Now
Overcast
59°
High
69°
Low
47°

Avery: Bruning trying to ‘score political points’ in housing war

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ERIC OLSON / The Associated Press

Friday, Apr 04, 2008 - 07:49:28 pm CDT

OMAHA — State Sen. Bill Avery says he understands the frustration the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission is experiencing in its dealings with Attorney General Jon Bruning.

“It looks to me like the attorney general will not pass up an opportunity to score political points on the immigration issue,’’ the Lincoln senator said Friday. “It’s not about the commission. It’s about immigration.’’

Bruning said it’s about protecting the people who pay his salary.

Story Photo
Bill Avery

“The taxpayers do not want my office to pursue citizens of this state on behalf of illegal immigrants,’’ he said.

The commission is at loggerheads with Bruning over his refusal to file a lawsuit on behalf of two illegal immigrants in Lincoln who alleged they were discriminated against by their landlord.

Commission director Anne Hobbs said state and federal law gives all individuals equal protection under the Fair Housing Act regardless of their legal status. She said Bruning’s office is required to provide counsel to anyone who has a legitimate complaint.

Bruning said his office decides which cases have merit, not the commission.

Bruning said he would never represent an illegal immigrant — even if he or she did have a legitimate complaint about discrimination.

Avery commented after equal opportunity commission leaders held a news conference to address their contentious relationship with Bruning.

“People, legal or illegal, are subject to not only the punishment of the law but the protections of the law,’’ Avery said. “He’s trying to make a distinction here. He’s trying to say we’re not going to give them protection of the law, but we’re going to enforce the sanctions of the law.’’

Bruning has attached himself to the illegal immigration issue. He pushed a bill in the Legislature that would have cut off state assistance to people who could not prove they are in the country legally. The bill died early in the session.

Hobbs said the commission has forwarded 104 housing discrimination cases to Bruning’s office over the past five years, and only one has gone to court.

Bruning said the prosecution record is more an indication of the poor work done by Hobbs and the commission. He said Hobbs should be fired.

“If my lawyers were that bad, and I managed the organization that poorly, I should be turned out by the voters,’’ Bruning said.

Hobbs said her agency is considering asking the Legislature to let it hire its own attorneys rather than relying on Bruning to handle its cases. Some state agencies have been allowed to use outside counsel, she said.

She said the commission fields 70 to 100 housing discrimination complaints a year, with only a handful deemed worthy to be sent to Bruning’s office.

Because of Bruning’s history of not pursuing what she deems to be legitimate cases, Hobbs said, many of the complaintants are encouraged to hire their own attorneys to pursue their cases in federal court.

The case that has caused the latest firestorm involves a landlord’s asking a couple to provide drivers’ licenses after he became concerned that too many people were living in their apartment.

Bruning said such a request is not unusual, with landlords often asking for documentation from tenants. The new landlord, he said, had discovered he did not have the tenants’ drivers’ licenses on record.

But Hobbs said the request was an example of how “one individual was treated differently than everybody else because of national origin.’’

Bruning said the investigative work handed over to his office was shoddy, and called the case “another in a long line of cases not properly investigated.’’


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Tim wrote on April 4, 2008 4:00 pm:
" It's past time that Bruning is kicked out of office. Hey Jon, it's time you actually did your job or something for that matter. "

I'm with Bruning on this one wrote on April 4, 2008 4:09 pm:
" Why do we spend my money, your money or any tax money on somebody who we should be spending money on getting them out of the country, not allowing them to stay in the country.

"

Cat wrote on April 4, 2008 4:20 pm:
" Why do we spend the money? Because the issue wasn't their status, but that they were treated differently because of their ethnicity. "

Tim wrote on April 4, 2008 4:25 pm:
" Because your immigrant forefathers said we protect the rights of all people. Even your illegal immigrant ancestors. It's not Brunings personal constitution that he can use as toilet paper if he wants. "

Anya wrote on April 4, 2008 6:46 pm:
" Well, things have certainly changed since I was a renter. I do not recall a landlord ever asking for my driver's license. That seems off.

The issue here is not the ethnicity of the tenants, but the number of people living in the unit. Landlords have a right to limit the number of people living in a unit, whether they be white, black, or purple polka-dotted.

I would like to see the request from the EOC that was put on Bruning's desk. If he's right about the shoddiness of the EOC's investigating, then we should be going after them. "

Why Doesn't... wrote on April 4, 2008 8:13 pm:
" If Bruning is such an expert on how to conduct investigations, wouldn't it have been a better idea to offer to help the EOC learn how to investigate better? Why call for the abolishment of an agency? That's throwing the baby out with the bathwater, isn't it? "

sue the AG's Office wrote on April 4, 2008 8:28 pm:
" Seems to me that the AG's office is practicing discrimination! 104 complaints and only 2 pursued? Doesn't that ring odd with anyone else? "

What about the Unborn Bill? wrote on April 4, 2008 9:21 pm:
" “People, legal or illegal, are subject to not only the punishment of the law but the protections of the law,’’ . Hey man, you said it, I didn't. "

Realist wrote on April 4, 2008 9:46 pm:
" Apparently none of you have rented anything lately. In most places, you not only have to provide valid identification, but you are subjected to a credit check. If someone was going to rent from me, I would want to know who they are. Are you kidding me? Someone is screaming foul because they were asked to provide ID to rent an apartment?!!! Of course they were - and it has nothing to do with race. The EOC sees everything through the race prism FIRST, and is a conflicted self-sustaining entity. "You asked me for my drivers license? You racist!" "

