Voter rolls show UNL City Campus faculty leans left
BY SAM ERB AND SAMANTHA HENG / For the Lincoln Journal Star
Josh Withrow will always remember the Nov. 2, 2004, election.
The next day, Robert Aguirre burst into a University of Nebraska-Lincoln classroom, looked at the students and offered this pronouncement: Republicans are going to destroy the country, and they should all be quarantined and removed from society.
Aguirre was the teacher.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln students who write for Redwire, a publication produced by the College of Journalism and Mass Communications, checked over voter registration records of UNL faculty on the Nebraska Secretary of State's Web site to do this report.
Redwire is available on the UNL campus. For more information, contact Redwire editors at redwire08@gmail.com.
“There was stunned silence that seemed to go on for a long time, until a student spoke up and asked him if he thought he was stepping over his boundaries,” said Withrow, a conservative from a Virginia military family.
“I couldn’t believe what I was hearing.”
Withrow is one of many conservative students from Nebraska, where Republicans outnumber Democrats 3 to 2.
On campus, a much different dynamic emerges: 11 political science professors are registered Democrats, and zero are registered Republicans. In sociology: 31 Democrats, one Republican. In history: 25 Democrats, four Republicans.
Overall, Democrats outnumber Republicans 3 to 1, making City Campus a deep blue island in a vast, statewide sea of red.
“Liberal people tend to be more attracted to the development of the mind, whereas more conservative (people) may be attracted to business,” said John Hibbing, one of those 11 Democrats in the Political Science Department.
Whatever the reason, the disproportionate number of Democrats among faculty on the main campus raises a number of questions. Among them:
* Where’s the line between academic freedom and political indoctrination?
* Does the largely liberal makeup of the faculty stifle the voices of more conservative students?
* Is this an age-old trend that is intensifying or simply becoming accepted as part of the academic landscape of public universities?
Academic freedom vs. indoctrination
UNL has a strong open speech policy. It allows faculty members to speak freely about their curriculum based on the subject taught, said Juan Franco, vice chancellor for student affairs.
“Universities are places where issues need to be discussed, but I would be disappointed if (a political discussion) was in an accounting class,” Franco said.
What UNL does not have is a general policy on political discussions in the classroom, he said. And individual colleges don’t have policies regarding political biases in the classroom.
The deans of the colleges of Journalism and Mass Communications, Education and Human Sciences and Arts and Sciences all echoed the same common theme: Faculty views on political issues will naturally come out in the classroom, but faculty members need to stimulate discussion by showing both sides.
Although educators “have a certain responsibility to not shove ideas down kids’ throats, public campuses have a responsibility to bring the political process to classrooms,” said Education and Human Sciences Dean Marjorie Kostelnik.
Although there is no official policy, faculty members are expected to discuss politics without forcing their own beliefs upon students, Kostelnik said.
But students say they have seen faculty members breach this unwritten code.
Dirk Chatelain, a 2004 UNL graduate, said he encountered a liberal bias in a civil liberties class during his last semester of college.
“I was not an angry partisan; he didn’t push my buttons,” Chatelain said. “I agreed with him on 90 percent of the court cases, but that wasn’t the point. He wasn’t addressing the logic of the opposing position.”
During the class, Chatelain felt that each case offered the opportunity to spark debate that was “stifled” by the political science professor.
“He would purposely or inadvertently stifle the conservative argument,” Chatelain said. “A civil liberties classroom should spark debate — there are 40 different people who bring different views — and you can learn more during student debates than from just listening to the professor.”
The deans say professors should guide discussion and debate, not force their biases on students.
“A biased point of view is not what education is about — that’s propaganda,” said Will Norton, dean of the College of Journalism and Mass Communications.
Students get offended
UNL Political Science Professor Michael Wagner said students tend to be more easily offended these days.
