Now
Fair
24°
High
32°
Low
24°

Triplets on the market

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Tuesday, Jun 19, 2007 - 12:24:25 am CDT

The three identical, historical houses commonly called The Triplets finally have found a home, out of the way of the city’s massive Antelope Valley public works project.

And now they’re hoping to become a home for people interested in living in the North Bottoms neighborhood.

The trio of homes got a lot of bad press when they were on North 22nd Street — because even though they were 100 years old, dilapidated and sometimes inhabited by homeless people, the city had no choice but to shell out about $630,000 to preserve and move them rather than just demolish them. The move alone cost the city $135,000.

Story Photo
Rick Williams of Lincoln, Neb., contractor for Skyline Homes, walks into 1425 North 15th Street. Williams has been working on the Triplets since March 2006 and says, "When I first saw them I thought, I'm getting into a mess...I never thought they would come out this good." (Kainaz Amaria)

The city agreed to preserve such historical structures when it signed up for some $49 million in federal funds to support the Antelope Valley project.

The city’s new Urban Development Department director, David Landis, likened the city’s predicament to getting on a roller coaster and realizing you can’t get off until the ride’s over. He said it was a “supremely unprofitable exchange,” but necessary to avoid jeopardizing federal funds.

The irony is that the houses were preserved, but look nothing like the eyesores they once were. The insides are completely remodeled, with new windows, carpet, light fixtures, kitchens and bathrooms. Very little of the original homes remains, other than the layout, design and Queen Anne architectural style, with white wooden columns on recessed front porches.

They each have garages in the alley and a good view of the Antelope Valley project, particularly the Big T overpass, and University of Nebraska-Lincoln campus.

The Joint Antelope Valley Authority bought them for $71,000 in 2005. Now that they’re nearly completely renovated, they’re for sale, and the city hopes to get about $130,000 for each. A sale is already pending on one of them, and negotiations are underway on a second. If the city gets its asking price, it will have spent about $240,000 on their makeover and relocation.

Like a benevolent Big Brother trying to keep orphan siblings together, the feds also required that the homes stay together. And so they stand, side by side, at 1433, 1437 and 1441 North 15th Street, triplets still. Except they no longer sag; they’re the jewels of the neighborhood.

Their garages are right across the alleyway from Leonard Pospisil’s garage, who was working on his roof Monday in the rain. Although the Triplets caused quite a mess when they first moved in, they’ve shaped up and he’s happy to have them around now.

“They’ll improve the neighborhood,” he said.

Before, there was just an empty lot for about 30 years, Pospisil said.

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
JED wrote on June 19, 2007 7:16 am:
" It is nice that the buildings were moved because the chimneys were suitable for use by Chimney Swifts. I hope the birds find the houses at the new spot and move in as well to the new neighborhood. Having the houses kept does something positive, considering the many chimneys razed for the JAVA project. "

Pipe Dream wrote on June 19, 2007 7:38 am:
" $130,000 for a 100 year old house in the North Bottoms? Good luck with that one! "

Absurd wrote on June 19, 2007 7:56 am:
" These eyesores were of zero historical consequence or note, and the huge city expenditure to move and rehab them was the ultimate expression of absurdity. Blaming it on the federal government is completely phony. These run down wrecks should have been torn down immediately rather than waiting for activists to find their way to federal bureaucrats. We could have spent half the money and built three new homes. For the taxpayer, here is one more bitter example of failed city leadership. "

Mr. Know-it-all wrote on June 19, 2007 8:23 am:
" It's a shame that the first thing remodelers do is replace all the windows in old historic structures like these, losing a great deal of the original character etc. It's nice to see them saved, but it would seem that nearly all the original details have been lost "restoring" them... Typical for Lincoln... "

got to love government's view of spending wrote on June 19, 2007 8:41 am:
" I just love how our city leaders look at this venture as "unprofitable", because of the fact that they had to waste money on these houses in order to keep their "federal funding". When are goverment leaders going to realize that the money they are spending is not monopoly money? "

KYKP wrote on June 19, 2007 8:57 am:
" Let's see it cost them $240,000 + $71,000 = 311,000 to purchase, move and renovate. $130,000 x 3 = $390,000. Looks to me like a $79,000 profit. Not that expensive, huh. Why they complaining? Shoot they even get to keep their fed funds. "

Mike Honcho wrote on June 19, 2007 9:23 am:
" Well, I suppose if the city had torn them down, then it more than likely would have cost them considerably more than it did to restore them, as there most assuredly would have been a lawsuit come out of it. I don't know if $130,000 is too much, but if one's already sold, and another sale is in the works, then it must not be too outrageous...especially for a house with all new floors, cabinets, fixtures, windows, a completely remodeled interior, an improved exterior, and a new roof. I think replacing the windows was the right move, as the old windows would have been terribly inefficient, and who wants to buy what is essentially a brand new house only to throw money away on utilities? "

Complainers wrote on June 19, 2007 9:46 am:
" Lets see...jeapordize 49 million in federal funds or lose a a couple hundred thousand on some housing. The numbers speak for themselves people. This one deal ended in a loss...sure, but if you lose a little to keep a lot, it makes the decision pretty straight forward, even if you don't like it. When you sign up for federal funding, it involves ENDLESS hoops to jump through, this is a perfect illustration. Some people need to stop complaining about every penny being spent and look at the bigger picture. "

Whoops wrote on June 19, 2007 2:37 pm:
" Hey KYKP, you forgot it also cost $135,000 to move them! Don't see a profit there?? Oh well, heck its just taxpayers money, plenty more where that came from. Sure wouldn't want these people in my company accounting department!!!! No way. This city would charge you a million to set a tent on top of the city dump!!! Oh then over assess it for big taxes! "

Scott wrote on June 19, 2007 3:02 pm:
" The funding issue hinged, I believe, from the National Historic Preservation Act which prevents federal money from being spent to demolish historic structures. And, if I remember correctly, The Triplets were on the National Register of Historic Places, which implements the Historic Preservation Act. "

Brt wrote on June 19, 2007 3:18 pm:
" Its so interesting how Lincoln is so busy making big bucks on 3 100 yrs old houses and what wonderful news they're gonna sell en and make a loss!! Yet ya have to read the Kearney news to learn the interesting profitable things going on, like Google building a big place in Council Bluffs and the big taxes it will bring in. Once again, Lincoln and Nebraska are asleep at the wheel. Yeh, if ya want the news ya have to read the Kearney new if you live in Lincoln!!! "

RMM wrote on June 19, 2007 8:39 pm:
" What a joke. These should have been torn down, period. Or moved to the NE corner of 48th and O and restored there. If we're gonna pay too much for things, let's put them all in one spot. "

Scott wrote on June 20, 2007 12:01 am:
" What a bunch of nay-sayers! It's our job to protect history. Thats why The Triplets were saved. Not just to waste money. They were historically significant structures. "