Now
Fair
71°
High
79°
Low
58°

Grass, weeds could be allowed to grow to 12 inches

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, May 09, 2008 - 06:50:55 pm CDT

We’ve all seen them in neighborhoods: vacant lots or yards with grass and weeds tall enough to hide a pack of chihuahuas.

The City of Lincoln has a long-standing ordinance that says if the unsightly vegetation is more than 6 inches high, you must mow or else the city will do it and send you a bill.

Homeowners, who have spent  hours keeping their lawns nicely trimmed, are usually the first ones to turn slackers in to the Lancaster County Weed Control Authority. The city has an agreement with the county to administer its weed abatement program.

Story Photo
Weed inspector Jim Kearney checks a property at North First and West Belmont for musk thistles Friday. He said on May 19 he will start checking for overgrowth, and this site has been an area of complaint for many years. (Robert Becker)

But those same homeowners might have to cool their heels, if a proposed change in the ordinance — which would increase the weed height from 6 inches to 12 inches — gets passed by the City Council. A public hearing is set for 5:30 p.m. Monday.

Weed superintendent Russ Shultz said the current ordinance was never intended to regulate the height of lawns. Rather, he said, it was passed under the health section of the city code as a way to control vegetation that could harbor mice, rats and other vermin.

“The 6-inch thing is really not very feasible or practical,” Shultz said.

Over the past several years, the weed authority has averaged  1,600 complaints a year about overgrown vegetation, Shultz said. The upshot is that 350 of those complaints were not violations but had to be investigated anyway, he said, resulting in wasted man-hours that could be used elsewhere.

“We end up making a lot of inspections this time of year that don’t result in violations,” Shultz said.

He estimates that the weed authority, which has a chief inspector and three seasonal inspectors, writes up 60 violations per year pertaining to vegetation less than 12 inches in height.

“Neighbors who are concerned about people letting their lawns grown high ... the weed abatement ordinance doesn’t really get at that issue,” Shultz said.

Curtis Wood, president of the Witherbee Neighborhood Association, said the proposed ordinance would send the wrong message. He said the association will have people at the hearing to oppose the change.

“We discussed it as a board and we don’t feel that’s the way to go. The reality is if you let it go to 12 it will be 18 (inches) before they actually get to cutting it,” he said. “Things can hide in 12-inch grass that can’t hide in 6-inch grass.”

Michael Snodgrass, executive director of NeighborWorks Lincoln, said his organization is against the proposed weed ordinance and believes it is a step backward at a time when neighborhoods can least afford it.

NeighborWorks is a nonprofit, community-based housing organization dedicated to community revitalization through an active partnership of resident leaders, private businesses and public officials.

“The heart of Lincoln neighborhoods are under tremendous stress with high rental vacancy rates, low home ownership, code enforcement issues, foreclosures, and many other factors,” Snodgrass wrote in an e-mail. “If you were looking to buy or rent, would you want to do so next to an overgrown lot, or in an area where this is tolerated?”

If the proposed change is adopted, Lincoln would be in step with other regional communities, Shultz said.  Omaha, for example, has an 18-inch height requirement and Topeka, Kan., and Des Moines, Iowa, both have 12-inch requirements.

“There’s no other community that has a 6-inch ordinance,” Shultz said. “It’s not very practical . ... It creates an additional workload for us and doesn’t accomplish much.”

 Nancy Clark, an environmental health supervisor with the Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department, said the agency does not have a problem with the proposed change.

“It may allow a little more insect harborage if you increase it, but we’re not aware of any evidence that 12 inches would be a significant problem of any kind,” she said.

The weed authority has a $266,000 annual budget, split between the city and the county. Shultz said he is able to hire three seasonal workers, typically college students, to conduct inspections during the summer.

 He said the three seasonal workers average about 5,000 inspections, which amounts to 80 inspections per day or one inspection every 15 minutes including office and field time.

Shultz said he understands that some homeowners may get perturbed because the proposed ordinance could result in more unsightly lawns.

“I’m not going to argue the issue,” he said. “I’m trying to be the most efficient and effective I can with the staff I got.”

Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at (402) 473-7243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Bill wrote on May 9, 2008 4:29 am:
" Let's raise the limit to 24 inches so our city can look not just as bad as Omaha and Kansas City but worse. Also, we can get rid of the weed superintendent since he will have nothing else to do and divert even more money to bike trails and civic centers. "

New to Lincoln wrote on May 9, 2008 5:33 am:
" The city of Lincoln/county of Lancaster has a weed superintendent, a chief inspector and 3 seasonal inspectors. That sure sounds like a lot of money a cash strapped city/county could save in a hurry by getting rid a totaly useless department.That is if they wanted to live within thier budget, like the rest of us. "

Chris wrote on May 9, 2008 5:33 am:
" Well, before this turns into a cluster of comments decrying property value and neighbors and the absolute horrors of an unkempt lawn, I have one question: What is more important; budget and the intention of the law, or this obsession we have with our lawns that is wasting water and time? I know, I know... I'm not very good at hiding my biases. "

Locke wrote on May 9, 2008 6:05 am:
" Of course, the real problem is not the length of the lawn. Rather, it is the truly noxious weeds that are growing in the lawn and going to seed. For example, in the time it takes for a lawn to grow to twelve inches and then get the city to intervene, one could have a real good thistle crop. "

well wrote on May 9, 2008 6:51 am:
" why not have normal crews that are already during the cities business help out with the regulating. you know like those city guys who park for hours in front of your home. "

What about wrote on May 9, 2008 6:56 am:
" What about the city dont they have to follow this rule or how do they get away with not mowing the grass in the parks?? "

It seems wrote on May 9, 2008 7:09 am:
" kinda hypicrital to me. Homeowners are expected to keep their lots mowed but the city can let theirs grow. I don't expect any fines for my property this year or it goes to court. "

homeowner wrote on May 9, 2008 7:23 am:
" I agree with Locke in part. The height is not always the issue, but what is growing in the yard or field. My neighbors will mow their yards, but not deal with the weeds within the yards.

As to other cities' standards, I am not sure Lincoln needs to be bound by their examples. What about cities of the same size as Lincoln, not Omaha or Kansas City? Omaha and Kansas City have plenty of other problems in their neighborhoods. Maybe some of those problems progressed because people didn't think there was much reason to be proud of the homes or neighborhoods. "

What a waste wrote on May 9, 2008 7:34 am:
" Do we have to mandate lawn perfection? There's nothing better to spend our time on? Where's the freedom of choice? This law is ridiculous. Shouldn't we be focused on conserving gas and water instead of forcing our citizens to waste both time and energy (by personal and gas). "

Yup wrote on May 9, 2008 7:41 am:
" What's wrong with you asking your neighbor to mow it? Or perhaps you could offer to mow it yourself. A lot of elderly find it difficult to mow, and their income has dwindled down so it's harder for them to pay. Maybe your neighborhood has some kids that could use a little cash this summer, fathers could help keep the mowers running, the kids could make a little money, and the elderly wouldn't have to pay big bucks for a lawn service. "

Ted Haubrich wrote on May 9, 2008 8:10 am:
" This proposal is a step in the right direction. Lawns in general are not a very good idea. Get rid of the monocrop golfcourse type non-native Kentucky Bluegrass and plant some 12 foot high prairie grasses. Encourage those voles, and pocket gophers and butterflies and songbirds to hide in that grass, Heck plant native thistle, just be prepared for the wrath of the ingnorant who think it's the noxious type. Or plant a vegetable garden there, help alliviate the food shortage all over the news. At the very least stop wasting all that water and poisoning whats left of it trying to make your yard look like a piece of plastic astro turf. If that's really what you think looks best, roll out the green carpet, It would better for the environment than trying to keep your grass looking like that. "

kjbclg wrote on May 9, 2008 8:19 am:
" One word for people who don't mow their yards/lawns/pastures every week....."LAZY". This shouldn't even be a story. "

heliodoc wrote on May 9, 2008 8:24 am:
" How about selling as an alternative fuel just like ethanol??

YEAAEAAEAHHHHH "

Dano wrote on May 9, 2008 8:44 am:
" Exactly why I live in the country. I don't worry about my neighbor's yard because it is 200-300 FT from mine. And they don;t have to wrooy about mine. And if mine looks like crap, you can barely tell anyways. "

Too High wrote on May 9, 2008 8:46 am:
" I used to live and own my home in a SW Lincoln neighborhood with the "eyesore" of the neighborhood right next door. Of course they only mowed when it was 6-12"s high. They were too lazy to pick up the toys in the yard and off course they didn't bag their grass and thus the toys would get chopped up and thrown all over. To top that, we never saw a snake in our yard until they moved in and the weeds grew tall and the snakes moved in. Of course my kids and wife didn't like to be out in our back yard due to the numerous snakes that would come through the fence from the "forest". I finally started mowing their yard to keep it down, having picked up the toys, garbage and what not. I'm sure you all get the point. We feel for the buyers of our home since we've left the neighborhood and have come back several times over the past several years and low and behold....Nothing has changed...even the broken down vehicle still sits in the drive, but hey they have a new newer vehicle and eat plenty of junk food. I would offer that raising the height isn't going to do anything for the people that don't mow...it will just further destroy the neighborhood. "

Jaci wrote on May 9, 2008 8:54 am:
" We have a "neighbor" who won't mow until the city comes out and threatens to do it for him and charge him for it. He doesn't have grass, his yard is weeds. You can't walk on the sidewalk after a certain point. I think what gets me is that he is single, able bodied and works day hours yet won't mow however the rest of us in the same boat plus kids manage to do it. His yard would take 15 minutes max. "

Lawn liberation wrote on May 9, 2008 9:10 am:
" I'm totally with Ted. These perfect turfgrass lawns are from another era. There is a new trend all over the country to start growing vegetables and herbs all over the yard rather than in a confined garden area. Check out a book called, "Food Not Lawns" and start growing front yard food. I even suggest looking into xeriscaping. It saves water, and I think we'll need it when we have the climate of New Mexico in about 30 years. "

Mick wrote on May 9, 2008 9:51 am:
" While I agree that weekly mowing is a reasonable expectation for a home owner, I caution those commenting on weeds to do their homework. The average home throws more chemicals down than the average golf course in per square foot. Mowing is one thing, but harming the water supply and the environment all to get rid of a dandelion or two is ridiculous. 50 years ago, kids found joy in picking a dandelion from the yard, now, people somehow feel the need to spray and spray. "

Country Living wrote on May 9, 2008 10:07 am:
" I'm right there with you Dano. Country living is the best!! I'm hoping my grass grows way taller than 12". All the more hay bails to sell at market!!! "

Responsibility wrote on May 9, 2008 10:53 am:
" Allowing weeds to reach heights of a foot or more will only produce more weeds. The weeds will go to seed after so many weeks. The weed seeds will spread to neighbors' yards. Neighbors will buy a bunch of chemicals to dump on their lawns to deal with their neighbor's spreading weed problem. Mowing your yard is like snow removal. No one wants to do it, but if you own a house it is your responsibility. If you can't handle the responsibility of home ownership, move to an apartment or move back home with your parents. "

Dawg wrote on May 9, 2008 11:23 am:
" About time, the City has property with grass & weeds higher than six inches so it's about time the public can too. "

peb wrote on May 9, 2008 11:37 am:
" I'm also totally in agreement with Ted. I drove through an upper class, progressive neighborhood in Atlanta, GA last summer and was excited to see the yards with long grass and a few dandelions. If we think a little bit past the "having to be like everyone else" mentality and realize what a racket lawn product companies have sold us, we would see that we have worked ourselves into a vicious cyle. Water, fertilize, mow, pay extra to the garbage man to haul our grass clippings to the landfill, Water, fertilize, mow, pay extra to the garbage man to haul our grass clippings to the landfill--you get the picture. "

Country Gril wrote on May 9, 2008 12:28 pm:
" Thank Heavens I live in the country. I don't have to look at someone else's ugly lawn and even though my lawn is probably 10 times the size of those in town, it is perfectly manicured at all times. It's called ambition and motivation. Good luck with your neighbors!!! "

Stone wrote on May 9, 2008 12:41 pm:
" Seriously, Weed Superintendent? That business card must get a chuckle every time. That is one of the funniest job titles ever. "

Random Fact wrote on May 9, 2008 12:44 pm:
" Did you know that the thistle is the national flower of Scotland? The flower is revered for its ability to protect itself from preditors. There is even an honor bestowed called the Order of the Thistle. I guess one man's trash... "

I want wrote on May 9, 2008 12:50 pm:
" my grass to grow to 12' so I don't have to see my neighbors. "

Del wrote on May 9, 2008 1:51 pm:
" People Who mow every week and weed and seed, need to have a better hobbie! Clover & weeds thats the way baby. "

Mason wrote on May 9, 2008 1:55 pm:
" The hieght limit should be 72 inches (6 feet), that way I could plant Big Bluestem (a natural sound barrier at that hieght) and not have to see or hear my drunk neighboors yelling at each other. "

Ryan wrote on May 9, 2008 1:59 pm:
" It doesn't matter how high the grass/weeds are permitted to grow, some of the complaints are not going to be justified. 350 out of 1600 found no violation. It doesn't matter how high the grass is allowd to grow, there are always going to be unfound violations. "

weed lover wrote on May 9, 2008 2:11 pm:
" The thistle in Scotland is an awesome plant! Musk thistles, on the other hand, are a noxious weed because they are foreign invaders and serve no purpose in our ecosystem. This is one thing the Weed Superintendent (gosh, i want that job!) watches out for. Kentucky Bluegrass is also a noxious weed in the Midwest, but people love it so much that it will, sadly, never go on the list. Plant Buffalo Grass!!!!!! It won't grow to 12 inches. "

Grundle wrote on May 9, 2008 2:21 pm:
" We're not in Scotland...thistles are noxious weeds. I'm not the kind of person who has a need for a perfectly manicured, totally weed-free lawn...but I sure as heck don't want thistles growing in my lawn. You won't either after you step on one barefoot. I don't think the height increase is that big of a deal...and six inches does seem to be a bit excessive. However, I take issue with the idea that this is going to save city resources and help the budget. I'm guessing there will be just as many weed inspectors, they'll just have less to do during their scheduled work hours. "

jo wrote on May 9, 2008 5:57 pm:
" I actually plan to cut down on mowing , do to the price of gas. I'll keep an eye on weeds and do prevenitive maintance. But I agree save the city money and get rid of the "weed patrol". "

Nina wrote on May 9, 2008 6:16 pm:
" The weed authority even exists in the rural areas. Can you believe the county government planted 'wildflowers' in the ditches and then a couple of years later decided some of those wildflowers were noxious weeds! We try to keep our lawn looking picture-perfect, which is easy right now, but in drouth times we can't afford to water two acres. You city folks could make lawn care a hobby, or a means to get some exercise. It really is fun - especially with all the flowers, shrubs, etc. available now for such little cost. And if not, you're not alone in falling down on the job - look at the some of the medians, already sprouting unsightly weed crops. the City of Lincoln, and also the State of Nebraska should lead the way instead of being part of the problem. Give some of those non-violent offenders a hoe, and point the way to some community service if you don't have money in the coffers for this maintenance. "

hiding wrote on May 9, 2008 6:52 pm:
" What would be hiding in there that's dangerous? A mountain lion? They are raising the height of the grass just so they can let the grass in the parks grow even higher. "

dewboy wrote on May 9, 2008 8:34 pm:
" Poor Shultz, sounds like he is overworked. It is also strange that Rays Lawn Care is the one proposing the change. No matter how you look at it this is a step backwards..If they want to do something worthwhile go after the repeat offenders and make everybody happy. WELL, maybe not the slumlords. Lets not forget the positive effect of a nice lawn on home value. GOSH, now Nancy Clark has a specialty "

... wrote on May 9, 2008 11:15 pm:
" AT least none of you live in David City. They have a city code against blowing your grass clippings into the street. Police officers there have to go tell home owners they need to sweep up their clippings off the street or face citations. Seriously! "

godsofwrath wrote on May 10, 2008 12:45 am:
" I find it funny how people spend more time and money on thier lawn then their family!! shame shame shame "

