Now
A Few Clouds
82.0°
High
82°
Low
61°

Guardian for woman hurt at BSDC files $1.85M claim

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Mar 19, 2008 - 04:25:10 pm CDT

The brother of a woman whose legs were broken in February while she was a resident of the Beatrice State Developmental Center has filed a $1.85 million claim against the state

Debra Bauer cannot walk or talk and requires assistance with daily care. The 53-year-old, who has lived at BSDC since she was 5, requires assistance getting out of her wheelchair, with staff using a mechanical lift, according to the claim.

The claim comes as the center, home to more than 300 Nebraskans with developmental disabilities, is under intense scrutiny and could lose $28.6 million in federal funds — more than half its annual budget.

The center doesn’t have enough staff to care for the residents, according to reports from two federal agencies and an advocacy group. State leaders have brought in temporary workers and announced one-third of residents will move to community programs.

Bauer lived in a unit with many other residents in wheelchairs who cannot talk and are either fed through a tube or by staff, according to the claim filed Wednesday by an attorney for Nebraska Advocacy Services.

Chronic staff shortages or inadequate employee training in 2007 and 2008 resulted in a pattern of staff allowing residents, like Bauer, to be “covered with feces and urine-soaked clothing,” according to the claim.

Residents on that unit have suffered fractures or have been negligently dropped because of the staff’s failure to properly operate the mechanical lift or to use the lift at all, the claim said.

Bauer suffered two broken legs between Feb. 16 and Feb. 21, but the injuries were not reported by staff to medical personnel for three to five days, according to the claim.

Bauer’s brother, Mike Ellsworth, said he was shocked when he learned about his sister’s injuries and that the Beatrice staff did not know how they happened.

“It crushed me to think I had my sister there for all this time” believing she was getting good care, he said.

“You have to have some kind of trust and faith that the people are doing an adequate job,” he said.

Bauer’s situation was one of the problems reported by federal investigators with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services during its recent visit.

And it was one of the issues that led to three recent “immediate jeopardy” sanctions against the institution.

The center took steps to correct the jeopardy issues but the institution still failed several broader inspection areas.

BSDC staff has failed to maintain a safe environment and provide treatment and appropriate medical care for Bauer and similar residents, particularly those living on the same unit, according to the claim.

After her broken legs were reported, Bauer had surgery for the fractures at a Lincoln hospital and remains in constant pain, according to the claim and her brother.

She is now living in an Omaha area nursing home, according to Ellsworth, who lives in Bellevue.  This is the first time his sister has lived close enough family can visit on a regular basis, he said.

Ellsworth said his biggest concern is for residents who are still living at Beatrice, “especially those people who don’t have guardians and people, like my sister, who can’t tell their story.  There has to be some way to protect those people.”

The claim against the state is the first step in a process that later could include filing a lawsuit in district court if the claim is denied or isn’t acted upon within six months, according to Laura Peterson, state risk manager.

Bruce Mason, litigation director for Nebraska Advocacy Services, says the group, which advocates for the developmentally disabled, also expects to file more claims against the state on behalf of Beatrice center residents.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
I hate these lawsuits wrote on March 19, 2008 12:41 pm:
" If he wins, I hope he plans on using the money to take care of his sister himself. The tax payers have been doing it for 48 years. I understand that families cannot always handle taking care of developmentally disabled members themselves, so why do they think it is easier for someone else to do it. It cannot be easier taking care of the residents of BSDC. This lawsuit just puts more burdens on tax payers. "

Confused wrote on March 19, 2008 1:12 pm:
" This Nebraska Advocacy Services is very hard to follow - is this the same group that was just in the paper saying they did not the clients placed in other facilities??? and now they are sueing the BSDC - what do they want - the place to close or the place to stay open??? I think we need to let the current workers do one thing at a time - it seems like all the head ache is coming at once and we are not giving them time to make it a better place - if you really believe it is that bad?? Sit back and give them time!!!!!!!!! "

dali_36 wrote on March 19, 2008 1:22 pm:
" To i hate these lawsuits. I'm sure this family has also paid their share of tax dollars for the care of their loved one. When you need to place a loved one in the care of others you expect that they are cared for in a loving and safe environment. Is that to much to ask for????? No one said it was easier for someone else to take care of the residents at BSDC but at the same time the state did not go knocking on doors telling these employees that they had to do this job. These people went looking for employment and if they cannot handle the job that they chose then it is time to step back and let people that can do the job do it. If your loved one that was unable to speak for him or herself was injured by neglect then I would expect that you to would take legal measures to insure their future safety. In the future put yourself in the others shoes and think of what you would do if the shoe was on your foot. "