When President Bush enjoyed more support a few years ago, Wagner noted, praising him would have repelled students who disliked the president. Today, conservative students might take offense if an instructor points out how much Bush’s approval ratings have declined.
Because of this “selective perception,” Wagner doesn’t share his political views with his students.
“I don’t want half the class to turn off right away,” he said.
That’s why his office walls are covered in posters and campaign ads of famous Democrats as well as Republicans.
Mike Doty, a sophomore political science and pre-law major, appreciated that Wagner didn’t indoctrinate his students in class last fall.
“I like it better when a professor keeps you guessing,” he said. “College is a time that students should face views opposite of their own. It should get them to understand why they support what they support.”
Not all professors take Wagner’s approach.
Aguirre, who left UNL after the spring 2005 semester, did not hide his political views, Withrow said.
After fully realizing how anti-Republican the writing rhetoric lecturer was, Withrow said he tried to “fly under the radar.”
It worked until Aguirre noticed a pro-Bush sticker on Withrow’s backpack. From then on, Withrow said, the lecturer referred to him as “the Republican.”
“The next class (Aguirre) showed up with a stack of papers about (2004 Democratic presidential nominee John) Kerry at least an-inch-and-a-half thick,” Withrow said. “And one by one started slamming them down on my desk, saying why I was wrong.
“He didn’t do it to anybody else in the class. Just me.”
Redwire was unable to find or reach Aguirre.
Seth McDonald, a registered independent, was in the same class as Withrow. He said Aguirre showed videos detailing the conservative bias of FOX News and — in lieu of traditional lectures — anti-Iraq war propaganda.
“In a way (the experience) was good because now I keep an eye out for biases,” said McDonald, a 22-year-old marketing major. “But in a way it shaped my life … now I tend to lean towards the liberal side.”
Said Withrow, a senior history and classics major: “Most of the faculty are very liberal, but they are willing to debate it, whereas students, both Democratic and Republican, are less likely to debate it reasonably.”
A liberal academia
So does any one thing explain why some public universities tend to have a more Democratic, liberal tilt — at least among faculty?
Solon Simmons, an assistant professor of conflict sociology at George Mason University, recently conducted a study published in The Chronicle of Higher Education. After carefully examining responses from 1,417 professors at more than 900 institutions, Simmons concluded about 90 percent referred to themselves as either liberal or moderate.
“It boils down to money and an interest in new knowledge,” said Simmons.
Conservatives with the talent and opportunity to teach, he said, are more likely to take better-paying, non-university jobs. Wanting to preserve old ways of thinking as opposed to creating new knowledge, which is what universities do, is also a common conservative point of view, he said.
UNL Political Science Professor John Gruhl isn’t surprised, and said it isn’t a phenomenon specific to UNL.
Applicants for faculty positions are themselves products of higher education, which tends to be more liberal. So it isn’t a conspiracy to have more liberals than conservatives, Gruhl said.
The University of Nebraska system is governed by eight regents, seven of whom are Republican.
The Democrat, Chairman Chuck Hassebrook, said university professors often are Democrats, but the private sector is often more dominated by Republicans.
“It’s good to get young people exposed to all kinds of ideas,” he said. “It gives them a chance to hear different sides of the issue so they can make a decision.”
ASUN President and Student Regent David Solheim discounts the notion that students can be inoculated with a liberal bias simply because City Campus has three liberal faculty for every conservative.
Yes, it’s liberal.
“But there are a lot of places more liberal than Lincoln, Nebraska.”
Sam Erb is a senior news-editorial and broadcast major in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Journalism and Mass Communications. Samantha Heng is a senior news-editorial major.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Sad Day wrote on March 23, 2008 12:44 am:
Rob wrote on March 23, 2008 12:58 am:
That is hogwash. I am an engineer and conservative, and we are always pushing the state-of-the-art in technology. Lets call it like it is: liberals are creating 'new knowledge" to justify the leftward tilt to socialism. What does that have to do with education?
"
Cat wrote on March 23, 2008 1:09 am:
Chris N wrote on March 23, 2008 2:51 am:
Rube Jackson wrote on March 23, 2008 4:47 am:
LJS bizarre reporting wrote on March 23, 2008 6:20 am:
Free Speech wrote on March 23, 2008 7:22 am:
Comm UnSense wrote on March 23, 2008 7:24 am:
ya think?? wrote on March 23, 2008 7:44 am:
I'm glad that these student journalists have realized something so obvious. Faculty, particularly those in the liberal arts (go figure) are extremely left wing. 20 years ago, I recall being admonished for expressing any views that were moderate. much less conservative. When my nephew began school at the University of Nothing but Liberals this year, he asked for advice. I told him to give all speeches and papers a left leaning tilt in order to get better grades. He didnt believe me but has since told me that I was correct.
it's really too bad that college campuses can't promote the teaching of facts and the development of independent thinking. Our system of education has become so focused on propaganda and political correctness that it is no wonder this country is slipping behind in so many areas.
"
Randy wrote on March 23, 2008 7:53 am:
Laurie wrote on March 23, 2008 8:25 am:
funny wrote on March 23, 2008 8:42 am:
Big News wrote on March 23, 2008 8:59 am:
Mrs. Johnson wrote on March 23, 2008 9:21 am:
Cole wrote on March 23, 2008 9:36 am:
If you're smart and you believe that your pursuit of personal gain supersedes your interest in improving the human condition, the corporate ladder fits like a glove.
The cool thing is that one cannot climb the corporate ladder without an education and education cannot exist without the wealth generated by corporations. We need bleeding heart socialists AND selfish robber barons to make it all work.
Wouldn't it be great if the conservative corporate ladder climber succeeds and donates millions in the name of the liberal professor that drove him or her crazy while attending university?
"
jo wrote on March 23, 2008 9:49 am:
ted wrote on March 23, 2008 9:51 am:
Dave K wrote on March 23, 2008 9:56 am:
Easy wrote on March 23, 2008 10:01 am:
Matt wrote on March 23, 2008 10:28 am:
Craig wrote on March 23, 2008 10:41 am:
Tom wrote on March 23, 2008 10:57 am:
Gerard Harbison wrote on March 23, 2008 10:59 am:
I served as faculty advisor to the College Republicans for 5 years. When asked why a chemistry professor was advisor to a political group, I invariably answered that it was because there wasn't a single Republican on the Poli. Sci. faculty. Surely nobody thinks that a department that is composed entirely of members of one political party can give students an objective appraisal of politics in America?
The answer that 'Republicans' are only interested in making money is too trite. There is a systematic bias against conservative ideas and conservatives across the university, though it's less bad in the sciences, engineering, and some of the professional schools. "
Locke wrote on March 23, 2008 11:11 am:
Ryan wrote on March 23, 2008 11:28 am:
David wrote on March 23, 2008 11:34 am:
Not Surprised wrote on March 23, 2008 11:41 am:
Carl wrote on March 23, 2008 11:48 am:
LanceR wrote on March 23, 2008 11:59 am:
JC wrote on March 23, 2008 12:02 pm:
WCG wrote on March 23, 2008 12:02 pm:
Scott wrote on March 23, 2008 12:05 pm:
Dee wrote on March 23, 2008 12:12 pm:
It is the responsibility of higher education to provide exposure to values and ideas other then those that are the norm for students. The point of higher education is to promote and hone critical thinking skills, not to “indoctrinate”. Assuming that those people attending a higher education institution are able to develop these skills and accept a challenge to their comfort zone rather then having a path of conservative “indoctrination” they will be able to develop their own opinions.
It is obvious that neither the liberals nor the conservatives have the absolute answer and that balance is the key. Until we can come to a balance in our “real world” it is likely that academia will continue to be left leaning. Nature abhors a vacuum. The apparent polarity of this “finding” when compared to the reality of the world we live in is evidence of this.
