Union wins wage dispute
BY NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star
More than 9,000 state workers should get better raises than offered by Gov. Dave Heineman’s administration, the state’s Commission of Industrial Relations ruled Tuesday.
The commission sided with the union on the wages for the eight state employee bargaining units that had wage contract disputes.
Under the ruling, state workers would get up to 7.5 percent raises each of the next two years, if their wages are lower than salaries for comparable jobs in other states.
In addition, the employees would get 2.5 percent raises on their hiring anniversary date each year.
The commission upheld a decision by a special master, who found the state’s original offer of 2.5 percent raises each year did nothing to bring underpaid employees up to comparable wages with other states.
The state’s offer provided equal pay treatment for each employee but did not move state workers toward comparability, the standard set in state law, the ruling said.
That ruling will stand unless the state decides to appeal it to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
Tuesday morning, the state’s chief negotiator, Bill Wood, said he hadn’t had time to read the decision and had no comment.
All employees not covered by the union received a 3 percent raise at the beginning of the state’s fiscal year, July 1. Workers in the eight bargaining units covered by the wage dispute will get the raises, plus 7 percent interest, when the issue is finally settled, said Mike Marvin, executive director of NAPE/AFSCME Local 61.
The state’s labor negotiation process provides a specific appeal process when the union and administration can’t agree.
The first step is a decision by a special master, who chooses between the final offers. That can be appealed to the commission and then to the state Court of Appeals and Supreme Court.
The state had originally offered a flat 2.5 percent increase each year during the negotiation phase. The administration increased its offer, to adjustments providing as much a 5 percent a year increases, after the union appealed the special master ruling to the commission.
The union rejected those later offers because they provided employees less than they would receive under the special master ruling.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit





Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.