Now
Fair
24°
High
32°
Low
24°

Stem cells: Behind the science, in front of the debate

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MARK ANDERSEN / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, Jun 16, 2007 - 11:56:03 pm CDT

Look closely at the human body.

Closer still.

Use a microscope.

Related Media

Graphic: Stem cell cultivation

Chad Gilliland / JournalStar.com...

The series

As stem cell research dominates the headlines with advances in the laboratory and a political standoff in Washington, the Journal Star takes a look at its imprint in Nebraska.

Sunday, June 17

THE SCIENCE: Learn about stem cells, the flexible building blocks from which each human being is constructed.

THE RESEARCHER: We’ll introduce you to Dr. Stephen Rennard, a researcher working with embryonic stem cells at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha.

Monday

THE POLICY: Regents discuss the rules adopted in 2001 that guide research at the University of Nebraska.

Tuesday

THE ETHICS: Supporters and opponents of embryonic stem cell research have the same information. They just don’t agree on an interpretation.

Wednesday

THE BENEFICIARIES: As politicians debate the necessity of embryonic stem cell research, Ben Stahl waits and hopes. Also, where research likely will first be useful.

Thursday

THE POLITICS: Stem cell research likely will play an increasing role at the ballot box. Also, the difference between adult and embryonic stem cells and what the latest scientific discovery means.

Friday

RESEARCHER 2: Meet Dr. Ira Fox, the other UNMC researcher using dated human embryonic stem cell lines to look for cures for liver disease. Also, how the body creates replacement cells.

Sunday, June 24

FUTURE OF THE MED CENTER: If UNMC wants a successful future, do its researchers need to study stem cells?

At this range, the body no longer appears as a single entity but as a collection of very different actors.

Each individual human cell plays a specific role.

The survival of them all depends upon the coordinated contribution of the individuals.

Too few blood cells and phhttt … it’s over.

Too few bone cells and crunch.

Too few nerve cells and, uhh, I forget.

The tiny contribution of each cell combines with others like it.

A single nerve transmits one impulse. Many impulses bunch into a signal. Signals merge to become a thought.

Together, the cells become us.

But we will always be the individual cells.

Death eventually will come because some group of cells will stop doing its job.

The system will break down. Blood won’t flow. All cells will die — and us with them.

From one to trillions

It takes trillions of cells to make an adult body.

And every one of those cells descended from one original cell.

Actually, from two halves of that one cell.

Half came from a mother’s egg.

Half from a father’s sperm.

They united to form the one cell.

It became two cells, then four, then eight, and quickly there were thousands, billions, trillions.

That first cell was a stem cell. Amid the trillions of actors in an adult, there will be many other stem cells — but none like that first one.

These later stem cells will continue dividing until we die, making new cells, replacing those turning to dust.

The cell lumberyard

Look closely at the cell.

It’s built of proteins that act a lot like bricks, steel and 2-by-4s.

Proteins are chemical chains that join together. They’re like prefabricated building blocks.

Existing cells create all the proteins used to make new cells.

About 30,000 different proteins must be created to build all of the different cells of the human body.

Many proteins get altered by chemical saws and welders once they reach the job site.

Thus, the body ends up with more than 200,000 unique shapes to use in constructing its trillions of cells.

How the materials — the proteins — fit together determines whether they’ll form part of a cell’s walls, its doors, an elevator or power plant.

Inside each cell, proteins zip around on conveyor belts. Sugars are burned.

Cells contain fuel storage depots, data centers, maintenance shops, shipping, receiving and communications departments.

Place any of these out of sequence, and the factory can fail.

If a conveyor belt ends at a stairwell, materials will clog the exit. The cell may even blow up.

Factories gone bad are supposed to blow up. Nature doesn’t want its failures creating new cells.

The need for each cell to survive as a small factory and yet support the larger system never changes.

A muscle cell survives unto itself, but it also contracts, contributing to the body’s movement.

A nerve cell survives unto itself as well, but it also transmits a signal.

