Now
Fair
73°
High
71°
Low
55°

Will AG's smoking ban opinion come in time?

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Apr 06, 2007 - 12:13:04 am CDT

It made it through a filibuster, two rounds of debate and serious compromise.

The question now is whether the lack of a timely response from Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning’s office will threaten a final vote on a statewide smoking ban.

Talk circulated around the Capitol Wednesday that a legal opinion requested on the opt-out portion of the bill would not make it out of Bruning’s office until after the session winds down at the end of May.

Story Photo
Jon Bruning

The bill (LB395), introduced by Sen. Joel Johnson of Kearney, would ban smoking from indoor work sites, including bars and restaurants, but would allow cities, counties, villages and unincorporated areas to opt out — in whole or in part — with a vote of the local governing body or by a voter petition.

The opt-out clause was a key compromise that allowed the bill to pass on second reading.

Omaha Sen. John Nelson asked the attorney general’s office for an informal legal opinion on a bill this session and was told it would take four to six weeks.

On Wednesday, Bruning’s office would not discuss any timeline on the opinion.

“We view every request as important,” said spokeswoman Holley Hatt. “We respond to every request as quickly as we can.”

On Thursday, Hatt said the attorney general’s office would respond to the Legislature’s request on the smoking ban bill “as quickly as we can.”

After the bill made it through second reading last week on a 35-4 vote, senators said they would seek an attorney general’s opinion before final reading on whether a county could pass a binding ordinance to opt out of the ban.

Johnson asked for the opinion this week. If it can’t be issued in this session, he said, maybe senators should get back to talking about the bill as it was originally written — without the opt-out clause.

“I think the Legislature should deal with this,” he said. “If we don’t, there’s always the potential that those who agree with us will do it by petition.”

Senators were sent to deal with these kinds of issues, he said, and “that’s what we should do.”

Speaker Mike Flood said he and others would consider the possibility of a delay on the opinion over the Easter break and try to decide next week what will happen with the bill.

Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
airedale wrote on April 6, 2007 2:21 am:
" There are very few politicians that I dislike as much as Jon Bruning. However, I would like to know exactly when the opinion was requeste by the legislature. The way the article reads it sounds like Senator Nelson has made the request at the last minute. It doesn't seem fair to construe a failure to respond to a last minute request as 'untimely'. It also sounds like the legislature is unloading questions on Bruning that the Senators should be able to answer themselves. Unless there is more information I have to side with Jon on this one. "

Justice for all wrote on April 6, 2007 11:32 am:
" Maybe by doing what he is getting paid to do, will cut in to his politican time. Or the AG office just doesn't want to give an answer, then he would be pinned down on something he couldn't flip flop on. "

Hot potato wrote on April 7, 2007 8:58 am:
" Bruning's office employs 'over 100 attorneys and support staff'. The delay here is not about lack of staff or time, its 'political'. The question isn't that tough really. The legislature just did it last session with concealed weapons. He just doesn't want to make smoking voters unhappy. What a goof. "

Tom wrote on April 7, 2007 9:24 am:
" Shouldn't a smoking ban be up to the people? Although I dont like the smoking indoors either, all I see is more and more Government intrusion into peoples lives. What freedom are they going to outlaw next? "

Buddha wrote on April 7, 2007 11:12 am:
" Jeeeez! 4 to 6 weeks to write an opinion with that big a staff? My attorney had a week to write a breif supporting a motion he made to the judge, and he did it himself! I think it's time the attorney general and his staff are paid on a case-by-case basis, not on a salary. If they knew they had to get things done to get paid, then they wouldn't drag their feet! I agree, this "procastination" is political, not due to a lack of manpower! "