Now
Overcast
59°
High
69°
Low
47°

Media takes potshots at Hagel event

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Mar 14, 2007 - 12:37:37 am CDT

Ouch.

Sen. Chuck Hagel attracted considerable media attention in the wake of his Monday news conference announcing he’ll delay a decision on his 2008 political plans.

Attention generally is a good thing for political figures —except when a considerable chunk of the feedback is negative.

Story Photo
Senator Chuck Hagel speaks during a press conference on the University of Nebraska-Omaha campus Monday morning. (William Lauer)

“The dramatic moment arrives for Chuck Hagel,” wrote The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz. 

And then Hagel “punts, ducks, dodges the issue,” Kurtz wrote. 

“Why pump that up into a big television moment?”

Ah, there’s the rub.

The bulk of Tuesday’s media criticism was aimed at the way in which Hagel chose to deliver the message rather than his decision to  delay determination of his 2008 course of action.

Hagel had scheduled a news conference in Omaha “regarding his future plans,” and the media showed up en masse.  Most of the national media anticipated a decision on whether he would pursue the presidency or opt for re-election to the Senate in 2008.

“A big announcement,” trumpeted Jon Stewart in a parody re-enactment on The Daily Show on Comedy Central Monday night. 

Preceded by clips of cable and network TV hype, Hagel made his announcement: “I am here today to announce that my family and I will make a decision on my political future later this year.”

Cut to Stewart, staring blankly into the camera.

Jay Leno was not as gentle on the Tonight Show on NBC: “This is the kind of bold, decisive leadership this country needs.”

Even the London Times got into the act: “A damp-squid declaration,” it declared on its Web site.

Why not just a news release or, as Kurtz suggested, a breakfast or conference call with reporters if that was all Hagel had to announce?

“We did think about other ways to do it,” said Hagel spokesman Mike Buttry, “but Senator Hagel thought this was the right way.

“He wanted to stand up and be accountable, and give members of the media an opportunity to question him and be able to answer their questions.”

Despite considerable media concentration on the method rather than the message, Buttry said the reaction Hagel has received is positive.

“He’s extremely grateful for the overwhelming support he’s received since he made his announcement,” Buttry said.

A new Hagel-for-Senate Web site sprouted in concert with the announcement that Hagel will step up campaign fundraising through his Senate re-election committee and his Sandhills PAC.

The site features a new TV commercial in which Hagel calls for “American leadership working with our allies.”

The Web site highlights videos of Hagel in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and at a Jewish Council of Public Affairs meeting speaking about the war in Iraq and U.S. foreign policy.

Hagel was asked Tuesday about media coverage of his news conference during a Nebraska Republican Party fund-raising breakfast in Washington.

Former Rep. Hal Daub posed the question, and Hagel pointed to a column by E.J. Dionne in The Washington Post and a story in The New York Times as examples of national media coverage that “got the point.”

Dionne’s column included this observation: “Republicans, usually not a band of rebels, still pray that Bush can succeed in Iraq. Thus Hagel waits, hyping a non-announcement to say he’s around if the world and the party move his way.”

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Jerry in seward wrote on March 14, 2007 7:16 am:
" It is time for Chuck to go. Nebraska can do better. "

Jody P. wrote on March 14, 2007 7:43 am:
" Contrary to popular belief, it sounds like he isn't lying awake at night dreaming of running for president or for senate re-election. His one and only goal is to help return the Republican Party to a traditional conservative foreign policy. Sounds like a good idea to me! What we have today is a neo-conservative foreign policy, and it's not the same thing at all. It's kind of funny, but most of the right-wingers out there aren't even aware of that basic distinction. Bush's father had a CONSERVATIVE (not neo-conservative) foreign policy, and would never have entertained the imperialist fantasies of his first-born son which have torn apart Iraq and America, and turned most of the world against us. "