What changes, especially early on, is the complexity of the system comprised by all of the cells.

In the early days when there’s a handful of cells from a newly united sperm and egg, the system — the body — is simple.

Cells can survive on stray bits of energy lying around on a plastic dish.

Later, increasingly complex systems must circulate oxygen and sugars and dispose of waste.

Cell factory renovations

As cells multiply over successive generations, new factories will differ from their predecessors.

By the time the body has moved from the one original cell to become a collection of trillions, there will be nerve cells and blood cells, bone cells and liver cells.

By then, the cell systems will have combined to form even bigger and more complex systems.

The cell factories still toil independently, but together they form tissues, like heart muscle. The tissues work together to form organs, like the heart. And together the organs form us.

Cells may begin to differ as early as that first division of the original cell.

By the time there’s a tiny ball of 30 cells, some have chosen to become the outside cells.

Still identical in appearance, others have chosen to become middle cells.

From plans to buildings

Written instructions for this increasingly complex interaction of factories exists within the original cell. It’s in the chemical code called DNA.

The exact same written instructions exist in the trillions of adult body cells.

Contained within these written instructions are the patterns for all 30,000 intermediate-stage proteins.

No one cell uses all of these proteins. One type of cell will use one set. Another will use a different set. There may be overlap.

As a cell divides and chooses a direction, its protein formula changes. New materials result in new shapes — new parts — and changed parts change the factory workings.

Changes that occur from one generation to the next may not be great. It may be more like a remodeling than an overhaul.

To review: Cells are three-dimensional living factories.

The DNA is the plans, the blueprints.

There’s a strong connection between the plans for a factory and the factory itself, but they’re not the same thing.

The DNA library

Building a system with trillions of cells operating together obviously requires a huge set of plans.

It’s helpful to think of it as a library of plans, a library with many rooms.

Each room contains the patterns needed to make all of the proteins for just one type of cell.

The library’s rooms are arranged in rings.

In this scheme, the plans of the original fertilized egg lie in the center room.

The offspring of this original cell can use the plans from this room or plans from an adjoining room in the next ring.

Their descendant cells will have the same option: plans from the room of their parent or plans from adjoining rooms in the next ring.

The only closed direction is back toward the center. Cell development always moves toward the more specialized.

A cell democracy

To the body, it doesn’t matter which cells stay in a same room and which move on to the next circle.

It matters only that some do change and some don’t, and that changes occur in the right proportions.

Eventually, there must be enough heart, brain and bone cells to take up the posts necessary for the body to survive.

There’s no general contractor overseeing system development.

And no one cell coordinates the progression. It’s a joint effort.

Cells communicate constantly with other cells around them.

To do so, they emit chemical signals, like smoke signals, into their shared liquid surroundings.

They also sample the levels of other chemicals present in the background.

Many types of communication occur simultaneously and in different languages. It’s like a symphony of lights, smells and sounds.

Individual cells experience the performance differently depending on whether they have front-row seats or are tucked into the balcony.

The real determining factor for what new type of cell is created is location, location, location.

Inside the cells, the unique experience causes some doors leading to an outer ring of the DNA library to slam shut and others to open.

Inside one factory, a hinge that was laid down for later placement of a factory door instead will be removed. This line of cells doesn’t need a door there.

So try as they might, scientists working with this cell might be unable to force it to accept a door. There’s no longer a hinge.

In working with stem cells, it almost always will be easier for researchers to force cells down a path that mimics their natural progression.

On the other hand, it will be more difficult to force a cell to step back and rebuild a hinge so it can later accept a door.

The lost factories

Throughout life, there will be great demand for certain types of factories. Skin cells last only five days, so their factories must continue at full production.

Other types of cells will be produced mostly in the womb or during early childhood. Most nerve cells must last a lifetime.

The goal of embryonic stem cell therapy, then, is to take cells from a recently fertilized egg, those at the beginning of the development process, and push them along a path they might have followed in a developing fetus.

