Now
Fair
24°
High
32°
Low
24°

Victim’s son-in-law prepares to witness execution

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By ERIC OLSON / The Associated Press

Sunday, Apr 08, 2007 - 05:54:06 pm CDT

OMAHA, Neb. — David Renken says he always has been a proponent of the death penalty, and he believes he still will be after witnessing next month’s scheduled execution of Carey Dean Moore.

Renken’s wife, Lori, is the daughter of Maynard D. Helgeland, who, along with fellow Omaha cab driver Reuel Eugene Van Ness, was murdered by Moore during two robberies in 1979.

Lori and her brothers, Steve and Kenny Helgeland, asked Renken to represent them as victim witness to Moore’s execution May 8.

The state gives victims’ families the option of having a representative at the execution, Department of Correctional Services spokesman Steve King said. No one from Van Ness’ family was on the witness list, King said.

David Renken, a 37-year-old UPS driver from Mount Vernon, S.D., said he does not relish the thought of watching a man die.

“I believe I owe it to the memory of Maynard and the six grandkids he never got to see,” Renken said. “I’ll witness justice being served.”

Moore said in a court filing last month that he was ending all efforts to contest his death sentence, clearing the way for Nebraska’s first execution since Robert Williams was electrocuted in 1997.

Since then, the closest anyone has come to the electric chair was Randolph Reeves, whose death warrant was withdrawn by the state Supreme Court in May 2000, just 40 hours before his scheduled execution. The judges ruled that their predecessors had erred in 1999 when they resentenced him to death. Reeves is now serving a life sentence.

Preparations for Moore’s execution are under way at the penitentiary in Lincoln, King said.

“There is an inevitability there,” King said. “But nobody stands by and waits for the execution process to begin. It always catches everybody by surprise.”

State corrections officials last week began assembling a list of six official witnesses. Renken will be joined by representatives of The Associated Press, the Omaha World-Herald, the Lincoln Journal Star, Omaha television station KETV and Grand Island radio station KRGI.

Moore’s decision to give up his decades-long fight followed a court blow he suffered in January. The U.S. Supreme Court denied an appeal by Moore, who had argued that execution by the electric chair amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. The order left Nebraska as the only state with electrocution as its only means of execution.

A federal court in 1994 vacated Moore’s death sentence, ruling that a portion of the state death penalty law used to sentence him was unconstitutionally vague. A three-judge panel resentenced Moore to death in 1995.

If executed, Moore would be one of four people — Williams, Harold Otey and John Joubert are the others — who have been put to death in Nebraska since executions were resumed in 1994.

Moore’s attorney, Alan Peterson of Lincoln, has said his client has the option of asking the state Pardons Board to commute the death sentence.

Nebraska in 1913 began using electrocution for executions. The electric chair has been used 15 times in the state.

Electrocution once was used in 26 states. Now only four states have electric chairs, with lethal injection also an option in three states other than Nebraska. The electric chair was used in four of 374 executions nationally from 2001 to 2006.

David Renken is a lifelong resident of South Dakota, where the death penalty is an option but hasn’t been used since 1947.

“I’m a proponent of the death penalty and have been since I was a young man,” he said. “When it comes to watching this, it will really test me. But I know this is the right thing.”

David and Lori Renken have been married 16 years. Lori, 47, was 19 when her father was killed.

A family meeting was called two weeks ago, after the state Supreme Court set the execution date. Renken said Lori and her brothers discussed whether one of them would witness the execution. All three balked, and David Renken was asked to watch Moore die.

“My wife has said she doesn’t harbor hatred for him anymore,” Renken said. “It should have happened a long time ago. What we heard from the assistant warden is that it seems certain it’s going to happen. They want closure to this.”

Renken said he was uncertain how he will mentally prepare for what he’ll see in the death chamber. He might consult with a clergyman. He said he would draw strength from knowing that he’s witnessing the execution on behalf of three siblings whose father was taken away from them.

“If Mr. Moore lived out his life in prison, it wouldn’t be much of an existence for him, but he would still get to be in contact with his family through phone calls and letters,” Renken said. “Maynard doesn’t get to have that.”


