Now
Fair
71.0°
High
87°
Low
64°

Council approves assisted-living center, with changes

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 - 11:38:08 am CDT

It took several hours, but in the end the City Council went for the closest thing to a compromise, approving a site design for an assisted living center that neighbors liked better than the company’s preferred design.

Center opponents still weren’t happy with the center size or the traffic that will be coming to their neighborhood, and AgeMark Corp. won’t get to build what it prefers.

Neighbors have been concerned about the center AgeMark wants to build on the corner of 25th Street and Old Cheney Road. The one-story, 19,000-square-foot building would house up to 33 people with Alzheimer’s disease.

Neighbors are worried about the noise, parking and traffic it will generate. They appealed the planning commission’s approval of a special permit allowing the facility.

In the end, the council approved a design that will situate the living center squarely on the property, rather than diagonally, as AgeMark had proposed. Neighbors felt the square design was better because it moved the building back farther from the street and looked more residential.

AgeMark officials felt the diagonal layout was more attractive, interesting and left more green space. The square design will have more concrete but fewer parking spots.

The council also specified that any trucks with three or more axles can only service the building on weekdays between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. and must use the 25th and Old Cheney entrance.

But sparks flew before a compromise was reached, with AgeMark and neighbors trading allegations over potential litigation,  because the neighborhood’s protective covenants only allow single family homes.

AgeMark Marketing Director Marcia Houchin said during one of the many meetings held with neighbors, one neighbor complained about not wanting to see “walking deceased people” in their neighborhood.

But the city’s zoning ordinance only allows assisted living facilities to be built in residential districts  with a special permit. AgeMark’s attorney, Mark Hunzeker, had stern words for neighbors who thought they could rebuff the facility through neighborhood covenants, saying the Fair Housing Act trumps those covenants.

“The city has recently had a rather expensive lesson on that act,” he said, referring to a federal judge’s May ruling that the city violated the federal law by refusing a group home provider’s zoning request. The company was awarded more than $300,000 in damages.

AgeMark came up with the diagonal design but took it off the table after neighbors refused the company’s request to sign a waiver of the covenants to erase the possibility the company would be sued “no matter how slight or meritless,” Hunzeker said.

William Gewain, who lives in the neighborhood, said the neighbors felt they were being threatened and the waiver was “nothing more than bullying of the neighborhood.“

Renee Prader Bateman was one neighbor who didn’t think AgeMark was being neighborly by yanking the compromise “because we won’t sign our rights away.” She said she didn’t oppose the facility but thought it was too big.

The compromise would still allow AgeMark to build a large building, just at a different angle, neighbors argued.

But Hunzeker said AgeMark had been threatened with a lawsuit, or the enforcement of covenants, and wanted assurance that the redesigned site would pass muster with the whole neighborhood.

“We’re not the ones here that are threatening litigation,” he said. “We’re not afraid of it, we’ve said that before. We think there is potential liability under the Fair Housing Act by those who are threatening it against us.”

While neighbors worried about increased traffic, Hunzeker said the city has received no complaints about such issues at other assisted living centers.

After several hours of testimony and debate, the council took a 15-minute break and asked the two sides to try to come to an agreement in the hallway. After the break, the council voted unanimously to approve the center with the square design.

In other business, the City Council heard three proposals that it will vote on during its next meeting:

* Annexation of about 40 acres of land near 90th Street and Leighton Avenue and a zoning change to allow 133 townhomes for a development called Cedar Cove Townhomes.

* Change the zoning to commercial on about six acres on the northwest corner of 84th Street and Old Cheney Road. The City Council approved the zoning change in 2000, but former Mayor Don Wesely vetoed it. The council approved commercial zoning for 22,000 square feet of the site in 2005, but Realty Trust officials said the restrictions made it difficult to market the site and want the zoning changed for the whole site so banks, restaurants or offices could be built. The planning commission and planning department recommended against the zoning change out of concern about traffic in and out of the area.

* Legally define restaurants in the city’s zoning code and make other code changes that would make it easier for restaurants to get alcohol licenses. Restaurants would be defined as any business that derives at least 60 percent of its gross sales from food and nonalcoholic beverages.