"
Edgar Pearlstein wrote on March 23, 2008 12:40 pm:
I am a professor at UNL (retired) In all my years there I never witnessed a case of discrimination based on political or religious views. In most cases, I don't even know those views of my colleagues.
In my own classes (in physics) there was essentially no opportunity to bring up political or religious issues. (Except, perhaps, with regard to the heliocentric model of the solar system.)
Some conservatives seem to have persecution envy.
"
PB&J wrote on March 23, 2008 12:42 pm:
ed wrote on March 23, 2008 12:54 pm:
Pat wrote on March 23, 2008 12:56 pm:
Come on Tom.... wrote on March 23, 2008 1:40 pm:
jab wrote on March 23, 2008 1:50 pm:
Amie wrote on March 23, 2008 1:51 pm:
I once taught at a conservative Christian high school where speaking well of any non-Republican was considered to be a "liberal bias". Things I was accused of bias for:
*Telling a speech class that then President Bill Clinton was a good public speaker.
*Answering this question: "How long has Clinton been president?" by saying: "Since January 20, 1993" (I was "biased" because I knew the inauguration date--never mind that it's in the Constitution)
*Telling students that then Senator Bob Kerrey lost part of his leg in Vietnam (this was biased because it may have made students think well of a Democrat)
These students went on to schools like UNL, where (as this article says) they interpret facts like Bush's low approval ratings as being intended to offend them or change their beliefs.
They need to grow up. "
Grad student wrote on March 23, 2008 6:33 pm:
Holly wrote on March 23, 2008 6:54 pm:
BamaGuy wrote on March 23, 2008 8:19 pm:
"Liberal people tend to be more attracted to the development of the mind". This guy is kidding, right? These are the same people who think that social security is a good investment and government education of children can be fixed by spending more money.
I'm a libertarian but I can find a few things that Bush has done that I agree with. The liberals are wrong about everything. I'd be happy to tell any professor in any class that he/she has no clue what she is talking about when they start spewing their Marxist-Leninist propaganda. "
Grad Stud. is right wrote on March 23, 2008 8:38 pm:
Matt P. wrote on March 23, 2008 8:46 pm:
This is ridiculous and completely non-news. Educational institutions tend to attract more of the "idealist" crowd, who tend to be more liberal. They are not wrong or right, they tend to focus more on the purpose of society and what our government "should" be doing for Americans. While conservatives tend to be a bit more practical and tend to focus on what the government "can" do for Americans. The beauty of the system is that we need an equal dose of both these ideologies.
The idea that UNL professors are somehow "poisoning" the minds of the youth is just absurd! And the idea that liberals are more intelligent is just absurd. I am so sick and tired of both of the venomous rhetoric coming from both sides I could puke. "
UNL 97 wrote on March 23, 2008 8:54 pm:
I believe one of the University instructor's greatest problems is they are highly paid and disconnected from reality. My my personal observations, the professors are paid very well (per hour of work) and have almost no accountability for their actions or behavior. For the kind of power and control they possess, this is frightening.
From my observations, in the real world, there is more accountability built in a "real world day's work" than a department's staff has in a accumlative year. This breeds arrogance, ignorance, and a closed minded, intolerant classroom environment.
I wish the University would "branch out" and have a university that somewhat represents Nebraska; not a bunch of insolent idealogues, detached from society, and living in a world that only exists in academia.
"
The Graduate wrote on March 23, 2008 9:28 pm:
wow wrote on March 23, 2008 9:30 pm:
A more interesting study would be to analyze the evolution of faculty politic composition of universities which are strongly affiliated with churches, such as BYU and other Christian colleges.
Otherwise, there is little learned from the article. A liberal UNL! What a surprise. Tell me something new please.
