Now
Fair
73.0°
High
82°
Low
61°

County hunt for jail construction manager back at square one

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By JEAN ORTIZ / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Jan 18, 2008 - 12:16:08 am CST

An effort to play fair in selecting a construction manager for a Lancaster County jail project has landed officials in a familiar place.

Last fall, the county requested proposals from firms interested in managing the construction but received only one submission. Sampson Construction said it could do the job for about $1 million.

The firm proposed signing a contract as a “construction manager at risk,” under which the firm would guarantee the project would come in under an agreed-upon cost once the project’s design was 60 percent along. The  contract would have increased Sampson’s fee, but would have protected the county from cost overruns.

The idea enticed commissioners and negotiations began. However, in late November, commissioners halted the process, voicing uncertainties about whether they were essentially hiring Sampson to do a different job than was initially advertised. The board agreed to re-advertise, this time asking for a construction manager at risk.

County Purchasing Agent Vince Mejer cautioned the second go could yield no additional proposals, or worse, none.

As of Wednesday’s deadline, Sampson was the only firm to bid on the job.

Because the fee is negotiable and not a fixed amount, Mejer said a dollar amount on the new proposal is not available.

The extra step likely cost the county about $1,000 in advertising costs, as well as time and some frustration, but in the end likely not much more than that, Mejer said.

Sampson, as well, lost money and time, he said.

Sampson representatives  were unavailable for comment Thursday.

With little discussion, commissioners gave Mejer clearance to begin negotiating the contract.

Also Thursday, the board  agreed to have a county employee serve as project manager for the new jail.

Bob Jarrett, a construction and maintenance manager within the Corrections Department, will serve as the County Board’s eyes and ears for the project and oversee Sampson’s work.

Commissioners are making plans to visit the Polk County, Iowa, jail to see how officials there have managed to build a 1,500-bed jail for $68 million. That project is due for completion later this year.

Consultants have estimated Lancaster County’s 776-bed jail plan could cost $94 million.

While commissioners say they aren’t ready to commit to that cost, one commissioner questioned whether they even need 776 beds.

Pointing to the push to put more offenders on house arrest and a corresponding drop in population at the downtown jail and a minimum-security site in Air Park, Commissioner Ray Stevens suggested the board needs to better evaluate what size jail is really needed.

“Perhaps we’re a little premature on some of these contracts,” he said.

As of Thursday afternoon, 56 people were hooked up to electronic monitors with another 53 waiting.

As of Thursday morning, the jail at 10th and J streets held 223. The Air Park site housed another 125. Another 56 were held in Butler, Platte and York counties.

The corrections system has a capacity of 373. Populations in recent months have gone well over 500.

Corrections Director Mike Thurber cautioned that the jail population traditionally dips around this time of year, but agreed the alternatives are working.

Consultants based the 776-bed concept on population projections 20 years into the future, he cautioned.

Board Chairman Bob Workman echoed sentiments from Commissioner Bernie Heier that he can’t support $94 million worth of new jail. But perhaps, he said,  they need to treat seriously consultants’ size estimates.

“I think we have to honor some of what these people are telling us,” he said.

Reach Jean Ortiz at 473-7107 or jortiz@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
why says wrote on January 18, 2008 4:51 am:
" why not make the facility the size of 776 beds. It seems like the crime rate in Lincoln and Lancaster county has risen in the last couple of years. Maybe we need to make the punishment harsher and do away with good time and make 20 yrs to life 20 yrs instead of 7 or 8. Make the criminals think twice about the consequences if they get caught. 776 sounds about right and then the county would not have to farm out any. wouldn't this save the county money in the long run. "

jb wrote on January 18, 2008 7:19 am:
" Does anyone out there remember voting to build a new jail. it seems to me this jail is being rammed down our throats with nothing we can do about where or how much this is going to cost the taxpayer "

Concerned Citizen wrote on January 18, 2008 8:01 am:
" Sounds to me like this County Purchasing Agent Vince Mejer is in a little over his head. I do think it is quite interesting that they can build a jail in Iowa for almost half the price and get almost twice the beds. It kind of makes you wonder if the Architectural firm that is leading this project is a little over their heads also. "

Kiddin me... wrote on January 18, 2008 8:32 am:
" Sounds to me like no one has any idea of what on earth they are doing. It is not fair to ask any general to estimate what their cost is before you even have prints drawn up. More than likely it will bite both tax payers and Sampson Construction in the end. It's like wanting to go on vacation to Italy not having any idea on what how you'll get their or where you'll be staying or even if you eat while there.



QUIT WASTING MY TAX DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

Hank wrote on January 18, 2008 8:49 am:
" We already put seven times as many people in jail, per capita, as other developed countries do, and our crime rate is about the same. Been there, done that, and massive incarceration doesn't work! Our oppressive incarceration of so many people for non-violent crimes and mental disorders cause crime, they do not deter it. We might also pay more attention to drug treatment, mental health, education, physical health, and income inequality. $94 million directed at those issues will improve our community. More prisons will further increase our social problems, which causes more crime and misery. Let's get out of this vicious law and order cycle in which we create more crimes and, by putting so many more people in jail for longer terms, we break up the social structures that prevent crime in the first place. I would urge our elected officials to close some prisons and force a shift toward more humanitarian criminal justice policies. "

MJ wrote on January 18, 2008 8:51 am:
" Here's an idea. Why not get the Sheriff from Phoenix who says he spends more money feeding his dogs than on the inmates. I'll be HE knows how to cut costs. How come other cities can build and maintain a jail and not burden the taxpayers with millions and millions of dollars? "

roger wrote on January 18, 2008 8:51 am:
" Until you see you are coming up to capacity, contract out those extra beds to the feds or others, and make money on the unused space, other counties are always looking for places to hold prisoners. "

