Legislators reject death penalty change
By JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star
Omaha Sen. Brad Ashford believed supporters of a bill that would change how the death penalty is assigned in Nebraska had made their case.
He also had heard some of his colleagues say they were struggling with their position on the controversial topic.
“We are here today because, like the Nebraskans we represent, we are conflicted by this issue,” he said. “There can be no other conclusion than that.”
Related Link(s):
Roll call of the Legislature’s vote Thursday on an amendment to a bill (LB377) that would change how death sentences are determined:
Yes (23): Aguilar, Ashford, Avery, Carlson, Chambers, Dierks, Dubas, Fulton, Howard, Johnson, Kopplin, Kruse, Lathrop, McGill, Nantkes, Pedersen, Preister, Raikes, Rogert, Schimek, Synowiecki, Wallman, White
No (25): Adams, Burling, Cornett, Engel, Erdman, Fischer, Flood, Friend, Gay, Hansen, Harms, Heidemann, Hudkins, Janssen, Karpisek, Langemeier, Louden, McDonald, Mines, Nelson, Pahls, Pankonin, Pirsch, Stuthman, Wightman
Excused (1): Christensen
Poll shows support for change
A recent Nebraska poll commissioned by Nebraskans Against the Death Penalty shows 51 percent of 500 respondents favored repeal of the death penalty if accompanied by life without parole and restitution to the victim’s estate.
It also showed 62 percent would favor a bill that would allow a jury to disallow a death penalty if a convicted murderer could be imprisoned for life without risk to the safety of others.
The poll of likely voters, which was conducted between March 29 and April 3 by Myers Research & Strategic Services of Springfield, Va., is the first one on the death penalty conducted in Nebraska in a while, said Eric Aspengren, executive director of Nebraskans Against the Death Penalty.
Fifty-four percent of the sample was registered Republicans, 34 percent registered Democrats and 12 percent independent voters. The margin of error was 4.38 percent.
Aspengren said the results did not surprise him because in the years he has worked against the death penalty he has seen people changing their minds about the issue. Nationwide polls show much the same results, he said.
The poll question on repealing the death penalty read: “Currently, Nebraska allows the death penalty for people convicted of first-degree murder, though only three people have been executed by the state in the last 40 years at a cost of at least $70 million to Nebraska taxpayers. The Legislature has considered a proposal that would repeal the death penalty and instead require life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, with a requirement of restitution to the estate of the victim. Would you say you favor or oppose that proposal?”
The poll showed 55 percent of Nebraska Democrats surveyed favored repeal of the death penalty and 34 percent opposed; 49 percent of Republicans favored repeal and 44 opposed; and 48 percent of independent voters favored repeal with 44 percent opposed. Fifty-three percent of women and 49 percent of men favored repeal.
Among younger college age respondents, 43 percent favored repeal and 52 percent opposed repeal.
On the proposal in LB377, both parties and independent voters gave a majority support, along with men, women and other subgroups.
Respondents also weighed in on these statements:
The death penalty is too arbitrary because some people are executed while others serve prison terms for the same crimes. Sixty-two percent agree, 30 percent disagree, 8 percent don’t know or refused to answer.
Defendants who can afford good lawyers almost never receive a death sentence. Sixty percent agree, 28 percent disagree, 12 percent don’t know or refused to answer.
I have moral doubts about death as a punishment. Forty-four percent agree, 48 percent disagree, 8 percent don’t know or refused to answer.
A 1991 poll of Nebraskans by the Northeastern University College of Criminal Justice asked: “If convicted murderers in this state could be sentenced to life in prison with absolutely no chance of every being considered for parole, would you prefer this as an alternative to the death penalty?” Forty-six percent said they preferred life without parole and 43 percent preferred the death penalty.
When restitution was added, 64 percent preferred life without parole with restitution and 26 percent preferred death.
In the end, senators hit more red lights than green. They voted 23-25 to defeat the amendment to LB377 that would have disallowed the death penalty for first-degree murderers who could be judged to be safely confined in prison.
Sen. Greg Adams of York said he wrestled with this proposal and the one last month that would have repealed the death penalty and replaced it with life in prison without parole and restitution.
“I feel somewhere here in the pit of my stomach that there is a place for (the death penalty),” he said.
Still, four words during debate haunted him.
Fairness, subjectivity, consistency and justice.
He was hoping for a way to make the assignment of the death penalty fair.
