Family appeals to allow dying girl to see father
BY KENDRA WALTKE / Lincoln Journal Star
Jayci Yaeger no longer can speak, but tears roll down her face when she hears her father’s voice on the telephone.
Back when the 10-year-old was well enough, she expressed one dying wish: To be with her dad.
The Lincoln girl’s seven-year struggle with cancer appears to be drawing to a close.
But her father, Jason Yaeger, can’t be at her side because he’s incarcerated on a methamphetamine conviction at a federal prison camp in Yankton, S.D., three hours away.
“I believe she’s just hanging on for her daddy,” her uncle, Ed Yaeger, said late Friday afternoon.
Twice, doctors have told the family to pay their last respects.
“Yesterday and last evening, she gave us quite a scare,” said Ed Yaeger, Jason Yaeger’s brother.
Jayci is in hospice care in Lincoln. She last saw her father three weeks ago during a two-hour visit supervised by a prison guard.
Her father has repeatedly appealed to the Bureau of Prisons for a furlough, or escorted release, which federal prisons can allow in cases with “extraordinary justification.”
“But they say this is not extraordinary,” said Jayci’s aunt, Heidi Genthe of Pleasant Dale.
No timetable was requested for the furlough, Ed Yaeger said.
“He’s left the time open so he can be here when she passes and for the funeral.”
Jason Yaeger has visited his daughter three times since her condition was declared terminal last fall, once in October and twice in the past month. Each visit cost the family $200 to $300 for the guard and expenses.
He has nearly a year left on a 5½-year sentence and is set for an August release to a Council Bluffs, Iowa, halfway house, where he would be allowed to visit Jayci in Lincoln.
Now he fears he will not see his daughter alive again.
“It’s eating him up,” his brother said. “Every second counts.”
The story, first reported on local television stations, has drawn outrage at home and nationwide from those who say a child is being punished for her father’s crime.
Jayci’s mother, Vonda Yaeger, was on the “CBS Early Show” Thursday. Ed Yaeger spoke to CNN live on Friday. Jason Yaeger was interviewed by ABC.
Phone calls and letters poured into the offices of South Dakota and Nebraska politicians.
Ed Yaeger hopes the national attention will force the Bureau of Prisons to overturn its decision,
“Anything anyone can do to put pressure on them will help us,” he said.
Gov. Dave Heineman has expressed his empathy to the Yaeger family, said spokeswoman Jen Rae Hein, but the matter is federal. Nebraska’s congressional delegation also received many calls.
Rep. Jeff Fortenberry’s office requested a clarification of the term “extraordinary” from the Bureau of Prisons, said Fortenberry spokesman Josh Moenning.
The matter rests in the hands of the federal agency, Moenning said.
In a response to Fortenberry’s request for clarification, sent in reference to Yaeger’s plea for early release to the halfway house in Council Bluffs, Michael K. Nalley, the regional director for the bureau, wrote: “While there are no set determining factors, ‘extraordinary circumstances’ are determined on an individual, case-by-case basis. ... His case is not unlike that of many other offenders, whose incarceration takes them away from loved ones who must endure both financial and health-related hardships.”
Ed Yaeger said all decisions appear to be left to federal prison officials, who upheld the Yankton warden’s recommendation.
“It appears the Bureau of Prisons does not answer to anyone but the president,” Ed Yaeger said.
“I think the thing to stress is that Jason is in a minimum-security prison. There are no bars, no walls. He has to cross a busy public street to get between the buildings.”
When he transferred from a prison to the Yankton site, Jason Yaeger was given a furlough and “put on a Greyhound bus.”
In a statement to the press, the Yankton prison said: “Bureau of Prisons officials have reviewed inmate Yaeger’s request for a compassionate release and have determined his situation does not meet the criteria.”
A spokesperson for the prison indicated no more information would be publicly released until next week.
Jayci’s parents were living near Princeton when she was diagnosed with brain tumors at age 3. They have since divorced.
The south Lancaster County area has been very supportive of the girl, even naming a Princeton street “Jayci Lane.”
Shelby Yaeger, Jayci’s younger sister, is not taking the illness well, their uncle said. The girls live with their mother in Lincoln’s Air Park.
“Jason has just about paid his debt to society,” Ed Yaeger said. “It’s not really about Jason, it’s about a little girl who just wants to see her dad.”
Reach Kendra Waltke at 473-7303 or kwaltke@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
too bad. wrote on March 21, 2008 5:42 pm:
His Fault wrote on March 21, 2008 5:56 pm:
me wrote on March 21, 2008 6:00 pm:
Lincoln wrote on March 21, 2008 6:35 pm:
Scott wrote on March 21, 2008 6:48 pm:
Truly heartbreaking.... wrote on March 21, 2008 6:59 pm:
Shelly L. wrote on March 21, 2008 7:21 pm:
DT wrote on March 21, 2008 7:47 pm:
Realist wrote on March 21, 2008 7:54 pm:
Rick M wrote on March 21, 2008 8:01 pm:
Let him out, its not like he's going to run anywhere.
This little child NEEDS her parents together with her for her final departure... is that going to hurt someone else...?
Heck, I'll go take his place for the duration of his stay with his daughter... would that suffice?
"
S.Fenin wrote on March 21, 2008 8:35 pm:
onlyhuman wrote on March 21, 2008 8:52 pm:
seriously? wrote on March 21, 2008 8:53 pm:
jill wrote on March 21, 2008 8:59 pm:
Ted wrote on March 21, 2008 9:37 pm:
KCollins wrote on March 21, 2008 9:54 pm:
KCollins wrote on March 21, 2008 9:58 pm:
His fault NOT HER FAULT! wrote on March 21, 2008 10:03 pm:
jerry wrote on March 21, 2008 10:08 pm:
chomper wrote on March 21, 2008 10:44 pm:
chomper "
Agree with His Fault wrote on March 21, 2008 11:31 pm:
Come on! wrote on March 22, 2008 12:01 am:
Chantelle wrote on March 22, 2008 12:02 am:
shannon wrote on March 22, 2008 12:21 am:
4realnow wrote on March 22, 2008 12:40 am:
John Cassidy wrote on March 22, 2008 1:57 am:
John Cassidy wrote on March 22, 2008 2:12 am:
tc wrote on March 22, 2008 5:30 am:
BUT...it is incredible to me that so many of you are downplaying the meth charge. METH is a violent drug -- DRUGS are killing our society -- and if it were for drugs, many of our more violent criminals would probably not be violent criminals. Think about the message you are sending with your down-play of the severity of his charge. "
Jan wrote on March 22, 2008 8:12 am:
xgman wrote on March 22, 2008 8:21 am:
Read it twice wrote on March 22, 2008 8:23 am:
Move the kid? wrote on March 22, 2008 8:29 am:
karwied wrote on March 22, 2008 8:37 am:
appalled wrote on March 22, 2008 8:41 am:
Again and again Nebraskan government has dug their heels in negatively on things like this. Have a heart, no a bigger heart, reach on in there you can find it. Let this little angel have her dad there until the end. "
sad wrote on March 22, 2008 9:00 am:
Her father is not asking for a reduced sentence but simply to be with his dying child during her last hours. He will be guarded and suffering internally in ways we will never know. He did not commit a crime of violence and will soon be out on the streets. This is a man that needs help with his recovery, not judgement and scorn from others.
"
Hank wrote on March 22, 2008 9:13 am:
sutton_curmudgeon wrote on March 22, 2008 9:17 am:
Joe wrote on March 22, 2008 9:35 am:
aj wrote on March 22, 2008 9:51 am:
"
extraordinary justification wrote on March 22, 2008 9:52 am:
Abbey wrote on March 22, 2008 9:53 am:
Saddened wrote on March 22, 2008 10:23 am:
Mike wrote on March 22, 2008 10:29 am:
Maybe wrote on March 22, 2008 10:32 am:
jeff wrote on March 22, 2008 10:56 am:
abbylove wrote on March 22, 2008 10:57 am:
mark wrote on March 22, 2008 11:01 am:
trying again to post wrote on March 22, 2008 11:24 am:
Maybe... wrote on March 22, 2008 11:46 am:
Russ A lincon wrote on March 22, 2008 12:01 pm:
WC76 wrote on March 22, 2008 12:05 pm:
GMP2 wrote on March 22, 2008 12:56 pm:
WOW wrote on March 22, 2008 12:58 pm:
Failed war wrote on March 22, 2008 12:59 pm:
Fact check (he has already visited ) wrote on March 22, 2008 1:24 pm:
They have already allowd him to visit three times TWICE in the past month. If they want her to see him take her up to Yankton it is not that long of a drive. "
Chris wrote on March 22, 2008 1:25 pm:
stop spending wrote on March 22, 2008 1:28 pm:
Forrest wrote on March 22, 2008 2:07 pm:
The Wizard wrote on March 22, 2008 2:16 pm:
Ex Nebraskan wrote on March 22, 2008 2:59 pm:
Jason wrote on March 22, 2008 3:05 pm:
Abbey wrote on March 22, 2008 3:18 pm:
HPG wrote on March 22, 2008 4:27 pm:
As for those critical of the Warden, think about it, you make an exception for one, you will have to make an exception for all. Inmates want everything to be fair and equal all the time. Then, they are the first ones to complain when they can't get the rule changed. "
Bao is amazed wrote on March 22, 2008 4:30 pm:
punishment? wrote on March 22, 2008 4:44 pm:
Compassion, please wrote on March 22, 2008 5:05 pm:
I thought caring and compassion for one another was part of our responsibilities as civilized human beings. From what I have read of some of the comments, there seems to be little compassion for a family that is in pain due to the fact that a small little girl is dying. THIS MAN'S DAUGHTER IS DYING. Moving Jayci probably is not a option.
