Now
Fair
74.0°
High
87°
Low
72°

Candidates under the microscope

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Sunday, Apr 15, 2007 - 12:51:05 am CDT

Chris Beutler and Ken Svoboda are in the home stretch of the mayoral race. Election day is May 1. No turning back now. But sometimes, when looking ahead, you need to look at the past for information that might help voters decide. Svoboda’s landscaping work for the city has been scrutinized. Today, we look at Beutler’s contracts from 2000 to 2006, when he worked as a fundraiser for the city.

In 1978, when Don Wesely made his first run to represent northeast Lincoln in the Legislature, he was pulling for his friend Marge Schlitt to win a seat serving central Lincoln.

Schlitt was running against a 33-year-old lawyer named Chris Beutler.

Story Photo
Lincoln mayoral candidate Ken Svoboda (from left) speaks to the Lincoln Southwest Business and Civic Association as fellow candidate Chris Beutler awaits his turn to answer questions in the debate held in the Museum of American Speed. (Gwyneth Roberts)
Some damages may be waived for Svoboda's company

The mayor gave City Councilman Ken Svoboda more than extra time to finish city landscaping work when she signed a change order in March.

She also agreed to waive more than $100,000 in damages.

Svoboda’s family-owned company, Ray’s Lawn and Home Care, has won the vast majority of contracts to maintain landscaping on city medians since the city began hiring contractors about six years ago.

Ray’s earned about $300,000 doing work for the city during the past decade.

The city has not been satisfied with Ray’s performance on a number of contracts to install and maintain landscaping on certain medians.

Ray’s received written notices threatening to terminate the contracts unless it corrected problems with median work on North 27th Street, West Highlands Boulevard, South 70th Street and 84th Street.

Svoboda phased out city work as he began his run for mayor.

Now the only contract is a lingering landscaping agreement for medians on 84th between South Street and Montello Court, which Ray’s won with a low bid of $55,835.

The medians were supposed to be planted with buffalo grass, poppy mallow and trees by June 1, 2004, but the contract still hadn’t been completed to the city’s satisfaction by March.

That’s when Mayor Coleen Seng and Svoboda signed a change order altering the terms of the 84th Street contract and extending the completion date.

Assistant City Attorney Steve Huggenberger confirmed the change order effectively waived $101,100 in “liquidated damages” against Ray’s for not getting the medians landscaped according to the city’s specifications by the original deadline of June 1, 2004.

The original contract said damages would accrue at a rate of $100 a day if the deadline wasn’t met.

Normally, the contractor doesn’t pay those damages until the contract ends.

But the change order will erase that big bill if Ray’s gets the medians in order by May 1. The only damages deducted from Ray’s final payment is $12,483 in “actual damages” that had accrued as of March 9, plus whatever additional staff and consultant expenses are incurred to inspect medians through May 1.

The change order also required Ray’s to get a $75,000 letter of credit the city can immediately draw on if Ray’s defaults on the contract.

But if Ray’s doesn’t come through by May 1 - Election Day for Svoboda - liquidated damages will be charged at a rate of $200 a day, beginning March 9.

Svoboda said he assumed his contract was being extended after repeated meetings with city officials about the problems he was having getting poppy mallow established. He said he didn’t know he was supposed to formally request an extension that would erase late damages.

On Friday, he said the medians are “in great shape,” and poppy mallow is scheduled to be planted next week, weather permitting.

City Councilman Jon Camp - who criticized the mayor when she waived damages related to the late arrival of seven new firetrucks last year - was surprised to learn his Republican colleague on the council also may have substantial damages waived.

Contractors should fulfill their obligations, Camp said, although there can be “mitigating circumstances.”

The news makes him worry about “who’s minding the store” in city government.

“The firetrucks were a matter of life and safety, so one could rationalize that that makes that more important,” Camp said. “Flowers are not firetrucks.”

- Deena Winter

Beutler won, forgave Wesely and they became friends.

So 21 years later, after Wesely had moved to the Lincoln mayor’s office and the city was looking for a fundraiser and grant-writer, he encouraged Beutler to apply.

Beutler was chosen from three candidates and spent nearly seven years applying for grants, shaking down donors and putting together fundraising campaigns the city says brought $8.9 million into its coffers.

He was paid an average of nearly $57,000 per year from mid-2000 to the end of 2006, for a total of $370,000, and worked an average of 25 hours a week.

Now Beutler wants to be mayor, and with his Republican opponent, City Councilman Ken Svoboda, under scrutiny for work his landscaping company did for the city, Republicans are scrutinizing Beutler’s city contracts.

They say Beutler’s contract was a political favor, compliments of his friend, Wesely. They say his contract should have been put out for bid rather than extended by Wesely year after year after year. And they question whether much of the $8.9 million Beutler says he raised would have flowed into the city anyway.

But city officials, Wesely and Beutler say he did the work he was paid to do. And the proof is in park paths, trees, new playgrounds and renovated parks like Sunken Gardens.

‘Sweetheart deal’

Actually, it wasn’t Wesely’s idea to hire a fundraiser. Former Parks Director Jim Morgan lobbied former Mayor Mike Johanns to add the position before Wesely took office.

A few months after Wesely was elected in 1999, the city began advertising for a fundraising consultant. Former United Way employee Darrell Podany and an Omaha company applied. But Morgan decided not to fill the position, in part because there were so few applicants and because the compensation they requested was higher than anticipated. Podany offered to work full time for $44,680 a year.

A year later, Morgan took a job in Wisconsin. After he left, the city readvertised the fundraising position. Beutler, Podany and an Omaha firm applied.

But this time, applicants were instructed to send proposals to then-city Personnel Director Georgia Glass, rather than the city purchasing agent, as was done the first time.

Podany thought it was odd the hiring was taken from the purchasing agent and given to a Wesely appointee.

But Wesely said it made sense for personnel to make a hiring decision, and Glass said she was not pressured by Wesely to hire Beutler.

She and two others on a selection committee thought Beutler was clearly the most qualified and recommended his hiring to Wesely.

She doesn’t recall interviewing the candidates.

She said they wanted “someone with connections,” someone “embedded in the Lincoln community.”

Applicants were supposed to have experience raising money, writing grants and leading capital campaigns.

Podany’s resume said he had experience raising money as director of the United Way Volunteer Connection from 1990 to 1999. He also had worked for Republican City Councilman Jon Camp — which probably didn’t help his chances with the Democratic administration.

City officials were unable to find the three proposals for the Journal Star to review, but Beutler said his resume touted experience raising money for his legislative campaigns.

In July 2000, Wesely signed a contract hiring Beutler as an independent contractor. The contract required Beutler to work at least 1,400 hours for $50,500 the first year.

Mark Fahleson, chairman of the Lancaster County Republican Party, said Beutler’s part-time gig was a “sweetheart deal.”

“This is further backroom politics between the same old gang who’s been in charge since Don

Wesely was mayor,” Fahleson said.

Beutler was clearly the best candidate, Glass said.

“This was not a set-up deal,” she said.

And Wesely said Beutler’s experience raising money for campaigns, involvement in environmental issues in the Legislature and connections in the community made him the clear choice.

“Honestly, there was no comparison between him and Chris,”

Wesely said of Podany. “Chris was the best applicant clearly.”

Two extra payments

A somewhat unusual term of Beutler’s contract called for him to be paid upfront before beginning work — and that led to a mistake in which he received a last paycheck in December that he shouldn’t have gotten.

He also received an extra payment in September 2005, when supervision of his contract was switched from the Finance Department to the Parks Department.

Those two checks — worth about $10,000 — were discovered recently by the Finance Department. Beutler reimbursed the city.

Beutler’s first contract required him to log a minimum of 1,400 hours of work and prepare monthly reports on hours and activities. But the reports weren’t done for the first two years of the contract.

City Budget Officer Steve Hubka, who oversaw the contract for the first few years, said he and Beutler didn’t realize the reports were required. He didn’t think it would be proper for Beutler to recreate them, so Beutler began generating the reports after they discovered the oversight in mid-2002.

City Attorney Dana Roper said that’s not a violation of law. “It’s not a good practice, however, not to have the contracts complied with.”

The initial contract said that after one year, Beutler’s contract could be renewed annually for two more years. When Wesely signed a contract extension after the first year, the language was changed to allow the contract to be extended for three years, instead of two.

Fahleson said the contract should have been put out to bid instead of renewed without question.

“What harm is there in giving the marketplace the opportunity to do the work?” he asked.

Until 2003, Wesely renewed each of Beutler’s contracts late. He signed them in July even though they were supposed to be renewed before the June 30 anniversary date.

But in 2003, Wesely renewed the contract earlier than usual. He had decided not to run for re-election, and Democratic Councilwoman Coleen Seng and Republican Councilman Glenn Friendt were locked in a tight race for mayor.

Two weeks after Friendt came out ahead of Seng in the primary election and appeared headed for the mayor’s office, Wesely signed a $57,351 contract renewal with Beutler April 22.

Councilman Svoboda held a rare press conference to decry the move as “cronyism and pork-barrel politics.” Wesely dismissed his complaints as pre-election politicking.

Seng won the election, and the following year the city opened up the job to others by sending out a “request for proposals.” This time, the city was offering a multiyear contract that would run through 2007.

City Finance Director Don Herz said the job was opened up to other bidders, because typically the city doesn’t renew contracts for more than four years.

Parks Director Lynn Johnson said the city wanted a four-year contract to ensure “some commitment to continuity” with the consultant.

This time, applicants sent proposals to the purchasing agent, rather than the personnel director.

And this time, Beutler was the only applicant.

Podany didn’t apply, he said, because it was clear Beutler was a shoo-in.

Beutler’s new contract called for annual raises of 3.5 percent.

$8.9 million raised

Among his duties, Beutler was required to develop written policies regarding gifts and donations, develop a plan for annual giving programs, develop a database of donors and generate publicity materials.

Beutler did all of those things, Johnson said.

Even though Beutler reported his own hours on the honor system, his office was near Johnson’s — and Beutler was putting in the time, Johnson said.

City officials provided documentation Beutler had “primary or significant involvement” in obtaining $8.9 million in grants and donations during his six years of work.

But Republicans such as Fahleson have questioned whether much of that money would have flowed into the city anyway.

Two of the largest sources of money Beutler obtained were Nebraska Environmental Trust grants and Land and Water Conservation Fund federal grants.

In his resume for a contract renewal, Beutler called himself “the key legislative force” that got the Environmental Trust Grant program passed by the Legislature.

The program began doling out grants in 1994, six years before Beutler began working for the city. Records from the Environmental Trust Grant program indicate the city received two grants in those six years: $103,000 in 1995 and $8,250 in 1999. After Beutler began, the city obtained five grants totaling $3.49 million.

But the city long has received Land and Water Conservation Fund grants in the program’s 40-year history.

The amount of money available statewide ebbs and flows, but records from the Land and Water Conservation Fund indicate the city received an average of $52,279 annually in federal grants from the fund from 1966 to 2000.

After Beutler came on board, the city received an average of $33,929 per year.

Beutler began a utility checkoff program called Lincoln Cares, in which Lincoln Electric System customers can contribute to projects and corporate sponsors match their contributions.

He was also instrumental in the Sunken Gardens renovation campaign.

“I’m really proud of all the work I did for the Parks Department,” he said.

Sandy Hilsabeck-Hastings, president of the Lincoln Parks Foundation — a nonprofit corporation that raises private money to enhance park programs — had nothing but praise for Beutler’s work for the foundation. He regularly attended board meetings and was always available when needed, she said.

“He has been able to get us federal funds when we didn’t even know it was out there,” she said. “We miss him.”

The city hasn’t yet filled the position Beutler left vacant in January.

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
May > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Case Closed wrote on April 15, 2007 5:02 am:
" Again, another example that Buetler is the best choice for Mayor. "

Dave K wrote on April 15, 2007 6:50 am:
" Unbelievable. Raising money for a political campaign is NOT difficult when you're an incumbent, as Beutler was. That's about as much qualification as saying Mike Tyson ought to run Lincoln's parks & rec programs because he used to engage in recreation. Bottom line is this... people in Lincoln say the city is run like crap. The same people who are running Beutler's campaign and advising him are the same people who turned Lincoln government into crap. Figure it out, folks. "

Rocky Raccoon wrote on April 15, 2007 7:09 am:
" Can we say liberally-biased reporting? On the same Internet page Sunday we have one story written favorably for Beutler that questions his fundraising contracts but puts plenty of people in position to try to explain it all away. The fact is when you put up a guy who's raised money for a non-profit organization for nine years against a guy who's taken contributions for his own political campaigns with very little strategic work involved, there is no question who should have gotten the job. Any competent person would have hired the non-profit guy in an instant. But since Beutler and Wesely were best buds, Beutler got the job. Then, in blue so it stands out, we have an unfavorable story written about Svoboda that provides no one to try to explain anything. Svoboda has had trouble getting poppy mallows to grow. But no one has said anything about the rest of the parts of the contracts being unfulfilled. Yet here we have the newspaper hinting that Svoboda is a crook while Beutler is an angel. Journal Star, if you want to be objective (which I doubt), why don't you examine Beutler's legislative voting record on pro-business and economic development issues and compare it to what he's saying about those issues in his campaign. You'll find Beutler was considered one of the most anti-business and anti-economic development legislators in the body for his entire stay. Funny how now, all of a sudden, Beutler is Lincoln's best hope for economic development. But you won't report that, will you Journal Star? Because you're more interested in keeping the status quo in Lincoln government, in order to keep the ability to write about scandals and keep your subscriptions up, then you are in telling Lincolnites the truth about Chris Beutler. Just come out and endorse Beutler now, Journal Star. No need to wait until the week before the election. We all know which candidate you support by your biased reporting. "

Are you kidding? wrote on April 15, 2007 9:49 am:
" Beutler raises over $8 million for his city contract. Svoboda has over $100,000 in penalties waived for work he failed to perform. Who got the "sweetheart" deal? "

funk wrote on April 15, 2007 9:49 am:
" This would have never been an issue the Republican received the job. Double standards. Ken Svoboda raised a stink when it came to the Fire Engine contracts, why can’t we raise them about his failed contract? Double standards, that’s all it amounts to. "

wow wrote on April 15, 2007 9:58 am:
" For a $370,000 investment the city got nearly $9 million in return. I'd say that was money well spent. "

check yourself wrote on April 15, 2007 10:06 am:
" I would be surprised to see the LJS go against a fellow LIBA member. That would be like eating one of your young, never going to happen. "

Unfair? wrote on April 15, 2007 10:23 am:
" How did the LJS go after Svoboda? The whole story was about the details of the Beutler contract. The only difference......the only difference...between the two "sweetheart" deals is that Beutler fulfilled his. He didn't owe the cty $100,000 for not fulfilling his contract. He raised nearly $9 million; Svoboda couldn't mow lawns and plant poppys. "

Jim wrote on April 15, 2007 11:01 am:
" Nice part-time job! This is the candidate in favor of the "average" worker, the soccer mom, the elder citizen on a fixed income, right? How does he explain his action? How does he explain that he, unlike all of us, didn't feel the need to submit a time card and proof of work to be paid? Would hard-working citizens of Lincoln earn a paycheck twice a month without submitting a time card? He was paid on the honor system; is this the kind of leader you want? What a shame. What a shame that "our" tax money is given to others as favors. If the democrat-controlled City was to abuse our taxes like this, they should be more controls in place; at least treat such situations like a real job. "

Who's Tight with Seng? wrote on April 15, 2007 11:04 am:
" The LJS reports that Seng forgives the $100,000 Svoboda was going to be charged for failing to meet his contract. All I've heard from the Republicans that Beutler will be another Seng.....what? Seng saved Svoboda's bacon on the contract. Seng and Svoboda have been running the city has council chair and mayor for the past four years. If anyone is a Seng clone; it's Svoboda. "

I can't wait to read the story about Ken wrote on April 15, 2007 11:11 am:
" Beutler takes $360k and brings back nearly $9 million. Ken takes $55k for a landscaping contract and the city has to write off $100k in damages. You tell me who got the sweetheart deal and who understands return on investment. "

Larry wrote on April 15, 2007 11:14 am:
" It's getting closer to final election time. I wonder if the repubs will send out a letter from cats and dogs again?!? They crack me up! They'll do anything to win an election and they don't mind playing dirty. I wonder if they can put up any more political signs in the public right of way? Where's the election commissioner on that? Oh, he's a repub! "

Mug wrote on April 15, 2007 11:18 am:
" When has Buetler held a real job? Not turning in a report and accounting for hours doesn't work in the real world. He has been living off our tax dollars too long. "

KLM wrote on April 15, 2007 12:01 pm:
" I hope no one in Lincoln is falling for these complaints about Sen. Beutler's salary. For starters, the numbers show there was a great return on the investment. But, more than that, Beutler's salary was very reasonable. $57,000 for 1400 hours worked in a year is practically a bargain for a man with Beutler's legal skills and expertise. In law practice, I have no doubt Beutler would have made more money with fewer billable hours. Of course, fundraising is a different sort of work, but the assets Beutler brought to the role were the same. We were lucky to have Beutler working for the city. We'll be luckier to have him working for us as our next Mayor. "

mp wrote on April 15, 2007 12:41 pm:
" Swoboda still hasn't finished a contract that was to be done 2 years ago and gets $100,000 in penalties waived? And then complains when someone else get contract penalties waived? What does that say about his ability to run a business? Especially when he touts his business experience as a reason to vote for him. I was leaning toward voting for him but if he can't get work done when promised, what will he do as mayor? Promise to do something and not follow through like he does in his business? I think not. Instead of trying to bash the opponent for doing good, why doesn't the republicans try to show the positives of their candidate--if they can find any. "

Mark wrote on April 15, 2007 1:22 pm:
" Again, another example that Beutler is NOT THE BEST CHOICE. This whole mess stinks to high heaven!! I'd sure like to work 25 hrs. a week for $57,000. +. I worked more than 84 hours 7 days a week and never came close to $50,000. The whole damn mess is run like crap. Theres no point in voting because theres no one worth voting for. With the mess in there called friends, you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours, its the same old crap down the road. Of course they aren't going to recognize anyone from Omaha, they crapped on Omaha for years! Nobody is telling this click bunch anything as long as the people of Lincoln let this stuff continue. When the largest employers in Lincoln are the state house and city government, these people will vote & protect their fellow people regardless whether the city continues to go down the drain and apparently don't care that the rest of the states are laughing their heads off. Yet they turn around and whine about their pay. Well guess why their pay is low, if it is, the "friends" are getting padded very well. When I told a realtor in another state that they said Lincoln's property values had gone up SINCE LAST YEAR, the realtor said, WHAT????? He said the values have gone down in his state and states round him!! You can see the "friends" click are coming after you again for all the money they can get and spend!!!! "

Roger wrote on April 15, 2007 3:39 pm:
" I will vote for the Republican everytime if it comes down to the lesser of two evils, which is the case here. I wish there was a pro-business, pro-growth Republican running that didn't have the baggage and current city connects that Svoboda does, but alas, is not the case. Beutler's record is clear for all to see, and he would just be Seng, Part II. "

Goodbye Green wrote on April 15, 2007 4:21 pm:
" How is Beutler not pro-business? He has owned a small business and made good on his City contract and brought 8.9 million dollars to the city of lincoln? I think if you look at Ken Svoboda's record - it would suggest otherwise. He has done enough damage to all local nursery businesses and contractors by his failure to complete a simple landscape contract. As a result of is action or inaction - he has brought a negative perception to all landscape contractors and landscape projects that the city will consider or now reconsider putting out for bid. Thanks to Ray's Lawn care we will experience a reduction in both environmentally friendly and aesthetically pleasing landscape projects. Why this is important? Because whenever LIBA or the tourist bureau or the University wish to promote Lincoln, they use images of the Parks Department, Sunken Gardens and "Greenspaces" that make Lincoln look like good place to live - it's called quality of Life. "

Mark wrote on April 15, 2007 4:26 pm:
" Roger, you should vote for the pro business pro growth democrat candidate named Chris Beutler. Your refusal to be a rational and open minded citizen for an office and election that is supposed to be non-partisan is part of the problem with the current city council. Your assumption that Beutler = Seng shows has not validity whatsoever. The sad part is that this is not untypical for someone so tied to party lines. I imagine that you still think Dick Cheney and George Bush are providing good leadership to this country. "

The Truth Hurts wrote on April 15, 2007 5:38 pm:
" I know all the political insiders hoped there was a smoking gun about Beutler's contract. Turns out there isn't one. He won a contract in a bid process and did a heck of a job. I love the new Sunken Gardens and the fact that Beutler had a hand in making it happen makes me glad to support him. "

Camped out wrote on April 15, 2007 5:42 pm:
" What happened to the tough questions Mr. Camp is known to ask? I thought he was the watch dog of the council? I guess that isn’t so when it comes to his Republican friends who are LIBA members. “Flowers are not Fire Trucks,” Taxes are taxes Mr. Camp and if you really were the watch dog that you pretend to be then it wouldn’t matter whom the contract belonged to. I just wish the people in your district could see that your concerns are solely what most benefit’s yourself and your political friends. Tough questions and ZERO answers. "

PHONEY wrote on April 15, 2007 5:45 pm:
" When has Mr. Camp ever been one to be concerned about public safety? I thought he was all about the bottom dollar. "

Jon Kerry? wrote on April 15, 2007 5:47 pm:
" Is Camp a flip flopper? Where are the tough questions now? "

Could have been worse... wrote on April 15, 2007 5:50 pm:
" Roger, I would take Seng over Friendt any day. "

Do as I say, Not... wrote on April 15, 2007 5:56 pm:
" I guess government waste and abuse is ok when it involves one of your friends, right Mr. Camp? "

PW wrote on April 15, 2007 7:28 pm:
" $57,000. for 25 hr work week is a reasonable salary??? Come on, Beutler has been living off the taxpayers from day 1. Being a lawyer would be too much hard work!!! And turn in no time sheet. How do you even know he worked the 25 hours??? His commercials, "the buck stops here" is absolutely right, the taxpayers citizens buck has stopped in his pocket for way toooo long!!! For both mayor elects, the citizens are too blind to see its just more of Seng and Wesley. With sales taxes down in good times, that ought to tell the public something. Whats going to happen if theres bad times, apparently there are so many state and city employees that keep benefiting from the taxpayers, that they could care less, except take they're buying to Omaha and elsewhere. There needs to be a professional brought in from outside the state, but then the "friends" sure wouldn't let that happen, they wouldn't want this city to change for the better!!!! "

So Sad wrote on April 15, 2007 7:37 pm:
" It is obvious that both candidates know how to work the system and easily enrich themselves at the public trough. It is free money for them. Regardless of which one gets elected, hold onto your shorts. He will have friends to reward. Interesting note: Notice how the purchasing agent was bypassed. It looks like Seng was not the first to tamper with this process (Firetrucks.) The purchasing agent is our watchdog. We need a law that says any Mayor who tampers with that system is immediately FIRED! "