“I just felt like the language (of the bill) did not really help the issue of inconsistency and fairness. In fact, it made it even more complicated,” he said after the vote.
Sen. Russ Karpisek of Wilber, who voted no, said the issue caused some soul searching.
“I e-mailed one of my good friends today and I said, ‘Boy, this … has really turned me inside out,” he said. “I know how I feel but I have to start asking myself why.”
Thursday was the second time in four weeks that senators had been over the issue. On March 20, after two days of debate, they voted 24-25 to defeat Omaha Sen. Ernie Chambers’ repeal bill.
The day after the vote, the Nebraska Supreme Court set an execution date of May 8 for death row inmate Carey Dean Moore. A day later, the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee met to talk about the possibility of crafting another bill that might make death penalty sentencing fairer.
Omaha Sen. Steve Lathrop called the new bill a bold move, saying it would develop a legitimate standard for who gets the death penalty and who doesn’t.
“This will become a standard for the nation, I’m telling you,” he said.
But during debate, some senators said they feared it would effectively repeal the death penalty. Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman had already threatened to veto the bill, and Attorney General Jon Bruning had threatened to file suit if it passed.
Was there room in this debate for politics, some asked.
If senators supported the death penalty only because that’s what they thought their constituents wanted, why were they not educating them, asked Sen. Dwite Pedersen of Elkhorn.
“Please search your minds and hearts to do what is right here, not just what is political,” he said.
Others questioned the mechanics of the proposal, such as how a jury could predict what an inmate might do in the future.
“It’s quite a burden to predict future dangerousness of murderers in Nebraska,” said Sen. Mike Flood of Norfolk.
Scottsbluff Sen. John Harms said he still looked at a death sentence as justice. And he questioned why the senators were not talking about how to clean up the criminal justice system if it is as fraught with errors and inconsistencies as they suggested.
“That is the issue. Let’s clean up the system first,” he said. “Until we’re willing to fix this … to make the judicial system the best we can possibly make it, I will fight this until we finally correct it.”
In the end, the votes just weren’t there, Ashford said.
With the failure of the amendment, he said, LB377 remains the way it started, a bill to reallocate district court judgeships.
Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit



Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Michael wrote on April 12, 2007 7:34 am:
Gerard Harbison wrote on April 12, 2007 8:07 am:
More bias. wrote on April 12, 2007 8:21 am:
Mike Honcho wrote on April 12, 2007 8:30 am:
Dlm wrote on April 12, 2007 8:33 am:
Cool with it wrote on April 12, 2007 8:55 am:
Mark wrote on April 12, 2007 9:02 am:
peb wrote on April 12, 2007 9:20 am:
foolish wrote on April 12, 2007 9:24 am:
Oh Yeah... wrote on April 12, 2007 9:27 am:
Mike Honcho wrote on April 12, 2007 9:27 am:
Ok. wrote on April 12, 2007 9:35 am:
What? wrote on April 12, 2007 9:39 am:
Do you people realize that most christian religions oppose the death penalty? How can you call yourself a christian and go against your church's tenets? I guess as long as you sit in church on Sunday, you can do whatever you want the rest of the week.
To all you people wanting to limit appeals and rush executions, will you personally guarantee that there will never be an innocent person executed? Are you willing to stake your life on this? "
K-man wrote on April 12, 2007 11:22 am:
Mike Honcho wrote on April 12, 2007 11:46 am:
peb wrote on April 12, 2007 12:26 pm:
HRH The Prince of Wales wrote on April 12, 2007 12:51 pm:
Honest question... wrote on April 12, 2007 1:37 pm:
Ann wrote on April 12, 2007 2:05 pm:
CSS wrote on April 12, 2007 3:03 pm:
BD wrote on April 12, 2007 3:16 pm:
Chris wrote on April 12, 2007 7:34 pm:
Forrest wrote on April 12, 2007 8:13 pm:
nemo wrote on April 12, 2007 8:28 pm:
contradiction wrote on April 12, 2007 8:48 pm:
Rick wrote on April 12, 2007 9:59 pm:
tkosmo wrote on April 13, 2007 2:26 am:
Waiting too long... wrote on April 13, 2007 7:41 am:
Bulldog wrote on April 13, 2007 7:52 am:
tr67 wrote on April 13, 2007 10:07 am:
Victoria wrote on April 13, 2007 3:33 pm:
Chad wrote on April 13, 2007 7:55 pm:
Penny Patterson wrote on April 17, 2007 11:37 am: