Now
Fair
84.0°
High
84°
Low
72°

Bill would allow note taking by jurors

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Jan 23, 2008 - 08:16:20 pm CST

Those note-taking skills you learned in school might come in handy the next time your name hits the jury duty list.

The Legislature’s Judiciary Committee heard testimony Wednesday on a bill introduced by Sen. Carroll Burling of Kenesaw that would allow jurors to take notes during the trial and use them later in deliberations.

Burling heard the proposal might be controversial. And it is.

Nebraska jurors can only take notes now if the judge and attorneys on both sides agree. Most of the time, one side or the other says no.

Burling said allowing note taking is better than relying on your memory.

It’s an issue “near and dear” to Hastings attorney Bob Parker, who asked Burling to sponsor the bill. Parker handles civil suits and criminal cases.

Defense attorneys are more apt to disallow note taking, he said, because they offer their cases to jurors after prosecutors and know people tend to remember what they heard most recently. As a defense attorney, he has taken advantage of the current law himself, saying no to note taking.

But he knows that in days of trial, with dozens of witnesses, and asking jurors to make weighty decisions, notes would be helpful, he said, and would further justice.

Members of the Nebraska Association of Trial Lawyers support the idea.

Former Lancaster County Judge Janice Gradwohl, who has studied these things, said people become much more capable jurors if they are allowed to take notes. It is routinely permitted in federal courts.

“There simply is not a good reason not to allow jurors to take notes,” she said. “If we’re going to trust jurors to make the awesome decisions they make, we should give them the tools to make fair and equitable decisions.“

But Lincoln trial attorney Jim Snowden begged to differ.

He’s not against note taking in general, he said. But one thing he wants from jurors is their undivided attention. Body language and expressions of witnesses are important to watch. Notes can be inaccurate and can unduly empower the jurors who have notes.

The Nebraska State Bar Association’s legislative committee voted to oppose the bill, said Bill Mueller, who represents the group.

The Nebraska Supreme Court, in addressing the issue, has said jurors lack the legal training to distinguish legally relevant elements of a trial and many lack note taking skills that develop with practice.

An unskilled note taker is apt to miss what is said, and other jurors could perceive note takers as being more alert and regard them as more informed.

Burling’s bill would make notes confidential to the jury and the notes would be destroyed immediately upon the return of a verdict.

Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Trust wrote on January 23, 2008 11:45 pm:
" We trust jurors to make decisions on people's lives - including in this state when to take someone's life - but we can't trust them to take notes? That seems odd to me. The idea that a bunch of hick, non-trained jurors can't be trusted with a note pad seems a bit over the top. "

What wrote on January 24, 2008 7:29 am:
" Note taking can distract from what is happening unless it is recorded, and I thought the court provided transcripts of what had been or is said at the trial to the jury anyways so why take notes, aren't we already hiring someone to do that. HMMMM "

Once again wrote on January 24, 2008 8:36 am:
" Once again you have the bar association spending uneeded money on a lobbyist to lobby against something that some or most of the lawyers in the bar would support. Why am I forced to pay the dues for this unnecessary organization again? "

Nina wrote on January 24, 2008 8:52 am:
" Makes sense - some are visual learners, some are audio learners. Silly to try to remember later exactly what was said when you could write it down while it was fresh. Many juries have spent much time arguing what was said, and this would make concurrence easier. .Sure, they might miss something while noting something else, but students have for years used this method, which is deemed the best for retention, it seems. In the name of accuracy and efficiency, go for it. "

Chef wrote on January 24, 2008 3:41 pm:
" Allowing jurors to take notes is prudent. Research on learning and memory both indicate that note taking increases reliabilty and retention of facts/information. This legislation allows Nebraska to move into the twentieth century. "

Terry wrote on January 24, 2008 7:56 pm:
" I didn't realize it was illegal for jurors to take notes! That's the stupidest thing I ever heard! Allowing those who are selected for jury duty to take notes, if they are smart enough to, is a "no brainer." When it comes to deliberation, the faintest ink is better than the most vivid memory. I'm impressed! This is about the 5th bill out of over 80 introduced this session that makes sense. Term limits must be working! Too bad there are still enough of the "old guard" aboard to prevent any of them from passing.
"

No transcripts wrote on January 24, 2008 10:29 pm:
" No, the court will not just provide transcripts on demand to jurors. In fact, it is pretty rare for jurors to see transcript. It is common for jurors to request transcript, and nearly always the judge instructs the jury that they have to rely on their memory. "

Legislature Coverage