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Okie wrote on April 8, 2007 6:57 pm:
" I feel for this family, but the state of Nebraska is barbaric for using the death penalty..especially the electric chair. "

Purpose of the law wrote on April 8, 2007 9:34 pm:
" It is not the purpose of the law to get revenge for families of victims. That was Saddam's law. "

CHARLEY wrote on April 8, 2007 9:44 pm:
" At almost thirty years later I believe it is time to put an end to this appeal process and git er done! I am a proponet of the death penalty and I think the electric chair needs to be used more often as a deterrant to crime. Our justice system has no justice in it anymore. People need to be responsible for their actions. In 1959 when Charles Starkweather was on to loose killing people every one had a gun behind the door and had all doors locked and everyone was scared to death. Now we hear of killings every night on the news and think nothing of it. It is time to revise the system and start going from the court room to the chair when the criminals are guilty beyond any reasonable dought. "

Montana wrote on April 8, 2007 10:39 pm:
" why is it that everyone seems to gloss over what the victims went through? There probably isn't a perfect way to administer the death penalty, but the victims sure didn't have much choice in the way they died, and there are some pretty barbaric ways these criminals go about it, aren't there? "

nitemare wrote on April 9, 2007 3:16 am:
" I agree with the death penalty. Be it by whatever means, firing squad, gas, electric, or lethal injection. All boils down to the bottom line... "An eye for an eye..."!! "

clint wrote on April 9, 2007 6:29 am:
" Since they will have ol sparky all warmed up lets keep on get the others in line. Taking #2. On to okie you say it's barbaric to use the chair what about what these animals did to there victoms and there families, I think what they did is more barbaric. "

Doug wrote on April 9, 2007 7:17 am:
" Yeah Okie because we use the death penalty so often. Oklahoma has executed 79 people since 1976 and is still executing them today. Who said anything about revenge? He said he wanted to see justice served and said nothing about revenge. "

death penalty wrote on April 9, 2007 8:36 am:
" is state sanctioned murder "

Jen wrote on April 9, 2007 9:11 am:
" before going on about how barbaric the electric chair is maybe you should do some research on the electric chair. it takes less time for a person to die in the electric chair than by lethal injection. Just remember an eye for an eye. and Do unto others as you want done unto you. to bad these killers cant be killed the way they killed their victims!!!!! "

Whatever wrote on April 9, 2007 10:22 am:
" lets look at both sides of the death penalty issue. Some state its a deterrant, NO IT'S NOT. And studies have proved that. Is it Revenge? NO IT's NOT. Is it barbaric. I ask those who think so to think about the barbarism used when he killed the two people in Omaha. There is no wrong or right answer to this problem. Besides that what gives man the right to say who lives and who dies...Isnt that God's job? "

rm wrote on April 9, 2007 10:43 am:
" I think the perfect way to punish a murderer is to keep them alive and let them rot in jail. Life in a maximum correctional facility isn't peachy! A close friend of mine was murdered by an ex-boyfriend..believe me I along with many others would like to get our hands on him ourselves, BUT at least he gets to spend the rest of his life in jail, miserable and rotting away! "

Angelita wrote on April 9, 2007 11:36 am:
" I think that I am for lethal injection. I think that the electic chair is cruel and unususal plus all that jazz, but in some way the state has to generate fear. I know better than to kill someone because there is a chance of not only having a murder on your hands, but I know that I could spend the rest of my life in jail, and that there is a possibility that I could be electricuted. It is that simple. Sorry if I don't have simpathy for murderers. If I had it my way, all pedifiles, perverts, and rapist would be treated as if they had committed a murder. If you want to see change, make the punishment final! "

Mike wrote on April 9, 2007 11:39 am:
" Whatever, you are correct, it isn't a deterrent, but then again, he will not take anyone else's life. too bad we don't have as much compassion for the victim as we do for the scum that committ crime. "

