Now
A Few Clouds
82.0°
High
82°
Low
61°

Here's our agenda for all to see

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Sunday, Jan 06, 2008 - 12:16:01 am CST

It should surprise no one that the Journal Star editorial board has an agenda. After all, we express a point of view daily on all sorts of topics, mainly those close to home, and also national and international issues that affect life in Nebraska.

This year we’ve decided to go a step further. In this editorial we are laying out our agenda for the coming year. Our objective is to be clear and direct with our readers. There should be no question about our priorities. As always, our editorials are offered with the hope that they will provoke thought and contribute to discussion.

1. Our top priority for the coming year is to promote and encourage creation of Innovation Park on the 251-acre state fairgrounds adjacent to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln city campus. We believe that the proposed research park has immense potential value to the entire state and the Capital City. For too long Nebraskans have failed to appreciate the role the university plays as a economic engine, providing research and innovation that benefit the spectrum of businesses from family farms to small businesses to high-tech employers. The proposed Innovation Park would enhance UNL’s vital economic role.

2. Lincoln is in desperate need of adequate funding for street and road construction. Meanwhile state and federal funding is drying up. Mayor Chris Beutler has suggested diverting some of the local sales revenue generated in new developments to pay for street construction. Ideas, such as one to replace the per-gallon fuel tax with a sales tax on fuel at the wholesale level, also are circulating for providing a better and more stable source of funding at the state level. The merits of the various proposals deserve more scrutiny. The need to change the status quo is clear. Lincoln has a current shortfall of more than $135 million.

3. The state of Nebraska needs to strengthen its services for developmental disabled and mentally ill residents. The state should start by finally fixing the problems at the Beatrice State Developmental Center. Nebraska Advocacy Services charged last year that the “problems and failures at the Beatrice State Developmental Center are systemic, chronic, and have persisted for years.” Regrettably, the advocacy group is right. One of its biggest problems is lack of staffing, which state officials hope to address by expanding community-based services. The same switch is under way with services the mentally ill. The state cannot allow this effort to falter.

4. Nebraska has made progress in recent years toward water use policies aimed at guaranteeing that adequate supplies of water can be sustained for future generations. For the first time state officials can — and have — declared that some river basins in Nebraska are overappropriated. For too long Nebraska has failed to adequately take into account the effect that unrestricted groundwater irrigation was having on its streams, rivers and groundwater. Demand in rural and urban areas will continue to increase. The needs of all stakeholders, including wildlife, must be properly balanced.

5. The Journal Star editorial board intends to maintain an independent, nonpartisan stance in offering candidate endorsements and other election commentary. This agenda item continues past practice, since the Journal Star historically has endorsed both Republican and Democratic candidates. The editorial board supports a pragmatic approach to government, and abhors partisan rancor and scorekeeping that interfere with problem solving. As publisher John Maher announced in a December column, the Journal Star has joined other Nebraska newspapers in a pledge to consider the tone and integrity of a candidate’s campaign in making endorsements. Nebraska voters deserve substance rather than accusatory messages and vague promises.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Herb wrote on January 6, 2008 1:26 am:
" If this is really the board agenda it is very constructive, well thought out and worth perusal. I doubt the readers will understand it nor agree as these items may cost a couple pennies. "

UNL needs and will get the land it needs wrote on January 6, 2008 2:19 am:
" UNL is a vital economic engine to not only Lincoln, but the State. And regardless of where the fair goes UNL will make great use of the land to make all Nebraskans proud 30-40-50 years from now. And yes I am a student at UNL and know how much we need more research space. This should be a no-brainer to anybody in the legislature. "The Pearl" should get alot of credit in how well UNL is doing compared to before his tenure as Chancellor. "

whatever wrote on January 6, 2008 11:42 am:
" Thank you for the "agenda". Now answer this, why the fixation on the state fair property as the only approach to a research park. How can this be the "best option" when no other option has been considered by your editorial board? And how do you convince the rest of Nebraska that this is the best option for revitalizing Nebraska when the rest of the state, all 1.1 million of us are essentially left out of the development and haven't been told in tangible ways how it will benefit the rest of us? "

Jim wrote on January 6, 2008 12:14 pm:
" I wonder how many "news" stories will cover and/or promote these five points. Ideally, these will remain on the editorial pages and not become page one topics. "

Ricky wrote on January 6, 2008 12:44 pm:
" What about the State Fair?
Can Lincoln see their Innovation Park and still keep the fair in the Star City?
I don't think so.
Let the State Fair go and build the big arena in the Haymarket!

Ricky From Omaha "

JT wrote on January 6, 2008 3:13 pm:
" I'm just happy you guys can't endorse George W. Bush for a 3rd straight time. "

Des wrote on January 6, 2008 4:22 pm:
" In regards to Number 5: ROFLMAO!!!! "

Questions wrote on January 6, 2008 6:21 pm:
" I have no major problems with the LJS positions and am glad you lay it on the line. But I wonder if we'll see the newspaper move coverage of stories and issues in a direction that reflects the newspaper's editorial view. Some newspapers prevent newsroom people from working on the editorial board for just that reason. And I and some friends have often observed that LJS news coverage seems to reflect its editorial views through its use of headlines, personalizations (who is profiled in a story), and who is put on the defensive and who is allowed to be on the offensive in questioning by reporters. For example, if someone opposes the UNL research park, and comes up with interesting viewpoints, will the LJS front page it and question the University? "

Clay wrote on January 7, 2008 12:47 am:
" In regards to number 4...Imagine how bad off your water situation in Nebraska would be if you didn't TAKE 75% of the water flowing out of the North Platte here in Wyoming. This is from snow falling in OUR state, melting and running off of OUR mountains, running through a river in OUR state. The miscreants who devised this travesty over 100 years ago obviously didn't have a clue "

over 60 wrote on January 7, 2008 1:17 pm:
" Glad to see ljs put it on the line. Now, who is going to pay for all these fine ideas? Will vision 2015 come up with the money? Is ljs willing to fork over say 5-10 million to help this come true? I think this paper should be located in NYC or LA with a population of over 2 million to be able to finance such a proposal. The taxpayers can't afford anymore develops such as this. As far as GW goes, good riddence! I guess the republicans in nebraska and lincoln can vote in another low tax person such as bush who has put the nation in about 7 trillion dollar debt. Thats exactly whats happening in lincoln. Lincoln is not and never will be a large metropolitan city get used to it. "

Research Park wrote on January 7, 2008 4:52 pm:
" It seems that this Research Park could be put any place in Lincoln, why does it need to take the State Fairgrounds. The University already has plenty of land to put this reseach facility on. The State Fair should not be moved. Why don't you as Newspaper investigate if any other states have moved their State Fair in recent history? I have attended other state Fairs and they all have historic buildings, many over 100 years old. This tells me that those States (IA, IL, MN, OH) have not moved their State Fair. You also need to look at the economics of it. It would be much less expensive to keep the Fair where it is and build Perlman's Park somewhere else. What guarantees do we have that this research facility will help the state as you say? I just can't believe that one institution (The University) can try to take over another institution (The State Fair). By the way, the State Fair is older than the University. "

Finally wrote on January 8, 2008 4:00 pm:
" Regarding priority #3, I want to laud you for your position on this matter. It is hard to take much pride in being a Nebraskan when we see our most vulnerable ctizens for all practical purposes jailed because they are disabled and then grossly maltreated while our political leadership can't seem to make it's way out of pre-1950 thinking on this issue. It's time to put politics aside and do right by people. I would ask that the JS not falter in it's commitment to supporting an agenda for change in what I believe is a critical issue for all of us. It goes to the core our values as citizens, of what kind of state we want Nebraska to be - to insure all of our citizens have the opportunity to lead "the Good Life", or to continue to shut people with differences away, out of sight, out of mind. "

Anne wrote on January 8, 2008 11:07 pm:
" Sure hope that JS provides a balance of issues even though they have stated their agenda. The issues stated have great impact on the state of Nebraska. We need to read all sides of issues presented in order to understand their impact. please present an equal reporting. "