Now
Overcast
76.0°
High
87°
Low
68°

Letters, 8/13: Bullish bias

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Monday, Aug 13, 2007 - 12:07:33 am CDT

Despite the many letters to the editor from residents outraged at the Journal Star’s recent coverage of the young woman who allegedly left her newborn at the hospital, it is obvious that your paper continues to show a double standard, and dare I say, an obvious bias against women. 

This was most recently evident in your front-page article on Aug. 2, “Group’s $8 million lawsuit is no bull,” about Legacy Plus, a champion bull whose high-quality semen was so valuable that the defendants allegedly faked his death so they wouldn’t have to share the pearls that his Rocky Mountain Oysters provided.

Why did we not see a grainy high school yearbook photograph of Legacy Plus?  What about mentioning all the child support payments that Legacy Plus has allegedly avoided by changing his name? (Even movie star Eddie Murphy has been upbraided for his alleged refusal to pay child support for baby Spice-Murphy!) 

What sort of investigative reporting is just listing a host of “no comments” from involved parties?  Surely there has been DNA testing on the many calves that have been born — out of wedlock — from all the model-actress-bovines that this bull has partied with? Or is it just your double standard — it’s not news until a frightened young ruminant leaves one of Legacy Plus’ calves at an animal hospital and sneaks out?! Is that the cow-tipping point?

I do not know if this is city-wide sexism that permeates the capital given the recent delirium exhibited by the district judge in removing words like “rape” from a rape trial, or the outrage voiced by the good old boys of engineering who don’t want to compete for the lucrative consulting fees on city jobs with women and minority-owned businesses, but if it is not, please consider your paper’s bias against females of all species and steer it to a place of equality.

Andrew Borakove, Lincoln

Agency on Aging needed

This comment will be too little, too late. But, you see, I am aging, and that has slowed me down considerably.

No one who has not experienced the process called “aging” can imagine what it can be like. America loves youth, beauty, riches.

America denies that “aging” is a concern to anyone. But it is. It shows up in the tiny details of the day: 10 minutes to tie a shoe; dropped dishes and un-openable jars (even with grips!); misread words and time lost trying to make sense of what is half-seen and half-heard.

And of course, try as we may have, everyone is not rich. We carefully pay for medical visits, eyeglasses, hearing aids, canes, pills and such needs, then budget the rest for “living.”

Living can become a depressant, or due to meeting all bills and still having food and shelter, living can be a challenge met.

Then comes social life. No one wants to hear the stories we have told for years, few have patience with our slowed gait, seldom does the technology generation slow down for us.

But there is one oasis in this older desert: the Lincoln Area Agency on Aging!

A place where they explain (patiently!) the ins and outs of Medicare Part D; where a dietician can elaborate on the prescribed diet; where new needs can be referred to the proper helper; and where volunteers help people with various and sundry occasional needs. (That last one has the example of a ride to a store to purchase a microwave that I simply could not bring home by bus on a walker).

We need LAAA. Prevention of declines in health by use of Lifetime Health and related services is not a frill but a necessity.

Creative ways to finance the program should be found. Small membership fees could be introduced, but must be kept within range of fixed-income seniors.

Buddy support programs could be tried: If someone can easily pay a small membership fee, perhaps they would adopt a buddy who cannot afford it. Fundraisers could be tried; perhaps it is time for a Walk for Seniors.

Cutting is not the answer, creative financing is.

Nancy Chandler, Lincoln

Toe comment an insult

Every once in a while, a politician will say something that truly reveals his/her character (or lack thereof).

In response to testimony opposing cuts in programs for seniors, Councilwoman Robin Eschliman asked: “Does the government owe it to the citizens to raise property taxes to cut toenails?” (LJS, Aug. 7).  Cute.

By trivializing the legitimate concerns of seniors, Eschliman tells us all we need to know about her character. But perhaps she’s just ignorant (the kindest explanation for her offensive question) and doesn’t know that those of us who have been on the planet a few decades longer than Eschliman are also citizens.

We also pay taxes, and we began paying long before she was only a gleam in her father’s eye. We are not stupid, or greedy, or selfish, or, worst of all, liberal. We understand that true conservatives are wise investors, not only in things, but in people. And we know that smart politicians do not insult large voting segments of the population.

Of course, we geezers sometimes have trouble remembering things (preoccupied as we are with our toes and other extremities). To compensate, we might use little tricks to jog our failing memories.

To ensure that we remember Eschliman’s insult come election time, I suggest we simply dub her “Ms. Toenail.”  And then let’s make sure she gets clipped.

Charles Thiessen, Lincoln

Where’s the efficiency?