The goal is to push them into becoming brain cells, pancreatic beta cells, heart muscle cells, the types of cells not created in large numbers by an adult body. The premature demise of these irreplaceable cells causes Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, heart failure.

A stem cell is any type of cell that can forever produce the more specialized cells needed by the body.

Not every stem cell holds within it the full range of possibilities.

Some can make blood.

Some can make nerves.

But that first cell, the newly fertilized egg, is a stem cell capable of producing all of the other cells.

Adult stem cells can be pushed in far fewer directions. Still, they have been used in novel ways.

For example, adult blood stem cells have been manipulated to produce heart muscle cells.

Moved from their home in the bone marrow and placed in the heart, blood stem cells receive different signals from their new surroundings. It could be that these signals force blood stem cells to create new muscle cells.

Another possibility is beginning to appear more likely. Blood stem cells placed in a damaged heart also emit signals.

These signals may be causing surviving muscle stem cells to reactivate local production.

If the therapy works for you, what’s the difference?

Inquiring scientists want to know.

Reach Mark Andersen at 473-7238 or mandersen@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Sunday Special > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
mom wrote on June 17, 2007 12:19 am:
" Someone please forward this article on to Dubbya. Maybe if we speak very slowly and draw pictures, he might finally "get it". This administration's arbitrary stance against stem cell research is just one more way he has damaged this country in the past six years. 01.20.09 can't come soon enough! "

Thanks Journal Star wrote on June 17, 2007 9:09 am:
" Thanks Lincoln Journal Star for biasing the locals into believing that this research is benign and for only printing the good doctor's interpretations of embryonic stem cell research. I'm glad that he left out the part that in order to make this therapy practical in humans that human cloning is necessary in the future in order to avoid condemning a patient to a life of dangerous and expensive immunosuppressant medications (unlike adult stem research). I'm also glad the good doctor left out the part about the problems that the embryonic research is having with cancer (unlike adult stem cell research). This sounds great!!! Sign me up. "

Zoomie wrote on June 17, 2007 9:43 am:
" Having failed (miserably) at convincing Americans that ESC research is inherently evil, the latest wingnut buzzword for it now is "cloning". Well, the advantage to ESC's in the first place is that they can become whatever you want them to; but that is NOT cloning! And the only embryos used are embryos scheduled for destruction anyway, comparable to harvesting organs during organ donation. This is just another of those issues that expose just how out of touch the GOP and conservatives actually are with real-world (reality) Americans, and another example of why they are still losing support nationwide! "

You know wrote on June 17, 2007 9:48 am:
" You know, if you write at a fourth grade level the sheeple are able to give you three seconds of attention and then they all nod their heads in agreement with the story. You also need to make it short and sweet because they need to go back to being mass consumers. "

A daughter wrote on June 17, 2007 9:50 am:
" My mother was recently considered for a stem cell transplant...which, had a match been found, would have been LIFE SAVING!!! Who said anything about cloning humans...ever hear of an umbilical cord? I encourage all expecting mothers to donate the cord immediately following childbirth. Completely uninvasive, and has the potential to save lives. If it isn't donated...it is THROWN AWAY! I hope that the remainder of this series helps people to understand what it is that is truly possible with stem cells. "

Dad wrote on June 17, 2007 11:02 am:
" Sunday is what newspapers call a "high-circ" day. That means it is the day on which the most newspapers are distributed or circulated. On this day we hear from the pro-embryo research doctor and he is positioned as the smart, most expert authority on all things stem-cell. On Wednesday, which is the 2nd highest circulation day, we will hear from some sick and ailing who could benefit from stem cell research...presumably embryonic stem cell research. I will be interested to hear the myriad success stories attributed to adult stem cell research. It is glaring that no experts are slated for the con side, while two are slated for the pro-ESCR side. In fact, no experts in the field of adult stem cell research are slated at all. No expert is slated to articulate why embryonic stem cell research has never yielded a treatment or cure. This is not objective, revelatory reporting...it is reporting to persuade. This is how editors exact influence in society today. While most do not recognize these facts, some do. A fair, persuasive presentation of BOTH sides would be both welcome and credible. What the Lincoln Journal is doing is neither. "