Scott wrote on March 19, 2008 1:38 pm:
" Typical government action....... warehouse bodies of its wards...... no different than prisons or the regional centers......... the state should be ashamed and yeah, I could clean this up better than it has been done to date. "

not confused wrote on March 19, 2008 1:47 pm:
" Confused- How long do we need to give BSDC. How many people need to suffer broken bones, neglect, and other abuse. If this was your loved one, would you say give them time. BSDC has had since September 2006 and even before that to provide quality care to their residents. According to NAS, CMS and the Department of Justice they continue to provide poor care to their residents. I urge you if you are confused to gather appropriate information so that you are not confused. The Department of Justice slammed the facility and you can read their report on their website. When are we as citizens going to stand up for the rights of the individuals at BSDC instead of the workers, administration, and Health and Human Services. These individuals (workers, administration and HHS) have voices and the abilities to speak and advocate for themselves. The residents as BSDC do not. If a child at a daycare center had a child with both legs broken what would happen. The daycare worker would be arrested and charges would be filed. Why is then okay for an individual who has their every need met by a staff person have both legs broken without accountability for those actions? It is time to say enough. If you have read the reports, which I have, it clearly says none of the investigations have called for the center to close. What they have asked for is improving the quality of care for individuals, transition into the community when appropriate, and a safe environment for those who still reside at BSDC. Basic fundamental quality of life. And to "I hate these lawsuits"- individuals are not burdens but blessings. May you have an opportunity to be touch by an individual with a disability. Maybe then you'll change your perspective. May NAS prevail in setting a tone that it is not okay to abuse and neglect individuals-disability or not. "

Scott (again) wrote on March 19, 2008 1:59 pm:
" You can tell a lot about a society by the way it treats its weakest, most dependent members. What does this say about us? Not much, I'm sad to say. "

Grundle wrote on March 19, 2008 2:35 pm:
" I wonder if those supporting the lawsuit and criticizing the BSDC have ever volunteered their time to help take care of these people? It's apparent they've forgotten that when you point the finger at someone, there are 3 more fingers pointed back at them. "

Bicycle Mike wrote on March 19, 2008 3:25 pm:
" Nothing creates action than hitting someone in the pocket book. Maybe now the long standing problems as BSDC will start getting the attention that it deserves, although I think the attention was ramped up by the feds. I find it strange that when a lawsuit is filed people will lash out at the party claiming wrong doing. Did this family not pay taxes for decades to help fund BSDC? Should thy not have a reasonable assumption that because they are funding the facility through their taxes that there should be at the very least reasonable care? I fully support them and their lawsuit. Next you have the people who blame the "finger pointers" for not dedicating some of their time to helping those in need at the center. Thank you I have a job, don't really want to help. That is why I pay taxes so that the place can be funded and pay the people who choose to work at the facility. Honestly don't you truly find it sickening that an individual would end up with two broken legs that go unreported for days? Now that is the perfect reason for a lawsuit. Why be upset at the party filing the lawsuit, when the people you should be upset with is your State Government and the feds. Accountability is what this lawsuit is about, without accountability government is free to conduct itself in any way it pleases. This is a simple issue of petitioning a court for redress. I'm sure that the family attempted to do one of the most basic rights as citizens... Petitioning the government for redress, guess that didn't work. "

doug holtmeier wrote on March 19, 2008 3:41 pm:
" Lets think about this, of course her disability is a tragedy. However if she can not talk, how do we know about her constant pain. Sounds like a attorney wanting some income from someone with deep pockets, ie. the State of Nebrska. How Sad! "

j83 wrote on March 19, 2008 4:13 pm:
" Grundle writes,
"I wonder if those supporting the lawsuit and criticizing the BSDC have ever volunteered their time to help take care of these people?"