They want to raise gasoline taxes again. I wish the city, county and state governments would listen to people and what they have to say.

Why doesn’t the government take a look at all the spending they are doing for all of the pork projects?

In my opinion, if they stop spending money on all the projects to make people feel good, we could save a lot of money.

If it is not a necessity, then we don’t need it.

Let’s cut spending. All government vehicles: Mandate them to 55 mph. I can’t afford to hardly buy gas for my vehicle, so why should I let them drive fast on my tax dollar?

We can all work together on this, but government needs to make the first move.

Stop spending my money. Increase your efficiency, eliminate duplicate jobs, hold yourself to a fixed budget.

I have had to hold myself to a budget just to afford gas to drive to work (by the way, the Lincoln transit system is not an option).

Ron Glinsmann, Lincoln

Quilt Center welcomed

On July 30 the Lincoln Journal Star featured a timely article about the International Quilt Study Center building under construction in Lincoln and a comment by University of Nebraska Regent Randy Ferlic that the funds could have been spent in better ways.

The Nebraska State Quilt Guild, one of the prime movers in the idea of the building, had just finished its annual quilting weekend in Omaha. This guild has members not only from Nebraska and the neighboring states, but others from New Hampshire to California, 20 states in all. The meeting features local (statewide) teachers and lecturers as well as nationally known ones from all over the United States, and they almost always want to come back. Researchers from all over the world come to the center to study the quilts there, too.

Since the building is privately funded, I wonder just how much of the $12 million or so for it would go to some other item. It may not bring in the monies spent in just one weekend for football in Lincoln — and as an OU graduate I have some idea of the bonanza that can be — but it adds to the reputation of the state. I know several states that would just love to have it in their area. 

Frances Murray, Altamonte Springs, Fla.

Speed limit not the issue

Eleven days, three accidents involving large trucks on I-80. Now the state is going into a reactive mode. Lower the speed limit. Why would this work? The speed limit was not adhered to before.

Just put a trooper on the site of the construction and issue some tickets. Guarantee this will slow them down.

George Clasey, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Trucker wrote on August 13, 2007 6:27 am:
" Lower speed limits? Wait as I driver my governed 65mph truck as a 4 wheeler flys by at warp drive, driver on his/her cell phone, latte cup in hand, and I am considered the problem. And the last minute construction lane weaver, who will run up at speed to the last possible moment, and expect everyone else to let them merge, for he/she is way more important than those who have formed the waiting line in the open lane. You will be surprised what we can see from up here, and what we have to deal with to make sure that your products are at the stores on time. People should more fear the 4 wheeler out there than the trucker, and accident national accident rates prove it. "

Wm. Morris wrote on August 13, 2007 6:36 am:
" Bravo Charles! I whole-heartedly agree with clipping Ms. Toenail. "

Big Chief wrote on August 13, 2007 8:27 am:
" Great letter Andrew Borakovi. . . I laughed so hard my ribs hurt plus you made a good point. "

James wrote on August 13, 2007 8:47 am:
" If people cannot afford a few extra dollars to fill up their tanks, then they need to reprioritize their finances. That is all it is...a few bucks. But it is easy to complain about it. "

Govt Vehicles wrote on August 13, 2007 8:54 am:
" Mr. Glinsmann: Government vehicles are to follow the speed limit. And for those rare times my government job takes me to Omaha, it can be a harrowing drive. Nobody else wants to do the speed limit, it seems, and a number of times I've been tailgated or cut off with a two inch margin. If we were mandated to 55, people would go even more crazy. Think about any time you're stuck behind a slower vehicle in a higher speed limit area. "

Whody wrote on August 13, 2007 9:20 am:
" Comment on Charles Thiessen's letter: This is basically a very good letter and I agree with it for the most part. But why does he say "worst of all, liberal?" Liberals believe that one of the roles of government is to help people. Isn't he criticizing Eschliman for denying seniors government services? If he wants government services how can he slander the people who support his wishes? "

Jason wrote on August 13, 2007 9:24 am:
" George - they are doing exactly what you said to do. Friday they had 4 troopers on the construction site and were pulling people over. Today there was 2. I drive it every day and people are slowing down. "

Ryan wrote on August 13, 2007 10:11 am:
" Yeah, I'm kinda missingthe liberal/conservative part of the spending argument. Typically, liberals want to spend money on services while conservatives want the users to pay for those services themselves. Lay blame where it belongs. "

Kim wrote on August 13, 2007 10:33 am:
" Its not just a few dollars and yes many people are having trouble affording it. I myself have had to make cuts in our families budget to afford gas to go to work. Filling my tank has doubled in cost and that is hard to do when you live pay check to pay check. We have a right to complain and there is only so much reprioritizing one can do! "