JT wrote on June 17, 2007 11:53 am:
" For those of you insisting that the LJS has a bias for liberal causes, please remember that this is the newspaper that endorsed George Bush and Jeff Fortenberry. "

Hey, Dad... wrote on June 17, 2007 1:57 pm:
" Yeah, and maybe they can find some "credible" authority that will tell us that global warming is a myth.... just to keep their reporting "unbiased." "

facts wrote on June 17, 2007 3:18 pm:
" So, how do ES and adult stem cells score at this point? These latest results show that the ES cells need to be genetically modified and extensive manipulation in vitro before they can be transplanted safely. Direct transplant of ES cells are known to give rise to teratomas and uncontrollable cell proliferation. There is already evidence that ES cells are genetically unstable in long term culture, and are especially prone to chromosomal abnormalities. The risks involved in using the cytomegalovirus promoter to drive over-expression of the transcription factor are undetermined. To avoid immune rejection, the ES cells have to be tissue-matched from a bank of stem cells created from ‘spare’ human embryos. Otherwise, a special human embryo has to be created for the purpose, by transferring the patient’s genetic material into an empty egg, a procedure prone to failure and morally objectionable to many, including scientists. By contrast, adult stem cells could be transplanted directly without genetic modification or pre-treatments. They simply differentiate according to cues from the surrounding tissues and do not give uncontrollable growth or tumours. The adult stem cells also show high degrees of genomic stability during culture. There is no problem with immune rejection because the cells can readily be isolated from the patients requiring transplant. And there is no moral objection involved. Better yet, research can be directed towards encouraging adult stem cells to regenerate and repair damaged tissues in situ, without the need for cell isolation and in vitro expansion. By minimising intervention, risks are reduced, as well as cost, making the treatment available to everyone and not just the rich. "

NL wrote on June 17, 2007 4:24 pm:
" Walk a mile in our shoes (paralyzed due to a virus) before you start your drivel about how evil embryonic stem cell research is. "

clarify wrote on June 17, 2007 8:20 pm:
" To the person who's mother died because she needed a stem cell transplant my condolences. But please clarify why she needed the “stem cell” transplant. If it was for bone marrow there is no debate or concern. That is not embryonic research. Good point though about cord blood banking. "

spinal chord injury wrote on June 17, 2007 9:49 pm:
" I keep hearing that adult stem research has poor potential and then I keep seeing articles regarding advances in adult stem cell research. This includes a full page article in the Des Moines Register two years ago about an Iowa woman who had received an adult stem cell transplant for paralysis from a research center in Portugal. "

revolter wrote on June 18, 2007 5:55 am:
" As I understand it stem cell research is legal. The only argument is about money. How much do the tax payers have to fork over to satisfy the scientist that are doing the research now and producing zero results. "

Local Biotech Researcher wrote on June 18, 2007 2:30 pm:
" Hey, revolter. I hate to break it to you, but research MUST--in part--fail before it can ever susceed. Yes, we do discover many things by accident (read: vaccinations and radiation), but most scientific discoveries are a series of failures followed by a major breakthrough. It is the persistance of the scientists that allows us many of the medical wonders and luxaries we have today. I say, CHARGE ON! Give embryonic (and adult) stem cell research a chance (as long as it will remain ethical). "

Tara wrote on June 22, 2007 2:24 pm:
" If I go to college to study American history and learn everything about American history, and take one class on European history, which subject do you think I would be able to answer the most questions about? There has been a lot of time and money put into adult stem cells, and very little time and money into embryonic stem cells. Common sense tells us that the research receiving the most attention will have resulted in the most answers. Just as in my example, European history still exists, I just haven't taken the opportunity to learn about it yet. "