"
happyirish wrote on March 23, 2008 10:24 pm:
SCW wrote on March 23, 2008 10:54 pm:
A lot of idiots can still get PhD's and a lot of very smart individuals can make a good living AND make a difference in the world without a College/University education.
The statement 'Most educated people lean left.'...Depends on your definition of education. True intelligence would allow individuals to see the strengths and weaknesses of every political party. They do exist.
To try and imply that left leaning liberals are the only correct, educated, and intelligent people on the planet is just an ignorant point of view. Plenty of intelligent Democrats and Republicans out there, and plenty of blind party 'followers-at-all-costs' as well. "
Why do we label each other like this? wrote on March 23, 2008 11:09 pm:
Merle wrote on March 24, 2008 1:15 am:
Whine wrote on March 24, 2008 9:20 am:
Also - the notion that there is a bias against right-leaning professors is ridiculous. First of all, you largely don't get into political leanings during the hiring process. Second of all, as long as the percentage of people graduating with advanced degrees who are Republican remains low, so will faculty numbers.
Not like, say, women who are earning the majority of PhD's in this country now, and are still way under-represented in junior faculty. That's actual evidence for bias against women, highly unlike the parnoid bias people seem to see for right-leaning faculty.
Give me a break. "
Henry wrote on March 24, 2008 2:10 pm:
Conservative PhD Engineer wrote on March 24, 2008 4:43 pm:
Dr. Robert Aguirre wrote on March 24, 2008 5:05 pm:
Had Sam Erb or Samantha Heng contacted me, I would have told them that Mr. Withrow's recollection is incorrect.
I have written a formal response to this article, and I hope it will be printed in either the LJS or the DN.
Lastly, I'm not that hard to find.
"
Joshua Withrow wrote on March 24, 2008 8:21 pm:
I think the Journal Star took the story out of context a little bit, though, because I do not believe at all that Rob's behavior in that class is a typical classroom experience. I would also like to think that it was an aberration on Rob's part as well, though his blatant bias pervaded the entire class that semester.
Though I did not intend to embarrass Rob in the town paper, I do stand by my account. "
Molecular Theory wrote on March 24, 2008 8:58 pm:
JimDandy wrote on March 24, 2008 10:15 pm:
I would have bet money this was the case, nice to have the Mr. Aguirre is working to correct it.
Should have been obvious to the two reporters that Mr. Winthrow's 'recollection' was highly suspect. But I guess verifying and finding out it wasn't true wouldn't have made for the grabber first paragraph.
So much for the Liberal (liberal liberal liberal) media. "
Ellen wrote on March 25, 2008 3:22 am:
UNL should post the political affiliation of each staff member next to their class listing in enroll. This way, students could choose to either be taught by a democrat or a republican.
If students tend to favor one side more than the other, requirements could be made so that students have to take a minimum number of equal courses from both sides before they would be allowed to select their own preference. This would maximize exposure to both sides of the debate and help to foster a well-rounded education for students. "
Joshua Withrow wrote on March 25, 2008 2:16 pm:
That's ridiculous. Bias is going to creep into a classroom, usually unintentionally, regardless of the professor. Some are better at keeping it back than others. But only taking classes from professors of your own affiliation runs the risk of being indoctrinated with incorrect knowledge in the same way as if you are in a class with someone you disagree with.
The point is, students have to be able to think critically for themselves, to recognize any bias and to judge for themselves whether or not they agree. Understanding the opposition's argument is a key to understanding your own, in every subject from politics to religion to academic discussion. And besides, sometimes the other side is right, at least partially.
If a teacher's views affect the way he interprets data, that's not a big deal as long as opposing views get their chance. The only thing I'm concerned about is avoiding ridiculous and blatant indoctrination, like what Rob tried to do in his class. Fortunately, over the past four years that kind of stuff has been (at least for me) very infrequent. "
Why so defensive? wrote on March 26, 2008 4:29 pm:
V wrote on March 29, 2008 12:44 am: