Now
Fair
72.0°
High
87°
Low
72°

Bush exhorts Senate Republicans to try to revive stalled immigration bill

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS / The Associated Press

Tuesday, Jun 12, 2007 - 02:55:41 pm CDT

WASHINGTON — President Bush pressed divided Republicans on Tuesday to support him on immigration overhaul, saying “status quo is unacceptable.”

The president, in a rare visit to the Capitol, told reporters after a luncheon with the Senate GOP membership that he recognized that immigration was an emotional issue and that many do not agree with him. Still, he said, “Now is the time to get it done.”

Bush mounted a personal effort to salvage his derailed immigration bill, as key lawmakers reached for a deal that could quickly revive the measure. He needs to change enough minds among GOP senators to push through a top domestic priority.

Story Photo
President George W. Bush

The measure, which legalizes up to 12 million unlawful immigrants and tightens border security, stalled last week in the face of broad Republican opposition.

Bush promised to work with senators in coming up with a measure he could sign. “The White House will stay engaged,” he pledged.

“Some members in there believe we need to move a comprehensive bill, some don’t,” Bush said. “I understand that. It’s a highly emotional issue.”

He said he hoped Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who supports the bipartisan legislation backed by the White House, “has the same sense of desire to move the product, the bill, that I do.”

“It’s going to take a lot of hard work, a lot of effort. We’ve got to convince the American people this bill is the best way to enforce our border. I believe that without the bill, it’s going to be harder to enforce the border. The status quo is not acceptable,” Bush said.

Bush has predicted he will prevail in his effort to win approval of an immigration bill. But his brief comments on Tuesday were muted, and he voiced recognition of the difficult work ahead.

Speaking with reporters after the president left, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said the meeting with Bush was “wide ranging” and touched on other issues besides immigration, including Bush’s recent trip to Europe.

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., called it “democracy working at its best” and said that Bush had signaled he “won’t sign a bad bill.”

“But he thinks this is an issue that needs to be addressed” and is “willing to work with us to get this job done,” Lott said. “I hope that the majority leader will work with us to move it forward,” Lott added.

Reid, D-Nev., had pulled the measure from the Senate last week when two efforts to cut short debate failed. The Democratic leader said he will bring up the measure again only if Democrats can be assured of more Republican backing.

Still, it was unclear how much influence Bush has among Republicans on immigration, given that it has sparked a backlash among some of the party’s core supporters, who see it as amnesty for people who sneaked into the country.

McConnell, asked whether he thought Bush had won over any more GOP senators in his presentation, said, “I think a lot of that will depend upon what it looks like in the end. And none of us know that yet.”

“Look, we had a very, very good discussion, including some of our members who are not — shall I say? — keen on this measure, and others who are still taking a look at it and trying to decide how they’re going to vote,” the GOP leader said. “So it was a good give and take. We didn’t expect anybody to stand up and holler that they had an epiphany.”

The fragile package promises a path of legalization for millions of undocumented workers in the United States while tightening borders and offering employers more temporary workers. The bipartisan bill supported by the White House is cosponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
hmmm. wrote on June 12, 2007 8:41 am:
" Bush has no clout left and people are finally realizing this. "

MarkyMark wrote on June 12, 2007 8:51 am:
" This is what happens when you ignore an important issue for six years when he was wielding dictator-like power. Thankfully those days are gone and the checks and balances back. "

whatever wrote on June 12, 2007 10:34 am:
" Bush has ignored the issue because he favors open borders as do those who support him and have voted for him. We have immigration laws on the books now, we just don't have the will to enforce them. I suspect any "new plan" will make it "legally" much easier to enter the country than it is now. You really have to ask yourself why all the hurry to pass a bill, what is the president trying to hide? "

Mike Honcho wrote on June 12, 2007 3:12 pm:
" whatever, I think you are a bit off in your assumption, as many Republicans and conservatives have supported the President on other issues, but do no support him in regard to this legislation. What they call a "path" to citizenship appears to be nothing more than amnesty at a modest price. If others would actually read the article, he's not facing much opposition or "checks and balances" from the Democrats, it's coming from his own party...and rightly so. Anything with Ted Kennedy's seal of approval as bound to be a piece of garbage. They need to dump this bill into the Chappaquiddick and come a bill that puts border security above all else...and something that doesn't allow convicted felons to enter the country. You want to know what the President has to hide...you should also ask what Harry Reid has to hide...as he is one of those who is pushing the hardest on this bill. "

I can assure you wrote on June 12, 2007 3:36 pm:
" that even though I voted for President Bush, in no way do I support this flawed immigration bill. I don't really understand why any Republican would support it, it is political suicide. So, because I have supported the President on many issues and because I voted for him does not mean that I support his proposal for illegal immigration in the slightest. For God's sake, the deal for the bill was made between Bush and Sen. Ted Kennedy (the LIBERAL lion), how can any Republican back it in good faith? I tend to side with Sen. Ben Nelson on this issue...I voted for him, too. "

Laurie wrote on June 12, 2007 4:57 pm:
" I think what the President is finding out right about now is that it's a lot easier to sell paranoia and hate than it is to sell common sense. "

Zoomie wrote on June 12, 2007 6:31 pm:
" Do the words "lame duck" mean anything to you? Synonymous with "George W. Bush"... "

Ryan wrote on June 13, 2007 12:15 am:
" Oh no! A LIBERAL did something?!? It must be wrong! Liberals!! Do you even know what the word liberal means? Do you ACTUALLY, really know the definition of a political liberal? Please knock off that black vs. white, liberals are evil, Fox "News" nonsense and get back to real political discourse. "

Bob wrote on June 13, 2007 3:52 am:
" What part of illegal doesn't President Bush and the other so called elected officals really doing here. Who is putting money into their pockets? They took an oath to up hold the laws that we the people want. They passed laws in 1986 that was to deal with the illegal immigration. They refused, got in the road of enforcement and have protected the ones who are responsible for the mess we now have. We don't need new laws just enforce the ones we have now and secure the borders simple plan for them, but it will never happen as the ones responsible are getting richer while we the working taxpayer keep getting the bill. It is getting to the point that we need a election revolution that removes all of those who refuse to listen to us the 300 million legal Americans that want this stopped and for the illegals to leave, go home, and come back legally. We need to remove the Kennedy's, Reid's, Clinton's, Hagel's, and McCain's. "

Dave wrote on June 13, 2007 6:30 am:
" Congress approved over 800 miles of border fence in Oct. 2006,so far they have completed 11 miles and now they want to cut it to 371 miles. Help me out,does that sound like border security is at the top of their list or is it amnesty for 12-20 million illegal aliens? "

Legislature Coverage