Gerard Harbison wrote on March 14, 2007 9:40 am:
" This is Hagel's Senate career in miniature. He garnered national attention by negative, internecine criticism of the President. His own substantive achievements have been negligible. And then when it came to doing something positive himself, something as basic as deciding his own medium-term political future, he muffed it. But of course, being addicted to media attention, he had to muff it on camera. Remind me again why electing him was a good idea? "

Republican wrote on March 14, 2007 10:30 am:
" I don't think many Republicans would claim Hagel as part of their party any more. What a waste of media time. "

Disgrace wrote on March 14, 2007 10:35 am:
" Anybody vote for Hagel has to be in another world. How people voted him in, in the first place is beyond me. But then Nebraska doesn't seem to have the intelligence to grow, let alone vote for anyone!! Plain to see why he came to Nebraska to get elected when he lives in Virginia. Guess its nice to claim your resident somewhere just long enough to wiggle your way into where you want, which shows what Nebraskans are!!! "

Susana wrote on March 14, 2007 11:18 am:
" I like EJ Dionne but he got this one wrong. Hagel's press conference left me feeling as if I'd been flirting with and had agreed to go out with the guy I really wanted, only to be dumped before our first date. Kinda left me feeling dirty, and not in a good way ... "

Roger wrote on March 14, 2007 1:11 pm:
" Usually disasters in Nebraska are from wind, tornados, hail, ice storms, snow storms, no rain, and others but this disaster was just plain a flop. Never in my life time at 62 have I seen such a horrible performance from someone elected to office from Nebraska. What would he be like in office as a President when the real press corp. gets to him. Wow, I was impressed, NOT,. If he decides to run for President, and I hope he does, he will find out that no one will even give him the time of day, as he has about as much savey as a public speaker as someone who just woke up and they found out their best friend died. "

Bah! wrote on March 14, 2007 2:11 pm:
" Hagel isn't admired by any true conservatives I know. He's established himself as an independent, similar to Ben Nelson. Hagel's just a little right of center instead of left. Concerning JodyP's comments, Hagel is doing and will do nothing for the Republican party image or conservative ideology. In addition, conservatism isn't just tied to foreign policy. Think fiscal conservativism, smaller government, support for private enterprise, and yes, support for the dignity of all humans, born and unborn. Liberals like yourself don't tend to understand such concepts. Libs want handouts from the government and they want nothing to touch the liberal sacrament of abortion as their ultimate freedom. Liberal ideology has done more to damage this country in the last 40 years than conservatism ever has. Chuck Hagel doesn't know what he wants anymore except to stay in office while pandering for support from both sides of the isle. He's a sell out....so is liberalism. "

Don't bother wrote on March 14, 2007 4:06 pm:
" He shouldn't bother running for anything now. This was a farce. "

GOP sucks wrote on March 14, 2007 4:10 pm:
" Who still supports any GOPer after the mess they've made the last 6 years? And who cares what Hagel does, it won't matter. "

SweetWillis wrote on March 14, 2007 4:17 pm:
" Nice spin job by the Hagel press guy..."overwhelming support"...really? Do the Hagel's honestly think the public buys that ridiculous nonsense? As long as talk-radio conservatives continue to VOTE, Sen. Hagel has no chance at winning a presidential primary. "

Sarah wrote on March 14, 2007 4:28 pm:
" Bah, you do realize that no one in the Senate currently has a better voting record in support of President Bush than does Chuck Hagel? It sounds to me like you believe conservatisim is tied to one thing and one thing only........the war in Iraq. "

SweetWillis wrote on March 14, 2007 4:49 pm:
" Sara hit the nail on the head...Hagel does support Pres. Bush quite often. Case in point: Hagel's staunch support for Bush's amnesty proposal. High five on that one! "

smart hagel move wrote on March 15, 2007 4:46 pm:
" I think Hagel made a smart move on Monday - he was honest and fortright in true Hagel fashion. I admire him for not feeling obligated to operate within artificial parameters established by the media and Washington types. I also admire him for taking his job as a US Senator seriously enough to want to work on solutions for the issues of our day instead of playing political games for two years. "