Now
Fair
39°
High
55°
Low
26°

In Nebraska, SCHIP helps needy children

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY LAURA J. REDOUTEY

Wednesday, Oct 03, 2007 - 12:11:44 am CDT

The State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), called Kids Connection in Nebraska, is an important and cost-effective program that provides access to health care for many children who do not qualify for Medicaid and do not have insurance because their families cannot afford it or it is not available through their parents’ employers. 

This program is funded with federal and state money, with the majority of the cost (more than 70 percent) covered by the federal government. In Nebraska, SCHIP provides coverage to children in households earning up to 185 percent of the federal poverty level, or $38,208 for a family of four. 

Congress has approved legislation to reauthorize SCHIP at a level that would potentially add 4.1 million children across the nation to this program. Last week, the House voted 265-159 to reauthorize this program.  The Senate voted 67-29 to do the same. The president has indicated he will veto this legislation. 

If he does, the House and the Senate each would have to muster two-thirds majorities to override that veto. The House is about two dozen votes short.  The Senate has enough votes to override. Sen. Ben Nelson was Nebraska’s only federal delegate to support the reauthorization of SCHIP.  We appreciate his efforts and commitment to our children.

Why is SCHIP reauthorization important? Too many children have been waiting too long for the health care they need. In 2005, Nebraska’s SCHIP (Kids Connection) and children’s Medicaid programs covered more than 44,000 children who otherwise would have been without health care. The average number of uninsured children in Nebraska over the past two years is approximately 34,000. 

Without reauthorization, the cost of this block grant program shifts to the state, and the number of uninsured children in Nebraska may increase. If the SCHIP reauthorization passed by Congress becomes law, Nebraska will have an incentive and the federal funds to expand coverage to those children who are currently eligible for the program but who are not enrolled. Close to 62 percent of Nebraska’s uninsured children live in households with incomes under 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Simply expanding eligibility to 200 percent of the federal poverty level could reduce the number of uninsured children in Nebraska by more than half.

Contrary to some reports, the SCHIP reauthorization passed by Congress does not provide any benefits to illegal immigrants.  In fact, legal immigrant children must wait five years before they are eligible. This legislation does not expand coverage to middle- and upper-income children. 

And the increase in tobacco taxes to fund this program will cause a drop in the number of smokers, not an increase as reported by some. Taxing tobacco to fund this program is not only supported by a majority of Americans, it is supported by a majority of smokers.

SCHIP provides critical health care to our low-income children. If a veto override becomes necessary, we hope that Sen. Chuck Hagel, along with Reps. Jeff Fortenberry, Lee Terry and Adrian Smith, will reconsider their positions and vote in favor of this important program.

Laura J. Redoutey is president of the Nebraska Hospital Association, a nonprofit organization that serves as a unified voice for Nebraska hospitals and health systems.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Columns > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
So we take money from the elderly wrote on October 3, 2007 10:14 am:
" to pay for the children? This will cut MediCaid!!! not a good answer here. "

Tom Hanthorn wrote on October 3, 2007 7:10 pm:
" My conversation with Fortenberry's office confirmed what the talk shows are saying: that bill is just another back door effort to add another group of kids to the federal program that the democrats are determined to put everyone on. That program does not add needy kids, it only doubles the income qualification from about 34000 to 80000 family income. There is no need to install this gimme at greater expense to the taxpayer, when these kids in this group should be paid by their wage earning parents. "

stignob wrote on October 4, 2007 7:33 am:
" Yes, Mr. Hanthorn that's correct, people making up to 80g's a year can afford health care. But to the left it's about the chilllldren or more likely about POWER! "

Wrong wrote on October 4, 2007 8:38 am:
" This program is paid for through an increase in tobacco taxes - not cutting any program for seniors. That was true of the House version of the bill, but that idea was scrapped. Also, states set eligibility levels and the Bush administration must sign off on any increase in those levels above 200% of the poverty level. So the idea that people making 80,000 would qualify is laughable. Fortenberry's office was misleading you. Most of the kids covered are well below $45,000. "

Dave wrote on October 4, 2007 8:58 am:
" Is it true that its covers children up to 25 years old? "

to Dave wrote on October 4, 2007 9:32 am:
" No that is not true either. the cut off is either 18 or 19. Republican Chuck Grassley was an adament supporter of this bill. I would suggest checking his website where he has news releases debunking all the lies about this legislation. "

willyjsimmons wrote on October 4, 2007 10:06 am:
" 'My conversation with Fortenberry's' That was your first mistake. 'it only doubles the income qualification from about 34000 to 80000 family income.' No wonder the United States is in so much debt. Apparently, fiscal conservatives have poor math skills in addition to having an inability to tell the truth. "Is it true that its covers children up to 25 years old?" You mean, you haven't bothered to read the legislation for yourself? The old program did, this new bill phases the coverage out. Go to senate.gov, search for H.R. 976. "

Dave wrote on October 4, 2007 10:18 am:
" Here's a interesting provision "The last controversial SCHIP provision relates to translation services at health care facilities. The SCHIP Reauthorization Bill authorizes funding for 75 percent of the costs to the states for translation services provided to a child or to the parents of a child who receives benefits under either SCHIP or Medicaid." "

yes Dave wrote on October 4, 2007 12:54 pm:
" complicated medial jargon is sometimes best delivered in one's native language. but illegal immigrants still can't get covered. "

Ian wrote on November 20, 2007 12:11 am:
" Awesome! Gosh, it sure sucks to make too much for medicaid but not enough for health insurance. Tell me to suck it up, please. Tell me to do that. Then come see what this out of state college graduate who is paying rent, car insurance, state and local taxes, renters insurance, and school loans makes a week! Hey, guess who won't be settling down here? Have fun Nebraska...talk about "liberal this and liberal that" all you want...but at the end of the day, I'm moving to a state that can support it's own because it knows that one day, I'll be paying higher taxes - because I had the support of the state to make it to the higher tax bracket. Gosh, $24,000 a year and I can't afford health insurance, yet make too much to get help from the state? Have fun while your state dies. I wish I could settle down here. "