No playlists required: iPods banned from marathon
BY CARA PESEK / Lincoln Journal Star
If you’re one of the 5,200 runners signed up (so far) to run the Lincoln Marathon or Half Marathon on May 4, you can stop thinking about your race-day playlist.
No need to download the “Rocky” theme song or the new Madonna album before the big day. No need to make sure you have three or four or five (or more hours) of suitable running music.
This year, iPods are banned.
Related Link(s):
This is part of a series of stories appearing this spring in The (402) about runners training for the May 4 Lincoln Marathon and Half-Marathon. Read more at http://www.journalstar.com/living/402/lincoln_marathon.
The decision to not allow iPods and other MP3 players was a practical one, said race director Nancy Sutton. It’s simply safer for runners if they’re able to hear what’s going on around them — whether they’re running a race or out for a run on their own.
The Road Runners Club of America regards iPods as a hazard, Sutton said.
USA Track and Field — the governing body for track and field, distance-running and race-walking events in the United States — has banned them from USATF-sanctioned events, saying such devices could give runners who use MP3 players an advantage over those who don’t.
Which means that come race day, runners should leave their earbuds at home.
It’s a rule that makes some runners nervous.
Bryan Sypal, 30, who is training for the full marathon, said he used to always use his iPod while running.
He said he felt like he could run harder while listening to music. Plus, it took his mind off the aches and pains that come with running long distances.
But as running became a bigger part of Sypal’s life, he decided to ditch the iPod.
“I’m more serious about my running now than I’ve ever been,” he said in an e-mail. “I think wearing headphones is frowned upon by the running community, so that, too, is motivation enough to try to stop wearing them.”
So he’s cut back and now wears them only when he runs alone, a habit he also hopes to break.
Most wearers of iPods agree that running to a beat also means running faster.
Turns out, you don’t need to be the one wearing an iPod to reap the device’s pace-enhancing benefits.
At mile 21 of last year’s Lincoln Marathon, Larry DeVries, 56, found himself next to an iPod-wearing man who was singing his heart out.
The singing was off-key and annoying, DeVries said.
But it wasn’t all bad.
“The good part of it for me, even though I was particularly slow that day, was I was then motivated enough to manage to speed up and get out of ear-shot of him,” said DeVries, who has run 12 marathons.
With this year’s iPod ban, that scenario will be less likely on May 4. But it could still happen.
While use of iPods and similar devices is discouraged, those who are photographed wearing earbuds won’t be disqualified, as they were in Grandma’s Marathon in Duluth, Minn., last June, Sutton said.
“It is a difficult thing to enforce,” she said.
Still, she hopes that most runners forgo their iPods and instead listen to the crowds and their fellow runners on race day.
Conversation has its benefits, too, said Paul Van De Water, 55, who has formed close friendships over two- and three-hour training runs over the years.
“We have solved the world’s problems, been through weddings and divorces, family illnesses, sending kids off to college and war, caring for elderly parents and many other life experiences,” he said.
“You can’t get this kind of comfort or advice from an iPod or MP3 player — no matter how sophisticated the technology gets.”
Reach Cara Pesek at 473-7361 or cpesek@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Weak... wrote on April 17, 2008 10:55 am:
CS wrote on April 17, 2008 4:03 pm:
Rather Silly wrote on April 17, 2008 4:47 pm:
I wonder if thinking of your favorite songs would also be illegal. That could distract a runner and provide a benefit over a runner who thinks about Dick Cheney naked or something else unpleasant.
Unless the runner is wearing rollerblades, I say give them a break and let them get through their miles as best they can. "
Seriously . . . wrote on April 17, 2008 5:24 pm:
joe9wicket wrote on April 17, 2008 5:45 pm:
Competetive Advantage? wrote on April 17, 2008 11:10 pm:
Dave wrote on April 18, 2008 10:14 am:
whats next? wrote on April 18, 2008 11:50 am:
Moody wrote on April 18, 2008 12:43 pm:
Mark wrote on April 18, 2008 12:44 pm:
Aaron wrote on April 18, 2008 12:48 pm:
Late O'Day wrote on April 18, 2008 2:19 pm:
n wrote on April 18, 2008 2:33 pm:
I can't believe it. wrote on April 18, 2008 2:47 pm:
Runnergirl wrote on April 18, 2008 3:22 pm:
iconoclast wrote on April 18, 2008 3:49 pm:
If this were just a bit reversed, and a runner were to be hit by a truck he couldn't hear because of the gangsta rap he was listening to, all the same people would be saying they should have been banned.
Yes, I have run marathons, including Lincoln, and I have listened to music while running thousands of miles.
They have announced a new rule, with reasons behind it, and while many of us might disagree, we can either skip this marathon, or go by the rule. "
Matt Poulsen wrote on April 18, 2008 5:16 pm:
jo gale wrote on April 18, 2008 5:31 pm:
Rudy wrote on April 18, 2008 6:39 pm:
Denis Malin wrote on April 19, 2008 11:23 am:
"
Good call Lincoln Marathon wrote on April 23, 2008 2:56 pm:
Doug wrote on April 25, 2008 11:19 am:
As for some of the previous comments. I do feel bad for the women in Florida who lost her legs but that is simply one example of a horrible accident. I don't think we'll be running across any active train tracks during this race, correct? Does the instance of one women's accident mean that millions of runners should suffer and be forced to conform? I certainly hope not.
I do understand that this is USTAF regulation but just because they say it's a rule, doesn't make it right! I guess by simply saying that "I was just doing my job and following the rules, doesn't that make me a good nazi"? Some rules are simply dumb and need to be ignored!
Lastly, the people who have posted here saying running should be enjoyment enough of that if I need music to enjoy running I should try another sport, I challange that. Don't tell me how to enjoy my hobby. Don't tell me how to live my life. If you need someone to tell you how to enjoy your life and how you should do everything then you enjoy your Orwellian world and leave me the hell alone!
I plan on proudly wearing my Ipod and singing at the top of my lungs and I hope many other do the same! "
Jeff wrote on April 26, 2008 3:46 pm:
I plan to run the first half of the marathon listening to the smattering of fans and those around me. However, past mile 13, I will put on the Ipod. For those of you familiar with the course, the second half is fairly desolate (of both runners and fans) and I don't think the few people I pass or who pass me will mind too much. As others have also said, I keep it low enough to hear other runners and the friendly people at the water stations.
"
runnr wrote on April 29, 2008 12:49 am:
joewicket wrote on April 30, 2008 11:51 pm:
Also.... (sorry about the rant) Could we all please be a bit more realistic about our pace, and choose a bit more wisely about our starting position? I think it is great folks want to walk 13 miles, but could you all please stop apologizing to the folks passing you for the first 3 miles and kindly get to the back of the line and let us meager 9 minute mid-packers get through the first mile in something less than 12 minutes? "