Gene Gene the Dancing Machine wrote on April 15, 2007 7:44 pm:
" Had the city hired a professional fundraiser instead of made the job a political favor, they'd have raised twice that much. "

Ed wrote on April 15, 2007 8:40 pm:
" What is so pathetic here is that the Republican Party has wasted dozens of city employee hours trying to find dirt on Chris Beutler only to find that he has been committed and successful in all aspects, raising 8.9 million dollars for the city. This has happened because it has been realized that Ken Svoboda has been ineffective as chairman of the City Council, has continued to fail on city contracts even when paid to do so, and technically owes the city of Lincoln and taxpayers over $100,000 in penalties. Whom do you think would be the better mayor - the one that is good on his word and has completed his contract for the city or the one whom continues to blame everyone and everything from poppy mallow to the moon for his inablity to be do his job. "

Vote for change wrote on April 15, 2007 9:59 pm:
" All you need to know about Beutler is in the people running his campaign. It's the same Wesely-Seng crew that's put the city in the financial disaster it's in. And Beutler, with the same people who have messed things up, is gonna fix things? Figure it out, people. You elect Beutler and he hires the same folks who have made Lincoln an anti-business city. If you're committed to change in Lincoln, Svoboda is the best hope for it. A vote for Beutler is a vote for Wesely and Seng and the same old anti-business policies. "

Deborah wrote on April 15, 2007 10:03 pm:
" All you need to know about the Beutler-Wesely connection is in this story. Wesely hired Beutler when he had zero -- ZERO -- fundraising experience. No, taking political contributions when you're an incumbent is NOT fundraising. And now, since Beutler left in January, the city hasn't filled the position? That's because the city only had the position for Beutler! The position was created by Wesely to thank Beutler for getting him elected! Don't get suckered, people. Chris Beutler is a part of the same old machine we've come to realize has demolished Lincoln financially. "

Matt Poulsen wrote on April 15, 2007 10:12 pm:
" I'm not sure what to think of this! I think it just highlights how both candidates may have their issues. It would be one thing if the issues were deep in their pasts. However, there seem to be some irregularities, on the parts of both candidates, while in public office. I guess the voters are lucky enough, once again, to have the distinct honor of choosing the lesser-of-two-evils!! "

William wrote on April 15, 2007 11:06 pm:
" Has Chris Beutler earned a dime in the private sector? We all know Svoboda has worked in both, but they both claim to be good for the private sector. It appears to me that Svoboda is the only one who has experience in both. "

omnione wrote on April 15, 2007 11:44 pm:
" Based on the timing of Beutler's fundraising position and Svoboda's recent contract mishap coinciding, I wonder if Beutler's position was "designed" for him so that Beutler would have this nice 8.9 million stat come election time. Coupled with Svoboda contract deal constantly being made public right NOW, it seems like this story points to a leveraging tactic by the Democrats to build and solidify Beutler's lead. Hmmmmm....... "

Whatever wrote on April 16, 2007 5:14 am:
" Given the track record of the City of Lincoln, I would want to be paid up front before doing any business with this city. "

Tortis wrote on April 16, 2007 5:54 am:
" Who cares who gets mayor, I may not even vote, as the negativity about everything is so gloomy in this town. Gloom, disppair, and agony on me, if it weren't for bad luck i'd have no luck at all, gloom, dispair and agony on me. Remember, right is right, and wrong is wrong, no matter how you, party it. "

give me a break wrote on April 16, 2007 6:07 am:
" How much of the so called money raised by Buetler would have come to the City anyway? How much of that money is NEW money? Do we want someone who for laST 20 YEARS JUST PICKED APART WHAT OTHER WROTE? "

LIBA radio wrote on April 16, 2007 6:15 am:
" Tortis, You can thank Jon Camp and LIBA radio for the doom and gloom of Lincoln. They are the ones out there warning us about the sky falling. If any a reason Lincoln were negative, these folks would be a good start. "