scares them for life" They would then have a bear with even more issues. I would hate to be the next person it encounters. "

To more than one chance... wrote on May 15, 2008 4:03 pm:
" did it ever cause any harm? Im sorry you are blinded by believing killing everything is the right thing, but some people actually care to put effort into saving animals lives. I know how hard that might be for you to understand. "

Um wrote on May 15, 2008 4:03 pm:
" Are you serious "more than one chance"? What kind of logic is that? All animals which could be considered dangerous but not always because they are ALWAYS unpredictable need to be shot once they are seen one,two or three time? I saw an ELK at Yellowstone not once but like 100 times. I gues they should have shot them all. The elk wandered into a little town known to anyone who travels yellowstone. If you get our of your car or even drive by them, they will charge. Um...seems dangerous to me but can you really just start shooting things cause they wre spotted three times?

Yes...I saw a bear more than one time as well. No one shot it. Most were educated on how to handle wildlife encounters since the park has wildlife. The U.S. needs to fence in all parks then so animals can't wonder off cause if you see one roaming the area and it poses a threat..aw forget it..you guys need some help from someone better than me. "

Wow wrote on May 15, 2008 4:08 pm:
" When did game and parks call the Zoologist at the ZOO and ask for advice? Like if we put it in a cage and hold it for 24 hours until we figure out what to do with, will it die? What can we feed it? Can you help us locate it? Instead of Hi,I am Mr. so and so from the NGPC and we would like to take a miminal amount of your time for some consulting..it's...uh, huh, go get that ther gun over yander and kill that ther creature over der. Okay boss. Jeez, somebody could have questioned somebody for crying out loud. "

Vets wrote on May 15, 2008 4:42 pm:
" How many vets have tranqulizers designed for, and training in, bears???? Neither does our G&P. So, as tragic as it was, this was the best option "

Grundle wrote on May 16, 2008 9:11 am:
" Again...I don't understand this idea that someone has to be mauled or killed for a bear to be considered dangerous. Here's some evidence from Washington State University, "Black bear attacks/encounters have been most common in national parks where the bears have been desensitized (also known as habituation) to the presence of humans, and have been conditioned to human food and garbage. These “food conditioned” bears have learned to associate humans as an easy and reliable food source, which brings some bears in closer contact with people than would normally be expected. More times than not, bears that have become habituated and/or food conditioned are killed because managers fear that the learned behavior will result in injuries, and possibly death to humans." So here we have righteous indignation over 1 bear in Nebraska, but nary a peep over the countless other bears across the country that have been killed for exhibiting the same behavior. You can't teach a wild animal to be wild again. I also find it amusing that NGPC officials are just supposed to KNOW what to do in this EXTREMELY rare situation. It's been over a century since the last bear was killed in Nebraska...and I would imagine that you could count the number of bear sightings in Nebraska over the past 30 years on one hand. Are game managers in Florida supposed to be fully trained on how to handle polar bears? Honestly, I believe many of the posters would complain just as loudly if the NGPC spent thousands of dollars every year keeping their employees trained for bear incidents. "

Lindsay wrote on May 16, 2008 10:53 am:
" I'm sure there is a bear sanctuary somewhere that would take the animal. Heck, there is one called Bear Country not too far away from Harrison. Someone mentioned that the bears there are wild...obviously they have not been to Bear Country during feeding time, where the bears have no qualms about getting into the bed of the pickup to grab food. I just have a hard time believing that killing it was the last resort for the animal, and I do not believe that every other way of dealing with the bear was exhausted (hello...phone calls to other states? Fed Ex a tranquilizer to Harrison?). "

John Holmes wrote on May 16, 2008 12:49 pm:
" Thank you, this bear could have seriously hurt or even killed someone. This was best for everyone. "

Ryan wrote on May 16, 2008 3:53 pm:
" Where exactly needs to learn where animals are from before he/she chimes in. You take bears back to where they came from. Western NE means it came from CO, WY or SD. Make a phone call and see where they could take the guy. This is just another episode of Rednecks in Nebraska. This episode is called "hold my beer, I'm gonna shoot that thing." "

Aaron wrote on May 16, 2008 11:39 pm:
" First off I'm not anti-gun, anti-hunting, etc....

I hike, backpack, and camp in the rockies all the time. Black bears live in the rockies where I hike. In no way am I scared of being around them. Black bears are big cowards. Someone mentioned reading something about this bear hiding under a trampoline....makes sense since they're big cowards. Let's not let hysteria either way cloud what should be a needed discussion on a policy that needs to be determined to handle black bears in the future.

In my opinion our state should look closely at how Colorado and Wyoming handle things like this. I don't have all the answers for the particulars. From what I've read no one else does either. Just a lot of hysteria here. I think the bear should have had a second chance somehow, but it's hard to second guess people who follow orders and policies and there is no policy for them to specifically deal with this. How about we all take all the energy we're putting into these posts and follow through with letting NGPC hear what our opinions are. "