Now
Light Rain
52°
High
58°
Low
44°

Direct college loans get welcome boost

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 12:20:04 am CDT

Alarm about ripple effects of the international credit crisis last week prompted Congress to approve and send to President Bush a bill aimed at ensuring that money would be available for college loans.

The measure is welcome enough. Better to take action now than wait too long. Students already are applying for student loans for next year.

But save your cheers for a more welcome development: the trend among universities toward direct loans from the government.

A variety of studies, including analyses from both the Government Accountability Office and the Office of Management and Budget, have shown that direct loans generally are a better deal for both students and taxpayers.

Fortunately for Nebraska students, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln has judiciously promoted direct loans under the leadership of Craig Munier, director of the office of scholarships and financial aid.

That’s not necessarily the case at all colleges and universities. Direct loans used to supply the needs of about a third of the student loan market. That has dropped over the past decade to about 20 percent.

That period coincided with an era of corruption in student loan practices that included private lenders plying college loan officers with golf outings and sailing trips.

Private lenders were able to exploit loopholes in the system to suck billions in profits away from taxpayers who subsidize the college loans.

It was a sweet deal until Congress enacted reforms last year. The lenders had both a subsidy and a guarantee that the loans would be repaid if a borrower defaulted. As Rep. Tom Petri put it, it was an arrangement that “no fiscal conservative or free-market supporter could justify…”

It was only a year ago that New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo was turning up case after case of unsavory deal-making in which loan companies received favored treatment after university officials received inducements, such as being allowed to purchase stock in the companies at discounts.

Also enabling the spread of private lenders into the field was a law that prevented the U.S. Department of Education from promoting the direct lending program.

Now a report last week from Student Lending Analytics shows that 5.8 percent of colleges, including Michigan State and Penn State, are planning to switch to the federal direct loan program and another 19.3 are contemplating the switch.

U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings said last month that the direct loan program could be doubled without problem.

Continuation of the trend would be good for college students, their families and the taxpayers that are subsidizing the program.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
What about other colleges in NE wrote on May 6, 2008 8:08 am:
" The article mentions UNL's promotion of direct loans. What about the other colleges in Lincoln or within the state of Nebraska?

I have noticed that the Journal Star's articles about higher education always use UNL as an example. Is the Journal Star promoting UNL or is it just easier for the reporters to contact UNL and not contact other colleges?

Contrary to the Journal Star's obvious writings, there are other colleges which have thousands of students in attendance. Issues in higher education affect them just as much as UNL students might be affected.

Journal Star, broaden your educational horizons! "

Joe Borrower wrote on May 6, 2008 8:40 am:
" Oh my. You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about if you think that direct lending is a good thing for students. Have you ever dealt with the government for ANYTHING? "

dan wrote on May 6, 2008 10:36 am:
" Get these talking points from Ted Kennedy? There are other reasons why the direct loan program is not that popular with education institutions. Student loan companies in the FFELP program operate under a competitive environment which benefits the students and colleges, as opposed to the govermental program. FYI- the "various" studies showing that the direct lending is "generally" better than FFELP ignore several costs and wouldn't pass accounting principles. These talking points from Kennedy must have taken 5-10 minutes to morph into this article. That's good reporting LJS! "

Kevin wrote on May 6, 2008 10:57 am:
" Direct Lending is not the answer. If you look back about a decade, you'll see that the government actually dumped off their direct lending program into the hands of the private sector.

Now, because of a few bad apples in the lending industry, and politicians more concerned with soundbytes than the whole story, we get to see the process happen all over again.

Students will not benefit from these changes. "

Tim wrote on May 6, 2008 11:00 am:
" Direct loans are superior to private loans. . . I am paying off both. Direct loans have a better rate, better customer service, more options and more flexibility. It is also easier for a student to budget, because they can predict how much they are going to get. "

Bill wrote on May 6, 2008 11:21 am:
" You are again misinformed on the student loans. Go back a few years and check the nonpayment rates when the government was running the loan program. If we have to depend on the government to supply all loans, you haven't seen anything yet for costs and service. "

db wrote on May 6, 2008 3:19 pm:
" Direct loans are cheaper than FFELP loans. Both are guaranteed and underwritten by the Dept of Ed. so both have to follow the same rules but private lenders aren't siphoning off profits from the govt. All loan payments rec'd under Direct lending go back into new loans. Also, the gov't never serviced the direct loans. They contracted out to the private sector the servicing. I know this because I worked in the student loan industry for over 10 years doing accounting of the loans. And Dan,no, none of these points come from Ted Kennedy, these are facts. "

ed wrote on May 6, 2008 6:37 pm:
" Actually db, I believe most of these are high level soundbytes. LJS wouldn't take to much time to do another one of these opinions. You can look at their previous opinions on this subject. The "cheaper" direct loans conveniently forget certain expenses and don't follow proper accounting rules in calculating costs. Plus, don't forget to ask the government to account for the billions of loan amounts unaccounted for. It's private sector vs. the government, and we all know how that typically works from a economic standpoint. "

whatever wrote on May 6, 2008 9:57 pm:
" "What about other colleges in NE" echoes something I have stated in postings in the past that is overlooked by the JS routinely. It is a statistical FACT that MOST people who attend institutions of higher learning in this state DO NOT attend UNL PERIOD. Those of us that had the fortune through hardwork and the proper work ethic have attended many of the Private Colleges in Nebraska. Do a little research JS, UNL may get the "headlines" but UNL grads DO NOT run the State of Nebraska, nor do they control it's most important economic generators. "

j wrote on May 11, 2008 1:43 pm:
" >> It's private sector vs. the government, and we all know how that typically works from a economic standpoint. "<

Yeah, we do. Enron, Worldcom, Global Crossing, Adelphia, the ongoing collapse of the airline industry, the mortgage crisis, 30%+ credit card interest rates, payday lending...

Government may be inefficient and sometimes blindingly stupid, but that's not something that big business is immune to either. And it's hard to argue that the private sector doesn't have an edge on corruption. "

jon wrote on May 13, 2008 4:15 pm:
" "U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings said last month that the direct loan program could be doubled without problem."

NO PROBLEM! Where's the money coming from?, CHINA! Our government needs to stop lending money they don't have.

"