Now
Partly Cloudy
28°
High
32°
Low
28°

Over neighborhood objections, Planners OK Alzheimer’s facility

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By MATT OLBERDING / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Aug 02, 2007 - 12:05:47 am CDT

Neighbors opposed to a proposed Alzheimer’s care facility near 27th and Old Cheney are vowing to take their fight to the Lincoln City Council after the city-county Planning Commission approved the plan Wednesday.

Commissioners voted 8-0 to grant a special permit to allow Agemark Corp. to build a 19,000-square-foot assisted-living center that would house up to 33 Alzheimer’s patients on a 1.8-acre strip of land at about 25th and Old Cheney.

Since Agemark sought a special permit and not a zoning change, that would have been the final word on the issue, but several neighbors said they will appeal the decision to the City Council.

Neighbors who testified Wednesday expressed concerns about increased traffic and noise  from deliveries and emergency vehicles, as well as concerns the center does not belong on land surrounded by single-family homes.

William Gewain, who has lived in the area for 17 years, said he has nothing against an elder care facility.

Gewain said his own mother suffers from dementia and lives at Savannah Pines at 40th and Pine Lake Road.

“But this is just not the right location,” he said.

Mark Hunzeker, an attorney representing Agemark, disputed that.

“We are required to be in a residential zoning district, that’s why we are here,” he said.

City ordinance requires nursing homes and assisted living facilities to locate in residential areas.

Though some neighbors argued the center would be like a hotel with lots of visitors and deliveries, an Agemark official said that’s not the case.

Martin Hug, the company’s chief operating officer, said similar facilities the company operates in Grand Island and Davenport, Iowa, average only six visitors a day, 3-5 deliveries a week and one ambulance call a month.

While the facility would employ 25-30 full- and part-time workers, no more than nine would be on duty at once.

“We are a business, we understand that,” Hug said. “But first and foremost we are a home.”

Agemark has a deal to buy the land from Windstream Corp. for $400,000. Hug said once Agemark has the needed approvals, construction would take about a year.

The land has been vacant for more than 30 years and some neighbors said they have grown used to that — and would like to see it stay that way.

“It has become a neighborhood park,” said Vicki Shank.

Shank said that attracted her and her husband to the area when they bought their home in 1991.

But if the land isn’t going to stay vacant, homes would be more appropriate, she said.

Several Planning Commissioners seemed sympathetic to the neighbors’ concerns but, in the end, decided there was no logical reason to deny a special permit for the project since it meets all the conditions of the permit.

“It’s hard to turn down a use that is properly applying” under the zoning code, said Commission Chairman Jon Carlson.

Reach Matt Olberding at 473-2647 or molberding@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Nate wrote on August 2, 2007 2:42 am:
" The rich continue with their NIMBY philosophy. Why build it in the rich part of town when it could be built in the slums and only impact people who aren't important? I vote for building the darn thing at 27th and Sheridan! "

Hunzeker Again wrote on August 2, 2007 4:11 am:
" No surprise, Hunzeker often pops up like a whack-a-mole. If this will present no problems in a residential neighborhood, then why not build it in Cripple Creek subdivision, right behind Hunzeker's McMansion? There's a huge piece of undevelopd property right just ripe for this facility. "

Give Me a Break wrote on August 2, 2007 7:45 am:
" If you want it to be a "neighborhood park", then cough up $400K and make Windstream an offer to buy it. "

Dick wrote on August 2, 2007 7:46 am:
" You knew when you bought the home that anything could go there and it wouldn't always be open space. No one wants anything near them. Whiners. I have a lot across the street from my house that is vacant and I would gladly have that built across the street. "

AD - discrimination wrote on August 2, 2007 8:14 am:
" Lincoln residents do NOT want disabled group homes in their neighborhoods and now they don't want elderly with special needs in their neighborhoods either....how disgraceful!! Just because you live near an empty lot doesn't mean it will forever remain and empty lot UNLESS you purchase it. "

Erin wrote on August 2, 2007 8:24 am:
" Reading about the reactions from some of the residents of this neighbohood make me cry. Are you all serious? "

Comm UnSense wrote on August 2, 2007 9:28 am:
" They'd rather have a vacant lot than a home for the elderly? Nice neighborhood. "

my wish wrote on August 2, 2007 9:30 am:
" I hope all of you never have to see someone you love suffer through this conditition. If someone is affected, I hope they would have a place in a nice neighborhood they could go to and be safe. Instead you want to cast them out. I hope that when you read this article you realize how insensitive you sound and think a little harder about what you're trying to do. Heaven forbid you be incinvenienced by having to wait for one extra car when you turn off your street. Think of what the spouses of these potential residents have to deal with every day just to keep them safe. I would have loved my grandma to have had a nice safe place to live instead of my grandpa spending his last years taking care of her like she was a child. I hope you enjoy your empty grass lot. "

SB wrote on August 2, 2007 9:39 am:
" Hey, we don’t need these URBAN elderly keeping the kids up all night with their loud television sets and Meals on Wheels delivery trucks at all times of the early afternoon! Think about the sanctity of the American Neighborhood! Why can’t they build this out by the Interstate where it belongs? "

What!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wrote on August 2, 2007 9:42 am:
" What is wrong with some of you people. You complain about the cost of everything but when something can bring some jobs to your area, You complain but it is ok if it happens in some other neighborhood. No wonder the city is hard pressed for revenue. Shouldn't there be some tax dollars from it. How about raising the taxes of everyone in that immediate neighborhood to make the difference up. then we have the revenue and they can have there empty space or maybe they could purchase the land from windstream. people get a clue. sure hope that none of you ever get alzheimers and need a place to stay that is close by. "

alf wrote on August 2, 2007 9:45 am:
" what selfish people - obviously they have never had a family member afflicted with Alzheimers. "

Barbara wrote on August 2, 2007 9:50 am:
" So, the NIMBY bigots are out in force. The lot is vacant, and has been for years. You're *lucky* that the developer isn't putting in 9-10 units of housing. Don't these neighbors realize that the developer could have done something MUCH more disruptive and intensive (without even consulting them), and this is the least intensive use of the land? They should count their lucky stars. However, the neighbors aren't really worried about increased traffic - the real problems they have with this are: 1) they lose their 8,000 sf "front yard" that someone else maintains; 2) they might actually *see* the old, confused patients; 3) they think their 300K property values might be affected. I don't often agree with what Hunzeker and Katt do, but in this case, they are completely right - they are in compliance with city code, and the development is good for the community as well as the economy. "

Doug wrote on August 2, 2007 10:49 am:
" What a moranic discussion. This is Amerioca and the Government is supposed to stomp all over you in the name of progress but who exactly is being stomped on? Windstream owns this property and they can sell it if they wish and they will when the proper permits are in place. Urbanites have no concept of land property ownership and you ruralites have just been annexed to their way of thinking. Sell and move to the sandhills and you can be my new neighbor. "

lallen wrote on August 2, 2007 10:53 am:
" I wish I could by it and build a large dog kenneling facility. "

Mindless Robot wrote on August 2, 2007 11:19 am:
" How terrible! That space could be used for a Baby Gap, Bennigans or Banana Republic! "

Wrong approach wrote on August 2, 2007 11:33 am:
" When any company plans to put up a building no matter what the use; the homeowners living around the affected area always complain. Some complaints may seem valid and some not. More often than not, the homeowners lose the battle with the end result being that of a new building being put up. Once the homeowners know the building is going up, they walk away. Try taking a proactive approach and walk into the city council meeting already assuming the building is going up (cause it is) and demand to work with the designers and have some imput into this. This will result in buildings blending into their surroundings. I know how a building would look if the homeowners got together to build and I know how it would look if some other entity built it. If you don't do this, you may very well have another T+ on the corner. If Lincoln wants a change to ensure aesthetically pleasing buildings, the people who live in the community need to demand thier input if it affects them. Plain and simple. Some drawing firms who care about this topic would not hurt either. "

Jeepers wrote on August 2, 2007 11:45 am:
" It's ok for the elderly to live at 40th & Pine Lake but not 27 & Cheeny? What's the difference? As for deliveries and visitors, what about the Knolls a couple of blocks further west? Maybe we should close that place because of all the extra traffic they cause. "

Not in the south wrote on August 2, 2007 12:22 pm:
" Nate: Who are you to call south Lincoln the "rich part of town". Thanks for putting down those of us that live on the other side of "O" street. No wonder the south part of Lincoln thinks they deserve everything! "

JK wrote on August 2, 2007 1:50 pm:
" Nate, I'll just bet in God's eyes, the people in the slums part of town are just important as the so called rich . And that is the problem in Lincoln. This is NOT a friendly community. Like I was told the DAY I moved here, "you'll be O.K. as long as you live like the Lincoln people do." and was told, "we have a good quality of colored people in Lincoln." Your diffently rated in this town. If your not in the right class, out you go by raising the property taxes so you can't afford to stay!!!! If I don't want you for a neighbor I'll make sure the city makes it a park!!! I've always said, one of the reasons for the high taxes is to keep the "unwanted" out of these snooty people's town. I guess because they pay such high taxes they think they own the whole town and state!!! Its well known, the city DOES NOT want business or industry, therefore the working person is NOT incouraged. Little wonder why all the young people leave the state after school. I sure did!!! Now the snooty "upper crust" have gotten old and guess what? The "lower class" relative has to come back and take care of them!!!!!!!! It will always come back to you, mark my word!!!! "