Former County Employee wrote on January 18, 2008 9:26 am:
" When the current jail was built, I worked in the court system. They bragged at that time that they would to be able to use the parking below for expansion, as well as expanding to the parking lot south of the jail. Employees at the county/city building are probably the only employees in downtown Lincoln who still have free parking. Even if they build a new jail, how much is it going to cost taxpayers to convert the jail to usable office space? Will there be a courtroom located in the new jail? If so, will the judge and his staff travel there, or be located ther full time? Will the court files be electornically transmitted, or will a runner bring a day's worth? (Hopefully John Doe citizen won't get another day in jail because someone forgot to bring their paperwork). A courtroom was specifically located in the jail for security purposes. How much security will there be when transporting prisoners to court from the new jail? And at what cost to taxpayers? I believe there are hidden costs that most people don't even think about. "

I am not wrote on January 18, 2008 9:57 am:
" on the commission(and don;t think the people on should be} it doesn't take a rocket engineer to say,hay Iowa is only a hour away,why dont we see how they are doing it.After all they are about three years ahead of Ne.on everything else. Is it because of their state leaders? Oh thats right we dont have anyone we can call that,all we have is people on a payroll that get an A+ for wasting money with no common since.But thats right,you dont need any to be a leader in Ne. A couple of us are going to Iowa next week to spend our Ne. money for some R&R, you can probably guess where.I think we will just take an extra day and check this new jail out and let the LJS know what we found out.Oh,for once,NO cost to the taxpayer. "

George wrote on January 18, 2008 10:06 am:
" They should up the size of the jail from 776 to 781. The five commissioners should be put in this jail for ripping us off! If a 1500 bed jail costs less then build the 1500 bed. DUH! "

Tax Payer wrote on January 18, 2008 10:49 am:
" I agree with the comments posted on this website. Members of the county board are in over their heads and the public is not receiving the truth. If our tax dollars are going to fund this project we deserve the truth. I've said this before and I'm going to say it again. Build onto the existing jail. The current jail was designed for that when it was originally built. There is no need to build a new jail at SW 40th and West O Street. There is no need for all of that space. The jail just installed new security features in the last two years and now we want to build a new jail and waste the money the jail just spent. I call that fraud, waste and abuse. In addition, the old jail will have to undergo serious structural design changes to accomodate office spaces for those who move into the old jail. I have yet to see that addressed in a LJS article therefore, I'm going to assume the county board hasn't considered that. Sheriff and Chief Casady I'm sure have raised many arguments regarding the new jail site i.e., added fuel cost and travel time from the West O site to the Hall of Justice. I'm sure those two arguments were among many voiced by the two. The concerned citizens have voiced their concerns on a number of occassions and so have government officials who the city and county boards look to for information. I recommend the county board allow a LJS reporter to do an investigative report and allow them full access to all information regarding the new jail. The citizens should know how many other jails sites were considered, the location of each site, the cost of each site, and the cost to build a jail on each site. In addition the cost to build onto the existing jail. Once the article has been written and published, I recommend the county board put the jail to a vote and let the citizens recommend a site based on all of the facts. Once the public has spoken the county board can then move forward. Frankly, I say build onto existing jail utilizing the parking lot to the south. Take the parking lot on the north side of the city building and build up which should have been done originally. Charge city/county employees to park in the garage. This will help with revenue to cover the cost of the garage. Let me make this clear, I am proponet of a new jail not only for the safety of the jail staff but for the inmates too. How about it county board...listen to the people! "

Thank Goodness wrote on January 18, 2008 11:16 am:
" "Commissioners are making plans to visit the Polk County, Iowa, jail to see how officials there have managed to build a 1,500-bed jail for $68 million." It's good to hear of the possibility of some common sense prevailing!
Now listen to Casady about roisks/distance transporting prisoners. . . "

Concerned Citizen wrote on January 18, 2008 12:05 pm:
" The existing building was built for expansion. There are hallways that are dead ended to provide a walkway or hallway directly to a new expansion. Also i believe, the 2 year old security system that was mentioned in a previous post, should be expandable so that only additional security equipment would be needed in the new addition. This would save the county a significant amount of money. Sounds like the head of the jail just wanted a place to call his own. "

another wrote on January 18, 2008 1:06 pm:
" The jail is another building built for expansion yet it is too expensive to expand. Doesn't this ring a bell? Sounds like the third floor of the county city building. Why can home owners expand and remodel but our government cann't? "

Jim wrote on January 18, 2008 1:20 pm:
" Folks, the county commissioners are making plans to pay for this jail WITHOUT public approval, or allowing the public go vote on this massive tax increase comming our way. Don't beleive me..go check for youselves. "

George wrote on January 18, 2008 1:54 pm:
" Yes, I agree the commissioners should go to Iowa and to add to it the Iowa commissioners should come here. We’ll just do a trade, job rotate at least until the end of their terms in office anyway. Since when does a hotel made of concrete and barbed fencing cost more than a luxury hotel? I just got off the phone with Donald Trump and he was like wow that’s expensive. "

LINCOLNTHINKN wrote on January 19, 2008 2:20 pm:
" Typical small town commissioner thinking. Funny how the loss of $1000 seems to be an issue with the commissioners but spending excess millions of our money on an oversized prison doesn't seem to phase them. In over their heads is an understatement. "