No win situation... wrote on April 9, 2007 11:58 am:
" Our whole justice system is a giant headache. No decent human being WANTS to sit around and watch people fry but I can't think of a decent human being who wants to sit on their front porch and watch all the murderers run around slaying their victims either. We need to put more thought into a less expensive, less graphic and painful way to execute people once and for all (maybe lincoln can hire a commitee to come up with something?) and then the whole US needs to agree with it so it is a nation wide decision. "

just me wrote on April 9, 2007 12:19 pm:
" Someone in my family was murdered six years ago. The person that did this was not given the sentence of death. Instead, he will spend the rest of his life not EVER tasting freedom again. To me, this a better. I remember thinking during the trial and his sentencing hearing, as I watched this man put on a show for anyone who was in the courtroom and the media...I do NOT want him to be given the death penalty because he would spend countless hours, days, months, and years fighting it and drawing all the attention he could to himself. My last memory of this person is how he said such derogatory things to myself and three other family members who chose to be their that day (including my then 10-year-old son who stood outside the courtroom because he did not want to be in the same room as this person) and then him leaving the courtroom after he was sentenced to life and then some, with correction officers trying to control him...looking directly at us with such darkness in his eyes and smiling, repeatedly screaming,"I AM THE ONE THAT LIVED!!!" The last memories I have of my family member is not being able to look into his eyes, talk WITH him, the sounds of all the machines that were the only things keeping him alive...and then being in the room when the life support was removed because there was NOTHING more that could be done...seeing and hearing him die. "

Deterrent? wrote on April 9, 2007 12:37 pm:
" To Whatever: How exactly can you analytically prove when a murder is averted due to the consequences of the death penalty? It is an immeasurable deterrent, hence the endless debate. "

publicexecution wrote on April 9, 2007 1:07 pm:
" Why can't we all be witnesses to the execution? This is something the State of Nebraska is doing in the name of its citizens. I should have the right to be there. "

Soylent Green wrote on April 9, 2007 2:56 pm:
" What do you mean that the death penalty isn't a deterrent to crime... it is the ultimate deterrent! The person put to death will NEVER EVER commit another crime! "

Maybe not... wrote on April 9, 2007 3:56 pm:
" I wonder what Jesus would say about the death penalty??? God's commandments state "thou shall not kill", so I sure would not want to be the one pulling the handle, or using the leathal needle. I think it is wrong that we must pay for these people who will live how ever long after the murder takes place, but I do not agree in the death penalty. I think God would be against it also. How do we deal with these people, I really don't know. Maybe a manual labor job the rest of their lives to earn their keep. I am not sure, but people we don't want the weight of their deaths on our shoulders when it comes time to answer to our maker. Let's build a big farm in the middle of no where and put them to work with hard labor every day of the week.....wouldn't that be better?? Maybe they could be the ones in the coal mines risking their lives for free for the rest of their lives. I don't know, but the death penalty is NOT the answer in my eyes. "

eagle60 wrote on April 9, 2007 4:13 pm:
" Barbaric, painful & inhuman, I wonder if the victim felt this way? Deterrent as being immeasurable? Several criminals were asked why they didn't kill their victims, their response they did not want to face execution as a penalty. A court has decided the punishment, let the punishment be carried out. "

kitchensink wrote on April 9, 2007 7:48 pm:
" If the electric chair is such a good way to deal with this - lets put it on tv. We can show everyone statewide where their tax money is going. lets make a tv show of this humane act we sanction to deal with people convicted of murder. "

DS wrote on April 9, 2007 8:52 pm:
" I'm tired of all you "do gooders" crying about the death penalty and electric chair. First, if we do away with the electric chair, then you will just start complaining about what ever takes it's place. Too much pain, takes too long, inhumane, on and on. Why don't we simply go back to the guillotine? It's quick, simple and you just have to sharpen the blade once in while. Second, who's to say if you do away with the death penalty for life in prison without parole, that some "bleeding heart" governor won't come along and pardon them like the governor of Illinois did several years back the day before he left office. There's no sure thing unless they are "dead". Besides, I'm sick of my tax money being used to provide everyone in prisons with all their health benefits, room & board, advanced education, TV's, etc. that I have to provide for myself if I want it. No one's giving those things to me for the rest of my life. What ever happened to "hard times" in prison? We take better care of those "scum-bags" on death row and life in prison then we do of our old folks and homeless people. End of subject....... "

anon2 wrote on April 10, 2007 12:41 am:
" No more posturing and no more sympathy for the murdering barbarian. Let justice be done upon him. "

do it wrote on April 10, 2007 7:49 am:
" If these whiners dont think the elctric chair is proper, they either need to 1)...wait til some barbaric crime happens to them or their family.....or 2) lets do the same exact thing to the criminals to which they did to their victims!...there, no more elctric chair!.....just get the justice part of this done! "