WASP-ville wrote on August 2, 2007 1:57 pm:
" this is ridiculous. Instead of using this as an opportunity for parents, and residnts to embrace the other part of our culture - aging, they would like to turn their backs and pretend it isn't happening. Well, sorry folks we don't live in Stepfordville - everyone is different and they might need your compassion, just a little bit. Get over yourselves! "

Chuck wrote on August 2, 2007 4:14 pm:
" The NIMBY's are at it again! "I" bought my property and was here first so "I" have a say in anything that goes on around or near "MY" property within at least a mile! (sarcasm) I agree with a few earlier posts here, if you don't want it to change then by all means go buy the property yourself! Problem solved!! "

Jason Lemon wrote on August 2, 2007 4:42 pm:
" WHAAAAA!!!!! Our vacant lot is going to have something built upon it. Do you own the lot, no I did not think so, therefore the developer and landowner can do what they want within code, which they are doing. "

nemo wrote on August 2, 2007 8:29 pm:
" It IS a home!!!!..A home for people with Alzheimer's!! "

Abe wrote on August 2, 2007 10:28 pm:
" If they don't get the alzheimers facility built I heard that someone wants to put an 1/8 mile dragstrip in there. "

Lee wrote on August 2, 2007 10:34 pm:
" I cannot believe the mindless gall of some people. Complaining about a facility that can be of great value for the very people who have lived in Lincoln for alot longer I am sure than any of the complainers. After all, they deserve a place that gives them the intense care they all deserve. Makes you wonder who is really suffering from dementia! "

Try Firethorn wrote on August 3, 2007 3:04 am:
" Firethorn seems like a better place for this facility. After all, a lot of MDs live there. Then again, there's Cripple Creek too, Hunzeker's own neighborhood, with a big, big undeveloped lot right behind his own house. How about those spots? "

db wrote on August 3, 2007 5:39 am:
" older people are not beautiful on the outside...it's on the inside that counts. Those who do not have dementia have alot to offer the younger generation. But instead most act like the aged are disposable. A care center is usually a very quiet area, with well kept landscaping. Multi-family dwellings would add alot more conjestion and the landscaping?...well with all the extra cars and people who would even notice. When I was a child our elementry school would go to the care center in town and put on a small program(mostly singing)...that's how is used to be...now most don't even want to think about the aged or becoming older themselves. How sad. "

good people of the Plains wrote on August 3, 2007 7:53 am:
" The juxtaposition of the two local building controversy stories in this week's local news, Talent+ at Holmes Park and this Alzheimer's Care Facility, symbolize much of what's frustrating about Lincoln. People seem to have no problem with selling off undeveloped parkland to keep a corporation happy, yet they balk at building an Alzheimer's care facility on a vacant lot to help local residents and their families who are in desperate need of help. Yet, next election we'll all line up to vote for those "family values" we all insist are so central to who we are as good, kind folks on the Plains. "

I'm laughing wrote on August 3, 2007 10:33 am:
" Sounds like a good plan to me. It is an appropriate use for the land in an appropriate area. It wasn't parkland, just vacant land (which in Lincoln means it is blighted). You are lucky the city didn't condemn it and build one of their projects. I'd be happy to trade this for any number of ventures in my neighborhood. As for the land behind Mr. Hunzeker's home, let's save that for a homeless shelter. "

Shadow wrote on August 3, 2007 12:54 pm:
" When it is a facility for old people or something along those lines where the construction is objected by at least a few dozen people, the council stamps ok on the plans and decides to go against the people around there it will affect. The revenue this project will draw is very limited and the 25 - 30 jobs is laughable. THEN... talent + asks for more land to offer 100 new jobs to the market and utilize some dead space at the holms park (which the city will have to replace the park space elsewhere). This proposal has been met with opposition strictly because of the fire chief situation which it was the decision of our mayor to look at a larger scope than the contract between the city and they accounted for. Finally... when a proposal is made for a drag strip that will only affect maybe a dozen people or so, they throw up so many road blocks that it was made impossible. The revenue stream would have buried these projects and not to mention the jobs that it would have brought. At some point in time this area will have to get out of its own way and allow change to happen so that the signs at the entrance to our state can actually be truthful when they boast "the good life". I think it is high time i start looking at my options for relocating to another state. "

Ed wrote on August 3, 2007 1:02 pm:
" Wouldn't matter if you owned the land or not. If the city wants something they just call it "blighted" and basically, go stuff it!!! Seems there are alot of buildings they could have made into a home, like the schools they want to close. "

gus wrote on August 3, 2007 3:44 pm:
" If the neighborsthink they are entitled to almost 2 acres to have as their own private park-they should buy the property. "