Now
Fair
41°
High
73°
Low
44°

No playlists required: iPods banned from marathon

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY CARA PESEK / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Apr 17, 2008 - 12:32:30 am CDT

If you’re one of the 5,200 runners signed up (so far) to run the Lincoln Marathon or Half Marathon on May 4, you can stop thinking about your race-day playlist.

No need to download the “Rocky” theme song or the new Madonna album before the big day. No need to make sure you have three or four or five (or more hours) of suitable running music.

This year, iPods are banned.

Story Photo
Don't worry about finding the perfect mix for running this year: The Lincoln Marathon has banned iPods from the May 4 event. (Courtesy of Apple)

Related Link(s):

More on the marathon

This is part of a series of stories appearing this spring in The (402) about runners training for the May 4 Lincoln Marathon and Half-Marathon. Read more at http://www.journalstar.com/living/402/lincoln_marathon.

The decision to not allow iPods and other MP3 players was a practical one, said race director Nancy Sutton. It’s simply safer for runners if they’re able to hear what’s going on around them — whether they’re running a race or out for a run on their own.

The Road Runners Club of America regards iPods as a hazard, Sutton said.

USA Track and Field — the governing body for track and field, distance-running and race-walking events in the United States — has banned them from USATF-sanctioned events, saying such devices could give runners who use MP3 players an advantage over those who don’t.

Which means that come race day, runners should leave their earbuds at home.

It’s a rule that makes some runners nervous.

Bryan Sypal, 30, who is training for the full marathon, said he used to always use his iPod while running.

He said he felt like he could run harder while listening to music. Plus, it took his mind off the aches and pains that come with running long distances.

But as running became a bigger part of Sypal’s life, he decided to ditch the iPod.

“I’m more serious about my running now than I’ve ever been,” he said in an e-mail. “I think wearing headphones is frowned upon by the running community, so that, too, is motivation enough to try to stop wearing them.”

So he’s cut back and now wears them only when he runs alone, a habit he also hopes to break.

Most wearers of iPods agree that running to a beat also means running faster.

Turns out, you don’t need to be the one wearing an iPod to reap the device’s pace-enhancing benefits.

At mile 21 of last year’s Lincoln Marathon, Larry DeVries, 56, found himself next to an iPod-wearing man who was singing his heart out.

The singing was off-key and annoying, DeVries said.

But it wasn’t all bad.

“The good part of it for me, even though I was particularly slow that day, was I was then motivated enough to manage to speed up and get out of ear-shot of him,” said DeVries, who has run 12 marathons.   

With this year’s iPod ban, that scenario will be less likely on May 4. But it could still happen.

While use of iPods and similar devices is discouraged, those who are photographed wearing earbuds won’t be disqualified, as they were in Grandma’s Marathon in Duluth, Minn., last June, Sutton said. 

“It is a difficult thing to enforce,” she said. 

Still, she hopes that most runners forgo their iPods and instead listen to the crowds and their fellow runners on race day.

Conversation has its benefits, too, said Paul Van De Water, 55, who has formed close friendships over two- and three-hour training runs over the years.

“We have solved the world’s problems, been through weddings and divorces, family illnesses, sending kids off to college and war, caring for elderly parents and many other life experiences,” he said.

“You can’t get this kind of comfort or advice from an iPod or MP3 player — no matter how sophisticated the technology gets.”

Reach Cara Pesek at 473-7361 or cpesek@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
402 > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Ban ipods? wrote on April 17, 2008 10:30 am:
" Is this serious? I am an adult and I know what is best for me, not someone who "thinks" they do. Is this really the direction our country is heading? Are we not suppose to be "free"? Thanks Nancy, one less runner this year! This is unreal. I get bored running a half, and music motivates me. Thanks for thinking what is "best" for me Nancy, incase you didn't know I can think on my own, im 28 it comes with the age. How is this safer? I run with one daily and have never came close to danger, but then again I do pay attention to my surroundings. Because it is frowned upon in the running community? You can not be serious. Didn't know the running community was a dictatorship! wow. "

Weak... wrote on April 17, 2008 10:55 am:
" Let the running people wear they's ipods. "

CS wrote on April 17, 2008 4:03 pm:
" Don't all the runners sign waivers for this sort of thing? Whether or not mp3 players provide an advantage is purely psychological. Im sure if you found a runner that convinced himself he was solar powered he would probably run faster in sunlight. This is ludicrous. You don't think people that already train this way that are accustomed to avoiding potential hazards in their daily runs on normal street conditions can't do the same during this run-especially when these runners will be on a marked course? "

Rather Silly wrote on April 17, 2008 4:47 pm:
" Using the same rationale as the USATF, they should ban running shoes as well. "such devices could give runners who use shoes an advantage over those who don’t." Better ban gatorade, too.

I wonder if thinking of your favorite songs would also be illegal. That could distract a runner and provide a benefit over a runner who thinks about Dick Cheney naked or something else unpleasant.

Unless the runner is wearing rollerblades, I say give them a break and let them get through their miles as best they can. "

Seriously . . . wrote on April 17, 2008 5:24 pm:
" Runners might be a little crazy, but very few of them are irresponsible idiots. I always keep my volume turned down low enough so I can carry on a conversation with my running buddy, or sometimes just wear one ear bud instead of both. I've never come across a runner with their music blaring so loud so as to pose a safety hazard. What's next - a dress code requiring dri-weave clothing, so we don't chafe ourselves? The Lincoln Marathon needs to decide if it loves its recreational runners and associated community support, or if it wants to be an elitist race with professional standards. It sounds like the Lincoln Track Club has already made its decision. "

joe9wicket wrote on April 17, 2008 5:45 pm:
" Thank you for choosing to disallow a very annoying gadget on the course, though I don't believe we'll be seeing officials DQing anybody out there w/ earbuds showing. I go out with a shuffle on training runs, but like hearing the encouragement from the folks passing each other and the crowd on race day. I'm going sans watch as well, if I'm that worried about my pace, I can ask another runner for the time, thank gosh he/she might hear me asking. "

Competetive Advantage? wrote on April 17, 2008 11:10 pm:
" There is a distinct seperation of groups who choose to run in marathon. Those who run for the competetion or for a qualifying time to another more prestige marathon and those who run for perosnal reasons such as: fitness, fun, camaraderie, overcoming disability, personal and menatl chanllenge, etc.. The majority of runners who run to compete are advanced runners who refrain from the use of ipods or similiar devices to listen to what their body is telling them and key in on their performance. Perhaps a better solution is to prohibit top competitors from using such devices, and allow the use of ipods for the less advanced runners who's competetive level is of less weight. Saftey seems trivial. "

Dave wrote on April 18, 2008 10:14 am:
" Runners, start your bluetooths!! "

whats next? wrote on April 18, 2008 11:50 am:
" I'm not sure what the point of this is exactly, they are banning ipods and mp3's but not enforcing it or disquailifing those who do use them? I agree with pervious posts that those who are competeing don't use ipods, and those who run for recreation use ipods more for a mental distraction. I run to tune out the world and use music as an escape and relaxation. Ipods are no more a competive advantage then those who choose to use certain types of energy supplement or a even certain kinds of watches for that matter. If safety is an issue there are other ways to deal with the ipod use. For example I have run races where they make you take off your ear buds a mile from the finish or at water points or busy intersections. It should be a runner choice, to me this is an individual preference. THis should be a recommendation, but to ban something and not enforce loses credibility and a source of power for race officals. "

Moody wrote on April 18, 2008 12:43 pm:
" If you need music in your ear to motivate you maybe you shouldn't be running the race. I would think that pushing yourself as hard as you can to finish with a good time would be motivation enough. "

Mark wrote on April 18, 2008 12:44 pm:
" My brother is deaf. Would he be banned from running for safety reasons? Or would that be considered a competitive advantage because he is less distracted by all of the yelling and cheering? "

Aaron wrote on April 18, 2008 12:48 pm:
" Boo! "

Late O'Day wrote on April 18, 2008 2:19 pm:
" Quick! Someone's enjoying themself!! Stop'em!!! This is Lincoln -- we have laws against that! "

n wrote on April 18, 2008 2:33 pm:
" looks like i'll have to bring my boombox along up on my shoulder. this is ridiculous. "

I can't believe it. wrote on April 18, 2008 2:47 pm:
" What is wrong with Lincolnite "leaders"? This is the stupidist thing I've ever heard. How can it be a safety issue when the roads are marked, crowds are along the path and most times you are running with many other eyes and ears. I will not be running this year. It's not a race with any real merit or reward anyway. "

Runnergirl wrote on April 18, 2008 3:22 pm:
" This is not a Lincoln law, this a USTAF law. The Lincoln Maraton is a USTAF sanctioned event, therefore it must abide by the rules of the USTAF. And if you need music to entertain yourself when running, I suggest you find a method of exercise that is more exciting for you. Running is not about being entertained. And I find it humorous that someone would feel their rights are being violated simply because they cannot wear their Ipod during a race. "Right to an Ipod during the Lincoln Marathon" I must have missed that after "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" It seems that these days it's all about the rights, very little about responsibility. Running with headphones is unsafe. If you don't believe me, ask the woman in Florida who was hit by a train because she coudln't hear it approaching. Both her legs were severed. But hey, at least she had her music, right? "

iconoclast wrote on April 18, 2008 3:49 pm:
" What a bunch of whiners are posting here!
If this were just a bit reversed, and a runner were to be hit by a truck he couldn't hear because of the gangsta rap he was listening to, all the same people would be saying they should have been banned.
Yes, I have run marathons, including Lincoln, and I have listened to music while running thousands of miles.
They have announced a new rule, with reasons behind it, and while many of us might disagree, we can either skip this marathon, or go by the rule. "

Matt Poulsen wrote on April 18, 2008 5:16 pm:
" Yeah, this seems to be a little bit overboard. I'm not really sure what the purpose is. Have there been safety issues in the past? Its not like its a Nascar event...what's the worst that could happen? A middle aged man running at a speed of 4 mi/hour runs into a middle aged woman running at a speed of 3.7 mi/hour...Oh the horror!! Seriously. This isn't the boston marathon and its not an Olympic event. People run in it for personal satisfaction...not public glory. This ipod rule is just funny. "

jo gale wrote on April 18, 2008 5:31 pm:
" Dumb rule. In a couple of weeks apple will come out with a ipod that is wireless and will fit into your ears without anyone even knowing you have 1. apple, ipod thanks you. we'll all buy the new ipods and game over. "

Rudy wrote on April 18, 2008 6:39 pm:
" This seems like a pretty good rule to simply ignore. The only people it will affect are those overly-competitive nutballs that would consider the weight of the mp3 player and decide that is weighing them down anyways. The safety hazard excuse is just a CYA proclamation, as running while daydreaming is just as much of a hazard as running with headphones on. I The lady that got hit by a train because she could not hear it is a tragic situation, but last I checked trains are not invisible machines running on invisible tracks whether they are silent or not. "

Denis Malin wrote on April 19, 2008 11:23 am:
" It is absolutely absurd to try to ban use of headphones. First of all, it will not work. Second of all, it annoys and angers runners. Third of all, what is the bloody point? All of the runners sign an insurance release stating that they are aware of the dangers of running a race and that they and take responsibility for their own health. If you want to take this to the logical end, the runners could sue over the placement of cones, potholes, or if the trip, or if they get sick from the food after the race, or if they run into a course worker blocking the way. Of course, runners never do any of these things because it would be absurd. My suggestion is that you add a clause in the insurance release indicating that it is recommended that people not use headphones. There is no way you could enforce such a silly rule without wrecking the whole spirit of the event.
"

Good call Lincoln Marathon wrote on April 23, 2008 2:56 pm:
" I think this is an excellent decision. It IS a safety issue. There are a number of places on the course where runners must listen to police instructions and the directions of course monitors and volunteers. I run along Superior Street a lot and there has been more than one occasion where I have kept myself from getting run over by an ignorant driver because - guess what? - I heard them coming behind me and could tell they were going to ignore the fact I had the right of way and turn into the intersection I was about to enter. Just because you have "never came close to danger" doesn't mean it WON'T happen in the future. Another reason for the ban - insurance. If the insurance carrier didn't ban them I doubt the race would. Do you want to pay $200 to run a race where you can use your iPod? I don't want to pay more so a few selfish people can listen to their music? There's enough to keep you occupied on the road. Try talking to your fellow runners or listen to the crowd support. "

Doug wrote on April 25, 2008 11:19 am:
" Really? I have run this race many times and plan on doing so again this year. Tell you what Nancy, make this a real race and people will start treating it like a real race. Stop having thousands of people run on a very narrow path along Hwy 2 and risk breaking an ankle because we have to run in deep weeds to pass slower runners. Start giving away serious prize money if you want to attract a serious field. Now that we have that out of the way...I have run a dozen marathons and countless halfs and 10ks and always with my Ipod. I've never had an issue and not one runner has had to yell to get my attention or complained about me being in their way.

As for some of the previous comments. I do feel bad for the women in Florida who lost her legs but that is simply one example of a horrible accident. I don't think we'll be running across any active train tracks during this race, correct? Does the instance of one women's accident mean that millions of runners should suffer and be forced to conform? I certainly hope not.

I do understand that this is USTAF regulation but just because they say it's a rule, doesn't make it right! I guess by simply saying that "I was just doing my job and following the rules, doesn't that make me a good nazi"? Some rules are simply dumb and need to be ignored!

Lastly, the people who have posted here saying running should be enjoyment enough of that if I need music to enjoy running I should try another sport, I challange that. Don't tell me how to enjoy my hobby. Don't tell me how to live my life. If you need someone to tell you how to enjoy your life and how you should do everything then you enjoy your Orwellian world and leave me the hell alone!

I plan on proudly wearing my Ipod and singing at the top of my lungs and I hope many other do the same! "

Jeff wrote on April 26, 2008 3:46 pm:
" I agree that the 'rule' without enforcement equals 'no rule'. I also agree with Doug that the Lincoln Marathon has a bigger problem then ipod safety. Miles 6-8 along Highway 2 where you run on a bike path (3 people wide) shows a serious lack of planning. I still do not understand why they can't close one lane of Highway 2 for a few hours. Anyway, I digress.

I plan to run the first half of the marathon listening to the smattering of fans and those around me. However, past mile 13, I will put on the Ipod. For those of you familiar with the course, the second half is fairly desolate (of both runners and fans) and I don't think the few people I pass or who pass me will mind too much. As others have also said, I keep it low enough to hear other runners and the friendly people at the water stations.

"

runnr wrote on April 29, 2008 12:49 am:
" If you have to use an iPod to get through the marathon, you didn't train hard enough. Suck it up and run. "

joewicket wrote on April 30, 2008 11:51 pm:
" I agree about 48th to 20th street on the bike path, since I train on that section quite a bit, and have had to endure it on the marathon the last 4 years. I propose a compromise, let us run on Hwy 2 to 20th. If they can close lanes for weeks at a time just to paint a bridge, why not close it for 3 hours on one sunday in May? And if that happens, Ipods for everyone! Heck, throw in a shuffle as shwag for finishing! Furthermore: i would propose closing Van Dorn from 20th to 17th, and letting us run on Van Dorn to Harrison.... that spot by Irving Middle School is a bit of a bottle neck itself.


Also.... (sorry about the rant) Could we all please be a bit more realistic about our pace, and choose a bit more wisely about our starting position? I think it is great folks want to walk 13 miles, but could you all please stop apologizing to the folks passing you for the first 3 miles and kindly get to the back of the line and let us meager 9 minute mid-packers get through the first mile in something less than 12 minutes? "