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
NL wrote on September 11, 2007 7:13 am:
" Wow, I'm disgusted at the sentence "one neighbor complained about not wanting to see “walking deceased people” in their neighborhood". How selfish of them and how crude. "

Sarah wrote on September 11, 2007 8:16 am:
" "walking deceased people"? I think this neighbor needs to learn a little about Alzheimers... These people are far from dead, most very lively, just slipping back in time. Learn a little before you make stupid comments.I'd rather have alzheimers then the ugly "condo's" on grainger parkway from 40th to McBride! "

Mikah wrote on September 11, 2007 8:50 am:
" I hope none of these neighbors ever come down with Alheimer's! "Walking dead." Nice... "

Mary wrote on September 11, 2007 9:50 am:
" Traffic concerns? This is the corner of 27th and Old Cheney. Perhaps the neighbors need to take another look at where they are living and quit being so crude and narrow minded. "

Realist wrote on September 11, 2007 10:00 am:
" Please. The AgeMark Marketing Director said the statement was made, it's not a direct quote. I would bet there's more to it then that. For all we know that statment was never made at all, or was totally taken out of context. You people need to freshen up on your reading skills. "

daughter of alzheimer patient wrote on September 11, 2007 12:52 pm:
" Maybe "walking deceased people" was not the exact statement made, but I remember the last article about this very location & it was very clear from the neighborhood that they did not want a facility of any kind placed in "their neighborhood". Regardless of how they put it in their opposition, they are descriminating against people who have no control over how their lives are. I hope none of the neighbors ever have a loved one with alzheimers or themselves end up with it. It is a totally heart wrenching disease that I don't wish upon anyone. I am glad to see that there is a facility being built. Shame on that neighborhood! "

Grandson of an Alzheimers sufferer... aka Realist wrote on September 11, 2007 4:04 pm:
" Discriminating because they don't want a business in their front yard? I suppose the salt creek people were "discriminating" against baseball players because they didn't want Saltdogs Field built in their neighborhood? Or how about all the complainers about a new drag strip... are they "discriminating" against people with mullets? And the those who fought against a new motorcycle track being built... they were "discriminating" against people who live an X-treme lifestyle. Or, most importantly, the people out on east O were "discriminating" against residents who want to save money and find bargains at Wal-Mart. In fact, some of you were probably the first ones in line complaining about the new Wal-Mart! Get a life. NOBODY wants a business built in their neighborhood. Nobody. And if you believe otherwise, you're a hypocrite. "

Why wrote on September 11, 2007 4:48 pm:
" If the statement was never made about 'walking deceased people' then why is no one from that neighborhood posting a comment letting everyone know that the statement is false. It may not have been in those exact words, but I bet it was close. Most of that area has been against any building because they want that land to stay green. All they had to do was buy the property then it would have stayed. Would they have been as outraged if a church had been built or do they just have a problem with people that have an illness. I hope none of these neighbors ever has a loved one who gets this horrible disease because they'll have to send them somewhere else to get the care they need. "

JACKET wrote on September 12, 2007 7:35 am:
" UNREAL!! I cannot believe that the people in that neighborhood can be so selfish. People that have it all, and are unwilling to give a little to the people that once walked in thier shoes. This may be a business, but it will be a home to those. I would much rather see them being on the outskirts of town, than say, on O street. If they were to wander off, it would be safer for them. People, dont you realize that, even though a business, it will be a home to many. And even though you will see nursing staff, you will also see families coming to see loved ones. Assisted living is far from walking dead people. These are people who still live, that need an extra hand in daily living, like meals, or cleaning. Just like some of you that can afford to hire someone to cook, or clean. These people, need it. Unlike you who just dont want to do it. "

Realist wrote on September 12, 2007 8:44 am:
" The disease has NOTHING to do with this. The neighborhood simply doesn't want a business there. Neither would YOU! "

Hattie wrote on September 14, 2007 11:00 pm:
" How sad that one person's (possible) comment can tarnish an entire neighborhood of good people. They are trying to protect their rights as well. Do any of you have protective covenants? Agemark, there is other land in Lincoln NOT in the middle of an established neighborhood. I support this neighborhoods efforts 100%. I hope they take further legal action. Mr. "Big Time Lawyer" is blowing smoke and doing best what law school taught him.....intimidating good people to gain financial wealth. Shame on you! Hope you can sleep at night! "