There is a certain ammount of training involved in taking care of these people. Volunteering in this instance seems a little more difficult than picking up trash. It is much more efficient to let trained professionals do the work (which seem to be lacking at this center). I don't think bringing in more amateurs is the solution here. What is going to be needed is going to be more funding, not less, and a top to bottom overhaul of the entire staff. "

Bill wrote on March 19, 2008 4:51 pm:
" It's not that the staff at BSDC want to do a bad job but since the govenor continually cuts spending for those of us most in need this is the result you get. they aren't going to do anything politcally to help him so they should crawl off some place and die quietly. Why should he spend any money on hiring staff and paying them a decent wage when they can't vote for him. It's pretty simple how things got to this point "

I support the law suit... and I have done this type of work... wrote on March 19, 2008 5:12 pm:
" I think that this is sad that the broken bones were not reported right away, even if they had an inkling that someone got hurt, it should have been reported. It is a hard job, but it is a job that requires good judgement and trust "

Laura wrote on March 19, 2008 6:04 pm:
" My granddaughter cannot speak and you can tell when she is pain by her facial expressions, blood pressure and heart rate. She will never be institutionalized, or in other words, "over my dead body" "

sick and tired wrote on March 19, 2008 6:08 pm:
" Maybe you should do the job before you criticize those of us who work our tails off at BSDC everyday. I have worked at BSDC for several years and all the newspaper articles, television report,etc. can tell you whatever they want, but there are hundreds of people who work at BSDC that treat the people that live there as if they were their own family and truly care about them. Yes, there have been many problems over the last several years, but unless you work here, you have absolutely no idea what we do here and what the individuals who live here mean to most of us. No one ever sees or hears about all of the wonderful things that are done for the individuals here. "

former hhs staff wrote on March 19, 2008 7:51 pm:
" I worked in hhs for over 5 years; inspected DD providers across the state. All I can say is that I've seen conditions equal to and/or worse to what is reported at BSDC in community based settings across the state. These settings experience the same staffing issues as they are often paid less than BSDC staff. And, guess what? the needs of these people do not change no matter where they reside. Community based settings are often isolated and much can happen when you are in a home where no one but the staff can communicate what is going on. Without the evidence to substantiate a report of abuse, it is difficult to administer sanctions. I also question why state inspections didn't identify the issues at BSDC years before the feds arrived? It did always seem a conflict of interest that the state inspected a state facility. "

Amazing wrote on March 19, 2008 8:57 pm:
" Well, Mr. Ellsworth may be on to something. What the public has to realize is that the State of Nebraska, in particular the many subsets of the Health and Human Services system, only seem to respond when there is a lawsuit. ONLY when there is a significant lawsuit does this system change!! The Child Protection System is an excellent example over the years of lawsuits from private watchdog groups, foster parents, and so forth. That seems to be the only way to reach our representatives, otherwise they just don't get it!!!!!!!!!!! It's also unfortunate that no "higher ups" personally ever seem to get touched by the poor performance of this system. "

Compassion wrote on March 20, 2008 8:43 am:
" Commenters who dismissively refer to "these people" need to remember that they are our brothers, our neighbors and our friends. They didn't ask to be born with developmental disabilities, any more than someone with a mental illness asked to be given their disease. 'That which you do to the least of me, you do to me also.' -- Jesus "

Comfort wrote on March 20, 2008 9:18 am:
" Believe me, if I was unable to talk, walk and eat (not to mention mentally imcompetent), I would be mad at whoever is keeping me alive by tube feeding. I would not ever expect the state and the people to pay for all the resources that are wasted to keep me alive. I am wondering what other people think? Who has the right to decide who pays for this and who should be kept alive by artificial means? How much can our society spend when we don't have the staff to support them? If I had a family member in this situation, I would feel guilty keeping her/him institutionalized. What do you expect?

"

Smith wrote on March 20, 2008 9:31 am:
" Not only can you tell when someone is in pain, but because of our belief that everyone that takes pain medication will become an addict, if you cannot ask for it they just won't give it to you. A pain management specialist could help this person and others at BSDC but that will not happen.
It is easy to give lip service to all sides of this problematic institution. But history shows us that the only thing that really gets anything done here is to hit the institution in the pocketbook. It is easy to point out that it is someone elses job, or fault. But it comes down to would you like to live at BSDC the way it is now? "

Nina wrote on March 20, 2008 9:46 am:
" Of course there are ways to measure a person's pain, even if he/she does not talk. Lifts are not always used when they should at many places that care for the disabled, which goes right back to the short staffing, etc. problems. They have a mechanical lift; three people need it at once, you have to get all those on your charge cleaned up and fed, so what do you do? You try to lift them by yourself, because there is no one to help you, and you'll never get them all taken care of if you wait for the lone lift each time...this is reality! This patient does not live far enough from her family, in my estimation, that regular visits are not possible. There are numerous patients whose families seldom visit, then if the chance of money becomes involved, they hover. Throughout all this, it is the patient who suffers. Ask the nurse aides you know; this is truly the way it is too many times. "