Wouldn't it cost more... wrote on August 13, 2007 10:51 am:
" ...to pay a worker to drive longer than it would save driving slower? Seems like a trip to Omaha wouldn't only save a little more than $1 in gas, but a worker getting a minimum of $10 an hour would be paid close to $2 more for the trip. That's figuring a 30 percent gas saving... "

JMK wrote on August 13, 2007 11:44 am:
" A few bucks? There are a lot of people stretched so far now that a few bucks is a big deal. Not everyone has the luxury of a few spare dollars for the extra gas tax. If the government would spend responibly, they would not need that extra few bucks. Besides, that is a few bucks every time you fill the tank. If it is only 1 time per week, thats well over 100 bucks a year. And as I said, a lot of people just can't aford that. So..james if you feel it isn't that big of a deal, how about you visit a gas station for an hour or so every evening and pitch in a few bucks to every driver filling up. After all, it only a few bucks. "

Zoomie wrote on August 13, 2007 11:51 am:
" Yes, the basic premise has changed. Liberals may still be the "tax and spend" party, but at least they raise taxes to pay for what they spend! The GOP has, in the last 6-10 years, become the "tax and charge" party, spending as much (or more) than liberals but just increasing the National Debt (essentially doubled in the last 5 years) and borrowing more and more from China (last week's housing bubble news mentioned repeatedly that China now holds over $1 TRILLION dollars of U.S. debt)! "

Worst of all, Liberal wrote on August 13, 2007 11:53 am:
" Yes Charles, preventative medicine paid for by a government through taxation - that is the liberal philosophy, and an absolute no no to conservatives. Conservatives believe in letting the free market forces and competition drive the issue - which results in huge profits for insurance companies and HMO's, drugs that are 10x higher than in Canada, and very little focus on preventative care - which doesn't pay as well as those knee replacements and open heart surgery. You are sounding very liberal Charles. "

SB wrote on August 13, 2007 12:32 pm:
" Ah yes, the “blame someone else on MY oil/energy addiction” fanatics are out again. What would those gas tax projects be that “make people feel good” – roads? Okay, lets stop road construction! Then you won’t have to fill up your tank since there’s no roads to drive on. America still has the cheapest ‘free market’ gas prices in the world! We have soldiers dying to secure our oil addiction and you are complaining about 100 dollars a year extra? Here’s an idea – don’t buy that soda or latte, cigarette, 12 pack, ask a coworker to carpool, turn up your thermostat…pick one and there’s your 100 dollars. Or is just complaining more convenient? -and who waits for GOVERNMENT to make the first move? "

sleeps with monsters wrote on August 13, 2007 1:11 pm:
" Bravo, Andrew!! What a bullishly on- the- mark missive. It's great to realize there are a few equality-minded males around even in places like Lincoln, where they seem to want to keep anyone with their brains in gear stupidly subjugated. "

MSK wrote on August 13, 2007 2:08 pm:
" If the Journal Star had any wisdom they would hire Andrew as a columnist. In addition to his genuine insight, it was almost lyrical reading about bull sperm. Who woulda' guessed? "

JP wrote on August 13, 2007 3:52 pm:
" Good article Nancy. Yes we already know Eschliman's impudent responses. What an interesting council person! I didn't vote for her but apparently all her elderly hating friends did! It will come back to her, cause she will get old. I've seen it happen too many times. I guess we pay our property taxes and it ALL HERS to do with for her friends. More of the reason Lincoln keeps going down the drain. There are places in the country that older seniors are cared about. I get letters every little bit trying to get me to go back to my former city. Unfortunately I'm stuck here for awhile!! "

John E. Smokes wrote on August 13, 2007 9:01 pm:
" Great letter Charles - - the "liberal" comment that seems to have caused so much confusion is simply Charles insinuating that "liberals" are held in contempt by Ms. Eschliman, an insinuation that seems appropriate to me. When it comes to labels, how anyone could run around proclaiming themselves to be conservative, after the string of disasters so called "conservatives" have brought this country, state, county, and city over the past several years, seems awfully humorous to me. What disasters? How about the War in Iraq instead of a focus on Bin Laden, Gov Heinaman giving a hand out to the well heeled by cutting estate taxes for the 100 or so wealthiest families in Nebraska, and squeezing the poor by cutting health care for thousands of low income families, the County Board, and City Council, dominated by Republicans, cutting the women's commission, Repbulican spearhead LIBA supporting the dreadful Initiative 423, which was mauled by voters at 74 to 26 percent clip here in Lancaster County, and the list goes on and on and on.....and we still have these politicians proudly calling themselves conservatives. Stop it folks, its demeaning to the both of us. "