WE wrote on May 10, 2008 8:53 am:
" I say fine the city for not keeping the parks mowed! "

Mid wrote on May 10, 2008 9:58 am:
" Does anyone else find it interesting that this comes up at a time when forclosed houses are all over the city? Perhaps the fact that banks and big business are responsible to keep the lawns down rather than tenants and home owners could have something to do with the timing???? "

you people are nuts wrote on May 10, 2008 9:58 am:
" while all you rich and upper class jerks complain and whine over how your lawn and your neiborhood lawns look, think about all of the poor or struggling families or how about the elderly who are on very fixed budgets? between gas to get to work, food on the table, lights, water,natrual gas, car insurance and paying the inflated amount of rent the rich jerks charge or the house payment, plus what ever they kids need, there is nothing left. even 50 cents is hard to come up with most of the time. is your so worried about how my lawn looks mow it yourself. im too busy trying to raise good respectful children and work 2 or 3 jobs than take care of the lawn. let to grow the sun will burn it up in june anyway. "

Waa waa waa wrote on May 10, 2008 10:37 am:
" I very regularly frequent Antelope, Stransky, Woods, and Pioneers parks, and I have never notice an untidy amount of weeds and unmowed grass. Y'all just love to complain. If they added more staff and man hours for this mowing and weeding you want so badly, you would only complain about your taxes. "

Darlene wrote on May 10, 2008 11:15 am:
" Leave the law alone! People need to mow their lawns. If not, we have a way to make them. "

Old guy wrote on May 10, 2008 12:29 pm:
" There is no way to make one of my neighbors happy.She will complain if I keep on breathing.She has called the city about this and that for all the years she has lived next door to us. I do not have any trouble identifying weeds. I know them better than I know my picky call-the-city neighbor. I found a notice on my door about my undergrowth- my undergrowth was Poa Pretensis which is a revered cultivated plant. I have eradicated Convolvolous arvensis. No Musk, Canadian, or any other thistle but the weed guy thought he had to leave a notice because I want my Poa to grow and seed. It is beautiful to my eyes and I have as much right to grow it as does the neighbor to grow what ever. Six inches? What kind of decorative plant only grows to 6 inches. Can we say discrimination here?? I see noxious weeds all over. That is Weed Control's job. Sweeping laws about vegetation are just as discriminating as sweeping laws about race, creed or any other differential subject matter. Personal opinions are just that and have no business being incorporated into city code. Lawns are optional. Tend to your own if that is your religion. "

Lawnboy wrote on May 10, 2008 12:57 pm:
" My lawn is near perfect....taking care of it gives me great exercise, it is a much better use of time than watching tv, it delivers a sense of pride, accomplishment, adds value in the way of "curb appeal" to my property and learning about how to do it properly is fascinating.

I seldom use chemicals because I know how to properly mow, maintain a mower, how and when to water and select organic fertilizers; following these proper cultural practices doesn't require lots of chemicals or money.

My observations of living here for 30 years is that those that don't care about how their place looks and criticize those of us who like well kept property are quick to accuse us of polluting with chemicals and are lazy and don't take care of much of anything. "

mark wrote on May 10, 2008 9:27 pm:
" " Does anyone else find it interesting that this comes up at a time when forclosed houses are all over the city?"
I have no clue what you're talking about. The Lincoln market has been resilient. Every house in our neighborhood has sold within 30 days. Foreclosures all over the city - not quite. "

Anya wrote on May 10, 2008 10:44 pm:
" It is so sad when people feel it is necessary to show their ignorance in public. Not all thistles are noxious weeds. Musk thistles are an example of a noxious weed and I spent PLENTY of time digging them out of our pasture. There is currently a thistle rosette in our yard and I am going to identify it before I kill it in case it is a native thistle. Native wildlife depend on native plants. I am also capable of walking AROUND it and not ON it. Perhaps more lawn junkies should wander out to the Nature Center and learn something about our area, it's plants, and why native plants, including thistles, are beneficial. "

Bill wrote on May 10, 2008 11:06 pm:
" a waste of time this issue. "