Now
A Few Clouds
82.0°
High
82°
Low
61°

Nebraska center for disabled to serve fewer people

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Nov 29, 2007 - 07:06:43 pm CST



The Beatrice State Developmental Center, home to more than 300 Nebraskans with severe developmental disabilities, will likely see its population drop in the next few years.

State leaders said Thursday they hope to reduce the number of people at the state institution in light of continued staffing shortages and federal investigations.   

Four point program

*Assess clients to determine if they can be placed in community programs

*Provide an on-campus pilot program to help clients transition to community care

*Improve recruitment and retention by overhauling the new employee orientation program; enhance employee recognition award programs; begin a leadership development training institute

*Redirect resources through a campus-wide review of programs, moving the thrift shop into the community and assessing the Beatrice State Developmental Center hospital.

Two federal agencies investigating care at the Beatrice center consistently point to problems created by staffing shortages, said John    Wyvill, director of the Division of Developmental Disabilities within the state Department of Health and Human Services. 

“I personally decided that we needed to be proactive, to start moving on some of these issues,” said Wyvill, who took over as division director  about two months ago.

On Thursday, Wyvill outlined a plan that includes assessing  clients, moving some of them to community programs and creating a pilot program to give clients experience with community care.

“We plan to right-size, revitalize and re-evaluate BSDC’s role in the developmental disabilities community,” he said  in a prepared news release.

This is not an attempt to eliminate the institution, Wyville said in a telephone interview Thursday. But he said he didn’t know how many people might remain at the center  in future years.

“We don’t have a magic number,” he said. “The focus is to make sure we can provide the best level of care or services with the staff we have.” 

Federal surveyors have said some people at BSDC might be ready to go into community programs, nursing homes or other settings, Wyvill said.

The state will also reassess the role of the 31-bed hospital on the Beatrice campus, which now has six patients, Wyvill said.

And a thrift shop on the campus will likely be moved into Beatrice, where residents of the center will be able to work in a community setting, he said. 

The announcement is in part a response to federal inspectors’ concerns.

Three times in a little more than a year, federal inspection teams associated with the Medicaid program found serious deficiencies at the Beatrice center.

The Medicaid program pays about half  of the $50 million annual cost of operating the institution, and continued problems jeopardize that funding.

A separate Department of Justice investigation could lead to court action requiring the state to allow clients to live in the most “integrative setting possible,” Wyvill said.

Staffing shortages have been a constant theme with both inspection teams, he said.

Beatrice has 736 full- and part- time staff members and 118 on-call workers to serve its 329 clients. 

That meets “minimum staffing requirements,” Wyvill said. However, there are 100 vacancies, and Beatrice has consistent difficulties recruiting and retaining staff.     

The state wants to do more than meet the minimum, Wyvill said.   

“We are not content to meet the minimum.  We strive to be the very best we can be,” he said.  

The news that state leaders want to reduce the center’s population is encouraging given staffing problems, said Tim Shaw, executive director of the Nebraska Advocacy Services.

“(It reflects) the reality that they have a significant staffing shortage and problems in meeting the needs of residents,” Shaw said. 

That agency has scheduled a Wednesday news conference to list its concerns and recommendations for the Beatrice center.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com



$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
long time BSDC employee wrote on November 29, 2007 6:39 pm:
" I found out about this on the 6pm news, what a great way(not) that Beatrice and Lincoln administration shows their lack of respect for the staff who work at BSDC. Another slap in the face for the already overworked, overly tired, stressed out staff. "

Dee wrote on November 29, 2007 10:02 pm:
" Part of the problem is that while the pay is ok, the Insurance is sky high, not to mention that for ok pay no one wants to get beat up at work every day. Not to mention being forced to work overtime under threat of firing "

A Tired BSDC Employee wrote on November 30, 2007 2:50 am:
" The quoted staffing number (736) is a bad joke. The *direct care* staffing is much less than that, and is where we are hurting (we have been hurting for at least three or four years). We are the ones who do much of the real direct work that goes on with the developmentally disabled. Unlike Mr. Wyvill's statement, we are at a bare minimum just for direct ICF care (not the higher ICF/MR level needed for training and active treatment of our individuals). The vacancy rate for direct care workers is probably over 50%. 60 percent of our direct care staff is on-call (show up when they can) now rather than full-time experienced staffing. The state had been using extensive mandatory overtime (nearly 16 hour shifts) to *routinely* fill the staffing vacancies on all shifts in violation of the union contract (no "emergency" exists) It has been doing so for at least three solid years and the higher-level management did not take action on this when it first became a problem. I see adds in the paper for a physician for BSDC, but for the 'front line' staff? They did a while back, but not any more. The efforts being made now are simply too little too late. The working conditions have burned out a lot of the dedicated hard-working "core" people who *used* to work at BSDC. They are gone now, and pretty soon, I may have to make a similar hard choice in my life. "

How's that? wrote on November 30, 2007 8:30 am:
" I can't believe that they are that short of staff. They have a big banner out front saying that they are hiring, and when I applied, they said that they would get back to me to set up an interview. Nothing heard in over six weeks. And, if you are wondering, I have a stable work history, no criminal record, I am not on the central registry, and am willing to work any time. If that is how they hire people, I would guess that when/if they finally do get around to calling people back, many people decide to either stay at their current employer (as I did) or find a different job. "

Another long-time BSDC employee wrote on November 30, 2007 8:37 am:
" I too found out about this on the early morning news instead of at the workplace. Respect for employees? HA! Here is yet another classic example of showing staff exactly how much they're respected. What a joke. And retaining staff? How 'bout we start by treating the veteran staff with the same dignity and respect the residents receive instead of freezing for overtime, constant suspensions, getting beat-up and injured, verbal abuse and neglect from supervisors (including high level administration), and generally treated like endentured servants. We've lost and will continue to lose staff with great knowledge and experience only to hand over the love & care of our individuals to teenage on-call staff who are only there for the paychecks...which aren't that great anyway. I'm excited to see the changes & improvements John Wyvill will bring to BSDC. We can and do need to decrease our population since many of our residents can be placed in a nursing home and/or community setting, but as far as hiring & retaining staff, changes needs to be made in the way current staff are treated before successful hiring can begin. Those in southeast Nebraska & northeast Kansas who are able to work at BSDC already have or they already know exactly how bad things are, so why would they foolishly choose to work there? "

Fed up too wrote on December 4, 2007 9:04 pm:
" Perhaps we should look at WHY the staffing is so low, maybe take a hard look at the Personnel Dept? "