Have we become so cold and hard core? The man sold drugs, yes! The man has 5 months left, yes! The father has seen his child several times already, yes! But is several times enough when your child is dying. This family needs comfort and compassion. Think about it if it were your child dying and you couldn't see them and maybe be there when they leave this earth.
Compassion, please "
Read it twice wrote on March 22, 2008 5:08 pm:
ap wrote on March 22, 2008 5:46 pm:
Jeff wrote on March 22, 2008 7:01 pm:
katie wrote on March 22, 2008 7:26 pm:
Eddie wrote on March 22, 2008 10:19 pm:
Greg wrote on March 23, 2008 12:13 am:
"Jason Yaeger has visited his daughter three times since her condition was declared terminal last fall, once in October and twice in the past month."
For someone in federal custody, I'd say he was getting more visits than I would have expected. I understand this is a sad case and I feel for the family, I really do... But I also hate how they seem to be playing the press on this. Previous stories I have seen mentioned nothing about him having visited once, (I saw that on TV finally Fri AM) let alone three times in the last six months!! Until I saw that, I thought maybe the Warden was being unreasonable, but I also accuse the family or the press of downplaying those visits so they can appeal to the public about this, maybe it makes for a better story and the press is to blame... I just think they should've been very clear about the previous allowances for visitation... Finding out now about these three visits makes them come across as ungrateful for what breaks the warden has given them.
"
Compasssion wrote on March 23, 2008 3:30 am:
jo wrote on March 23, 2008 9:53 am:
jeff wrote on March 23, 2008 10:28 am:
MarkyMark wrote on March 23, 2008 11:27 am:
for all the "bigger picture" people wrote on March 23, 2008 12:25 pm:
Liza wrote on March 23, 2008 4:41 pm:
Dawn Truitt wrote on March 23, 2008 6:24 pm:
Bob Canning wrote on March 23, 2008 6:58 pm:
Todd wrote on March 23, 2008 9:58 pm:
Andrea wrote on March 23, 2008 10:00 pm:
Linds wrote on March 23, 2008 10:04 pm:
Herb wrote on March 23, 2008 10:16 pm:
Brian Dunlap wrote on March 24, 2008 12:04 am:
armstrong wrote on March 24, 2008 7:18 am:
I agree with Chomper, there are many people in prison who have lost their loved ones while they were/are incarcerated, but the bottom line is...they should have been thinking about their loved ones before they did the crime. Jason did wrong and he is being punished for it, but so is his daughter and I hope he remembers that for the rest of his life and turns his life around.
If he'd been a convicted child molester, would you have been so forgiving? Crimes are crimes and criminals are criminals, no one crime or criminal is any better than the next.
And for those of you who were wondering who paid for the trips, it was the family. It is always the family of the criminals who pay, they are victims of crimes as well as the people the criminal perpetrated his crime(s) against.
The warden showed his/her compassion on more than one occasion and I think that was very generous. It is a warden's job, and his agency's job to ensure first the safety of the public, then his employees and last but not least the safety of his offender. It isn't always an easy decision to make, but he has rules to follow as well. "
Really??? wrote on March 24, 2008 8:56 am:
mixed emotions wrote on March 24, 2008 10:50 am:
a daddy wrote on March 24, 2008 11:28 am:
Bijan wrote on March 24, 2008 11:37 am:
I don't have rose-tinted glasses about what happens in my country, but when I came across this story, I have to say