BYOB wrote on March 20, 2008 9:49 am:
" Like I said earlier, take care of the disabled and elderly or start with the mass graves, looks like Beatrice opted for the graves instead. "

bubba1 wrote on March 20, 2008 9:50 am:
" Criticizing staff is the wrong tactic here. Where I do find that their was negligience on the part of the staff in this instance and I believe that the lawsuit is warranted, I also agree with 'sick and tired'. Over the past 2-3 years, BSDC has been through multiple CEO's (most of which have been temp's) and a lot of the administration has retired, resigned or have been outright fired. Each time their is a change in the adminstration, rules, policies and procedures have changed. Staff one day would do report to one person and the next day or week they may report to someone entirely different. These changes are made constantly by officials not only at the facility level but also from the state level. Their is mass confusion at the staff level (who to report to, when to report, etc.) and who is to say that this incident was not reported by staff and pushed under the rug by a supervisor who recognized the impending firestorm. But these supervisors are also overworked and pushed and pulled from an ever changing administration. From personal experience, I know that most staff form a bond with the individuals that they work with and for and I, for one, have been an outspoken advocate for these individuals during team meetings. We also must not only blame the facility and its employees for these issues. The blame needs to also be shouldered by the media and the (professional)advocates who sensationalize one or two instances to forward their own agendas. These groups make these incidents appear as a facility-wide problem as opposed to isolated instances. In the feds report (which I have read also), they do not necessarily give the numbers of an instance. Immediate jeopardy can be invoked for a single instance of an issue in that inspectors eye. These inspectors views can and does vary from inspector to inspector. One inspector doesn't like the format of a report or thinks a report is too long or has too much information. Another inspector looks at the same report and compliments it for its thoroughness and content... Who's right? The blame should also go to the state for not having any oversight of the facility. Enough ranting. Maybe this lawsuit will force the state into making the necessay changes into our flawed system. "

been there wrote on March 20, 2008 10:21 am:
" I worked with developmental folks for over 9 years. I know how hard it is and how gratifying it can be. The bottom line is, it is our problem. These folks cannot advocate for themselves and it is our job to do this for them. I happen to have worked with this brother and happen to know he is very involved with his sister's care and this is not only about her, but all of the others that live at BSDC. I know it hard to find good help and they cannot be paid enough, but we need to always be aware of what COULD happen so we can prevent this abuse. IT IS OUR PROBLEM! "

From Beatrice wrote on March 20, 2008 11:19 am:
" It is interesting to read all of these comments about a business and a community that most of you probably are not familiar with. While arguments from both sides are valid, I personally feel that the only benefit to a law-suit at this time is to hold the government accountable for the mess they've created at BSDC with their mis-management of the facility. However, I mostly feel that a law-suit at this time will only impede the process for the betterment of BSDC.

I have lived in Beatrice most of my life and the labor problem is much worse than most realize. A facility like BSDC will not survive in Beatrice any more. BSDC has been poorly managed for several years now and the facility has burned countless bridges with those of the labor pool in Beatrice that "want" to do this job. When this happens, you start to get only those that need a job versus employees who desire to help those in need.

Although I'm sure the city of Beatrice and the State of Nebraska will disagree (because of revenue and expense issues), I feel that Beatrice isn't large enough in population to have a solid workforce at BSDC anymore. It would benefit BSDC and its residents to re-locate to a larger market where the labor pool would be larger. Keep in mind that Beatrice's population is hovering around the 12,500 (this number fluctuates due to the increased constructive business in and around Beatrice) mark and has been in this area for 30+ years. Those of you who deal with employee relations can do the math and understand how quickly a business that has such incredible turn-over with employees can lose control so easily.

This unfortunate situation needs immediate closure for the benefit and safety of the residents at BSDC, the future of Beatrice and the credibility of the State and Federal Government.