Cat wrote on April 4, 2008 9:47 pm:
" It's interesting: The cases went to Bruning's office in February. But it's not considered 'shoddy' until the last minute? The NEOC has fought with him for years over cases. Many have gone to court, without him, and done well. Can;t be 'that shoddy'. "

airedale wrote on April 5, 2008 6:49 pm:
" As I stated in another post Jon is doing this in part because he is a headline grabber and in part because he needs to cover his poor case track record of late. The AGs office has been BADLY beaten on most of the important cases that they have handled of late. Jon needs to invoke a knee jerk political issue to take the publics minds off the fanny whippins his office has been taking in court lately.
Another thing to remember is that Jon installed a 'Latino outreach coordinator' (or something like that) in his office back in 2003. That was when the pubs and dems were both desperate to get the votes of increasing numbers of Hispanics. Now that it is no longer popular to court those votes Bruning has gone 180 about and is squawking the 'illegal immigrant' alarm. Hypocrisy at its worst (and that is the best case scenario).
The AG has a job to do. Bruning obviously isn't doing it. THAT is a big waste of taxpayer money. "

Solution wrote on April 6, 2008 12:56 pm:
" If they are illegal, deport them. Problem solved. Or do you all think that's discriminatory? Absolutely ridiculous this is even an issue. Good job Jon. I appreciate your position. "

Interesting wrote on April 7, 2008 8:47 am:
" If Mr. Bruning is so concerned with illegal immigrants why did he not contact the appropriate authorities and have them deported??? "

Buddha wrote on April 7, 2008 9:20 am:
" Again, you all are not considerate of what Federal law says on this matter. Bruning is REQUIRED by Federal law to bring these cases to a lawsuit, and has refused to do so over 100 times, which means he's breaking the law over 100 times. I've said it once the other day when this story broke, and will say it again: The Legislature needs to impeach Jon Bruning because he is a law-breaker, not a law-abider. Better yet, the voters of Nebraska might be better off to abolish the office of the Attorney General! "

grrr! wrote on April 7, 2008 11:37 am:
" Until the federal housing laws are changed, he is LEGALLY OBLIGATED to pursue these cases in court, despite his personal or political opinions. He does not have the discretion to pick what cases he will or won’t take to court. This is NOT just a National Origin issue, we’re dealing with- it’s a Fair Housing issue. EVERYONE should be deeply concerned with Bruning’s refusal to uphold the law. He would have you believe that the NEOC has only forwarded cases involving National Origin Discrimination, which is simply not true. “The taxpayers do not want my office to pursue citizens of this state on behalf of illegal immigrants," "

wow! wrote on April 7, 2008 11:46 am:
" “The taxpayers do not want my office to pursue citizens of this state on behalf of illegal immigrants," Think of how dangerous this is...imagine a child was sexually assaulted. Is he not going to prosecute because the child is illegal? I'm shocked and embarassed that he is the Attorney General of my state. "

mtwomba wrote on April 7, 2008 11:53 am:
" What of those of us who are refugees, Mr.Bruning? Those of us who have left our beloved countries after years of tyranny and abuse and are seeking political asylum? Will you not protect us if we are harmed? "

no distinction wrote on April 7, 2008 1:34 pm:
" Until or unless the fair housing laws, both federal and civil, are changed Bruning is obligated to file in court. The landlord doesn't appear to have asked non-Hispanic tenants to show proof of citizenship or identity, only Hispanic tenants. Currently, the law states the Attorney General "shall" pursue such cases, not that he "may" pursue such cases, thus leaving the discretion up to the NEOC and the governor appointed commissioners of the NEOC, not Bruning or his office. Just like every other citizen, if Bruning doesn't like the law as it is stated, he has the option of petitioning to have it changed; however, he doesn't have the option of ignoring a law just because he doesn't agree with it. I wonder how many other public accommodations laws Bruning has violated by discriminating based upon national origin? I also wonder if perhaps this isn't a violation that the Bar Association should look into and sanction Bruning for failure to perform his legal duties and following the law. "

G-7 wrote on April 7, 2008 1:42 pm:
" Remember the NEOC helps Caucasians and Disabled people too. If you fit either of those categories, you should be just as concerned as anyone else with his refusal to take any of their cases forward. We are going to have a lot of young disabled men and women returning from this war who are going to need homes. Are we not going to protect their rights after they’ve served our country so bravely? They don’t deserve Bruning turning his back on them. The law says he has to protect the housing rights of every “person”. If he has an issue with the definition of “person” he can take it up with the legislature, but until he gets the laws changed, he MUST do his job and pursue cases where discrimination occurs. There are many Nebraskans, (U.S. Born, Caucasian,) who have been violated against, who have been referred to his office but he refuses to represent in court. It’s not an issue of National Origin. The issue is Bruning is not doing the job he was elected to do. He said it best when he said, “If my lawyers were that bad, and I managed the organization that poorly, I should be turned out by the voters.” You should. Impeach. Impeach. Impeach. "

So What wrote on April 7, 2008 6:10 pm:
" While most times I disagree with bruning on this issue I agree in full. Nuch is said about illegals in this country. If the landlord has suspicious about someone they can inquire more. If a landlord housed a illegal that committed a crime we would be asking why he or she was able to rent a place. Or illegal turned out to be a bomber we would ask how could the landlord not know. If they are here illegally send them home then every problem is resolved. They can enter this country like every other legal immimgrant.Why is it we have people crying for those that hjave broken the law.If Bush would put the resources on the border like he should have after 9/11 we would have fewer of these types of problems.Being her legally is great being here illegally I have no tollerance for them. "

Realistsx2 wrote on April 16, 2008 11:54 am:
" I agree with "Realist"-the real issue is that there was no discrimination! You aren't even allowed to tour most apartment complexes without showing a drivers license, let alone live there. "