I wish the residents and the over-worked, under-trained staff members the best. "

Ol' Farmer wrote on March 20, 2008 11:33 am:
" From Beatrice brings up good points. Nina cites situations I'm all too familiar with. I've even seen (not at BSDC, but at nursing homes) disabled people taken back to their rooms without eating because staff ran out of time to do it all. It takes time to hand feed someone who can't chew or swallow too well. One big issue is when you see nursing homes getting extra staff for one day, and putting on the dog because "state inspectors will be here Tuesday." Inspectors should be there on a surprise visit, including evening shift, etc. Anybody can look good for a few hours, with three days of advance notice. Nebraska state inspection is a farce, and other states do make surprise visits, to see the situation like it really is. I agree, bless the workers and residents, because they are the ones who suffer.
"

Common Sense wrote on March 20, 2008 12:08 pm:
" If the State would pay a livable wage to the employees, I'm sure they would have no problem getting people to work at this institution. This seems like a sensible solution to the problem. Typical State of Nebraska employment plan, poverty wages paid to the majority of employees, thus turnover is high and finding quality employees is impossible. "

Proud to pay taxes wrote on March 20, 2008 12:48 pm:
" Many complicated issues at play here. Nina illustrates the reality of short staffing, and I would add that the legs of a non-weight bearing adult are demineralized and break much easier than those of a normal ambulatory adult. So a hurried situation can easily result in serious injury. Hope we all, including our governor and legislature, consider such issues before pandering to the "Don't raise taxes" crowd. You truly get what you do-or don't-pay for. "

Staff responds wrote on March 20, 2008 1:49 pm:
" BSDC is not the abusive institution in which it has been portrayed. A good majority of the residents are frail due to medical conditions. Of course people which weak bones are prone to fractures.

I do not know what happened to the resident in this article. I do know that the majority of the staff on her unit (as on all units) are caring people. I have witnessed many a staff person giving loving care to the individuals on this unit. I have witnessed person persons cry when one of the residents on this unit has been ill or when one of the reseidents has died from natural causes.

BSDC is not an evil place. I wouldn't work here if it was. People need to realize that everything they read in the paper is not always true.

Yes, there is a staffinf shortage at BSDC, but who would want to work somewhere where everyone is paranoid and everyone is getting accused of abuse when most of the time there is no abuse.

Our solution now is to move out the residents who are nursing home quality out of the center. Is this really what is best for the residents-probably not, but we are being forced due to the Federal Auditors and some others who have unfairly accused us.

Don't make negative comments unless you are willing to come to BSDC and witness for yourself what this place is really like!! "

been there wrote on March 20, 2008 4:38 pm:
" I think From Beatrice might have a point. Maybe Beatrice is not a big enough place to have BSDC. I realize how costly it would be to move it, but in the long wrong there may be a more invested employee pool. I don't the answers either, I just know we need to continue to work toward making a safer and more quality of life for the folks that need our help. Sometimes I think we should just place video cameras in all facilities to help people remain accountable and hopefully avoid this type of abuse or accidents. "

money wrote on March 20, 2008 5:30 pm:
" Just because someone makes "good money" doesn't mean they will do a good job. Mistakes happen at all levels, lack of caring is not a money issue but a complacency issue.

Better inspections and regular visits and checks by parents, friends and relatives will help to make a difference. "

conflicted wrote on March 20, 2008 6:26 pm:
" This is a very helpful dialogue. I agree with From Beatrice--a larger city would have more people to draw from for employment. But there seem to be a number a factors that are going on here. I would imagine employees are not getting paid enough--who is? I would also imagine (although I don't claim to know) that the background requirements for employees is fairly low. If you only need a HS diploma (or less), don't expect a great deal of experiential competency. On the other hand, more experience does not equal more compassion. But, compassion aside, the bottom line is always money and man-power. The law-suit is well-founded, and the federal withdrawal of money is understandable. However, neither will further ensure quality care. Rather, it will disable BSDC to the point of closing it's doors. One option would be to bring in more professionals for a time to facilitate more direct supervision and training. That means needing more money, not less. In the end, I must include myself in the group who considers hiding behind our taxes as a sufficient positive contribution to the care of these individuals. This really is our problem, and a more active participation in the solution would benefit everyone involved. "

SPED Teacher wrote on March 20, 2008 9:21 pm:
" To Comfort: Just so you know, people with severe disabilities can lead meaningful lives and are able to communicate using Assistive Technology (AT). These people are NOT brain dead! I am assuming that you have never spent time with a child/adult with severe disabilities - if you had, you would probably have a lot more compassion. And you might just realize that they are able to comprehend, express emotion, and typically have a good sense of humor. I feel sorry for you and others that share your opinion. "